Retrospective review of medication allergy labeling among patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Qatar.

Background: Timely access to accurate, up-todate drug allergy information is critical to avoid potentially life-threatening adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, the completeness and accuracy of allergy documentation remain a challenge. Inappropriate allergy documentation usually necessitates alternative treatments, increases costs, and may negatively impact patients' outcomes. Objectives: Review medication allergy labeling documentation, identify the most reported medication class, and describe allergic reactions based on the reported severity. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional audit including all medication allergy labeling documentation for patients admitted to Hamad General Hospital (HGH) from January-December 2022 was conducted. A list of patients with medication allergies was generated from the pharmacy system, which included patients' demographics, medication names, documented allergy severity, and any other comments. The list was reviewed, and medications were categorized into different classes. Results: 2856 allergy documentation for 2431 unique patients were identified and included in the analyses. The mean age of included patients was 43 years old, with 73.2% (1780) being females. Among the reported allergic reactions, 11.8% (336) were documented as severe allergic reactions, 51.1% (1457) were moderate, and 37.1% (1060) were mild. Antibiotics were the most common documented allergens, representing 42.1% of all reported allergies, followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (20.7%, n=591), and paracetamol (5.3%, n=151). Of all the reported allergies, only 6 (0.21%) cases had documented confirmatory allergy tests done. Further analysis of the reported allergies revealed that 1.2% (34) of the allergies had documentation to counteract the allergy labeling through either revised patient history or re-challenging. Despite such, allergy labeling was kept in the medical profile without proper de-labeling. Conclusion: Allergy labeling documentation is a key to safe medication prescribing. However, standardized allergy documentation should be implemented to include a brief description and onset of the symptoms. Additionally, a safe de-labeling pathway should be adopted. Most of the allergy documentation was based on patients' or family/parents' reports, while actual allergies observed by a healthcare provider were limited.

Characteristics and outcomes of adult patients with asthma presenting with COVID-19: A comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial asthma affects about 20% of Qatar's population. The impact of asthma on COVID-19 outcomes is controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of asthma on COVID-19 outcomes and the predictors of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in a cohort of asthma patients infected by COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with asthma infected with COVID-19, who were recruited from Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), the main healthcare system in Qatar. Patients were matched to a control group of non-asthmatic COVID-19 patients (1:2) based on sex, age, and other comorbidities. RESULTS: Between March and August 2020, 616 patients with asthma met the inclusion criteria. The need for hospitalization among patients with asthma was independently associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for 10 years, 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.54; p = 0.001) and hypertension (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.43-3.93; p = 0.001) but not with the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting beta2 agonists, montelukast, or tiotropium. Patients with asthma required less hospitalization for COVID-19 than non-asthmatic patients (28.2% vs. 37.3%, respectively; aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.77-0.90; p < 0.001). However, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) was comparable between both groups (3.3% vs. 2.2%; aOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.78-3.43; p = 0.193). No difference in mortality rate was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In Qatar, adult patients with asthma do not appear to be at higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or ICU admission compared to the general adult COVID-19-infected population. Older age and hypertension were the only significant predictors of COVID-19-related hospitalization among patients with asthma. Further larger studies are required to confirm such an association.

EVALUATION OF HYDROCORTISONE, VITAMIN C, AND THIAMINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (THE HYVITS TRIAL).

ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of combined hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine (triple therapy) on the mortality of patients with septic shock. Methods : This multicenter, open-label, two-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted in four intensive care units in Qatar. Adult patients diagnosed with septic shock requiring norepinephrine at a rate of ≥0.1 µg/kg/min for ≥6 h were randomized to a triple therapy group or a control group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality at 60 days or at discharge, whichever occurred first. Secondary outcomes included time to death, change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 h of randomization, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and vasopressor duration. Results: A total of 106 patients (53 in each group) were enrolled in this study. The study was terminated early because of a lack of funding. The median baseline SOFA score was 10 (interquartile range, 8-12). The primary outcomes were similar between the two groups (triple therapy, 28.3% vs. control, 35.8%; P = 0.41). Vasopressor duration among the survivors was similar between the two groups (triple therapy, 50 h vs. control, 58 h; P = 0.44). Other secondary and safety endpoints were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Triple therapy did not improve in-hospital mortality at 60 days in critically ill patients with septic shock or reduce the vasopressor duration or SOFA score at 72 h. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03380507. Registered on December 21, 2017.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dosing Considerations of Novel ß-Lactams and ß-Lactam/ß-Lactamase Inhibitors in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Focus on Obesity, Augmented Renal Clearance, Renal Replacement Therapies, and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: Dose optimization of novel ß-lactam antibiotics (NBLA) has become necessary given the increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections in intensive care units coupled with the limited number of available treatment options. Unfortunately, recommended dose regimens of NBLA based on PK/PD indices are not well-defined for critically ill patients presenting with special situations (i.e., obesity, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), augmented renal clearance (ARC), and renal replacement therapies (RRT)). This review aimed to discuss and summarize the available literature on the PK/PD attained indices of NBLA among critically ill patients with special circumstances. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Embase databases were searched for studies published between January 2011 and May 2022. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles relevant to NBLA (i.e., ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, ceftobiprole, imipenem/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam) were selected. The MeSH terms of "obesity", "augmented renal clearance", "renal replacement therapy", "extracorporeal membrane oxygenation", "pharmacokinetic", "pharmacodynamic" "critically ill", and "intensive care" were used for identification of articles. The search was limited to adult humans' studies that were published in English. A narrative synthesis of included studies was then conducted accordingly. DATA SYNTHESIS: Available evidence surrounding the use of NBLA among critically ill patients presenting with special situations was limited by the small sample size of the included studies coupled with high heterogeneity. The PK/PD target attainments of NBLA were reported to be minimally affected by obesity and/or ECMO, whereas the effect of renal functionality (in the form of either ARC or RRT) was more substantial. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients presenting with special circumstances might be at risk of altered NBLA pharmacokinetics, particularly in the settings of ARC and RRT. More robust, well-designed trials are still required to define effective dose regimens able to attain therapeutic PK/PD indices of NBLA when utilized in those special scenarios, and thus aid in improving the patients' outcomes.

