Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 138: 172-181, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: CONKO-006 was designed for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with postsurgical R1 residual status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and sorafenib (GemSorafenib) compared with those of gemcitabine + placebo (GemP) for 12 cycles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was planned to detect an improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) from 42% to 60% after 18 months. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), safety and duration of treatment. RESULTS: 122 patients were included between 02/2008 and 09/2013; 57 were randomised to GemSorafenib and 65 to GemP. Patient characteristics were wellbalanced (GemSorafenib/GemP) in terms of median age (63/63 years), tumour size (T3/T4: 97/97%), and nodal positivity (86/85%). Grade 3/4 toxicities comprised diarrhoea (GemSorafenib: 12%; GemP: 2%), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (19%; 9%), fatigue (5%; 2%) and hypertension (5%; 2%), as well as neutropenia (18%; 25%) and thrombocytopenia (9%; 2%). By August 2017, 118 (97%) RFS event had occurred. There were no difference in RFS (median GemSorafenib: 8.5 versus GemP: 9.4 months; p = 0.730) nor OS (median GemSorafenib: 17.6 versus GemP: 17.5 months; p = 0.481). Landmark analyses suggest that patients who received more than six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy had significantly longer OS (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: CONKO-006 is the first randomised clinical trial to include exclusively patients with PDAC with postsurgical R1 status thus far. Sorafenib added to gemcitabine did neither improve RFS nor OS. However, postoperative treatment exceeding six months seemed to prolong survival and should be further investigated in these high-risk patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: German Tumor Study Registry (Deutsches Krebsstudienregister), DRKS00000242.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Sorafenibe/administração & dosagem , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Sorafenibe/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Gencitabina
3.
Chirurg ; 91(7): 553-560, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500214

RESUMO

Modern surgery is currently undergoing a significant change in the sense of the introduction of modern technologies and innovative techniques. Robotic-assisted surgery and modern techniques of visualization confront surgery with unprecedented challenges with respect to possible and meaningful areas of application for these innovations. If an innovation is not to remain only an interesting singularity as proof of feasibility and a sign of unchecked progress but is to have a fixed place within the framework of standardized treatment processes, firm regulations are required which flank the path from innovation to introduction into clinical practice. This overview article critically examines the deficits of the currently practiced models of introducing new technologies into the clinical practice and discusses new aspects that can improve the introduction of innovations with particular respect to patient safety.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente
4.
Injury ; 51(9): 1979-1986, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32336477

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic trauma (PT) involving the main pancreatic duct is rare, but represents a challenging clinical problem with relevant morbidity and mortality. It is generally classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) and often presents as concomitant injury in blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma. Diagnosis may be delayed because of a lack of clinical or radiological manifestation. Treatment options for main pancreatic duct injuries comprise highly complex surgical procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 12 patients who underwent surgery in two tertiary centers in Germany during 2003-2016 for grade III-V PT with affection of the main pancreatic duct, according to the AAST classification. RESULTS: The median age was 23 (range: 7-44) years. In nine patients blunt abdominal trauma was the reason for PT, whereas penetrating trauma only occurred in three patients. MRI outperformed classical trauma CT imaging with regard to detection of duct involvement. Complex procedures as i.e. an emergency pancreatic head resection, distal pancreatectomy or parenchyma sparing pancreatogastrostomy were performed. Compared to elective pancreatic surgery the complication rate in the emergency setting was higher. Yet, parenchyma-sparing procedures demonstrated safety. CONCLUSIONS: Often extension of diagnostics including MRI and/or ERP at an early stage is necessary to guide clinical decision-making. If, due to main duct injuries, surgical therapy for PT is required, we suggest consideration of an organ preservative pancreatogastrostomy in grade III/IV trauma of the pancreatic body or tail.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adulto , Alemanha , Humanos , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pâncreas/lesões , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
5.
HPB Surg ; 2018: 2943879, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30364084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since local tumor infiltration to the mesenteric-portal axis might represent a challenging assignment for curative intended resectability during pancreatic surgery, appropriate techniques for venous reconstruction are essential. In this study, we acknowledge the falciform ligament as a feasible and convenient substitute for mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction with high reliability and patency for local advanced pancreatic tumor. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis. Between June 2017 and January 2018, a total of eleven consecutive patients underwent pancreatic resections with venous reconstruction using falciform ligament. Among them, venous resection was performed in nine cases by wedge and in two cases by full segment. Patency rates and perioperative details were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean clamping time of the mesenteric-portal blood flow was 34 min, while perioperative mortality rate was 0%. By means of Duplex ultrasonography, nine patients were shown to be patent on the day of discharge, while two cases revealed an entire occlusion of the mesenteric-portal axis. Orthograde flow demonstrated a mean value of 34 cm/s. All patent grafts on discharge revealed persistent patency within various follow-up assessments. CONCLUSION: The falciform ligament appears to be a feasible and reliable autologous tissue for venous blood flow reconstruction with high postoperative patency. Especially the possibility of customizing graft dimensions to the individual needs based on local findings allows an optimal size matching of the conduit. The risk of stenosis and/or segmental occlusion may thus be further reduced.

