Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 197(11): 1433-1442, 2018 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29327948

RESUMO

RATIONALE: The combination of the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) corrector lumacaftor with the potentiator ivacaftor has been approved for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation. The phase 3 trials examined clinical outcomes but did not evaluate CFTR function in patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of lumacaftor-ivacaftor on biomarkers of CFTR function in Phe508del homozygous patients with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years and older. METHODS: This prospective observational study assessed clinical outcomes including FEV1% predicted and body mass index, and CFTR biomarkers including sweat chloride concentration, nasal potential difference, and intestinal current measurement before and 8-16 weeks after initiation of lumacaftor-ivacaftor. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the study, and 52 patients had baseline and follow-up measurements. After initiation of lumacaftor-ivacaftor sweat chloride concentrations were reduced by 17.8 mmol/L (interquartile range [IQR], -25.9 to -6.1; P < 0.001), nasal potential difference showed partial rescue of CFTR function in nasal epithelia to a level of 10.2% (IQR, 0.0-26.1; P < 0.011), and intestinal current measurement showed functional improvement in rectal epithelia to a level of 17.7% of normal (IQR, 10.8-29.0; P < 0.001). All patients improved in at least one CFTR biomarker, but no correlations were found between CFTR biomarker responses and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Lumacaftor-ivacaftor results in partial rescue of Phe508del CFTR function to levels comparable to the lower range of CFTR activity found in patients with residual function mutations. Functional improvement was detected even in the absence of short-term improvement of FEV1% predicted and body mass index. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02807415).


Assuntos
Aminofenóis/uso terapêutico , Aminopiridinas/uso terapêutico , Benzodioxóis/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Agonistas dos Canais de Cloreto/uso terapêutico , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Cística/genética , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Alemanha , Homozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMC Pulm Med ; 14: 156, 2014 Oct 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25280757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nasal potential difference (NPD) and intestinal current measurement (ICM) are functional CFTR tests that are used as adjunctive diagnostic tools for cystic fibrosis (CF). Smoking has a systemic negative impact on CFTR function. A diagnostic comparison between NPD and ICM and the impact of smoking on both CFTR tests has not been done. METHODS: The sweat chloride test, NPD, and ICM were performed in 18 patients with CF (sweat chloride >60 mmol/l), including 6 pancreatic sufficient (PS) patients, and 13 healthy controls, including 8 smokers. The NPD CFTR response to Cl-free and isoproterenol perfusion (Δ0Cl- + Iso) was compared to the ICM CFTR response to forskolin/IBMX, carbachol, and histamine (ΔIsc, forskolin/IBMX+ carbachol+histamine). RESULTS: The mean NPD CFTR response and ICM CFTR response between patients with CF and healthy controls was significantly different (p <0.001), but not between patients with CF who were PS and those who were pancreatic insufficient (PI). Smokers have a decreased CFTR response measured by NPD (p = 0.049). For ICM there is a trend towards decreased CFTR response (NS). Three healthy control smokers had NPD responses within the CF-range. In contrast to NPD, there was no overlap of the ICM response between patients with CF and controls. CONCLUSIONS: ICM is superior to NPD in distinguishing between patients with CF who have a sweat chloride > 60 mmol/l and healthy controls, including smokers. Neither NPD nor ICM differentiated between patients with CF who were PS from those who were PI. Smoking has a negative impact on CFTR function in healthy controls measured by NPD and challenges the diagnostic interpretation of NPD, but not ICM.


Assuntos
Cloretos/metabolismo , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/fisiologia , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Fibrose Cística/fisiopatologia , Mucosa Intestinal/fisiopatologia , Mucosa Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Fumar/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Cloretos/análise , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nariz , Reto , Suor/química , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...