Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 273(4): 905-9, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26006724

RESUMO

There are numerous surgical approaches for oro-antral-fistula (OAF) closure. Secondary sinus disease is still considered by many experts a relative contra indication for primary closure. To describe a single-stage combined endoscopic sinus surgery and per-oral buccal fat pad (BFP) flap approach for large OAF causing chronic maxillary sinusitis. The records of all the patients with OAF and chronic manifestations of secondary rhinosinusitis that were treated between 2010 and 2013 in our tertiary care medical center were reviewed. The exclusion criteria were: OAF ≤ 5 mm, resolved sino-nasal disease, OAF secondary to malignancy, recurrent fistula, medical history that included radiotherapy to the maxillary bone and age <18 years. Each procedure was performed by a team consisting of a rhinologist and a maxillofacial surgeon. The surgical approach included an endoscopic middle antrostomy with maxillary sinus drainage, and a per-oral BFP regional flap for OAF closure. Total OAF closure, complications and need for revision surgeries. Forty-five patients that underwent OAF closure together with sinus surgery using a combined endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and BFP flap approach met the inclusion criteria. There were 28 males and 17 females with a mean ± SD age of 53.5 ± 14.9 years (range 22-80 years). The presenting signs and symptoms included purulent rhinorrhea (n = 22, 48.9 %), foreign body in sinus (n = 10, 22.2 %) nasal congestion (n = 7, 15.5 %), halitosis (n = 6, 13.3 %) and pain (n = 5, 12.2 %). Surgical complications included local pain (n = 2, 4.4 %), persistent rhinitis (n = 2, 4.4 %) and synechia (n = 1, 2.2 %). One patient required revision surgery due to an unresolved OAF. The OAF of all the other 44 patients (97.8 %) was closed after the first procedure and the paranasal sinuses on the treated side were completely recovered. The mean follow-up time for the group was 7.6 ± 4.3 months (7-21 months), and no untoward sequelae or recurrence were reported. Combined, one step, endoscopic Maxillary sinus drainage together with per-oral BFP flap approach is an efficacious surgical approach for safe closure of OAFs that are complicated with secondary chronic maxillary sinusitis.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Drenagem/métodos , Endoscopia , Sinusite Maxilar , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Fístula Bucoantral , Adulto , Idoso , Bochecha/cirurgia , Doença Crônica , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Endoscopia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Sinusite Maxilar/etiologia , Sinusite Maxilar/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/métodos , Fístula Bucoantral/complicações , Fístula Bucoantral/cirurgia , Recidiva , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 26(12): 1476-81, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25319026

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with combined one-stage double-team maxillary sinus floor elevation (SFE) and endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) procedure for concomitant inflammatory sinonasal pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical records of all patients that underwent maxillary SFE in conjunction with endonasal ESS for the treatment of inflammatory sinonasal pathologies between 2011 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. All included patients had a sinonasal-related pathology that was first suggested by the referring physician and was later confirmed clinically and radiographically by our combined team comprised of otorhinolaryngologist and maxillofacial surgeons. RESULTS: Fifteen combined SFE+ESS surgeries were performed using either xenograft-allograft mixture or autograft-xenograft-allograft mixture. The study group included seven males and eight females, whose median age was 55 years (range, 45-78 years). Seven patients underwent a unilateral SFE, and eight patients underwent bilateral SFEs. During the same session, four patients also underwent septoplasty for deviated nasal septum, five patients underwent bilateral maxillary antrostomy, 10 patients underwent unilateral maxillary antrostomy, and six patients underwent maxillary sinus cyst resection. Seven combined procedures were performed under active infection. There were no intra-operative complications, and all SFE+ESS combined procedures were successful. Three patients required extended postoperative antibiotic treatment for persistent sinusitis. One patient reported infraorbital hypoesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: We first report the promising outcomes of the double-team one-stage SFE+ESS procedure performed by a combined team of otorhinolaryngologist and maxillofacial surgeons, including on patients presenting with an infection of the sinuses at the time of surgery.


Assuntos
Endoscopia/métodos , Sinusite Maxilar/cirurgia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sinusite Maxilar/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...