6.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 62(4): 451-463, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim was to analyse the association between severity of complications up to 30 days after surgery and pre-operative nutritional and physical performance parameters. METHODS: The participants were a subsample of the previously published PERATECS study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01278537) and included 517 onco-geriatric patients aged ≥ 65 years, undergoing thoracoabdominal, gynaecological, or urological surgery. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien Classification System (CCS). Independent risk factors related to the severity of complications, defined as major complications (CCS IIIa-V) and graded complications (CCS grade 0-V), were analysed using logistic and ordinal regression, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 132 patients suffered major post-operative complications. The development of major post-operative complications was independently associated with body mass index (BMI) < 20 kg/m2 , hypoalbuminaemia (< 30 g/l), longer duration of surgery, and specific tumour sites (upper gastrointestinal, gynaecological, colorectal) (all P < 0.05). Higher-grade complications were predicted by Timed Up and Go (TUG) > 20 s, hypoalbuminaemia (< 30 g/l), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status III-IV, longer duration of surgery (> 165 min), and specific tumour sites (upper gastrointestinal, gynaecological) (all P < 0.05). Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores and weight loss were not independent risk factors for the severity of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional and physical performance risk factors that predicted the severity of complications differed between major and higher-grade post-operative complications, but hypoalbuminaemia independently predicted both. The results support the need for pre-operative risk screening. Due to the explorative nature of the study, further research is required in larger cohorts to corroborate these findings.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/complicações , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
7.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 43(9): 1668-1681, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28599872

RESUMO

Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) have remarkably benefited from the advances in medical multimodal treatment and surgical techniques over the last two decades leading to significant improvements in long-term survival. More patients are currently undergoing liver resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which has been increasingly established within the framework of curative-indented treatment strategies. However, the use of several cytotoxic agents has been linked to specific liver injuries that not only impair the ability of liver tissue to regenerate but also decrease long-term survival. One of the most common agents included in modern chemotherapy regimens is oxaliplatin, which is considered to induce a parenchymal damage of the liver primarily involving the sinusoids defined as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). Administration of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been reported to improve response of CLM to chemotherapy in clinical studies, concomitantly protecting the liver from the development of SOS. In this review, we aim to summarize current data on multimodal treatment concepts for CLM, give an in-depth overview of liver damage caused by cytostatic agents focusing on oxaliplatin-induced SOS, and evaluate the role of bevacizumab to improve clinical outcomes of patients with CLM and to protect the liver from the development of SOS.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos Organoplatínicos/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia , Hepatopatia Veno-Oclusiva/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Irinotecano , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Chirurg ; 88(5): 395-400, 2017 May.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28361269

