Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Ethics ; 24(1): 47, 2023 07 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37407992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biobanking biospecimens and consent are common practice in paediatric research. We need to explore children and young people's (CYP) knowledge and perspectives around the use of and consent to biobanking. This will ensure meaningful informed consent can be obtained and improve current consent procedures. METHODS: We designed a survey, in co-production with CYP, collecting demographic data, views on biobanking, and consent using three scenarios: 1) prospective consent, 2) deferred consent, and 3) reconsent and assent at age of capacity. The survey was disseminated via the Young Person's Advisory Group North England (YPAGne) and participating CYP's secondary schools. Data were analysed using a qualitative thematic approach by three independent reviewers (including CYP) to identify common themes. Data triangulation occurred independently by a fourth reviewer. RESULTS: One hundred two CYP completed the survey. Most were between 16-18 years (63.7%, N = 65) and female (66.7%, N = 68). 72.3% had no prior knowledge of biobanking (N = 73). Acceptability of prospective consent for biobanking was high (91.2%, N = 93) with common themes: 'altruism', 'potential benefits outweigh individual risk', 'frugality', and '(in)convenience'. Deferred consent was also deemed acceptable in the large majority (84.3%, N = 86), with common themes: 'altruism', 'body integrity' and 'sample frugality'. 76.5% preferred to reconsent when cognitively mature enough to give assent (N = 78), even if parental consent was previously in place. 79.2% wanted to be informed if their biobanked biospecimen is reused (N = 80). CONCLUSION: Prospective and deferred consent acceptability for biobanking is high among CYP in the UK. Altruism, frugality, body integrity, and privacy are the most important themes. Clear communication and justification are paramount to obtain consent. Any CYP with capacity should be part of the consenting procedure, if possible.


Assuntos
Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Estudos Prospectivos , Consentimento dos Pais , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inglaterra
2.
Vox Sang ; 114(3): 189-197, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834556

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the UK, a significant proportion of red cell units is discarded due to the 30-min rule governing out of temperature control. Studies have shown that repeated warming to ambient temperature has little impact on red cell quality or bacterial growth. We aimed to validate extension of the rule to 60 minutes by investigation of repeated same, and different, day exposures on bacterial growth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Red cell units were seeded individually at 100-1000 cfu/ml with Yersinia enterocolitica, Serratia liquefaciens, Pseudomonas putida, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterobacter cloacae and Bacillus cereus. Test units were exposed to 30°C for 30 or 60 min on a single occasion at days 15, 17 and 21, or thrice on day 15 of a 35-day storage period. A 10-fold increase in bacterial counts in tests versus controls maintained in cold storage was considered indicative of significant bacterial proliferation. RESULTS: Exposure of units to 30°C for up to 60 min had no substantial impact on the growth of bacteria and all mesophiles declined steadily in tests and controls. Only P. putida showed a near significant elevation in count on exposure for 60 min at day 35. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of the out of temperature rule for red cells to 60 min will potentially not compromise patient safety, although exposures to ambient temperatures should be minimized. Units returned to storage must not be reissued for at least 6 hours and not be exposed to ambient temperatures on more than three occasions.


Assuntos
Preservação de Sangue/métodos , Criopreservação/métodos , Eritrócitos/microbiologia , Preservação de Sangue/normas , Criopreservação/normas , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pseudomonas putida/patogenicidade , Serratia liquefaciens/patogenicidade , Staphylococcus epidermidis/patogenicidade , Temperatura
3.
Transfusion ; 57(5): 1122-1131, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28425610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of blood components remains a major cause of sepsis in transfusion medicine. Between 2006 and 2010 in the 5 years before the introduction of bacterial screening of platelet (PLT) components by National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), seven cases of PLT component-associated transmission of bacterial infection were recorded for 10 patients, three of which were fatal. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sampling of individual PLT components was undertaken at 36 to 48 hours after donation and tested in the BacT/ALERT system with 8 mL inoculated into each of aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles. Bottles were incubated until the end of the 7-day shelf life and initial reactive bottles were examined for contamination. Bacterial screened time-expired PLTs were tested as in the screen method. RESULTS: From February 2011 to September 2015, a total of 1,239,029 PLT components were screened. Initial-reactive, confirmed-positive, and false-positive rates were 0.37, 0.03, and 0.19%, respectively. False-negative cultures, all with Staphylococcus aureus, occurred on four occasions; three were visually detected before transfusion and one confirmed transmission resulted in patient morbidity. The NHSBT screening protocol effectively reduced the number of clinically adverse transfusion transmissions by 90% in this reporting period, compared to a similar time period before implementation. Delayed testing of 4515 time-expired PLT units after screening revealed no positives. CONCLUSION: The implementation of bacterial screening of PLT components with the NHSBT BacT/ALERT protocol was an effective risk reduction measure and increased the safety of the blood supply.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Plaquetas/microbiologia , Transfusão de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Armazenamento de Sangue/métodos , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Plaquetoferese/normas , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Transfusion ; 54(3 Pt 2): 870-8, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23701338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Culture-based systems are currently the preferred means for bacterial screening of platelet (PLT) concentrates. Alternative bacterial detection techniques based on nucleic acid amplification have also been developed but these have yet to be fully evaluated. In this study we evaluate a novel 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and compare its performance with automated culture. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2050 time-expired, 176 fresh, and 400 initial-reactive PLT packs were tested by real-time PCR using broadly reactive 16S primers and a "universal" probe (TaqMan, Invitrogen). PLTs were also tested using a microbial detection system (BacT/ALERT, bioMérieux) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. RESULTS: Seven of 2050 (0.34%) time-expired PLTs were found repeat reactive by PCR on the initial nucleic acid extract but none of these was confirmed positive on testing frozen second aliquots. BacT/ALERT testing also failed to confirm any time-expired PLTs positive on repeat testing, although 0.24% were reactive on the first test. Three of the 400 "initial-reactive" PLT packs were found by both PCR and BacT/ALERT to be contaminated (Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Streptococcus vestibularis identified) and 14 additional packs were confirmed positive by BacT/ALERT only. In 13 of these cases the contaminating organisms were identified as anaerobic skin or oral commensals and the remaining pack was contaminated with Streptococcus pneumoniae. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the 16S PCR assay is less sensitive than BacT/ALERT and inappropriate for early testing of concentrates. However, rapid PCR assays such as this may be suitable for a strategy of late or prerelease testing.


Assuntos
Azidas/química , Plaquetas/citologia , DNA Ribossômico/química , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...