Does Better Specimen Orientation and a Simplified Grading System Promote More Reliable Histologic Interpretation of Serrated Colon Polyps in the Community Practice Setting? Results of a Nationwide Study.

INTRODUCTION: Colonoscopic surveillance guidelines for serrated polyps (SPs) are predicated upon the histologic characteristics of the index polyp. However, discrimination between SP subtypes [hyperplastic polyps vs. sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P)] is often unreliable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the impact of (1) a novel tissue orientation method, performed in the endoscopy laboratory, whereby polyps are flattened in a small paper envelope immediately after resection (modified protocol); and (2) 2012 consensus-modified criteria (CM-2012). These interventions were compared with conventional tissue-handling protocol (CP) and traditional 2008 World Health Organization criteria (WHO). Twenty blinded community pathologists from around the United States scored 100, independent, 0.5 to 2.0 cm, proximal colonic SPs randomly selected from a 2-site tissue section archive. We compared interobserver agreement and diagnostic grading. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was higher using CM-2012 than WHO criteria (absolute agreement: 13% vs. 4%, P<0.01; 75% agreement: 54% vs. 38%, P<0.01). Interobserver agreement was higher with the modified protocol than with CP (WHO absolute agreement: 6% vs. 2%, P>0.05; WHO 75% agreement: 46% vs. 30%, P>0.05, and CM-2012 absolute agreement: 20% vs. 6%, P=0.07; CM-2012 75% agreement: 66% vs. 42%, P=0.03). Compared with WHO, use of CM-2012 criteria resulted in fewer diagnoses of "indeterminate"; more diagnoses of SSA/P (P<0.01); and "upgraded" the diagnosis from hyperplastic polyps to SSA/P in approximately 7% of cases. These observations were independent of polyp size, patient gender, and study site. CONCLUSIONS: Simple enhancements to postresection SP handling and diagnostic criteria markedly improve interobserver agreement of SP diagnosis among nongastrointestinal community pathologists. This finding, if confirmed, has important implications for SP colonoscopy surveillance guidelines.

A simple tissue-handling technique performed in the endoscopy suite improves histologic section quality and diagnostic accuracy for serrated polyps.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic resection of serrated polyps are partially predicated on the histology of the polyp(s) removed during the index exam. Histologic discrimination between sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P) and hyperplastic polyps is challenging. We devised and tested a simple tool--an envelope--that gastroenterologists can integrate into routine colonoscopy practice to address this problem. METHODS: In the "modified protocol," immediately after polypectomy each serrated polyp was flattened and enclosed in a paper envelope before being placed in formalin. In the pathology laboratory, each polyp was sectioned after processing. A two-site, prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial was performed to compare this modified protocol with the conventional protocol. Serrated polyps located proximal to the splenic flexure and 5-20 mm in diameter were included. A novel orientation score that measured the number of well-oriented crypts per unit area of polyp (higher orientation score = better orientation) was validated. Orientation score, SSA/P diagnosis rate, and inter-pathologist agreement were measured. RESULTS: A total of 375 polyps were enrolled, of which 264 were identified for analysis. The mean orientation scores in the modified and conventional protocol groups were 3.11 and 1.13, respectively (P < 0.0001). SSA/Ps were diagnosed in 103/135 cases (76.3%) in the modified protocol group vs. 54/129 (41.9%) in the conventional protocol group (P < 0.0001). Inter-pathologist agreement was higher with the modified than the conventional protocol (77.0% vs. 62.8%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Standard polyp handling techniques may be sub-optimal for interpretation of serrated polyps resected at colonoscopy, and may lead to inadvertent histologic "under-grading" of many lesions. Our intervention improved histopathologic interpretation and increased the SSA/P diagnosis rate.

A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video).

