Factors Affecting Permanent Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Bone Conduction in Patients After Receiving Radiotherapy to the Head and Neck Region.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting permanent sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and causing changes in bone conduction (BC) thresholds over time in patients after receiving radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to the head and neck region. Methods: A total of 63 patients with irradiated HNC that were admitted to the Radiation Oncology Department between 2011 and 2018 were included in the study. All patients were assessed with pure tone audiometry at eight different time points (first before RT and last five years after completion of RT). A chi-square test was used to analyze the variables that affected permanent SNHL occurrence. Repeated measure analysis of variance was conducted to investigate the factors affecting change in the BC threshold at pure-tone average (0.5-2 kHz) and the air conduction (AC) threshold at 4 and 6 kHz frequencies over time. Results: Median follow-up was 52 months (range, 12-110 months). SNHL was found in 18 (14%) of the 126 ears. According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cut-off values of cochlear Dmean and Dmax radiation doses were 40 Gy [p=0.017, area under the curve (AUC): 0.676] and 45 Gy (p=0.008, AUC: 0.695). Dmean (≤40 Gy vs. >40 Gy) and Dmax (≤45 Gy vs. >45 Gy) cochlear doses and age (≤40 vs. >40 years) were determined as factors affecting SNHL in the chi-square test. Repeated measures showed that BC thresholds between 0.5-2 kHz and AC thresholds at 4 and 6 kHz increased over time. Age (≤40 vs. >40 years), treatment of head and neck cancer (RT vs. CRT), cisplatin use, and Dmean (≤40 Gy vs. >40 Gy) and Dmax cochlear dose (≤45 Gy vs. >45 Gy) were important factors affecting the course of BC threshold over time. Conclusion: Dmean and Dmax cochlear doses and age were found to be associated with permanent SNHL. Conduction thresholds worsened over time at all frequencies, and this trend was affected by cochlear doses, age, CRT, and cisplatin use.

The negative prognostic impact of bone metastasis with a tumor mass.

OBJECTIVE: Typically, bone metastasis causes osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions resulting from the interactions of tumor cells with osteoclasts and osteoblasts. In addition to these interactions, tumor tissues may grow inside bones and cause mass lesions. In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate the negative impact of a tumor mass in a large cohort of patients with bone metastatic cancer. METHODS: Data from 335 patients with bone metastases were retrospectively reviewed. For the analysis, all patients were divided into three subgroups with respect to the type of bone metastasis: osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed. The patients were subsequently categorized as having bone metastasis with or without a tumor mass, and statistically significant differences in median survival and 2-year overall survival were observed between these patients (the median survival and 2-year overall survival were respectively 3 months and 16% in patients with a tumor mass and 11 months and 26% in patients without a tumor mass; p<0.001). RESULTS: According to multivariate analysis, the presence of bone metastasis with a tumor mass was found to be an independent prognostic factor (p=0.011, hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.76). Bone metastasis with a tumor mass was more strongly associated with osteolytic lesions, other primary diseases (except for primary breast and prostate cancers), and spinal cord compression. CONCLUSION: Bone metastasis with a tumor mass is a strong and independent negative prognostic factor for survival in cancer patients.

The negative prognostic impact of bone metastasis with a tumor mass

OBJECTIVE: Typically, bone metastasis causes osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions resulting from the interactions of tumor cells with osteoclasts and osteoblasts. In addition to these interactions, tumor tissues may grow inside bones and cause mass lesions. In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate the negative impact of a tumor mass in a large cohort of patients with bone metastatic cancer. METHODS: Data from 335 patients with bone metastases were retrospectively reviewed. For the analysis, all patients were divided into three subgroups with respect to the type of bone metastasis: osteolytic, osteoblastic, or mixed. The patients were subsequently categorized as having bone metastasis with or without a tumor mass, and statistically significant differences in median survival and 2-year overall survival were observed between these patients (the median survival and 2-year overall survival were respectively 3 months and 16% in patients with a tumor mass and 11 months and 26% in patients without a tumor mass; p<0.001). RESULTS: According to multivariate analysis, the presence of bone metastasis with a tumor mass was found to be an independent prognostic factor (p=0.011, hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.11–1.76). Bone metastasis with a tumor mass was more strongly associated with osteolytic lesions, other primary diseases (except for primary breast and prostate cancers), and spinal cord compression. CONCLUSION: Bone metastasis with a tumor mass is a strong and independent negative prognostic factor for survival in cancer patients. .

Survival analysis and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the demographical distribution, survival and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors monitored in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for 52 patients who were admitted to Cumhuriyet University Medical Faculty Training Research and Practice Hospital Oncology Center between 2006 and 2012 and were diagnosed and treated for neuroendocrine tumors were investigated. RESULTS: Of the total, 30 (58%) were females and 22 (42%) were males. The localization of the disease was gastroenteropancreatic in 29 (56%) patients and other sites in 23 (44%). The most frequently involved organ in the gastroenteropancreatic system was the stomach (n=10, 19%) and the most frequently involved organ in other regions was the lungs (n=10, 19%). No correlation was found between immunohistochemical staining for proteins such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and NSE and the grade of the tumor. The patients were followed-up at a median of 24 months (1-90 months). The three-year overall survival rate was 71%: 100% in stage I, 88% in stage II, 80% in stage III, and 40% in stage IV. The three-year survival rate was 78% in tumors localized in the gastroenteropancreatic region, and 54% in tumors localized in other organs. In the univariate analysis, gender, age, performance status of the patients, grade, localization, surgical treatment, and neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio (≤ 5 versus >5) affected the prognosis of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the tumors were localized in the gastroenteropancreatic region, and the three-year survival rate in tumors localized in this region was better than the tumors localized in other sites. Surgical treatment was a positive independent prognostic factor, whereas Grade 3 and a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio of >5 were negative independent prognostic factors.