Optimizing Postoperative Care in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty: A Review of the Role of Nasal Packing and Alternatives in Complication Management.

Rhinoplasty, a common surgical procedure for nose reshaping, demands meticulous preoperative evaluation and precise execution. When coupled with septoplasty to address medical issues stemming from a deviated nasal septum, these procedures can lead to noteworthy postoperative complications. These encompass early issues like epistaxis and hematoma, as well as long-term challenges such as scarring and aesthetic deformities. Strategies like steroids and tranexamic acid are employed to prevent and manage these complications. A contentious aspect in postoperative care is the use of nasal packing. While some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it due to patient discomfort. This review assesses the pros and cons of postoperative nasal packing following rhinoplasty and septoplasty. A thorough literature review spanning 2000-2023 yielded 30 relevant articles from 62. Discussion reveals that nasal packing offers limited benefits in reducing bleeding, edema and ecchymosis. In conclusion, the decision to employ nasal packing in rhinoplasty and septoplasty should be made carefully, considering patient comfort and surgical context. Evidence suggests that nasal packing may not consistently provide significant advantages and could lead to adverse outcomes. Nasal splints offer similar advantages and may be considered viable alternatives. Surgeons should tailor their approach to individual patient needs, with further research needed to refine postoperative management for these procedures.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Rejuvenation in Men Facial Aging: A Combined Approach.

Facelift surgery, also known as rhytidectomy, is a popular cosmetic procedure aimed at reversing the signs of facial aging. While facelift surgery is more commonly performed in women, an increasing number of men are seeking this procedure to maintain a youthful appearance. The long recovery period conflicts the overall primary outcome anticipated by men undergoing rhytidectomy, i.e., appear younger, youthful, and ready to reaffirm their value in the working environment. Anterior direct neck lift, blepharoplasty (upper and lower eyelid blepharoplasty), and lipofilling are three techniques that have been shown to be effective in improving facial rejuvenation outcomes in elderly male patients. However, there is little to no evidence of the safety and efficacy of these techniques when used in combination. By combining these techniques, we hypothesized that we could achieve outcomes comparable to traditional facelift surgery, but with a lower risk of complications and a shorter recovery time. We conducted a retrospective case series study of 18 male patients who underwent facial rejuvenation surgery using the combination of anterior direct neck lift, blepharoplasty (upper and lower eyelid blepharoplasty), and lipofilling at our institution between 2018 and 2021. All 18 patients completed the study, with an average follow-up of 12 months. No major complications were observed, and all patients reported a high level of satisfaction with their outcomes.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Body Mass Index on Postoperative Complications and Aesthetic Results: A 5-Year, Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing adoption of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) has raised expectations regarding postoperative outcomes and aesthetic results. BMI has been extensively explored as a predictor of complications. This study is the first to examine complication rates in underweight subjects, and compares these rates among underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of BMI on postoperative complications and aesthetic results in IBR following mastectomy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis encompassed patients undergoing mastectomy with subsequent IBR, performed by a collaborative team of breast and plastic surgeons. Demographics, treatment specifics, and outcomes were evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression models. Significance was determined at P < .05. RESULTS: In total, 1046 IBRs were performed in 921 patients, of whom 63 had a BMI <18.5 kg/m2, 572 were normal weight, 215 were overweight, and 71 were obese. Significantly higher complication rates were observed in both obese and overweight patients compared with normal-weight patients (P < .001). Each unit increase in BMI correlated to 7% increased odds of overall complications and 13% increased odds of reconstructive failure. Underweight individuals had higher capsular contracture rates than normal-weight patients, 14.3% vs 3.65%, respectively (P = .001). In addition, aesthetic complications rates in underweight patients were higher than in normal-weight patients, 36.4% vs 25.7%, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed BMI to be a strong predictor of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes, and demonstrates that low BMI has a significant impact on the incidence of capsular contracture and aesthetic complications.

Surgical Tips for Aesthetic Lower Lid Blepharoplasty: Prevention of Round Eye.

