Effectiveness and Risk Factors for Virological Outcome of Raltegravir-Based Therapy for Treatment-Experienced HIV-Infected Patients.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness of a raltegravir (RAL)-containing regimen plus an optimized background regimen in HIV-1 highly treatment-experienced patients. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort, multicentre study was conducted. METHODS: Adult (>16 years old) HIV treatment-experience patients starting therapy with a RAL-containing regimen were included. Effectiveness was evaluated as the percentage of patients with an undetectable HIV-1 RNA viral load (<50 and <200 copies/mL) after 48 weeks, and changes in CD4+ cell counts. We evaluated the risk factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Of the 107 patients in the cohort, 86% were men, the median age was 45 years [interquartile range (IQR) 40-52] and the median number of previous regimens was six (IQR 4-7). After 48 weeks of treatment, 73% (IQR 63-80%) of patients (n = 78) had a viral load of <50 copies/mL and 85% (IQR 77-90%) (n = 91) had <200 copies/mL. In a logistic regression model, risk factors associated with a virological outcome of HIV-1 RNA of <200 copies/mL were age >40 years [odds ratio (OR) 5.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-18.84; P = 0.006] and use of tenofovir in the regimen (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.80; P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In this Mexican cohort, RAL achieved high rates of virological suppression and an increase in CD4+ cell count in highly treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV-1. Age >40 years was associated with a good virological outcome, contrary to tenofovir use, which was associated with a poor virological outcome.

Effectiveness and risk factors for virological outcome of darunavir-based therapy for treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness of darunavir (DRV) treatment plus an optimized background regimen in 120 HIV-1 treatment-experienced patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort, multicenter study. METHODS: Adults >16 years with virological treatment failure starting therapy with a DRV-containing regimen were included. Effectiveness was evaluated as the percentage of patients with an undetectable HIV-1 RNA viral load (<50 and <200 copies/mL) after 48 weeks, and changes in CD4+ cell counts. We evaluated the risk factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 83 % were men with a median age of 45 years (interquartile range, IQR 40-51). They had experienced treatment for a median of 13 years (IQR 9-17) with a median of six previous regimens (IQR 4-7), all using protease inhibitors. After treatment, 82 % (95 % confidence interval, CI 74-88 %) of patients had an HIV-1 RNA viral load <200 copies/mL and 69 % (95 % CI 60-76 %) had <50 copies/mL. The CD4+ cell count increased by 378 cells/µL (IQR 252-559; P < 0.001 vs. baseline). Risk factors associated with poor outcome were age >40 years [odds ratio, OR 0.15 (95 % CI 0.10-0.78); P = 0.015], use of raltegravir in the regimen [OR 0.37 (95 % CI 0.10-0.97); P = 0.046], and baseline CD4+ cell count <200 cells/µL [OR 2.79 (95 % CI 1.11-6.97); P = 0.028]. CONCLUSION: In this Mexican cohort Darunavir was metabolically safe, well tolerated and achieved high rates of virological suppression in highly treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV-1.