Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial).

Current stent delivery systems make primary stenting (stent placement without predilatation) possible, but few controlled trials have been performed to evaluate the success, safety, cost saving, and potential benefit of this approach in reducing late restenosis. The Comparison of PRE-Dilatation Versus Direct Stenting In Coronary Treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System trial was a 399-patient study comparing results with the Medtronic-AVE S670 stent to objective performance criteria based on prior approved stents, with subrandomization to direct stenting versus stenting after balloon predilatation. Overall, results with the S670 stent showed excellent success and safety, with delivery success of 99%, a 14-day adverse event rate of 6.8% (including 6.5% non-Q-wave myocardial infarction), and favorable angiographic (20%) and clinical (12%) restenosis rates. Direct stenting was successful in 92% of cases, with a 99.5% secondary success rate including additional pretreatment of initially unsuccessful direct-stenting attempts, and no increase in complications. There were modest ( approximately 10%) savings in fluoroscopy time, contrast use, and a decrease in angioplasty balloon use (0.6 vs 1.3 balloons/case), but no reduction in clinical or angiographic restenosis. Patients treated later in the study, with a device that had less balloon extension beyond the edges of the stent, had slightly lower angiographic restenosis rates (19% vs 23%). In conclusion, the S670 stent showed excellent overall performance. Although direct stenting was safe and highly successful, it offered only modest cost savings, and no reduction in late restenosis compared with stenting after predilatation.

Coronary artery stenting in the aged.

OBJECTIVES: The study compared the safety and efficacy of coronary artery stenting in aged and nonaged patients and identified predictors of adverse clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the outcomes of stenting in the aged (> or = 80 years) compared to nonaged patients. METHODS: The study was a pooled analysis of 6,186 patients who underwent coronary artery stenting in six recent multicenter trials. A clinical events committee adjudicated clinical end points, and quantitative angiography was performed by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: There were 301 (4.9%) aged patients (> or = 80 years). Compared to nonaged patients, aged patients had a higher prevalence of multivessel disease (16.5% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.001), unstable angina (50.8% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.003), moderate to severe target lesion calcification (30.4% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.001) and smaller reference vessel diameter (2.90 mm vs. 2.98 mm, p = 0.004). Procedural success rate (97.4% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.14) was similar in the two groups. In-hospital mortality (1.33% vs. 0.10%, p = 0.001), bleeding complications (4.98% vs. 1.00%, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (5.65% vs. 1.41%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher for the aged patients. Clinical restenosis was similar for the two groups (11.19% vs. 11.93%, p = 0.78). Advanced age, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction and presence of three-vessel disease were independent predictors of long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery stenting can be performed safely in patients > or = 80 years of age, with excellent acute results and a low rate of clinical restenosis, albeit with higher incidences of in-hospital and long-term mortality, and vascular and bleeding complications compared to nonaged patients.

Economic assessment of rheolytic thrombectomy versus intracoronary urokinase for treatment of extensive intracoronary thrombus: Results from a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in mechanical and pharmacologic therapy, thrombus-containing lesions are at high risk for adverse events and remain a challenging subset for percutaneous coronary revascularization. Recently, rheolytic thrombectomy with the AngioJet device has been shown to safely remove intracoronary thrombus, but the overall cost-effectiveness of this technique is unknown. METHODS: We determined in-hospital and 1-year follow-up costs for 349 patients with overt intracoronary thrombus who were randomly assigned to treatment with intracoronary urokinase (6- to 30-hour infusion followed by definitive revascularization; n = 169) or immediate thrombectomy with the AngioJet device (n = 180) as part of the Vein Graft AngioJet Study (VeGAS) 2 trial. Catheterization laboratory costs were based on measured resource utilization and 1998 unit costs, whereas all other costs were estimated from hospital charges and cost center-specific cost-to-charge ratios. RESULTS: Compared with urokinase, rheolytic thrombectomy reduced the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (12.8% vs 30.3%, P <.001) and major hemorrhagic complications (2.8% vs 11.2%, P <.001) and shortened length of stay by nearly 1 day (4.2 vs 4.9 days; P =.02). As a result, AngioJet treatment reduced procedural costs, hospital room/nursing costs, and ancillary costs with resulting hospital cost savings of approximately $3500 per patient during the initial hospitalization ($15,311 vs $18,841, P <.001). These cost savings were maintained at 1 year of follow-up ($24,389 vs $29,109, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard treatment with intracoronary urokinase, rheolytic thrombectomy both improves clinical outcomes and reduces overall medical care costs for patients with extensive intracoronary thrombus.

