30-day Morbidity and Mortality after Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease (AMBROSE): A Prospective, International Collaborative Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality rates following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease and identify the factors associated with complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although cholecystectomy is common for benign gallbladder disease, there is a gap in the knowledge of the current practice and variations on a global level. METHODS: A prospective, international, observational collaborative cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease from participating hospitals in 57 countries between January 1 and June 30, 2022, was performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify preoperative and operative variables associated with 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Data of 21,706 surgical patients from 57 countries were included in the analysis. A total of 10,821 (49.9%), 4,263 (19.7%), and 6,622 (30.5%) cholecystectomies were performed in the elective, emergency, and delayed settings, respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complications were observed in 1,738 patients (8.0%), including mortality in 83 patients (0.4%). Bile leaks (Strasberg grade A) were reported in 278 (1.3%) patients and severe bile duct injuries (Strasberg grades B-E) were reported in 48 (0.2%) patients. Patient age, ASA physical status class, surgical setting, operative approach and Nassar operative difficulty grade were identified as the five predictors demonstrating the highest relative importance in predicting postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This multinational observational collaborative cohort study presents a comprehensive report of the current practices and outcomes of cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. Ongoing global collaborative evaluations and initiatives are needed to promote quality assurance and improvement in cholecystectomy.

Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): A Systematic Review.

Background and Objectives: The three most widely performed bariatric surgeries are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Aside from the benefits of weight loss, current findings suggest that these procedures can also induce remission of T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus). There are limited data that directly compare these three procedures. This study aims to compare the short-term and long-term remission of T2DM after RYGB, SG, and OAGB. Materials and Methods: Three databases (Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane) were searched for randomised controlled trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies that compared the effects of RYGB, SG, and OAGB on T2DM remission. Studies published between 2001 and 2022 were analysed. Only patients with T2DM and who had primary bariatric surgery were included. Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven articles were included in the review. It was found that all three procedures had comparable T2DM remission. RYGB was noted to have the highest complication rate when compared to SG and OAGB. Importantly, it was noted that other predictive factors such as age, duration of diabetes, baseline HbA1c, BMI, and use of antidiabetic medication play a crucial role in T2DM remission. Conclusions: This systematic literature review confirms the existing data that all three bariatric surgeries induce remission of T2DM. Increasing in popularity, OAGB had comparable outcomes to RYGB and SG in inducing T2DM remission. In addition to the choice of bariatric surgery, there are other independent predictive factors that have an impact on T2DM remission. Further studies with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods, and studies that control confounding factors are required in this field.

Effect of protein supplementation on fat-free mass among upper gastrointestinal surgical patients: A review of compliance.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is minimal data regarding the long-term effects of targeted daily protein intake and its role in nutritional restoration. This study aims to evaluate the effect of protein supplementation among upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgical patients, reviewing the effect on muscle mass and hand grip strength. METHODS: The records of 223 upper GI surgical patients from September 2017 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Protein intake was categorised based on average daily protein intake (0.8g-1.2 g/kg/day vs. more than 1.2 g/kg/day), depending on compliance to the institution target of 1.2g-1.5 g/kg/day. Hand grip strength and body composition including weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), Fat-Free Mass (FFM), and Fat Mass (FM) were measured. Paired t-tests and independent t-tests were used to analyse the effects of different levels of protein intake on hand grip strength and body composition. RESULTS: Among the 223 patients included, 84 subjects had benign upper GI pathology and 139 subjects had malignant upper GI pathology, with mean follow-up duration of 52.3 (SD,42.10) weeks and 39.3 (SD,35.11) respectively. Patients with malignant pathology who consumed more than 1.2 g/kg/day of protein had increased hand-grip strength and preservation of FFM, while those who consumed 0.8g-1.2 g/kg/day of protein had deteriorating hand grip strength and significant FFM reduction (p = 0.004). Patients with benign pathology showed significant improvement in hand-grip strength (p < 0.001) and increase in FFM (p < 0.001) with higher protein intake. CONCLUSION: Protein supplementation is paramount in nutrition recovery and muscle mass restoration among upper gastrointestinal surgical patients. Protein intake of at least 1.2 g/kg/day was especially important among patients with malignancy to preserve muscle mass and strength.