Comparative analysis of genetic testing utilization rates among people with and without disabilities in South Korea from 2016 to 2019, focusing on malignant neoplasms: A national population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Oncogene testing is widely used to detect or direct cancer treatments. Compared to people without disabilities, people with disabilities in Korea have a lower cancer incidence rate but a fivefold higher cancer mortality rate, implying delayed detection. METHODS: We used an administrative database combining disability status and care utilization to analyze every case of cancer-related genetic testing paid for by the National Health Insurance Services of Korea between 2016 and 2019. We first compared percentages of individuals who had taken a registered genetic test by their disability statuses. We then compared the most frequently utilized tests between individuals with and without disabilities. RESULTS: Korean citizens, 175,000 in total, underwent at least one of the 192 registered cancer-related genetic tests between 2016 and 2019. People with disabilities utilized these genetic tests at higher rates than those without disabilities, regardless of sex or age. Among people aged ≥40 years, lung and colorectal cancer-related tests were most frequently utilized, regardless of disability status. CONCLUSION: Although the cancer-related genetic test uptake rate is higher among people with disabilities than among those without disabilities, it is still possible that information on these tests is not as readily available to people with disabilities. Therefore, it is imperative for the government to actively devise strategies to enhance national cancer screening rates among people with disabilities.

Real-time online point-of-view filming education for teaching clinical skills to medical students.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to measure the educational satisfaction with and effectiveness of real-time online point-of-view filming (POVF) clinical skills education in medical students. METHODS: Medical students participated in a 120-minute clinical skills education session. The session consisted of emergency procedures, wound management, and vascular access. The authors provided real-time online POVF using a smartphone. A questionnaire survey was issued to the students after the class, and their satisfaction with education, educational environment, and effectiveness were analyzed. RESULTS: Responses about satisfaction with POVF education were very positive in all grades. However, approximately half of the students were satisfied with the smoothness of listening to a lecture and the video quality. More than half of the students responded positively to the question about educational effectiveness. CONCLUSION: In these times of non-classroom teaching brought on by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, POVF clinical skills education is likely to be a very useful educational tool. If disadvantages such as insufficient feedback or environmental problems can be addressed, it could serve as an alternative method of clinical skills education even after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Genetic Testing on Patients with Developmental Delay: A Preliminary Study from the Perspective of Physicians.

This study aimed to discover and propose solutions to various decision-making problems, including obtaining consent, encountered by physicians when administering genetic testing to patients with disabilities. A preliminary survey and focus group interviews (FGIs) were conducted with 27 specialists who had 5-25 years of clinical experience in rehabilitation medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology, regarding their experience in providing genetic testing to people with developmental disabilities. This included the "role of medical staff in the patient's decision-making process", "difficulty of the consent process for genetic testing", and so forth. Some limitations were identified in the genetic testing communication process for patients with disabilities. Although providing information corresponding to the level of understanding of each person and accurately evaluating the correct consenting ability is important, the usage rate of auxiliary tools, such as booklets and videos, was only 50.0%. Additionally, there were concerns regarding the marriage prospects of people with disabilities. For people with developmental disabilities to provide consent for genetic testing, legal consent forms and explanation aids that consider individual characteristics are necessary. Moreover, education on disability awareness throughout society, including cost support, is needed.