Efficacy of Vaccination and Revaccination Against Hepatitis B Virus Using 2 Different Strategies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit an increased risk for acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV), thus they should be vaccinated preferably, if not already infected or immunized. We assessed the efficacy of HBV vaccination in IBD patients and impact of different factors on the immune response. We also evaluated the success rate of 2 different revaccination strategies in the nonresponders. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study carried out in 5 tertiary centers. All patients were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen, antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen. Patients tested negative and underwent the standard schedule with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months. Nonresponders (anti-HBs <10 IU/L) were offered a revaccination scheme with either 3 doses of 40 µg at 0, 1, and 6 months or an accelerated scheme with 20 µg at 0, 1, and 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 409 patients were included, and 273 (66.7%) of those (females: 49.5%; Crohn's disease [CD]: 56.7%) responded to baseline vaccination. A total of 189 (69.2%) of 273 (females: 48.1%; CD: 60.3%) developed anti-HBs >100 IU/L. Body mass index <30 kg/m2 (P = .017) was positively associated, while diagnosis of CD (P = .013), extensive UC (P <.0001), extraintestinal manifestations (P = .001), and treatment with immunomodulators/anti-tumor necrosis factor (P < .00) negatively affected the response. Revaccination was offered to 103 patients, and 58.3% of them achieved anti-HBs >10 IU/L. Both revaccination strategies were equally effective. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients demonstrate lower response to HBV vaccination compared with the general population. Age, body mass index, type, disease activity, and immunosuppression negatively affect the response. Half of nonresponders may benefit from an enhanced revaccination attempt.

In this retrospective study, we addressed the impact of several factors on the immune response postvaccination against hepatitis B virus in a large cohort of >400 inflammatory bowel disease patients and compared the effectiveness of 2 different revaccination strategies on nonresponders.

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Disk Tool for Assessing Disability in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: Validation of the Greek Version.

BACKGROUND: The Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Disk (IBD-Disk) is a physician-administered tool that evaluates the functional status of patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of our study was to validate the content of the IBD-Disk in a Greek cohort of IBD patients. METHODS: Two questionnaires [the IBD Disk and the IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI)] were translated into Greek and administered to IBD patients at baseline visit, after 4 weeks and 6 months. Validation of the IBD Disk included measuring of concurrent validity, reproducibility, and internal consistency. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were included at baseline and 269 at follow-up. There was a good correlation between the total scores of the IBD-Disk and IBD-DI at baseline (Pearson correlation 0.87, p < 0.001). Reproducibility of the total IBD-Disk score was very good [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 (0.86-0.91)]. Cronbach's coefficient alpha for all items achieved 0.90 (95%CI 0.88-0.92), demonstrating a very good homogeneity of the IBD-Disk items. Female gender and extraintestinal manifestations were significantly associated with a higher IBD-Disk total score. CONCLUSIONS: The Greek version of the IBD-Disk proved to be a reliable and valid tool in detecting and assessing IBD-related disability in a Greek cohort of IBD patients.

The Role of Decoy Receptor DcR3 in Gastrointestinal Malignancy.

Malignancies are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Early detection and treatment are the primary targets of clinical and translational research, and may be facilitated by the recognition of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) is a soluble receptor of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily of proteins (TNFRSF), which associates with its respective TNF-like ligands, Fas-L, LIGHT, and TL1A. DcR3 has been recognised as a significant anti-apoptotic factor with prominent involvement in various inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Increased intratumor expression of DcR3 and elevated soluble DcR3 protein content in the sera of patients has been reported for various malignancies. Recent published work has suggested that monitoring of local and systemic DcR3 may provide an attractive biomarker, mainly for defining subgroups of patients with aggressive tumor behaviour and poor prognosis. The aim of the present review is to summarize and critically present existing evidence regarding the potential clinical importance of monitoring DcR3 expression in patients with malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract, as well as liver and pancreatic cancer. We also present a detailed description of the pathophysiological basis that may underlie the involvement of DcR3 in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. Based on these data, we comment on the potential applicability of DcR3 monitoring in the diagnosis and, most importantly, the prognostic stratification of patients.

Acute and Late Rectal Toxicity Following Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Previous randomized clinical trials have shown that moderate hypofractionation has a non-inferior or even superior efficacy to conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We herein aimed to evaluate the acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma eligible to receive HRT were prospectively enrolled. All patients were submitted to rectoscopy after completion of HRT, every three months after radiotherapy for the first year and every six months for the second year. Toxicity events were classified as acute, when presenting during radiotherapy or within the first three months following its completion, and as late when appearing three months to three years post-HRT. RESULTS: Twenty prostate cancer patients participated in this study and received 22 sessions of HRT (5 sessions a week; 2.75 Gy per session) and an overall dose of 60.5 Gy. None of our patients developed acute GI toxicity; late GI toxicity (RTOG/EORTC grade 3 rectal bleeding) was observed in 1 patient only (1/20, 5%), at 6- and 12-months post-HRT. No rectal mucosa damage was observed on follow-up rectoscopy in the acute phase in any of our patients; five patients (5/20, 25%) developed late telangiectasias. Vienna retroscopy score (VRS) was 1 in 4/5 patients (80%) and 2 in 1/5 (20%). CONCLUSION: Minimal radiation-induced rectal mucosal damage was observed in our patient population, and only as a late event, further attesting to the safety of HRT in this setting.