Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of High-dose or Standard-dose Influenza Vaccine in a Second Consecutive Influenza Season.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at high-risk for morbidity from influenza virus infection. We demonstrated in a primary phase II randomized controlled trial that two post-HCT doses of high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) given four weeks apart were more immunogenic than two doses of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (SD-QIV). Herein, we present immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccination in a consecutive season post-HCT using the same dosing regimen. METHODS: A subcohort of study participants re-enrolled and had hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers measured at baseline and four weeks after each vaccine dose in year two. We estimated geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in HAI titer from baseline for each group and used linear mixed effects models to estimate adjusted geometric mean ratios (aGMR, comparing HD-TIV to SD-QIV) for each antigen at each time point. We described systemic and injection-site reactions. RESULTS: A total of 65 subcohort patients participated (33 SD-QIV, 32 HD-TIV). Post-vaccine GMFR and aGMR estimates were higher for both groups following a single influenza vaccine dose in year two compared to two doses of the same formulation in year one. Both groups had similar frequencies of injection-site and systemic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of HD-TIV or SD-QIV was more immunogenic in year two than two doses of the same formulation in year one. Reactogenicity was comparable between groups. One dose of influenza vaccine may be sufficient after a two-dose schedule in the prior year post-HCT.

Impact of Respiratory Viral Infections in Transplant Recipients.

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are among the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Transplant recipients remain at high risk for super imposed bacterial and fungal pneumonia, chronic graft dysfunction, and graft failure as a result of RVIs. Recent multicenter retrospective studies and prospective studies utilizing contemporary molecular diagnostic techniques have better delineated the epidemiology and outcomes of RVIs in pediatric transplant recipients and have advanced the development of preventative vaccines and treatment interventions in this population. In this review, we will define the epidemiology and outcomes of RVIs in SOT and HSCT recipients, describe the available assays for diagnosing a suspected RVI, highlight evolving management and vaccination strategies, review the risk of donor derived RVI in SOT recipients, and discuss considerations for delaying transplantation in the presence of an RVI.

Approach to suspected donor-derived infections.

Prevention of donor-derived disease among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients requires judicious risk-benefit assessment. Comprehensive guidelines outline specific donor risk factors and post-transplant monitoring strategies to prevent and mitigate transmission of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. However, elimination of unanticipated donor-derived infections remains challenging. The objectives of this review are to (1) define risk of anticipated vs. unanticipated disease transmission events in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients; (2) discuss donor presentations that confer greater risk of unanticipated disease transmission; (3) develop a matrix for consideration of donor acceptance; and (4) discuss limitations and future directions for donor screening. Although solid organ transplant confers inherent risk of infection transmission, the risk of significant disease transmission events may be mitigated by a comprehensive approach including donor assessment, consideration of recipient need, post-transplant monitoring, and early intervention.

Immunization of Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients: A 2022 Update.

Immunizations are a relatively safe and cost-effective intervention to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with vaccine preventable infection (VPIs). As such, immunizations are a critical part of the care of pre and posttransplant patients and should be prioritized. New tools are needed to continue to disseminate and implement the most up-to-date vaccine recommendations for the SOT population. These tools will help both primary care providers and multi-disciplinary transplant team members taking care of transplant patients to stay abreast of evidence-based best practices regarding the immunization of the SOT patient.

Single Site Experience of the use of Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of COVID-19 in High-risk Pediatric and Young Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: Effective therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19 have been investigated since the onset of the pandemic. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 have been developed for the treatment of mild or moderate COVID disease in high-risk populations. Despite widespread use in the adult population, data are limited on the safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibody infusions in the adolescent and young adult population. METHODS: Patients who received bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab-etesevimab, casirivimab-imdevimab, or sotrovimab for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from 5/1/2020 to 3/1/2022 were identified retrospectively. Patient data including demographics, adverse events, and outcomes were extracted from patients' charts and summarized by standard descriptive summaries. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients received monoclonal antibody therapy, of which 14 (14.9%) received either bamlanivimab or bamlanivimab-etesevimab, 54 (57.4%) received casirivimab-imdevimab, and 26 (27.6%) received sotrovimab. Ten patients (10.6%) experienced one or more infusion-related adverse event. Of the patients who experienced adverse events, all resolved with cessation of infusion. No life-threatening events or deaths occurred. Within 90 days of receiving a monoclonal antibody, 12 patients (12.7%) required additional medical care for ongoing COVID symptoms. Five of these were either hospitalized or received escalation of care while already in the hospital. All subsequently fully recovered. Neither infusion-related adverse events nor progression to hospitalization for ongoing COVID-19 symptoms following monoclonal antibody administration were associated with any particular underlying condition. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, monoclonal antibodies are reasonably well-tolerated COVID-19 therapies in high-risk adolescent and young adult populations.