Combined percutaneous biosense-guided laser myocardial revascularization and coronary intervention.

Laser myocardial revascularization is a promising new treatment strategy for patients with severe ischemic heart disease who are not candidates for conventional percutaneous or surgical revascularization. The open chest surgical approach to transmyocardial revascularization has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of angina in inoperable patients, but has had limited use as a stand-alone procedure. More recently, use of fiber-optic catheters has made it possible to use a holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser to perform percutaneous catheter-based transmyocardial revascularization. To the extent that many patients have a combination of ischemic sources, some amenable to conventional revascularization and some not, combination or hybrid approaches have been considered. We report herein two patients with class IV angina who underwent laser myocardial revascularization using the Biosense system and complex percutaneous coronary intervention during the same procedure. Areas amenable to conventional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were so treated, and viable but ischemic areas were supplied by totally occluded native vessels and bypass grafts underwent Biosense-guided laser myocardial revascularization (LMR). As the results of more controlled and blinded studies of laser myocardial revascularization become available (if results continue to be promising) and a better understanding of the mechanism of action of this treatment modality is achieved, LMR-PTCA hybrid will be performed in increasing frequency. However, even after establishing LMR efficacy, studies of LMR-PTCA hybrid should be conducted to determine the efficacy of this approach.

In vivo assessment of stent recoil in normal porcine arteries: evaluation of contemporary stent designs.

Acute stent recoil has been observed following balloon deflation in normal and diseased coronary arteries, and the magnitude varies by stent design. We sought to evaluate acute stent recoil in five new stents. Twenty-five stents (four Crown, five Nir Conformer Royale, five Crossflex, five SupraG, and six GFX) were implanted in six Yorkshire pigs. All stents were expanded using a noncompliant balloon (balloon:artery ratio 1.2:1.0). Continuous ultrasound imaging was performed during stepwise balloon inflation and deflation using a 0.018" imaging core. Maximum cross-section areas (CSA) and minimal luminal diameter (MLD) were measured at 12 atm and immediately following balloon deflation. Maximum stent CSA matched expected balloon CSA. Area and diameter recoil were calculated as 1 - (CSAdeflation/CSAmax) and 1 - (MLDdeflation/MLDmax), respectively. Upon deflation, all stents showed recoil from maximal CSA. Area recoil was significantly lower for slotted-tube stents than modular stents (12.6% +/- 1.6% vs. 23.2 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.05). In compliant, nonatherosclerotic porcine coronary arteries, acute stent recoil for the four slotted-tube designs ranged from 8.4% to 18.0% by area. The modular stent tested was associated with significantly greater acute recoil than the slotted-tube stents.

Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies of stent thrombosis in the modern era of second-generation stents, high-pressure deployment, and current antithrombotic regimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six recently completed coronary stent trials and associated nonrandomized registries that enrolled 6186 patients (6219 treated vessels) treated with >/=1 coronary stent followed by antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine were pooled for this analysis. Within 30 days, clinical stent thrombosis developed in 53 patients (0.9%). The variables most significantly associated with the probability of stent thrombosis were persistent dissection NHLBI grade B or higher after stenting (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9 to 7.7), total stent length (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5 per 10 mm), and final minimal lumen diameter within the stent (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7 per 1 mm). Stent thrombosis was documented by angiography in 45 patients (0.7%). Clinical consequences of angiographic stent thrombosis included 64.4% incidence of death or myocardial infarction at the time of stent thrombosis and 8.9% 6-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Stent thrombosis occurred in <1.0% of patients undergoing stenting of native coronary artery lesions and receiving routine antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus ticlopidine. Procedure-related variables of persistent dissection, total stent length, and final lumen diameter were significantly associated with the probability of stent thrombosis. Continued efforts to eliminate this complication are warranted given the serious clinical consequences.

