RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent postmarketing trials produced conflicting results about the risk for hospitalized heart failure (hHF) associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, creating uncertainty about the safety of these antihyperglycemic agents. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of hHF with saxagliptin and sitagliptin. DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective, new-user cohort study. SETTING: 18 health insurance and health system data partners in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel program. PATIENTS: Patients aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes who initiated therapy with saxagliptin, sitagliptin, pioglitazone, second-generation sulfonylureas, or long-acting insulin products from 2006 to 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Hospitalized HF, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 402.x1, 404.x1, 404.x3, and 428.xx recorded as the principal discharge diagnosis. RESULTS: 78 553 saxagliptin users and 298 124 sitagliptin users contributed an average of 7 to 9 months of follow-up data to 1 or more pairwise comparisons. The risk for hHF was not higher with DPP-4 inhibitors than with the other study drugs. The hazard ratios from the disease risk score (DRS)-stratified analyses were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99) for saxagliptin versus sitagliptin, 0.63 (CI, 0.47 to 0.85) for saxagliptin versus pioglitazone, 0.69 (CI, 0.54 to 0.87) for saxagliptin versus sulfonylureas, and 0.61 (CI, 0.50 to 0.73) for saxagliptin versus insulin. The DRS-stratified hazard ratios were 0.74 (CI, 0.64 to 0.85) for sitagliptin versus pioglitazone, 0.86 (CI, 0.77 to 0.95) for sitagliptin versus sulfonylureas, and 0.71 (CI, 0.64 to 0.78) for sitagliptin versus insulin. Results from the 1:1 propensity score-matched analyses were similar. Results were also similar in subgroups of patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease and in a subgroup defined by the 2 highest DRS deciles. LIMITATION: Residual confounding and short follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort study, a higher risk for hHF was not observed in users of saxagliptin or sitagliptin compared with other selected antihyperglycemic agents. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Assuntos
Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Dipeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/efeitos adversos , Adamantano/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pioglitazona , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/efeitos adversos , Tiazolidinedionas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Thorough QT studies conducted according to the International Council on Harmonisation E14 guideline are required for new nonantiarrhythmic drugs to assess the potential to prolong ventricular repolarization. Special considerations may be needed for conducting such studies with antidiabetes drugs as changes in blood glucose and other physiologic parameters affected by antidiabetes drugs may prolong the QT interval and thus confound QT/corrected QT assessments. This review discusses potential mechanisms for QT/corrected QT interval prolongation with antidiabetes drugs and offers practical considerations for assessing antidiabetes drugs in thorough QT studies. This article represents collaborative discussions among key stakeholders from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies participating in the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. It does not represent regulatory policy.
Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/anormalidades , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do QT Longo/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome de Brugada , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Eletrocardiografia , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1 , Inibidores de Glicosídeo Hidrolases , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos , Técnicas de Patch-Clamp , Receptores de Glucagon/agonistas , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/efeitos adversos , Tiazolidinedionas/efeitos adversos , Função VentricularRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A regulatory science priority at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is to promote the development of new innovative tools such as reliable and validated computational (in silico) models. This FDA Critical Path Initiative project involved the development of predictive clinical computational models for decision-support in CDER evaluations of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs. METHODS: Several classification models were built using predictive technologies of quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis using clinical in-house and public data on induction of QT prolongation and torsade de pointes (TdP) in humans. Specific models were geared toward prediction of high-risk drugs with attention to outcomes from thorough QT studies and TdP risk based on clinical in-house data. Models used were independent of non-clinical data or known molecular mechanisms. The positive predictive performance of the in silico models was validated using cross-validation and independent external validation test sets. RESULTS: Optimal performance was observed with high sensitivity (87%) and high specificity (88%) for predicting QT interval prolongation using in-house data, and 77% sensitivity in predicting drugs withdrawn from the market. Furthermore, the article describes alerting substructural features based on drugs tested in the clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The in silico models provide evidence of a structure-based explanation for these cardiac safety endpoints. The models will be made publically available and are under continual prospective external validation testing and updating at CDER using TQT study outcomes.
Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/anormalidades , Torsades de Pointes/terapia , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/métodos , Antiarrítmicos/farmacologia , Síndrome de Brugada , Doença do Sistema de Condução Cardíaco , Biologia Computacional , Simulação por Computador , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Modelos Biológicos , Relação Quantitativa Estrutura-Atividade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
On April 6, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved vandetanib (Caprelsa tablets; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP) for the treatment of symptomatic or progressive medullary thyroid cancer in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease. Vandetanib is the first drug approved for this indication, and this article focuses on the basis of approval. Approval was based on the results of a double-blind trial conducted in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. Patients were randomized 2:1 to vandetanib, 300 mg/d orally (n = 231), or to placebo (n = 100). The primary objective was demonstration of improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with vandetanib compared with placebo. Other endpoints included evaluation of overall survival and objective response rate. The PFS analysis showed a marked improvement for patients randomized to vandetanib (hazard ratio = 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.53; P < 0.0001). The objective response rate for the vandetanib arm was 44% compared with 1% for the placebo arm. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities (>5%) were diarrhea and/or colitis, hypertension and hypertensive crisis, fatigue, hypocalcemia, rash, and corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. This approval was based on a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS. Given the toxicity profile, which includes prolongation of the QT interval and sudden death, only prescribers and pharmacies certified through the vandetanib Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy Program are able to prescribe and dispense vandetanib. Treatment-related risks should be taken into account when considering the use of vandetanib in patients with indolent, asymptomatic, or slowly progressing disease.
Assuntos
Intervalo Livre de Doença , Aprovação de Drogas , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino , Humanos , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
Electrocardiographic monitoring is an integral component of the clinical assessment of cardiac safety of all compounds in development. The International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E14 guideline recommends a dedicated study to evaluate drug-induced effects on cardiac repolarization ("thorough QT/QTc study"). There has been limited published information on QT interval changes secondary to therapeutic proteins; however, in theory, biologic therapies may affect cardiac electrical activity either directly or indirectly. This article summarizes scientific discussions of members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium and includes possible approaches to consider for the clinical evaluation of drug-induced QT prolongation in development programs of therapeutic proteins.