Labeling of penicillin allergy in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Qatar: A retrospective audit.

BACKGROUND: Penicillin (PNC) allergy is a major healthcare concern that necessitates antibiotic substitution which is associated with increased costs, worse clinical outcomes, and increased risks of antimicrobial resistance. Many patients are labeled as PNC allergic; however, this has been rarely confirmed. In this audit, we aimed to determine the characteristics of PNC allergy labeling. METHODS: A list of all the patients labeled with PNC allergy who presented to the Hamad General Hospital (HGH) for any medical reason from January to December 2021 was generated from pharmacy system. Of those, 30% were randomly selected for audit review. Electronic health records of the selected patients were retrospectively reviewed to identify the allergy labeling characteristics and whether the patients had recently received an antibiotic within the PNC class without developing any allergic reaction. RESULTS: Of the 464 patients identified with labelled PNC allergy, 139 patients were randomly selected and reviewed. Of the reviewed patients, 82 (59%) were women with an average ( ± SD) age of 46 ( ± 16.5) years. Forty-six patients were categorized to have a mild PNC allergy, and only 18 were categorized as severe with the remaining patients categorized as having a moderate PNC allergy. Despite documentation of severity, an accurate description of the allergic reaction event was significantly lacking with only 30/139 (21.5%) patients having clear documentation of the event description. Twenty (14.4%) patients labeled as PNC allergic received at least one antibiotic within the PNC class (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam, ampicillin-sulbactam, or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) safely without any documented reactions. Interestingly, of those 20 patients, 4 were categorized as being severely allergic to PNC. However, as more than 80 patients presented to the hospital for reasons not requiring antibiotics; experiences with PNC could not be assessed effectively. CONCLUSION: Poor documentation of the details of allergic reactions may falsely affect future antibiotic decisions. The results of this audit highlight the need for standardizing the documentation process of medication allergy. In addition, reviewing the patient's experience with other drugs within the PNC class can guide healthcare providers during the PNC allergy evaluation.

Thrombocytopenia Associated With Teicoplanin Use: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Contradictory studies reporting vast heterogeneity in the teicoplanin-induced thrombocytopenia (TIT) incidence exist. OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence of TIT associated with teicoplanin dosing range (6-12 mg/kg/dose) and the risk factors of TIT. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients who received teicoplanin for ≥3 consecutive days over a period of 3.5 years. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of <100 × 103/µL coupled with at least a 25% drop from the baseline count. The TIT incidence was assessed using the adverse drug reaction probability scale (Naranjo scale). RESULTS: Data from 482 patients who received teicoplanin and met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the analyses. The cohort presented a mean age of 53.5 ± 19 years, where 72.4% were male, and 49.2% exhibited normal baseline renal function. Teicoplanin was most commonly used for bacteremia (n = 134), and the most common isolated pathogen being Staphylococcus aureus (n = 221). The TIT incidence was 4.6% (the possible and probable category using the Naranjo scale; 22/482). The median time to first platelet count dropped to <100 × 103/µL after teicoplanin initiation was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-10) days and 8 (IQR, 5-14) days till the maximum platelet count dropped. None of the tested patient variables were found to be independently associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The overall TIT incidence was low across our study cohort, including critically ill patients. Our study results may aid in the optimal monitoring of such serious teicoplanin-induced adverse effects.

Propofol Safety in Anticoagulated and Nonanticoagulated Patients During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Sedation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO) is a common challenge encountered by treating intensivists. Data about the safety of propofol use during ECMO has been contradictory. We aimed to investigate associated risks of propofol use on oxygenator lifespan and to explore the effect of propofol use on oxygenator membranes when therapeutic anticoagulation was omitted. Adult respiratory ECMO patients who received propofol were retrospectively compared with those who did not, and outcomes were assessed by means of duration of oxygenator functionality before requiring an exchange, and number of exchanges during propofol use and/or ECMO support. Out of the 63patients included in the analysis, 46%received propofol during ECMO as part of sedation regimen. The use of propofol was not found to be associated with an increased incidence of oxygenator failure when compared with cohorts who did not receive propofol (21% propofol arm vs. 6% control, p = 0.13). When analyzed for anticoagulation omission effects, propofol did not increase the risk of oxygenator failure (p = 0.63). The only predictor that statistically predicted the risk of oxygenator failure was development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) during ECMO. The results of this study further support the previously reported safety of propofol utilization during respiratory ECMO even in the absence of anticoagulation.

