Shelter dogs, university employees, and lunchtime walks: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Workplace walking interventions can lead to positive physical and psychological outcomes for employees. For optimal success, however, innovative approaches that appeal to employees are needed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the physical activity levels and experiences of university staff members who walked shelter dogs during their lunch breaks. METHOD: Participants walked with a dog and a partner for 30 minutes during their lunch break one day a week for four weeks. Accelerometer data was collected during participant walks and interviews conducted post-intervention. RESULTS: Quantitative results indicated that participants averaged 24.9±7.4 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (range 12- 37 min) during the walk. Qualitative findings suggested that the incorporation of shelter dogs into a walking intervention encouraged participants to take part in the study and continue each week. CONCLUSIONS: Both the quantitative and qualitative data from this pilot study support the notion that including shelter dogs into a university-based walking program encouraged physical activity engagement and adherence.

A Phase I/II Study of Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and Fluorouracil (D-FOX) Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Locally Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase III study established docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) as one of the standard treatments for patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, DCF use is limited due toxicity. With the purpose to evaluate a less toxic regimen, we conducted a single arm, phase I/II trial of modified DCF (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and docetaxel [D-FOX]) for untreated AGC patients. The primary objective of the phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel and for the phase II study was to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled a total of 98 patients with AGC. Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered intravenously on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil was infused starting on day 1 over 48 hours. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks and patients were monitored for toxicities. Kaplan-Meir curve was used to estimate unadjusted OS and PFS. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel was 50 mg/m. In total, 24 (45%) patients experienced grade 2 adverse events, 22 (41%) experienced grade 3, and 1 (1.9%) experienced grade 4 toxicity. The median PFS in the phase II portion of the study was approximately 6.5 (95% confidence interval, 5.5-9.5) months and the median OS was 11.1 (95% confidence interval, 9.4-18.8) months. CONCLUSIONS: D-FOX administered every 2 weeks is a well-tolerated and active regimen in untreated AGC patients.

Phase I Dose-Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Intravenous Aflibercept in Combination with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies.

PURPOSE: This phase I study (EudraCT No. 2006-001177-25) investigated aflibercept, a vascular endothelial growth factor decoy receptor protein (VEGF Trap), in combination with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 2, 4, or 6 mg/kg of intravenous aflibercept with docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 in 3-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1 and to determine the recommended phase II dose. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and antitumor activity were also investigated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled and treated (29 patients in a dose-escalation phase and 15 patients in an expansion cohort). Following three cases of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving aflibercept at 4 mg/kg, the protocol was amended to allow earlier granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (from day 6) and prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Subsequently, there were two DLTs: febrile neutropenia (2 mg/kg) and grade 4 pulmonary embolism (6 mg/kg). An excess of free over VEGF-bound aflibercept was observed at 6 mg/kg. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (54.5%), lymphopenia (47.7%), and stomatitis (38.6%). AEs associated with VEGF blockade (any grade) included epistaxis (61.4%), dysphonia (40.9%), hypertension (38.6%), and proteinuria (11.4%). There were 15 partial responses, including 9 in patients with gastroesophageal cancers. Thirteen patients had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Aflibercept 6 mg/kg administered every 3 weeks in combination with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5- fluorouracil is the recommended dose for further clinical development based on tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity.

Docetaxel-related side effects and their management.

Docetaxel is an effective treatment approved in five key cancers, but its effectiveness in clinical practice can be compromised by sub-optimal side-effect management. The aim of this review was to investigate the extent of the published work on specific docetaxel-related side effects and to provide, where possible, evidence-based recommendations for their prevention and management. PubMed and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were systematically searched for articles published in English over the past 5 years and 2 years, respectively, and pertaining to six side effects identified as being common to the majority of docetaxel regimens and indications and of particular relevance to the oncology nurse. The Cochrane library was also searched. A total of 103 citations were identified, 14 of which discussed strategies for the prevention or management of febrile neutropenia (n=6), hypersensitivity reactions (3), fluid retention (1) and nail changes (4). No articles were identified that related to asthenia or neuropathy. Based on the literature review, evidence/guidelines-based advice for the use of G-CSF in febrile neutropenia is provided. The evidence base with respect to the other side effects does not permit the formulation of recommendations. It is the experience of the authors, however, that the severity of symptoms experienced by patients is generally mild and the side effects are for the most part easily managed with prophylactic and supportive care measures. It is, therefore, important to share and build on experiences, through research and discussion, to maximise the healthcare professional's ability to offer the best standard of care to patients.

