Sex differential mediation effects of planning within the health behavior change process.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research demonstrates that planning mediates the relationship between intention and health behavior change, but evidence is inconclusive, and possible sex differences within the intention-planning-behavior-chain are understudied so far. The current study, therefore, aims to disentangle this by addressing potential sex differences in the mediating role of planning in the health behavior change process. METHOD: Three longitudinal studies were conducted in Germany between 2009 and 2011 (Study 1: 245 women, 216 men; Study 2: 156 women, 37 men; Study 3: 82 women, 84 men). In each study, intention (predictor), planning (mediator), and sex (moderator) were assessed to predict changes in (1) fruit and vegetable intake, (2) physical activity, and (3) sun protection. A moderated mediation model was specified to test whether the conditional direct effect of intention on health behavior change and/or the conditional indirect effect of intention on health behavior change through planning was different for men and women. RESULTS: Similar patterns of sex differential effects emerged within the intention-planning-behavior-chain across all three studies. The conditional indirect effect of intention on health behavior change through planning was meaningful for men but not for women for all three health behaviors. Thus, planning acted as a mediator between intention and health behavior change only for men. CONCLUSION: The study contributes to the understanding of the inconclusive evidence on the role of planning as mediator between intention and health behavior change and sheds some light of possible sex differences that qualify this mediation. The findings suggest that women and men may not similarly benefit from health behavior change modification techniques involving planning strategies. Future theoretical developments and interventions should take this into account.

Social network, autonomy, and adherence correlates of future time perspective in patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Socioemotional selectivity theory proposes that, with more limited future time perspective (FTP), the meaning of individual life goals shifts from instrumental and long-term goals, such as autonomy, to emotionally meaningful and short-term life goals, especially concerning meaningful social relationships. Adverse side effects of cancer therapy may conflict with the realization of emotionally meaningful goals leading to nonadherence. In line with the theoretical assumptions, this study aimed to investigate (a) associations among disease symptoms, physical and cognitive limitations, and FTP and (b) among FTP, family network size, striving for autonomy, and treatment adherence. METHOD: One hundred fifty-seven patients (43-90 years; 75% male) with head and/or neck cancer of a German University Medical Centre completed a questionnaire measuring FTP, age, disease symptoms, physical and cognitive functioning, family network size, and treatment adherence. Autonomy was assessed with a card sort task. RESULTS: A structural equation model yielded an acceptable fit χ2 (28) = 44.41, P = .025, χ2 /df = 1.59, root mean square error of approximation = 0.06 (90% CI = 0.02, 0.09), Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.92, and Comparative Fit Index = 0.96. An increased level of disease symptoms and physical and cognitive limitations was related to a shorter subjective FTP. Furthermore, individuals with a limited FTP reported a smaller family network, a lowered quest for autonomy, and lower treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotheses derived from socioemotional selectivity theory were supported by the data. Longitudinal investigations should follow to corroborate findings and to focus on underlying mechanisms as improving patients FTP may play a crucial role in future disease management programs.