Comparison of endocardial electromechanical mapping with radionuclide perfusion imaging to assess myocardial viability and severity of myocardial ischemia in angina pectoris.

The assessment of left ventricular electromechanical activity using a novel, nonfluoroscopic 3-dimensional mapping system demonstrates considerable differences in electrical and mechanical activities within regions of myocardial infarction or ischemia. We sought to determine whether these changes correlate with indexes of myocardial perfusion, viability, or ischemia. A 12-segment comparative analysis was performed in 61 patients (45 men, 61 +/- 12 years old) with class III to IV angina, having reversible and/or fixed myocardial perfusion defects on single-photon emission computed tomographic perfusion imaging. A dual-isotope protocol was used, consisting of rest and 4-hour redistribution thallium images followed by adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. Average rest endocardial unipolar voltage (UpV) and local shortening (LS) mapping values were compared with visually derived perfusion scores. There was gradual and proportional reduction in regional UpV and LS in relation to thallium-201 uptake score at rest (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively) and redistribution studies (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.003, respectively). UpV > or = 7.4 mV and LS > or = 5.0% had a sensitivity of 78% and 65%, respectively, with a specificity of 68% and 67% for detecting viable myocardium. UpV values of 12.3 and 5.4 mV had 90% specificity and sensitivity, respectively, to predict viable tissue. UpV, but not LS, values differentiated between normal segments and those with adenosine-induced severe perfusion defects (11.8 +/- 5.3 vs 8.8 +/- 4.1 mV, p = 0.005). Catheter-based left ventricular assessment of electromechanical activity correlates with the degree of single-photon emission computed tomographic perfusion abnormality and can identify myocardial viability with a greater accuracy than myocardial ischemia.

Rheolytic thrombectomy during percutaneous revascularization for acute myocardial infarction: experience with the AngioJet catheter.

BACKGROUND: Although balloon angioplasty and stenting are effective in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI), reduced coronary flow and distal embolization frequently complicate interventions when thrombus is present. Adjunctive treatment with mechanical thrombectomy devices may reduce these complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the angiographic and clinical outcomes of 70 patients with acute MI (16% with cardiogenic shock) and with angiographically evident thrombus who were treated with AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy followed by immediate definitive treatment. Procedure success (residual diameter stenosis <50% and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow > or =2 after final treatment) was achieved in 93.8%. Clinical success (procedure success without major in-hospital cardiac events) was achieved in 87.5%, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 7.1%. Final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 87.7%. AngioJet treatment resulted in a mean thrombus area reduction from 73.2 +/- 64.6 mm(2) at baseline to 15.5 +/- 30.1 post-thrombectomy (P <.001). Subsequent definitive treatment included stenting in 67% and balloon angioplasty alone in 26% of patients. Procedural complications included distal embolization in six patients and perforation in two patients. There were no further major adverse events during 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Rheolytic thrombectomy can be performed safely and effectively in patients with acute MI, allowing for immediate definitive treatment in thrombus-containing lesions.

Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.