In the present study, we highlight surgical tips based on our experience in lower eyelid blepharoplasty. These have been shown to be crucial in the prevention of several complications, specifically lateral lower-lid displacement. Methods: A series of bilateral lower-lid blepharoplasties were performed on 280 patients at Humanitas-Research-Hospital (Milan, Italy) between January 2016 and January 2020. Patients with a history of lower-lid blepharoplasty and patients requiring canthopexy/canthoplasty were excluded. Needing to singularly evaluate and correct several lower-eyelid structures to obtain a harmonic result, we preoperatively assessed the amount of skin excess, the eyelid margin malposition relative to the globe, and the presence/absence of herniated fat-pads. Pre- and postoperative standard photographs were collected. Patients were evaluated by measuring scleral show, snap-back test, and distraction test. Blinded-fashioned photograph analysis was performed by independent plastic and oculoplastic surgeons who did not execute the procedures. A visual analogue scale was administered to all patients to assess satisfaction. Results: In total, 280 patients underwent successful lower blepharoplasty, with satisfactory results of scleral show, snap-back test, and distraction test. Of the 280 patients, four presented postoperative complications. At 10-month follow-up visit, we achieved a mean patient visual analogue scale satisfaction score of 8.4. Postoperative surgeon's photographs mean score was 4.5. Conclusions: Without the use of muscle flaps, our technique averts tarsal ligament misposition, preserves orbicularis-muscle innervation, and limits thermal spread, assuring excellent stability of results and high patient and surgeon satisfaction. Cosmetic outcome in terms of symmetry, appearance, and lower lid line definition revealed high satisfaction with the result over time, with a remarkably low complication rate.

Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: A single center comparison between different procedures.

Background: The increased incidence of conservative mastectomy operations (nipple- and skin- sparing) has increased the frequency of immediate breast reconstructions (IBR). In order to guarantee patients the best possible aesthetic outcome, the least chance of complications and moreover, the least postoperative pain, the technique with prepectoral prosthetic pocket was recently reconsidered with the use of ADM. This is the first study using Fortiva® in prepectoral breast reconstruction, and it compares the outcomes of three different patient populations (undergoing retromuscular, prepectoral and prepectoral reconstruction with ADM). The authors suggest that prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM may bring benefits compared to the current standard technique (retromuscular) as well as compared to the prepectoral reconstruction without ADM. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients who underwent mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction with silicone implants (DTI), performed by a team of breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. Logistic factor regressions were performed in order to investigate the effects of the three different intervention techniques on the incidence of complications. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the differences in the occurrence of each complication. Mann Whitney test was used to compare the averages of referred pain. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 67 patients underwent DTI reconstruction, of which 43 with retromuscular prosthesis, 13 prepectoral and 11 prepectoral with ADM. We found a significantly lower incidence of surgical complications with ADM, exclusively in comparison with retromuscular reconstruction (p = 0.028). It emerges prepectoral reconstruction with ADM involves significantly less visibility of the implant than both the prepectoral surgery without ADM (p = 0.013) and the retromuscular technique (p = 0.029). Finally, postoperative pain referred at twelfth month is significantly less relevant in the group with prepectoral prosthesis and ADM, both in the group with retromuscular (p < 0.001) and prepectoral without ADM (p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM is a safe and reliable technique, able to exceed some type of limits imposed by prepectoral reconstruction. Moreover, it provides benefits if compared to the current standard technique. In the future, this technique could also be added to it, after a proper selection of patients in pre- and intraoperative time.

Algorithm-Assisted Decision Making in Otoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Ear congenital deformities represent an aesthetical concern in adult patients and a social matter in children. An accurate assessment of ear defects should be made preoperatively in order to plan surgery adequately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to correctly assess the ear preoperatively the authors have considered four different subunits: helical and scaphal region (A), antihelical region (B), conchal region (C) and lobule region (D). Surgical planning should start from sub-unit A evaluation, ending with sub-unit D, in a concentric fashion. When sub-unit A defects have to be corrected, an anterior approach is preferred. DISCUSSION: A correct evaluation of ear defects prior to surgery is of dramatic importance. Sub-unit A ear defects are often disregarded, and surgical techniques for their correction are rarely considered. Correcting helical and scaphal defects requires an anterior approach, influencing the technique employed for the correction of subunits B and C defects. Sub-unit B defects should be evaluated and corrected before sub-unit C defects in order to avoid overcorrection of ear protrusion. CONCLUSION: Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature for correcting ear defects. After many years of experience, we outlined a schematic flowchart that prevents from leaving areas of the ear untreated, providing the best possible result for the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Aesthetic and Functional Abdominoplasty: Anatomical and Clinical Classification based on a 12-year Retrospective Study.