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic placement of intraperitoneal drains in elective abdominal surgery is still subject to scrutiny. OBJECTIVE: Do currently available data enable the practice of routine placement of abdominal drainages to be abandoned? METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical trials concerning the practice of routine drainage placement in elective abdominal surgery. The available evidence was summarized for cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, gastrectomy and pancreatic surgery, as well as for liver resection. A total of 6 Cochrane reviews including 65 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 retrospective analyses, as well as 1 more recent RCT and 3 retrospective analyses that were not included in a meta-analysis were reviewed. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that drains should not be routinely used in elective abdominal surgery, such as cholecystectomy, colorectal resection and gastrectomy. Even for some cases of pancreatic and liver resection, there is growing evidence that routine placement of drains is not mandatory. In conclusion, there is a need for more prospective randomized controlled trials.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Drenagem/métodos , Colecistectomia , Cirurgia Colorretal , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Gastrectomia , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Pancreatectomia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Zentralbl Chir ; 141(4): 375-82, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556429

RESUMO

Liver resection is currently considered to be essential part of the curative treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies. However, long-term survival in these patients is limited by the high incidence of tumor recurrence. Recent clinical and experimental studies have indicated that cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy may have a proliferative effect on occult micrometastases and circulating tumor cells and are thus responsible for recurrent disease. Growth factors and cytokines involved in liver regeneration have also been shown to influence tumour growth and metastasis. However, the underlying mechanisms explaining the interactions between regenerating liver tissue and tumour cell proliferation remain unclear. The development of modern agents specifically targeting these processes may improve disease-free and overall survival rates after oncological hepatectomy.


Assuntos
Proliferação de Células/fisiologia , Hepatectomia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Regeneração Hepática/fisiologia , Micrometástase de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Micrometástase de Neoplasia/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Prognóstico , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Ann Surg ; 263(3): 440-9, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26135690

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess pancreatic fistula rate and secondary endpoints after pancreatogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy in the setting of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND: PJ and PG are established methods for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy. Recent prospective trials suggest superiority of the PG regarding perioperative complications. METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PG with PJ was conducted involving 14 German high-volume academic centers for pancreatic surgery. The primary endpoint was clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints comprised perioperative outcome and pancreatic function and quality of life measured at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: From May 2011 to December 2012, 440 patients were randomized, and 320 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of grade B/C fistula after PG versus PJ (20% vs 22%, P = 0.617). The overall incidence of grade B/C fistula was 21%, and the in-hospital mortality was 6%. Multivariate analysis of the primary endpoint disclosed soft pancreatic texture (odds ratio: 2.1, P = 0.016) as the only independent risk factor. Compared with PJ, PG was associated with an increased rate of grade A/B bleeding events, perioperative stroke, less enzyme supplementation at 6 months, and improved results in some quality of life parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of grade B/C fistula after PG versus PJ was not different. There were more postoperative bleeding events with PG. Perioperative morbidity and mortality of pancreatoduodenectomy seem to be underestimated, even in the high-volume center setting.


Assuntos
Pancreatopatias/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Pancreaticojejunostomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatopatias/mortalidade , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco
12.
Eur J Cancer ; 51(12): 1546-54, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26049689