BACKGROUND: Proximal colorectal cancer may arise from sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), which are often inconspicuous during colonoscopy. The gross morphologic characteristics of SSPs have not been systematically described, and this omission may contribute to colonoscopists overlooking them. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the gross morphologic characteristics of SSPs detected during routine colonoscopy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of high-resolution endoscopic video clips depicting SSPs in situ. SETTING: Outpatient gastroenterology practice. PATIENTS: A total of 124 subjects undergoing surveillance or screening colonoscopy after split-dose bowel preparation. INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of 158 SSPs performed by using validated descriptors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The prevalence of morphologic characteristics related to polyp shape, color, and texture. RESULTS: A total of 158 SSPs were studied. For 7 visual descriptors, a κ coefficient of ≥ 0.7 was achieved, indicating good to excellent intraobserver agreement. The most prevalent visual descriptors were the presence of a mucous cap (63.9%), rim of debris or bubbles (51.9%), alteration of the contour of a fold (37.3%), and interruption of the underlying mucosal vascular pattern (32.3%). The most common "sentinel signs" were the presence of a mucous cap and alteration of the contour of a mucosal fold (each 24.6%), rim of debris or bubbles (21.7%), and a dome-shaped protuberance (20.3%). When comparing SSPs with adenomatous polyps, the frequencies of 5 of 7 morphologic characteristics and the distribution of sentinel signs differed (P < .01). LIMITATIONS: Single-site, retrospective analysis. CONCLUSIONS: SSPs exhibit distinct, variable morphologic characteristics. Many do not display classic features such as a mucous cap. Enhanced appreciation of these morphologic characteristics may improve SSP detection and thereby colorectal cancer prevention.

The detection of premalignant colon polyps during colonoscopy is stable throughout the workday.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that colonoscopic polyp detection decreases as the workday progresses. This may reflect time-dependent factors such as colonoscopist fatigue and decreased colon cleanliness, which can be addressed through adaptations in colonoscopy practice. OBJECTIVE: To test for time-of-day differences in adenomatous polyp (AP) and sessile serrated polyp (SSP) detection in a practice that uses split-dose bowel preparation and moderated daily colonoscopist procedure loads. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Community-based, group gastroenterology practice. PATIENTS: This study involved 2439 patients undergoing surveillance or screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Detection rate of all premalignant polyps (PMPs), and of APs and SSPs, individually. RESULTS: A total of 1183 PMPs were identified in 1486 eligible patients (mean PMP/colonoscopy = 0.80; PMP detection rate = 47%). In univariate and multivariate analyses, PMP detection as well as detection of APs or SSPs individually did not vary significantly in relation to the hour of the day. In a binary comparison of morning (am) versus afternoon (pm) procedures, the total polyp detection rate was 67% and 66%, respectively. For PMPs, APs, SSPs, and hyperplastic polyps (HPs), the am and pm detection rates were 46% and 47%, 41% and 44%, 8% and 8%, and 27% and 24%, respectively. Bowel preparation quality was independent of time of day and was rated excellent or good in 86% to 87% of cases. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, nonrandomized study. CONCLUSION: Stable PMP, AP, SSP, and HP detection rates throughout the workday occur under certain practice conditions, including the use of split-dose bowel preparation and/or moderated daily colonoscopist procedure loads.

Is gastroduodenal biopsy safe in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel?: a prospective, randomized study involving 630 biopsies.

GOALS: To assess prospectively the bleeding risk attributable to gastroduodenal biopsy in subjects taking antiplatelet medications. BACKGROUND: No prospective data exist regarding the bleeding risk attributable to endoscopic biopsy in patients taking antiplatelet agents. A majority of Western endoscopists withdraw antiplatelet agents before upper endoscopy, despite expert guidelines to the contrary. STUDY: We performed a prospective, single-blind, randomized study in healthy volunteers participating in a larger study regarding the effect of antiplatelet agents on gastroduodenal mucosal healing. Multiple gastroduodenal biopsies were performed during 2 esophagogastroduodenoscopy in subjects dosed with aspirin enteric-coated 81 mg once daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily. Data for endoscopic bleeding, clinical bleeding, blood vessel size, and depth of biopsy in histology specimens were collected. RESULTS: Four hundred and five antral biopsies and 225 duodenal biopsies were performed during 90 esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 45 subjects receiving aspirin or clopidogrel. Median maximum blood vessel diameter per biopsy was 31.9 µ (range: 9.2 to 133.8). About 50.8% of biopsy specimens breached the muscularis mucosa. In the clopidogrel group, no bleeding events were noted after 350 biopsies [upper confidence limit (UCL) for probability of bleeding=0.0085]. In the aspirin group, there were no clinical events (UCL=0.0106) and one minor endoscopic bleeding event (UCL=0.0169). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with expert guidelines, the absolute risk attributable to gastroduodenal biopsy in adults taking antiplatelet agents seems to be low. Half of routine biopsies enter submucosa. The largest blood vessels avulsed during biopsy correspond to midsized and large arterioles and venules.