Convalescent plasma for the treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019: A preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: The role of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively compared outcomes in a cohort of critical COVID-19 patients who received standard care (SC Group) and those who, in addition, received convalescent plasma (CP Group). RESULTS: In total, 40 patients were included in each group. The median patient age was 53.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 42-60.5), and the majority of patients required invasive ventilation (69, 86.2%). Plasma was harvested from donors after a median of 37 days (IQR 31-46) from the first positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result and 26 days (IQR 21-32) after documented viral clearance; it was administered after a median of 10 days (IQR 9-10) from the onset of symptoms and 2.5 days (IQR 2-4) from admission to intensive care unit. The primary endpoint of improvement in respiratory support status within 28 days was achieved in 26 patients (65%) in the SC Group and 31 patients (77.5%) in the CP Group (p = .32). The 28-day all-cause mortality (12.5% vs. 2.5%; p = .22) and viral clearance (65% vs. 55%; p = .49) were not significantly different between the two groups. Convalescent plasma was not significantly associated with the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.49; p = .62). Adverse events were balanced between the two study groups. CONCLUSION: In severe COVID-19, convalescent plasma therapy was not associated with clinical benefits. Randomized trials are required to confirm our findings.

The first consecutive 5000 patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 from Qatar; a nation-wide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes at a national level, and none after 60 days of follow up. The aim of this study was to describe national, 60-day all-cause mortality associated with COVID-19, and to identify risk factors associated with admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including the first consecutive 5000 patients with COVID-19 in Qatar who completed 60 days of follow up by June 17, 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 60 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. In addition, we explored risk factors for admission to ICU. RESULTS: Included patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 28 and April 17, 2020. The majority (4436, 88.7%) were males and the median age was 35 years [interquartile range (IQR) 28-43]. By 60 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 14 patients (0.28%) had died, 10 (0.2%) were still in hospital, and two (0.04%) were still in ICU. Fatal COVID-19 cases had a median age of 59.5 years (IQR 55.8-68), and were mostly males (13, 92.9%). All included pregnant women (26, 0.5%), children (131, 2.6%), and healthcare workers (135, 2.7%) were alive and not hospitalized at the end of follow up. A total of 1424 patients (28.5%) required hospitalization, out of which 108 (7.6%) were admitted to ICU. Most frequent co-morbidities in hospitalized adults were diabetes (23.2%), and hypertension (20.7%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that older age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.041, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.022-1.061 per year increase; P < 0.001], male sex (aOR 4.375, 95% CI 1.964-9.744; P < 0.001), diabetes (aOR 1.698, 95% CI 1.050-2.746; P 0.031), chronic kidney disease (aOR 3.590, 95% CI 1.596-8.079, P 0.002), and higher BMI (aOR 1.067, 95% CI 1.027-1.108 per unit increase; P 0.001), were all independently associated with increased risk of ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: In a relatively younger national cohort with a low co-morbidity burden, COVID-19 was associated with low all-cause mortality. Independent risk factors for ICU admission included older age, male sex, higher BMI, and co-existing diabetes or chronic kidney disease.

Hospital pharmacists' self-evaluation of their competence and confidence in conducting pharmacy practice research.

OBJECTIVES: Research is essential to the advancement of pharmacy practice and healthcare. Pharmacists have a pivotal role to play in this strategy. However, there is a paucity of data about hospital pharmacists' competence and ability in conducting health-related research. This study primarily aims to determine the research demographics of hospital pharmacists in Qatar and to assess the pharmacists' perceptions of their competence and confidence to conduct research. METHODS: A multi-centered survey using a 70-item piloted questionnaire was conducted among a randomly selected sample of pharmacists practicing at seven Hamad Medical Corporation-managed hospitals. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were applied using IBM-SPSS® version 20. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 120 participants responded to the survey (67% response rate). About 70% of the participants did not have any previous research experience. At least 20% of the respondents self-reported inadequate competence and/or confidence in developing research protocols, critically appraising the literature, undertaking and applying appropriate statistical techniques, and interpreting research findings. The level of education along with the current hospital of practice had significant effects on pharmacists' self-assessed competence (p < 0.05). Overall, 85% of the participants were interested in pursuing postgraduate studies or research-related training. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of hospital pharmacists in Qatar self-assessed themselves as having deficiencies in several domains of research process or competencies, although they recognized the value of research in advancing pharmacy practice. These findings have important implications for developing informal research training programs and promoting the pursuit of formal postgraduate programs to bridge the knowledge gaps found among hospital-practicing pharmacists.