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) is considered to predict survival in patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. A standard evaluation system for immunohistochemical analysis (antibody, scoring system) has not yet been established. METHODS: CONKO-001, a prospective randomised phase III study investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine (gem) as compared to observation (obs). Tumour samples of 156 patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry with the rabbit monoclonal antibody SP120 (Ventana Medical Systems) for expression of hENT1. Kaplan-Meier analyses for median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed in dependence of hENT1 expression measured analogously to Farrell et al. 2009 and Poplin et al. 2013. RESULTS: For the 88 gem and 68 obs patients, median DFS/OS was 12.9/22.7 months and 6.2/19.1 months. High hENT1 expression was not associated with improved median DFS (Farrell: no hENT1 22.2 months, low hENT1 13.7 months, high hENT1 12.1 months, p=0.248; Poplin: low hENT1 13.2 months versus high hENT1 11.5 months, p=0.5) or median OS (Farrell: no hENT1 21.7 months, low hENT1 24.7 months, high hENT1 19.5, p=0.571; Poplin: low hENT1 24.4 months versus high hENT1 19.7 months, p=0.92;) in the gem group or in the obs group (median DFS Farrell: no hENT1 5.1 months, low hENT1 6.2 months, high hENT1 7.5 months, p=0.375; Poplin: low hENT1 6.2 months versus high hENT1 5.9 months, p=0.83; median OS Farrell: no hENT1 20.2months, low hENT1 17.7 months, high HENT1 19.1 months, p=0.738; Poplin: low hENT1 17.7 months versus high hENT1 20.4 months, p=0.65) measured by the Farrell or Poplin Score. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot confirm a predictive role of hENT1 measured by the clone SP120 rabbit antibody in our study population. Reproducible standard procedures are urgently needed prior to the implementation or exclusion of hENT1 as a predictive biomarker in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN34802808.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Transportador Equilibrativo 1 de Nucleosídeo/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Conduta Expectante , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/química , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Coelhos , Análise de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
13.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2014: 452089, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25401140

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) in patients with pancreatic cancer is still a controversial subject and its benefit in inoperable stages of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), even after induction chemotherapy, remains unclear. Modern radiation techniques such as image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may improve effectiveness and reduce radiotherapy-related toxicities. METHODS: Patients with LAPC who underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy between 09/2004 and 05/2013 were retrospectively analyzed with regard to preradiation chemotherapy (PRCT), modalities of radiotherapy, and toxicities. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: 15 (68%) women and 7 men (median age 64 years; range 40-77) were identified. Median duration of PRCT was 11.1 months (range 4.3-33.0). Six patients (27%) underwent conventional RT and 16 patients (73%) advanced IMRT and IGRT; median dosage was 50.4 (range 9-54) Gray. No grade III or IV toxicities occurred. Median PFS (estimated from the beginning of RT) was 5.8 months, 2.6 months in the conventional RT group (conv-RT), and 7.1 months in the IMRT/IGRT group (P = 0.029); median OS was 11.0 months, 4.2 months (conv-RT), and 14.0 months (IMRT/IGRT); P = 0.141. Median RT-specific PFS for patients with prolonged PRCT > 9 months was 8.5 months compared to 5.6 months for PRCT < 9 months (P = 0.293). This effect was translated into a significantly better median RT-specific overall survival of patients in the PRCT > 9 months group, with 19.0 months compared to 8.5 months in the PRCT < 9 months group (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: IGRT and IMRT after PRCT are feasible and effective options for patients with LAPC after prolonged preradiation chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
Br J Cancer ; 111(10): 1917-23, 2014 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25314063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations in pancreatic cancer suggest a prognostic role for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression and stromal density in the peritumoural stroma. The aim of this study was to further validate the impact of α-SMA expression and stromal density in resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine compared with untreated patients. METHODS: CONKO-001 was a prospective randomised phase III study investigating the role of adjuvant gemcitabine as compared with observation. Tissue samples of 162 patients were available for immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays to evaluate the impact of α-SMA expression and stromal density impact on patient outcome. RESULTS: High α-SMA expression in tumour stroma was associated with worse patient outcome (DFS: P=0.05, OS: P=0.047). A dense stroma reaction was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population (DFS: P=0.001, OS: P=0.001). This positive prognostic impact was restricted to patients with no adjuvant treatment (DFS: P<0.001, OS: P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, α-SMA and stromal density expression were independently predictive factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the negative prognostic impact of high α-SMA expression in pancreatic cancer patients after curatively intended resection. In contrast to former investigations, we found a positive prognostic impact for a dense stroma. This significant influence was restricted to patients who received no adjuvant therapy.