Docetaxel-related side effects and their management.

Docetaxel is an effective treatment approved in five key cancers, but its effectiveness in clinical practice can be compromised by sub-optimal side-effect management. The aim of this review was to investigate the extent of the published work on specific docetaxel-related side effects and to provide, where possible, evidence-based recommendations for their prevention and management. PubMed and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were systematically searched for articles published in English over the past 5 and 2 years, respectively, and pertaining to six side effects identified as being common to the majority of docetaxel regimens and indications of particular relevance to the oncology nurse. The Cochrane library was also searched. A total of 103 citations were identified, 14 of which discussed strategies for the prevention or management of febrile neutropenia (n=6), hypersensitivity reactions (3), fluid retention (1) and nail changes (4). No articles were identified that related to asthenia or neuropathy. Based on the literature review, evidence/guidelines-based advice for the use of G-CSF in febrile neutropenia is provided. The evidence base with respect to the other side effects does not permit the formulation of recommendations. It is the experience of the authors, however, that the severity of symptoms experienced by patients is generally mild and the side effects are for the most part easily managed with prophylactic and supportive care measures. It is therefore important to share and build on experiences, through research and discussion, to maximise the healthcare professional's ability to offer the best standard of care to patients.

The impact on survival of thromboembolic phenomena occurring before and during protocol chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events (TEEs) are considered common in patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma, but their frequency at baseline and during chemotherapy is not known. Because prophylactic anticoagulation results in improved overall survival (OS) of solid tumor patients, the authors hypothesized that TEEs at baseline and during chemotherapy would have an adverse effect on OS. METHODS: The authors analyzed patients with advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma who were treated on 4 prospective chemotherapy Phase II/III trials. Baseline and subsequent TEEs were documented and correlated with OS. RESULTS: On the 4 trials, 191 patients received single-agent or a combination of a taxane, camptothecin, platinum, or fluoropyrimidine. At baseline, TEEs occurred in 5.3% of untreated patients compared with 8.5% of previously treated patients (who had received prior treatment for metastatic disease). The median OS was only 3.9 months for patients who had a TEE at any time versus 8.7 months for patients who never developed a TEE (P = .007). TEEs at baseline were correlated with poor median OS in untreated patients (4.9 months vs 8.9 months for patients without a TEE; P = .014). There was no associated between TEEs and the type of chemotherapy used. CONCLUSIONS: The current results established that TEEs at baseline and/or during chemotherapy are frequent and result in poor OS for patients with advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma. Aggressive methods to treat or prevent TEEs are warranted.

Impact of induction chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy on operative morbidity and mortality in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Significant tumor downstaging has been achieved in patients with localized gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma by induction chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX-CTXRT). However, the influence of CTX-CTXRT on operative morbidity and mortality has not yet been clarified. The aim of the present study was to document the frequency and nature of morbidity and mortality after surgery combined with CTX-CTXRT, and identify factors predictive of postoperative complications in patients with localized gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A prospectively collected database on 71 consecutive patients who underwent CTX-CTXRT at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1997 and August 2004 was reviewed. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were investigated, and risk factors for overall complications were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 38.0% (27 patients) and 2.8% (2 patients), respectively. Age greater than 60 years [relative risk 11.3 (95% confidence interval 2.50-50.6)] and body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m(2) or above [relative risk 4.08 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 15.4)] were significant risk factors for overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: CTX-CTXRT can be performed safely with an acceptable operative morbidity and a low operative mortality rate in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer, with careful consideration of added risk associated with age and obesity.

An open-label, multinational, multicenter study of G17DT vaccination combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with untreated, advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer: the GC4 study.

