Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of fracture in children and young adults: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) are being used by increasing number of children and young adults. However, evidence for a relationship between ASD use and the risk of fracture in these groups of patients is conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of fracture in children and young adults exposed to ASDs. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to November 2020. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the relationship of ASD use with fracture risk in children and young adults. RESULTS: Six studies reporting the outcomes of more than 900,000 children and young adults with ASD use were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR for fracture with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus non-use of these medications was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.1-1.25; P < 0.001) in children and 1.2 (95% CI = 0.87-1.65; P = 0.272) in young adults. By contrast, the use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) was not significantly associated with fracture risk in children (RR, 1.08, 95% CI = 0.99-1.17; P = 0. 083) or young adults (RR, 1.08, 95% CI = 0.82-1.42; P = 0.589). Significant statistical and clinical heterogeneity among studies were determined for the main analysis and most of the subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence linking PPI use to an increased risk of fracture in children. Thus, the use of PPIs in these patients should be carefully considered. However, randomized controlled studies are needed to determine causality and the role of unmeasured/residual confounding factors in this association.

Maternal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposure during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have suggested that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might be associated with increased risk of miscarriage. However, these results are conflicting and inconclusive. METHODS: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between NSAIDs exposure and risk of miscarriage. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies published from the time of database inception until June 2021. RESULTS: A total of ten studies involving 207,341 pregnant women were subjected to meta-analysis. There was no statistically significantly increased risk of miscarriage with the use of NSAIDs during pregnancy (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.99-1.88, p = 0.057). However, our findings showed that women exposed to NSAIDs around the time of conception were at increased risk of miscarriage (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.16-4.66, p = 0.018). Furthermore, no significant association between NSAID use and miscarriage was evident during the first trimester of pregnancy (OR = 1, 95% CI = 0.83-1.2, p = 0.996), possibly attributable to the small sample size. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that NSAID exposure around the time of conception might be a risk factor for miscarriage. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether the risk varies by the type, dosage, or timing of NSAID exposure.

Maternal anti-tumour necrosis factor-α drug use during pregnancy and risk of infection in the offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α drugs are used by increasing numbers of reproductive-age women. Although the neonatal outcomes have been described, there are concerns regarding the risk of infection in offspring following exposure to anti-TNF-α. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database, from inception through August 2020. We evaluated the risk of infection in autoimmune disease (AID) offspring unexposed to anti-TNF-α compared to AID offspring exposed to anti-TNF-α, as well as to unexposed non-AID offspring. RESULTS: Our primary analysis showed that both AID offspring unexposed to anti-TNF-α [risk ratio (RR) 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.16; I2=0%] and AID offspring exposed to anti-TNF-α (RR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.2-1.61; I2=0%] was associated with an increased risk of infection during the first year of life compared with the unexposed non-AID offspring. However, our secondary analysis demonstrated that AID offspring exposed to anti-TNF-α was not associated with an increased risk of infection when compared with AID offspring unexposed to anti-TNF-α (RR=1.1; 95% CI, 0.86-1.4). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in utero exposure to anti-TNF-α does not appear to increase the risk of infection during the first year of life in the offspring; however, AID itself was associated with a marked excess risk of infection in the children.