The NIR stent is a novel second generation tubular stent that was designed to overcome some of the limitations of the earlier Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent design. The NIR Vascular Advanced North American (NIRVANA) trial randomized 849 patients with single coronary lesions to treatment with the NIR stent or the PS stent. The study was an "equivalency" trial, designed to demonstrate that the NIR stent was not inferior to (i.e., equivalent or better than) the PS stent, for the primary end point of target vessel failure (defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) by 9 months. Successful stent delivery was achieved in 100% versus 98.8%, respectively, with a slightly lower postprocedural diameter stenosis (7% vs. 9%, p = 0.04) after NIR and PS stent placement, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, repeat target lesion revascularization) were not different at 30 days (4.3% vs. 4.4%). The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was seen in 16.0% of NIR versus 17.2% of PS patients, with the NIR proving to be equal or superior to the PS stent (p <0.001 by test for equivalency). Angiographic restudy in 71% of a prespecified cohort showed no significant difference in restenosis (19.3% vs 22.4%). Thus, the NIR stent showed excellent deliverability with slightly better acute angiographic results and equivalent or better 9-month target vessel failure rate when compared with the PS stent.

Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.

The MULTI-LINK (ML) stent is a novel second generation coronary stent. The ACS MultiLink Stent Clinical Equivalence in De Novo Lesions Trial (ASCENT) randomized 1,040 patients with single, de novo native vessel lesions to treatment with the ML stent or the benchmark Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent, to demonstrate that the ML stent was not inferior to (i.e., equivalent or better than) the PS stent in terms of target vessel failure by 9 months. Successful stent delivery was achieved in 98.8% versus 96.9% of patients, with a slightly lower postprocedural diameter stenosis (8% vs 10%, p = 0.04), and no difference in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (5.0% vs 6.5%) for the ML stent versus the PS stent. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was seen in 15.1% of ML-treated patients versus 16.7% of PS-treated patients, with the ML proving to be equal or superior to the PS stent (p <0.001 by test for equivalency). In a prespecified subset, angiographic restudy showed a nonsignificant trend for reduced ML restenosis (16.0% vs 22.1%). Thus, the ML stent showed excellent deliverability and acute results, with 9-month clinical and 6-month angiographic outcomes that were equivalent or better than the PS stent.

Impact of end-stage renal disease on clinical and angiographic outcomes after coronary stenting.

Although patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk for restenosis that requires repeat revascularization after balloon angioplasty, their restenosis rate after coronary stenting is still unknown. Over a 4-year period, we performed coronary stenting on 40 lesions in 34 patients with ESRD. We compared these lesions with 80 lesions from patients without renal disease who underwent coronary stenting in the STARS and WINS clinical trials, matched for treatment site, diabetes, lesion length, and reference vessel diameter. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed on all lesions and clinical outcomes were assessed at 9-month follow-up. Clinical and angiographic characteristics were well matched between the 2 groups and acute clinical success rates were similar. Despite comparable initial angiographic results over the 9-month follow-up period, repeat target lesion revascularization was twice as frequent in the ESRD group compared with the control group (35% vs 16%, p <0.05). After adjusting for differences in postprocedural minimum lumen diameter and other angiographic and clinical characteristics, ESRD remained the most important predictor of late target lesion revascularization (relative risk = 2.3, p = 0.04). In addition, overall 9-month mortality was higher for ESRD patients than for the control population (18% vs 2%, p <0.01). Thus, despite similar angiographic results, patients with ESRD are at higher risk for target lesion revascularization after coronary stenting than controls. Nonetheless, most patients with ESRD do not develop restenosis after stent placement, suggesting an important role for stenting in the management of this challenging population.

Short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes from direct myocardial laser revascularization guided by biosense left ventricular electromechanical mapping.

