Sarcopenia and its effects on outcome of lumbar spine surgeries.

PURPOSE: Sarcopenia, defined as progressive impairment of muscle function secondary to loss of skeletal muscle mass, has prevalence of 24-56% in patients > 60 years. Forty-four per cent of elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery are found to be sarcopenic. It is a known risk factor for fall, fractures, disability, increased post-operative morbidity and mortality. If diagnosed pre-operatively, it can help prepare the patient and surgical team to foresee complications and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality. In the present study, we evaluated and correlated sarcopenia with the surgical outcome of operated patients with lumbar spine pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted on 114 patients > 40 years undergoing lumbar spine surgeries, who were studied and followed up for 3 months. They were segregated into 5 groups based on age (40-50 year, 50-60 year, 60-70 year, 70-80 year, and > 80 year) and were assessed separately. Data on demography, grip strength analysis, 30-s chair stand test, Psoas muscle index (calculated on pre-operative MRI), pre- and post-operative ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores at 2 weeks and 3 months, Dindo-Clavien Classification of peri-operative complications, 90-day readmission rates and mortality (if any) were included. Patients were segregated into sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic groups based on the definition and set parameters as per the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). A comparative analysis between these groups was performed. RESULTS: Of 114 patients, there were 18 patients in 40-49 years, 24 in 50-59 years, 33 in 60-69 years, 30 in 70-79 years and 9 in > 80 years age group. Statistically significant difference in peri-operative ODI scores was seen in sarcopenic vs non-sarcopenic patients in all age groups (p < 0.05) except 40-49 years. The results showed that sarcopenic group had higher rate of peri-operative complications, delayed mobilisation, longer stay and mortality compared to non-sarcopenic group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that sarcopenic patients have poor outcome in lumbar spine surgery compared to those without. So, by diagnosing sarcopenia using tests routinely done as pre-operative requirement, one can reduce radiation exposure and cost of treatment. The management can be revolutionised by predicting those who are at high risk of developing post-operative complications and poor surgical outcomes by mere diagnosis of sarcopenia. This knowledge will benefit both the patients and the surgeons.

Prevalence and risk factors of neck pain in spine surgeons - Are we our own patients?

Aim: This survey of spine surgeons aimed to determine the prevalence of neck pain and identify the associated risk factors. The prevalence of neck pain has been reported in various medical sub-specialities including laparoscopy surgeons, dentists, plastic surgeons, ophthalmologist, urologist and orthopaedic surgeons. However, the literature is lacking on prevalence and risk factors for neck pain in spine surgeons. Methods: A survey questionnaire containing demographic, Neck pain and work practice details was administered to 300 spine surgeons (members of an online group) via text message and e-mail. Results: One hundred and eighty surgeons responded to the survey (response rate, 60%). Three spine surgeons had previous cervical spine surgeries. The 1-month prevalence rate of neck pain was 74.4% (134/180 surgeons). One hundred and eighteen surgeons (88%) reported only neck pain, 16 surgeons (11.9%) had neck pain with radicular arm pain. Only 20.5% of surgeons used a loupe, 18% of surgeons used a microscope, and 24% of surgeons used operating table height at umbilicus during surgery. There was no significant difference between the mean age (p = 0.65), work experience (p = 0.8), time spent in surgery (p = 0.7), and operating table height preference (p = 0.4) when symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were compared. However, a significantly greater percentage of surgeons had a sedentary lifestyle (p = 0.002) & used loupes as compared to microscopes (p = 0.04) in the symptomatic group. There was significant correlation between the surgeon's lifestyle & use of loupe and the incidence of neck pain. Conclusion: Spine surgeons have a higher prevalence of neck pain than general populations and surgeons from other specialties. Considering the high prevalence of neck pain, general health, work, and ergonomic guidelines and recommendations must be formulated to help prevent and decrease the burden of neck pain among spine surgeons.