Assuntos
Actinas/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Células Estromais/metabolismo , Microambiente Tumoral , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Células Estromais/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Análise Serial de Tecidos , Gencitabina
15.
Ann Oncol ; 25(5): 1025-32, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24562449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations in pancreatic cancer suggested a prognostic role for secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression in the peritumoral stroma but not for cytoplasmic SPARC expression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SPARC expression in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine compared with untreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CONKO-001 was a prospective randomized phase III study investigating the role of adjuvant gemcitabine when compared with observation. Tissue samples of 160 patients were available for SPARC immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays to evaluate its impact on patient outcome. RESULTS: Strong stromal SPARC expression was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population (DFS: P = 0.005, OS: P = 0.033). Its negative prognostic impact was restricted to patients treated with gemcitabine (DFS: P = 0.007, OS: P = 0.006). High cytoplasmic SPARC expression also was associated with worse patient outcome (DFS: P = 0.041, OS: P = 0.011). Again the effect was restricted to patients treated with gemcitabine (DFS: P = 0.002, OS: P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, SPARC expression was independently predictive of patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the prognostic significance of SPARC expression after curatively intended resection. The negative prognostic impact was restricted to patients who received adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine, suggesting SPARC as a predictive marker for response to gemcitabine.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Osteonectina/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Gencitabina
16.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 40(2): 208-13, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24275202

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. The majority of patients with HCC have cirrhosis. Beside liver transplantation the resection is an established curative treatment option for patients with HCC in cirrhosis. However, the long term success is limited by a high tumor recurrence rate. Furthermore, by many patients surgical resection is restricted by poor liver function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of patient age on long term outcome after liver resection in patients with HCC in cirrhotic liver. Further purpose was to define the potential prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The outcome of 141 patients with liver cirrhosis after curative resection was analyzed using a prospective database. Only patients with postoperative histological assurance of HCC were included in the database. Patients with fibrolamellar HCC were excluded. RESULTS: By patients below 70 years of age the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 78.5%, 56.5% and 47.1%. By patients over 70 years the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 59.9%, 40.3% and 6.7%. Cumulative survival of the total collective was significant influenced by patient age, Clavien grade, positive lymph vessels, mechanical ventilation and BMI. The overall postoperative morbidity was 44.7%. No intraoperative deaths were observed, but 11 patients (8 older than 70 and 3 younger than 70 years) died during the hospital stay. Clavien grade correlated with preoperative increased GGT, need for intraoperative blood and fresh frozen plasma transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Patient age and postoperative complications are more relevant for the outcome than many tumor factors, especially by patients over 70 years of age. In contrast, the prognosis of patients below 70 years of age is significantly better and a 5 year survival rate above 50% could be shown in our patients. However, by carefully selected elderly patients with HCC in cirrhosis an acceptable long term survival is reachable.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicações , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Rofo ; 186(1): 23-9, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24081785