BACKGROUND: Direct myocardial revascularization (DMR) has been examined as an alternative treatment for patients with chronic refractory myocardial ischemic syndromes who are not candidates for conventional coronary revascularization. Methods and Results-We used left ventricular electromagnetic guidance in 77 patients with chronic refractory angina (56 men, mean age 61+/-11 years, ejection fraction 0.48+/-0.11) to perform percutaneous DMR with an Ho:YAG laser at 2 J/pulse. Procedural success (laser channels placed in prespecified target zones) was achieved in 76 of 77 patients with an average of 26+/-10 channels (range 11 to 50 channels). The rate of major in-hospital cardiac adverse events was 2.6%, with no deaths or emergency operations, 1 patient with postprocedural pericardiocentesis, and 1 patient with minor embolic stroke. The rate of out-of-hospital adverse cardiac events (up to 6 months) was 2.6%, with 1 patient with myocardial infarction and 1 patient with stroke. Exercise duration after DMR increased from 387+/-179 to 454+/-166 seconds at 1 month and to 479+/-161 seconds at 6 months (P=0.0001). The time to onset of angina increased from 293+/-167 to 377+/-176 seconds at 1 month and to 414+/-169 seconds at 6 months (P=0.0001). Importantly, the time to ST-segment depression (>/=1 mm) also increased from 327+/-178 to 400+/-172 seconds at 1 month and to 436+/-175 seconds at 6 months (P=0.001). Angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification) improved from 3.3+/-0.5 to 2.0+/-1.2 at 6 months (P<0.001). Nuclear perfusion imaging studies with a dual-isotope technique, however, showed no significant improvements at 1 or 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous DMR guided by left ventricular mapping is feasible and safe and reveals improved angina and prolonged exercise duration for up to a 6-month follow-up.

Relation of coronary artery size to one-year clinical events after new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries (a New Approach to Coronary Intervention [NACI] Registry Report).

The influence of vessel size on clinical and angiographic outcomes after new device angioplasty has not been well documented. We reviewed clinical and angiographic outcomes of 2,044 patients undergoing new device angioplasty of native vessels enrolled in the New Approaches to Coronary Interventions (NACI) Registry. Quantitative angiography was performed using standard methods. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to reference vessel diameter (RVD) (<2.75, 2.75 to 3.25, and >3.25 mm). Patients with the smallest vessels had a higher incidence of diabetes (26% vs. 16%, p<0.01), multivessel disease (50% vs. 45%, p<0.01), left anterior descending coronary artery disease (61% vs. 39% p<0.01), and in general, more severe baseline lesion characteristics than patients with larger (>3.25 mm) vessels. Absolute baseline and final minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was also smaller in patients with RVD <2.75 mm despite similar final percent diameter stenosis. Although in-hospital events were similar, patients who underwent interventions in vessels <2.75 mm had an increased incidence of death (p<0.01), surgical revascularization (p<0.05), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p<0.01) at 1 year. Multivariate analysis by vessel size showed a stepwise increase in the risk of TLR by 1 year in patients with the smaller RVD (p = 0.0001) and the combined end point of 1 year death/Q wave-myocardial infarction/TLR (p = 0.02). Thus, despite similar early clinical events among patients undergoing new device angioplasty, patients who underwent treatment of smaller vessels had a significantly increased risk of major adverse clinical events and particularly TLR by 1 year after new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries.

Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can assess stent geometry more accurately than angiography. Several studies have demonstrated that the degree of stent expansion as measured by IVUS directly correlated to clinical outcome. However, it is unclear if routine ultrasound guidance of stent implantation improves clinical outcome as compared with angiographic guidance alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CRUISE (Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion) study, a multicenter study IVUS substudy of the Stent Anti-thrombotic Regimen Study, was designed to assess the impact of IVUS on stent deployment in the high-pressure era. Nine centers were prospectively assigned to stent deployment with the use of ultrasound guidance and 7 centers to angiographic guidance alone with documentary (blinded) IVUS at the conclusion of the procedure. A total of 525 patients were enrolled with completed quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative coronary ultrasound, and clinical events adjudicated at 9 months for 499 patients. The IVUS-guided group had a larger minimal lumen diameter (2.9+/-0.4 versus 2.7+/-0. 5 mm, P<0.001) by quantitative coronary angiography and a larger minimal stent area (7.78+/-1.72 versus 7.06+/-2.13 mm(2), P<0.001) by quantitative coronary ultrasound. Target vessel revascularization, defined as clinically driven repeat interventional or surgical therapy of the index vessel at 9 month-follow-up, occurred significantly less frequently in the IVUS-guided group (8.5% versus 15.3%, P<0.05; relative reduction of 44%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ultrasound guidance of stent implantation may result in more effective stent expansion compared with angiographic guidance alone.