Abdomen reshaping is a common plastic surgery procedure, and numerous surgical techniques have been described in the scientific literature. To standardize surgical approach, we propose our protocol that correlates patients' anatomy with the type of procedure performed. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2020, we retrospectively analyzed 582 consecutive female patients who underwent abdomen reshaping procedures, assessing anatomical features, complication rate, patient satisfaction, and surgical result, comparing them with previous reports in the literature. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated with VAS scale (0-10). RESULTS: Among the 582 patients recruited in the study, we performed 74 liposuctions as a single procedure, 62 mini-abdominoplasties, 28 T-inverted abdominoplasties, and 418 full-abdominoplasties. Aesthetic outcome evaluation reported a mean value of 8.2 from patients and 7.8 from surgeons. We experienced four early postoperative bleedings requiring hemostasis revision, 18 wound dehiscences, five seromas, and 24 re-interventions for aesthetic issues. We found no differences in the complication rate while comparing our data with previous reports in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol and surgical technique have proved to be effective, safe, and reproducible, with high patient and surgeon satisfaction, low complication rate, and fast recovery time.

The Periareolar Approach: All Seasons Technique for Multiple Breast Conditions.

The periareolar approach was first introduced by Hollander in 1924 and, since then, numerous contributions have been reported by different authors. Despite all the strengths associated with this versatile technique, the periareolar approach still poses three main problems: large areolar diameter with poor quality scar, flattening of the breast cone, and poor stability of the results. The purpose of this article is to show how this surgical technique, with a good patient selection, can be applied to different situations and obtain excellent results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 5028 consecutive procedures in 4198 female patients treated with a periareolar approach in two regional institutions between 2008 and 2018. We considered 853 pure mastopexies, 362 breast augmentations, 422 secondary breast augmentations, 402 corrections of stenotic breast, 2921 oncoplastic surgeries, and 68 breast reductions. Postoperative complication, as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction were assessed. RESULT: Patient and surgeon satisfaction 1 year after the procedure was excellent, and the complication rate was low. CONCLUSIONS: When the indication is set correctly, the periareolar approach can obtain excellent results. This versatile technique, initially introduced as a mastopexy technique, has expanded its applications and can now be used for multiple surgical situations.

Gynecomastia: Ultrasound-Confirmed Classification Pertainent to Surgical Correction.

BACKGROUND: Gynecomastia is the most common form of breast alteration in men, due to proliferation of the gland ducts and stromal components, including fat. In addition to the most obvious indications (weight loss, pharmacotherapy, and drugs suspension), the surgical treatment is needed for long-standing gynecomastia, combining liposuction, adenectomy, partial mammary adenectomy, periareolar skin resection, and round-block suture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 148 patients undergoing gynecomastia correction from May 2012 to April 2018. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 14 months. The authors propose a new ultrasound-confirmed classification system, dividing patients into six categories. The authors analyzed immediate complications, revision, recurrence, and minor aesthetic problems (retracted/depressed areas) and introduced a way to correct the irregularities with fat grafting and needles. RESULTS: The total complication rate was 11.5% (17/148). Most of the complications (11) were observed in patients who underwent glandular resection and 3 after liposuction only. Retrospective surveys about patients' and surgeons' satisfaction were performed, showing excellent feedbacks regarding the results accomplished. CONCLUSIONS: The simple classification helps surgeons choose the most suitable approach, avoiding insufficient or invasive treatments and undesirable scars. Moreover, the analysis of the type of sequelae and their correction allow high patients' satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective monocentric study.

BACKGROUND: Infective complications following implant-based breast reconstruction range from 2,5 to 24% and are often associated with high morbidity and poor outcome. Many authors still employ long-term antibiotic prophylaxis even though there is no conclusive evidence on the impact on infection-rate reduction. In the present study, we report we report our single-shot short-term prophylaxis protocol for surgical site infection prevention in immediate two-stage implant breast reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively compared clinical data from two groups of women undergoing immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expander. Group 1 (n = 391) was administered with long-term prophylaxis, and Group 2 (n = 89) was administered with short-term prophylaxis associated with early drains removal (21 days maximum). We evaluated risk factors for infection, clinical preoperative data, time before drain removal, and clinical feature of the diagnosed infections (early or late onset) and compared the reconstructive outcome between the two groups (infection rate, implant loss rate). RESULTS: We did not find any statistically significant difference in the infection rate (11,51% overall) and implant loss rate (4,49% overall) between the two groups. We found a difference in the implant loss to infection ratio (46.67% in group 1 and 20% in group 2, p < 0,05) and in the time before drain removal (19 days in group 1 and 15 days in group 2, p < 0.001). We finally found an association between prolonged time before drain removal and increased infection rate (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term single-shot perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis associated with early drain removal (within 21 days postop) represents a safe approach in terms of prevention of local infective surgical complication and allows a more effective treatment of the diagnosed SSI.