Safety and Efficacy of Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite for the Treatment of Cellulite Dimpling on the Buttocks: Results from an Open-Label, Investigator-Initiated, Single-Center, Prospective Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND: Cellulite is a condition characterized by dimpling and contour irregularities in the gluteal and thigh regions, affecting an estimated 80-98% of postpubertal women. Innovative treatments for cellulite dimpling in the buttocks have gained popularity in recent years, seeking new solutions for a historically challenging condition. In this open-label, investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective clinical study, the authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of diluted calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA; Radiesse®, Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) for the treatment of cellulite dimpling in the buttocks of adult women. METHODS: Subjects underwent three treatment sessions, receiving a total of 12 syringes of 1:1 diluted CaHA administered using a cannula-based subcision technique. Endpoints included the cellulite severity scale (CSS), the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS), subject satisfaction measured on a 5-point scale, and three-dimensional imaging analysis via the Quantificare 3D Track®. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects completed the study (mean age, 35 years; mean BMI, 26.88 kg/m2; mean body fat percentage, 31.29%), and no serious complications were reported. Quantitative analysis at week 14 revealed a mean reduction of 54.0% in the number of visible dimples and 50.09% in dimple depth compared to baseline. The mean CSS score decreased by 4.29 points, representing a 43.92% improvement in cellulite severity from baseline (p < 0.0001). Both physician-assessed and subject-assessed GAIS ratings also demonstrated significant improvement, with 91.6% of subjects rating their cellulite appearance as "improved" or greater. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the safety and efficacy of diluted CaHA for treating cellulite dimpling in adult women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 . CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT05885035) and can be found at this link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05885035 .

Artificial Intelligence Versus Expert Plastic Surgeon: Comparative Study Shows ChatGPT "Wins" Rhinoplasty Consultations: Should We Be Worried?

Introduction: Large language models, such as ChatGPT, hold tremendous promise to bridge gaps in patient education and enhance the decision-making resources available online for patients seeking nasal surgery. Objective: To compare the performance of ChatGPT in answering preoperative and postoperative patient questions related to septorhinoplasty. Methods: Two sets of responses were collected for the questions: one from an expert rhinoplasty surgeon with over two decades of experience, and the other from ChatGPT-3.5. Seven expert rhinoplasty surgeons, blinded to the source of responses, independently assessed the responses using a 5-point Likert scale in four performance areas: empathy, accuracy, completeness, and overall quality. Results: ChatGPT outperformed physician responses in three of the four performance areas, earning significantly higher ratings in accuracy, completeness, and overall quality (p < 0.001). In addition, ChatGPT was overwhelmingly preferred over physician responses (p < 0.001), with evaluators favoring ChatGPT in 80.95% of instances. Conclusions: ChatGPT has demonstrated its remarkable ability to deliver accurate, complete, and high-quality responses to preoperative and postoperative patient questions. Although certain improvements are warranted, this artificial intelligence tool has shown its potential to effectively counsel and educate prospective septorhinoplasty patients at a level comparable with or exceeding that of an expert surgeon.

Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Gluteal Augmentation found to be Safe and Effective in Retrospective Clinical Review of 60 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a well-established biostimulator that induces neocollagenesis, allowing for volume loss correction. Although PLLA is FDA approved to treat mid-to-lower facial wrinkling, it has grown increasingly popular as a nonsurgical, minimally invasive procedure for soft-tissue volume augmentation of other extremities. However, research detailing PLLA buttock injections is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of PLLA for buttock augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical retrospective review of 60 patients (ages 23-54 years) were followed for 2 years by 2 investigators. Patients underwent 1 to 3 treatments, spaced 4 to 6 weeks apart, and received 2 to 12 vials per session (based on the patient budget). Pretreatment and post-treatment photographs were assessed by the primary and secondary investigator in blinded and double-blinded surveys, respectively. The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale was used to quantify improvements in volume, skin texture, and cellulite dimpling. RESULTS: Poly-L-lactic acid allows for visible volume amplification, improved skin texture, and softened cellulite dimpling in the buttocks when at least 20 vials are used. CONCLUSION: Poly-L-lactic acid is safe and effective for overall aesthetic enhancement of the buttocks if used in adequate quantity (minimum 20 vials) for all women, independent of age or the number of sessions.