Usefulness of stent length in predicting in-stent restenosis (the MULTI-LINK stent trials).

The cumulative experience of 4 clinical trials using the MULTI-LINK coronary stent design was analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression identified postprocedure in-stent minimum lumen diameter (p = 0.0001), stent length (p = 0.0038), smoking (p = 0.0105). and diabetes (p = 0.0803) as the most important predictors of in-stent restenosis at late (6- to 9-month) angiographic follow-up.

Importance of lesion length on new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries. NACI Investigators. New Approaches to Coronary Interventions.

The influence of lesion length on early and late outcomes after new device angioplasty has not been well documented. We reviewed the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 2,980 patients (3,902 lesions) undergoing new device angioplasty of native vessels enrolled in the New Approaches to Coronary Interventions (NACI) Registry. Patients were divided into three groups according to the longest lesion length (< 10, 10-20, and > 20 mm) treated. Patients with the longest lesions had more multivessel disease (56.9% vs. 49.0%, P<0.05), right coronary artery disease (52.7% vs. 32.0%, P<0.001), and total occlusions (19.1% vs. 2.5%, P<0.001) than patients with shorter lesions. Longest lesions had the smallest minimal lumen diameter (P<0.001) at baseline and at the end of the procedure. Although in-hospital events were similar, there were differences in clinical outcomes at 1 year due mainly to more target lesion revascularization in the longest lesion group (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that each 1-mm increase in lesion length was associated with an increase relative risk of 1.014 (95% CI, 1.004-1.025) for target lesion revascularization at 1 year. We conclude that despite similar early clinical events, patients undergoing new device angioplasty of longer lesions have more target lesion revascularization at 1 year.

Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials.

Despite advances in other aspects of cardiac catheterization, manual or mechanical compression followed by 4 to 8 hours of bed rest remains the mainstay of postprocedural femoral access site management. Suture-mediated closure may prove to be an effective alternative, offering earlier sheath removal and ambulation, and potentially a reduction in hemorrhagic complications. The Suture To Ambulate aNd Discharge trial (STAND I) evaluated the 6Fr Techstar device in 200 patients undergoing diagnostic procedures, with successful hemostasis achieved in 99% of patients (94% with suture closure only) in a median of 13 minutes, and 1% major complications. STAND II randomized 515 patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional procedures to use of the 8Fr or 10Fr Prostar-Plus device versus traditional compression. Successful suture-mediated hemostasis was achieved in 97.6% of patients (91.2% by the device alone) compared with 98.9% of patients with compression (p = NS). Major complication rates were 2.4% and 1.1%, and met the Blackwelder's test for equivalency (p <0.05). Median time to hemostasis (19 vs 243 minutes, p <0.01) and time to ambulation (3.9 vs 14.8 hours, p <0.01) were significantly shorter for suture-mediated closure. Suture-mediated closure of the arterial puncture site thus affords reliable immediate hemostasis and shortens the time to ambulation without significantly increasing the risk of local complications.

Outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction who are ineligible for primary angioplasty trials.

We determined acute outcome in 148 consecutive patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing angioplasty including 72 patients (48.7%) considered ineligible for primary angioplasty trials. Overall, in-hospital mortality for acute infarct angioplasty was 12%, with fivefold higher mortality in the trial-ineligible group (21% vs. 4%, P = 0.003). Thus, primary angioplasty trials continue to exclude nearly 50% of acute infarction patients and reported mortality rates of primary angioplasty trials are likely to be significantly lower than the unselected in-hospital mortality rates. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 49:237-243, 2000.