Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves baseline erectile function: a randomized sham-controlled crossover trial.

Background: Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction is emerging as a promising treatment option. Aim: This randomized sham-controlled crossover trial assessed the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Methods: Thirty-three participants with organic erectile dysfunction were enrolled and randomized to shockwave therapy (n = 17) or sham (n = 16). The sham group was allowed to cross over to receive shockwave therapy after 1 month. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were the changes in Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score and Erection Hardness Score at 1 month following shockwave therapy vs sham, and secondary outcomes were erectile function measurements at 1, 3, and 6 months following shockwave therapy. Results: At 1 month, mean SHIM scores were significantly increased in the shockwave therapy arm as compared with the sham arm (+3.0 vs -0.7, P = .024). Participants at 6 months posttreatment (n = 33) showed a mean increase of 5.5 points vs baseline (P < .001), with 20 (54.6%) having an increase ≥5. Of the 25 men with an initial Erection Hardness Score <3, 68% improved to a score ≥3 at 6 months. When compared with baseline, the entire cohort demonstrated significant increases in erectile function outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Clinical Implications: In this randomized sham-controlled crossover trial, we showed that 54.6% of participants with organic erectile dysfunction met the minimal clinically important difference in SHIM scores after treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this study include a sham-controlled group that crossed over to treatment. Limitations include a modest sample size at a single institution. Conclusions: Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction as compared with sham treatment, which persists even 6 months after treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04434352.

Comparison of microwave ablation and partial nephrectomy for T1a small renal masses.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oncological and renal function outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) in two small renal mass (SRM) tumor size cohorts, <3 cm and 3-4 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included retrospective data from 2009 to 2015 and prospective data since 2015 from a single-institution database. Patient demographics, renal mass characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected. Survival curves and hazard analysis were used to assess oncological outcomes. Changes in eGFR and CKD stage following surgery were used to assess renal function outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 80 PN and 126 MWA patients were analyzed. Median age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of MWA patients were greater than PN for each tumor size cohort. Cumulative progression free survival at 36-months was 91% for MWA and 90% for PN. Preoperative renal function was significantly lower in patients undergoing MWA for both tumor sizes, however there was no significant difference in the postoperative change in renal function between MWA and PN for tumors up to 4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Oncological outcomes and renal preservation were comparable between MWA and PN cohorts for SRMs <3cm and 3-4cm despite the MWA cohort being older and having more comorbidities. Our findings suggest that MWA can be used as a safe and effective alternative to PN for T1a renal tumors up to 4 cm.

Academic Productivity Among Underrepresented Minority and Women Urologists at Academic Institutions.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize academic productivity for underrepresented minorities (URMs) vs non-URMs and by gender in Urology. METHODS: A database was created from 145 Urology residency programs. URM status was determined by origin of name, photo, biography, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Doximity. A PubMed query was performed for publication output. URM status, gender, post-graduate year/years of practice, and Doximity residency rank were factors in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: For residents, the median total publications was 2 [1,5] for URMs and 2 [1,5] for non-URMs (P=.54). The median first/last author publications was 1 [0,2] for URMs and 1 [0,2] for non-URMs (P=.79). The median total publications was 2 [0,4] for women and 2 [1,6] for men (P=.003). The median first/last author publications was 1 [0,2] for women and 1 [0,2] for men (P=.14). For faculty, the median total publications was 12 [3,32] for URMs and 19 [6,45] for non-URMs (P=.0002). The median first/last author publications was 4.5 [1,12] for URMs and 7 [2,20] for non-URM faculty (P=.0002). The median total publications was 11 [5,25] for women and 20 [6,49] for men (P<.0001). The median first/last author publications was 4 [1,11] for women and 8 [2,22] for men (P<.0001). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in total publications and first/last author publications for URMs vs non-URMs. There remained a difference between genders for residents and faculty with total publications but not first/last author publications (P=.002/P=.10 residents, P=.004/P=.07 faculty). CONCLUSION: Academic productivity was not different in URMs and non-URMs for both residents and faculty. Men residents and faculty had more total publications compared to women.

Microwave ablation of the T1a small renal mass: expanding beyond 3 cm.

PURPOSE: To compare the oncological and renal function outcomes for patients receiving microwave ablation (MWA) in tumors < 3 and 3-4 cm. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database identified patients with < 3 or 3-4 cm renal cancers undergoing MWA. Radiographic follow-up occurred at approximately 6 months post-procedure and annually thereafter. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were calculated before and 6-months post-MWA. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor size was evaluated as a prognostic factor using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Predictors for change in eGFR and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage were modeled using linear and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients fit the inclusion criteria. Overall recurrences were 2/62 (3.2%) and 6/64 (9.4%) for < 3 versus 3-4 cm. Both recurrences in the < 3 cm group were local, 4/6 in the 3-4 cm group were local and 2/6 were metastatic without local progression. For < 3 versus 3-4 cm, cumulative LRFS at 36 months was 94.6% versus 91.4%. Tumor size was not a significant prognostic factor for LRFS. Renal function did not change significantly after MWA. Patient comorbidities and RENAL nephrometry score significantly affected change in CKD. CONCLUSION: With comparable oncological outcomes, complication rates, and renal function preservation, MWA is a promising management strategy for renal masses of 3-4 cm in select patients. Our findings suggest that current AUA guidelines, which recommend thermal ablation for tumors < 3 cm, may need review to include T1a tumors for MWA, regardless of size.

Cost-effectiveness analysis: percutaneous microwave ablation vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for small renal masses.