BACKGROUND: Gastrin hormone is trophic to in vitro gastric cancer, and the antigastrin antibodies (AGAs) are antiproliferative and antimetastatic. Human gastric cancers overexpress gastrin genes and receptors that react to gastrin's trophic effects. Immunogen G17DT elicits a specific and high-affinity AGA. The authors evaluated G17DT vaccination given with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for the treatment gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In this multicenter, Phase II study, patients received G17DT vaccination intramuscularly on Weeks 1, 5, 9 and 25 and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil every 28 days. Eligible patients had untreated, metastatic, or unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with near-normal organ function. The primary endpoint of the study was the over response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety, and the impact of successful vaccination on patient outcome. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were enrolled in 5 countries. Seven patients who were overdosed inadvertently with 5-fluorouracil (a major protocol violation) were removed from the analysis. The confirmed ORR was 30% in 79 patients who were evaluated for response. The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 5.4 months, and the median survival (MS) was 9.0 months (n = 96 patients). Sixty-five of 94 patients who were vaccinated (69%) had 2 consecutive AGA titers of > or =1 units (successfully vaccinated patients or immune-responders). The TTP was longer in immune-responders than in immune-nonresponders (P = .0005). Similarly, the MS was longer in immune-responders than in immune-nonresponders (10.3 months vs. 3.8 months; P < or =.0001). In a multivariate analysis, successful vaccination was an independent OS prognosticator (P = .0001). G17DT did not have an adverse effect on safety. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that successful G17DT vaccination was correlated with longer TTP and MS. AGA response was an independent OS prognosticator. A Phase III evaluation of G17DT in gastric cancer is warranted.

Irinotecan/cisplatin in advanced, treated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

We conducted a phase II study to assess the response rate and toxicity profile of the irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) plus cisplatin combination administered weekly to patients with at least one previous chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Patients with histologic proof of adenocarcinoma of the stomach orgastroesophageal junction with adequate liver, kidney, and bone marrow functions were treated with 50 mg/m2 of irinotecan plus 30 mg/m2 of cisplatin, both administered intravenously 1 day a week for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week recovery period. Response rate, time to disease progression, survival, and toxic effects were analyzed. Of 32 registered patients, 29 were assessable. Nine patients (31%) achieved a partial response. Median time to disease progression was 7 weeks (range: 5-48+ weeks) and median survival time was 5 months (range: 2.5-31 months). There were no treatment-related deaths. Major toxic effects included diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. Of 260 doses administered in 65 6-week courses, 46 doses were either delayed or missed. Most delayed or missed doses occurred in the third or fourth week of the cycle. We concluded that the combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is an active second-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma in whom one previous chemotherapy has failed. Modifications in doses and schedule are warranted to increase the tolerability of the regimen. Phase III trials are necessary to establish the clinical utility of irinotecan/cisplatin in these patient populations.

CPT-11 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced, untreated gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma: results of a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This Phase II study assessed the response rate and toxicity profile of the combination CPT-11 and cisplatin administered weekly to patients with untreated, advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or the gastroesophageal junction. METHODS: Patients with histologic proof of adenocarcinoma of the stomach or the gastroesophageal junction with adequate liver, kidney, and bone marrow functions were treated with 65 mg/m(2) CPT-11 plus 30 mg/m(2) cisplatin, both administered intravenously 1 day per week for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a recovery period of 2 consecutive weeks. The response rate, time to disease progression, survival, and toxic effects were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 38 registered patients (95%) were assessable. The median number of 6-week cycles per patient was 2.5 (range, 1-7 6-week cycles). Four patients (11%) achieved a complete response, and 17 patients (47%) had a partial response for an overall response rate of 58%. The median time to progression of carcinoma was 24 weeks, and the median survival was 9 months (range, 1-23+ months). There was one treatment-related death. Major toxic effects included diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. Ninety percent of all planned doses were delivered on time; however, 53 of 79 canceled or delayed weekly doses (66%) occurred in the third or fourth week of the therapy cycle. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin is active against gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and needs to be studied further. A modification in doses and schedules may be warranted to make the regimen more tolerable to patients. The addition of other active drugs or radiation therapy to this regimen would be of interest.