RESUMO

Complete tumor resection is still the only potentially curative therapy option for patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Surgical exploration is the gold standard for the determination of tumor resectability. Radiological resectability assessment is of great importance because many clearly unresectable cases can be identified preoperatively and it became essential for surgical planning. The evolving surgical and radiological techniques demand a continuous reappraisal of radiological criteria in resectability assessment. In the following, the criteria for resection planning are described along with surgical management and the role of radiology in some innovative surgical concepts is explained.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Humanos , Prognóstico
18.
Front Physiol ; 4: 118, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23745115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Genetic risk factors for sporadic pancreatic cancer are largely unknown but actually under high exposure. Findings of correlations between the AB0 blood group system (Chromosome 9q34,1-q34,2) and the risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in patients from Asia, America and south Europe have already been published. So far it is unclear, whether this correlation between blood group an PC incidence can be found in German patients as well. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-six patients who underwent a resection of PC were evaluated in a period between 2000 and 2010. Blood group reference distribution for the German population is given as: 0: 41%; A: 43%; B: 11%; AB: 5%; Rhesus positive: 85%; Rhesus negative: 15%. Analyses were done using the non-parametric Chi(2)-test (p-value two sided; SPSS 19.0). RESULTS: Median age was 62 (34-82) years. Gender: female 73/44%; male: 93/56%. Observed blood group proportions: 0: 43 (25.9%)/A: 94 (56.6%)/B: 16 (9.6%)/AB: 13 (7.8%)/Rhesus positive: 131 (78.9%)/negative: 35 (21.1%). We detected a significant difference to the German reference distribution of the AB0 system (Chi(2) 19.34, df 3, p < 0.001). Rhesus factor has no impact on AB0-distribution (Chi(2) 4.13, df 3, p = 0.25), but differs significantly from reference distribution-probably due to initial AB0-variation (Chi(2) 4.82, df 1, p = 0.028). The odds ratio for blood group A is 2.01 and for blood group 0 is 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PC in the German cohort is highly associated with the AB0-system as well. More patients with blood group A suffer from PC (p < 0.001) whereas blood group 0 was less frequent in patients with PC (p < 0.001). Thus, our findings support the results from other non-German surveys. The causal trigger points of this carcinogenesis correlation are still not known.

19.
Rofo ; 185(3): 219-27, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23196834

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate morphologic characteristics and establish a standardized diagnostic algorithm to differentiate benign cystic pancreatic tumors (CPTs) in non-pancreatitis patients using multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histopathologically proven CPTs who had undergone MRI and/or CT and subsequent tumor resection in our institution were retrospectively identified. Images were analyzed for morphology and enhancement patterns by three independent blinded observers. Preoperative image findings were correlated with histopathological results. Based on the evaluated morphologic parameters, a standardized diagnostic algorithm was designed to help characterize the lesions. RESULTS: A total of 62 consecutive patients with 64 CPTs were identified from the surgical database (21 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; 10 mucinous cystic neoplasms; 12 serous microcystic adenomas; 3 serous oligocystic adenomas; 6 solid pseudopapillary tumors; 12 neuroendocrine neoplasms). The overall averaged accuracy for the 3 observers was 89.9 % for CT and 93.1 % for MRI with increasing overall accuracy in relation to the experience of the observer (88.2 %, 91.5 %, and 93.8 %, respectively). Overall, the generalized kappa value was 0.69 (CT, 0.64; MRI, 0.76); p < 0.001). The accuracy of the standardized diagnostic algorithm was 91.1 %. CONCLUSION: It is possible to characterize benign CPTs with MRI and CT, while MRI appears to be superior to CT. Diagnostic accuracy depends on the observer's experience. The standardized algorithm can aid in the differential diagnosis but still needs to be tested in other patient populations.


Assuntos
Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/métodos , Cisto Pancreático/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/normas , Pâncreas/patologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
20.
Gastroenterol Res Pract ; 2012: 939350, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23258977

RESUMO

Backround. Pancreas resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In the event of unexpected incidental liver metastases during operative exploration patients were traditionally referred to palliative treatment arms. With continuous progress in the surgical expertise simultaneous pancreas and liver resections seem technically feasible nowadays. The aim of this study therefore was to analyze the impact of synchronous liver-directed therapy on operative outcome and overall survival in patients with hepatic metastasized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (HMPA). Methods. 22 patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas resection and liver-directed therapy for HMPA between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2009 were compared to 22 patients who underwent classic pancreas resection for nonmetastasized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NMPA) in a matched pair study design. Postoperative morbidity, preoperative, and operative data and overall survival were analyzed. Results. Overall survival was significantly decreased in the HMPA group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality and median operation time did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion. The results of our study showed that simultaneous pancreas resection and liver-directed therapy may safely be performed and may therefore be applied in individual patients with HMPA. However, a potential benefit of this radical surgical approach with regard to overall survival and/or quality of life remains to be proven.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...