Technical note: acetabular augmentation with customisable cementless all-polyethylene insert.

Acetabular augmentation is a challenge for complex primary and revision hip surgery. Several methods exist to recreate a supportive, hemispherical acetabulum where a defect exists, however, these can be complex, expensive, time consuming, and limited by available size and shape. We present a simple, inexpensive, quick and customisable method of acetabular augmentation using cementless polyethylene with titanium coating. The first case is presented with follow-up up to 8 years.

Long-term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Fluted Conical Femoral Stem.

BACKGROUND: This study presents minimum 6-year follow-up data on the survival and satisfaction of an uncemented modular revision femoral system, following on from our previously published earlier results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all revision hip arthroplasties performed at our institution between January 2005 and October 2012, using a single modular femoral revision system. Patient-reported outcomes were collected (satisfaction score and Oxford Hip Score). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed for stem subsidence, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for survival. A total of 115 femoral revisions were performed in 106 patients. RESULTS: All-cause survival was 82% (95% confidence interval 74 to 91%) at 10.8 years, and 96% (95% confidence interval 90 to 100%) excluding septic failure. Of the 19 cases requiring reoperation, 16 were for infection, 2 for aseptic loosening, and 1 for mechanical failure. At final follow-up, 88.5% of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied". CONCLUSIONS: This study showed excellent clinical results of a commonly used revision hip stem with at least 10 years follow-up. Satisfaction rates were high, with few aseptic failures. Stem subsidence was more common in revisions for infection, but did not correlate with lower satisfaction scores.

Survivorship and Patient-Reported Outcomes of an Uncemented Vitamin E-Infused Monoblock Acetabular Cup: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Addition of vitamin E to polyethylene is theorized to reduce the potential for oxidative wear in acetabular components. This paper presents a multicenter prospective cohort study that reports on outcomes from use of a Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cup. METHODS: Patients were recruited across nine medical institutions. Clinical outcome measures recorded were the Harris Hip Score, visual analogue score for pain and satisfaction. Evidence of implant loosening or osteolysis was collected radiologically. Cup survival and reasons for revision in relevant cases were also recorded. Data collection was undertaken preoperatively, at 6-12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. A total of 675 patients were recruited, with 450 cases available at final review. Data regarding cup survival was available to 8 years and 9 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Improvements in both the Harris Hip Score and visual analogue score for pain and satisfaction were recorded at all time points, with these being maintained through the length of follow-up. In total, 89% of cups were implanted within the Lewinnek safe zone. A lucent line was identified in one case, with no evidence of acetabular osteolysis observed throughout the follow-up period. Cup survival was 98.9% at 8 years and 9 months. No revisions for aseptic loosening were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a vitamin E-infused polyethylene acetabular cup demonstrates reassuring patient-reported outcomes, radiological measures, and cup survival at medium to long-term follow-up.

Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Revision Hip System.

BACKGROUND: The growth in hip arthroplasty surgery has meant a corresponding escalating revision burden with increasing challenges for the orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to review clinical outcomes of a modular revision hip system within a single institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of modular revision hip system stems performed in our institution between January 2005 and October 2012 giving a potential minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical outcomes data on complications, Oxford Hip Score (OHS, 0-48) and patient satisfaction were collected. Radiographic outcomes including subsidence were assessed. Implant survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: 115 stems in 106 patients were identified. All cause survival was 82% (95%CIs: 73%-89%) at 6.1 years; survival excluding infection being 99% (95%CIs: 93%-100%). There was a low incidence of subsidence (seven stems) and no peri-prosthetic fractures. Primary cause of re-revision in this series was re-infection with only one re-revision for mechanical failure. Median Oxford Hip Score at mean follow up 4.1 years (2-9) was 40 (14-48) and 93% of patients reported being satisfied with their revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This study showed good clinical outcomes and survival using a modular revision stem with low mechanical failure and subsidence. Recurrence of infection remains a challenge in revision surgery.

Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve.

The learning curve for computer navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not well defined. We collected data prospectively on a consultant surgeon's first 50 navigated TKAs. Over the same period, matching data was taken from 50 consecutive cases performed by an expert who has performed over 1000 navigated TKAs. From the first case, the novice navigator was able to achieve the same standard as the expert in terms of post-implant mechanical alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes. Equally, at 6 weeks and one year post-surgery there was no significant difference in the mean Oxford score, mechanical axis and range of movement for the two groups of patients. Operative time was significantly longer for the novice surgeon in the first 20 cases (92 versus 73 min, p < 0.001), but by the final 20 cases there was no difference (72 versus 74 min, p = 0.944). This study shows that the learning curve for navigated TKA is approximately 20 cases and that a beginner can reproduce the results of an expert from the outset.