PURPOSE: The majority of newly diagnosed renal tumors are masses < 4 cm in size with treatment options, including active surveillance, partial nephrectomy, and ablative therapies. The cost-effectiveness literature on the management of small renal masses (SRMs) does not account for recent advances in technology and improvements in technical expertise. We aim to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RA-PN) for the treatment of SRMs. METHODS: We created a decision analytic Markov model depicting management of the SRM incorporating costs, health utilities, and probabilities of complications and recurrence as model inputs using TreeAge. A willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 and a lifetime horizon were used. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Percutaneous MWA was the preferred treatment modality. MWA dominated RA-PN, meaning it resulted in more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a lower cost. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed a negative Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), indicating dominance of MWA. The model revealed MWA had a mean cost of $8,507 and 12.51 QALYs. RA-PN had a mean cost of $21,521 and 12.43 QALYs. Relative preference of MWA was robust to sensitivity analysis of all other variables. Patient starting age and cost of RA-PN had the most dramatic impact on ICER. CONCLUSION: MWA is more cost-effective for the treatment of SRM when compared with RA-PN and accounting for complication and recurrence risk.

Food Insecurity and Obesity in US Adolescents: A Population-Based Analysis.

Background: Food insecurity and obesity are significant problems affecting adolescents. There is a paucity of recent data examining this relationship. This study utilizes a recent nationally representative sample of US adolescents to examine the relationship between obesity and food security status, as well as other risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 4777 US adolescents (13-18 years old) was performed using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2007-2016. Prevalence of obesity based on food security status was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine characteristics of adolescents in relationship to obesity. Results: The prevalence of obesity among adolescents from food insecure households was significantly higher compared to those who were not, with a prevalence ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 1.2-1.5, p < 0.0001). Food insecurity was associated with a higher unadjusted rate of obesity, with an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2-1.7, p = 0.0002). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, food insecurity was no longer significantly associated with obesity (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4, p = 0.08). However, other factors such as black race, Hispanic ethnicity, male sex, and households with a monthly income ≤185% of the poverty line were associated with increased odds of obesity. Conclusions: While the prevalence of obesity in adolescents from food insecure households was higher compared to those who were not, no association between the two was found when accounting for other risk factors. Data on independent food-seeking behaviors of adolescents may help clarify this complex relationship in future work.

Perioperative Cost Comparison between Percutaneous Microwave Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Masses.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine and compare the perioperative cost associated with percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RA-PN) for treatment of localized renal masses (LRMs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved LRM database. The database was queried for patients treated with microwave ablation or partial nephrectomy from 2015 to 2020. Allocated costs related to the procedural encounter and related to complications were collected. Allocated cost was calculated using ratio of cost-to-charges cost accounting methodology. Total cost was the sum of medical center cost and physician related cost. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS using Student's t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were identified, of whom 165 underwent percutaneous MWA and 114 underwent RA-PN. All partial nephrectomies were robot-assisted. The mean total cost was $20,536 for RA-PN and $6,470 for percutaneous MWA (p <0.0001). Five patients (3%) who underwent MWA and 7 (6%) who underwent RA-PN experienced complications. Patients who underwent MWA and did not have a major complication had an average medical center cost of $5,174, compared to $8,990 for those with a major complication (p=0.36). Among patients who underwent RA-PN, those who did not have a major complication had an average medical center cost of $15,138, compared to $28,940 for those who did have a major complication (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: MWA demonstrates lower perioperative cost and lower cost of complications than RA-PN for treatment of LRM. Further cost-effectiveness studies for LRM treatment should be performed with this updated cost information.

Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment and Sphincter Misuse Among Men With Artificial Urinary Sphincters.

OBJECTIVES: To define the prevalence of cognitive impairment and sphincter misuse among men who had undergone AUS placement. METHODS: Men who had previously undergone AUS placement from 2004 to 2019 were assessed through comprehensive telephone surveys. The primary survey outcome was cognitive function, assessed via validated Telephone Mini-Mental State Examination. Secondary survey outcomes included rate of AUS misuse, surgical outcomes, and overall device satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences between patients with and without cognitive impairment. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients participated, with a mean age and follow-up of 75 and 7.8 years, respectively. Telephone Mini-Mental State Examination assessment revealed cognitive impairment in 18 (24%) patients, 13 (18%) with mild-moderate and 5 (7%) with severe impairment. Overall, 23 (31%) and 11 (15%) patients reported inconsistent use (not cycling AUS with every void) and device neglect, respectively. Patients with impaired cognition were more likely to report difficulty with AUS use compared to those with normal cognition (39% vs 9%, P= .01). There was no difference seen in rates of revision, rates of retention, or urinary tract infections between cognitive groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed significant rates of cognitive impairment and sphincter misuse among men with AUS. These data suggest a role for long-term follow-up and monitoring for cognitive changes. Prospective study of cognitive decline and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing AUS is warranted.

Publication of Positive Studies in the Urologic Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To assessed rates of positive publications within the urologic literature, comparing the years 2012 and 2017. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All studies published in Journal of Urology, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Urologic Oncology, Journal of Endourology, and Urology in 2012 and 2017 were reviewed. The primary study outcome was proportion of positive studies. Additional article characteristics, including associated citations and subspecialty focus, were recorded and statistical analyses used to assess for differences in negative publication rates based on these variables. RESULTS: A total of 1,796 articles meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed (2012, 959; 2017, 837). The overall proportion of positive studies decreased in comparison of 2012 and 2017. (90%-86%, P =.01). A statistically significant decrease was seen in 2 of 5 journals: Neurourology and Urodynamics (97%-87%, P = .01) and Journal of Endourology (93%-83%, P <.01). There were no significant differences in associated citations for positive vs negative studies in either year. Logistic regression focused on year and journal revealed that studies published in 2017 and Urology were more likely to be negative. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of studies within the urologic literature are positive, with only a small increase in negative study publication comparing 2012 vs 2017. Continued efforts are needed to identify publication bias and promote dissemination of negative research findings.