Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 40(2): 128-136, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35750320

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a scoring system-called the Sepsis-Associated Adverse Outcomes in Pregnancy (SAAP) Score-to identify individuals with maternal infection that have composite maternal adverse outcomes (CMAO). STUDY DESIGN: Using the International Classification of Disease codes, we identified pregnant and postpartum (up to 6 weeks after birth) individuals admitted at our center with a primary diagnosis of infection. The primary outcome was CMAO which included any of the following: maternal intensive care unit admission, surgical intervention, vasopressor use, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary edema, mechanical ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, disseminated intravascular coagulation, dialysis, organ failure, venous thromboembolism, or maternal death. Regularized logistic regression was used to identify variables that best discriminate CMAO status. Variables were chosen for inclusion following evaluation of statistical and clinical significance. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. RESULTS: Of the 23,235 deliveries during the study period, 227 (0.9%) individuals met inclusion criteria and among them CMAO occurred in 39.2% (95% CI: 33.1-45.7%). The SAAP score consisted of six variables (white blood cell count, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, lactic acid, and abnormal diagnostic imaging) with scores ranging from 0 to 11 and a score of ≥7 being abnormal. An abnormal SAAP score had an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86) for CMAO. The sensitivity and specificity of the SAAP score for CMAO was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.80), respectively. The positive predictive value was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.72) and negative predictive value was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86). CONCLUSION: Pending external validation, the sixth variable SAAP score may permit early recognition of pregnant and postpartum individuals with infection who are likely to develop adverse maternal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Sepsis is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.. · Early recognition improves maternal sepsis outcomes.. · The SAAP score may permit early recognition of maternal adverse outcomes due to infection..


Assuntos
Pré-Eclâmpsia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Sepse , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Sepse/diagnóstico
2.
J Clin Densitom ; 21(2): 185-192, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102474

RESUMO

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a texture parameter that measures the grayscale variation within dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, and has been shown to significantly correlate with the 3-dimensional bone microarchitecture. The objective of this study was to determine whether TBS is a better clinical tool than traditionally used bone mineral density (BMD) to detect the skeletal deterioration seen in patients with diabetes (DM), patients undergoing oral glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, and patients who are both diabetic and taking steroids (GC + DM). We performed retrospective, cross-sectional study using DXA images of patients who visited UTHealth Department of Internal Medicine DXA clinic in Houston, TX, from May 30, 2014 to May 30, 2016. A total of 477 men and women, who were 55 years or older, were included in the study. Lumbar spine (LS) BMD and TBS were collected. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect clinical information for each patient. When both men and women were analyzed as a single group, LS-BMD was significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the control group (1.14 vs 1.10, p = 0.038), whereas mean TBS of L1-L4 was significantly lower in the diabetic group (1.21 vs 1.26, p = 0.004). LS-TBS was also significantly lower in diabetic women than in nondiabetic women (1.20 vs 1.26, p = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve indicated that LS-TBS provided better ability than LS-BMD to discriminate between control subjects and those in the DM, GC, or GC + DM groups (areas under the curve between 0.645 and 0.697, p < 0.010 for all). LS-TBS is a BMD-independent parameter that is capable of capturing a larger portion of bone quality deterioration undetected by BMD alone in patients with DM and undergoing oral GC therapy.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Osso Esponjoso/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Administração Oral , Osso Esponjoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico por imagem , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico por imagem , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...