Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Autism Dev Disord ; 2023 Sep 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751095

RESUMO

Caregivers of children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experience more stress than caregivers of typically developing children but there is limited research evaluating caregivers' quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to describe the association of caregiver QoL in children with ASD and/or ADHD. This study included patients with ADHD and/or ASD seen in one pediatric specialty clinic between September 2018-August 2020. Caregivers were classified as those caring for children with ASD-only, ADHD-only, or youth with both conditions (ADHD + ASD). An adapted version of the PedsQL Family Impact Module was used to measure caregiver QoL. The sample included caregivers of 931 children. The majority of these children were male (74.7%), non-Hispanic white (63.3%), and aged 6 to 12 years (57.8%). Across the groups, significant differences were observed in patient age (p < 0.0001), preferred language (p = 0.005), and insurance (p = 0.001). Caregivers of non-Hispanic Black children had 4-times the odds of reporting feeling isolated from others (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.19-16.00 p = 0.03). Those caring for children with ADHD-only had significantly lower odds of reporting helplessness or hopelessness (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.80, p = 0.004), and difficulty talking about their child's health with others (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.54, p < 0.0001). Similarly, caregivers of children who had ADHD + ASD reported higher odds of difficulty making decisions together as a family (OR 14.18, 95% CI 1.15-17.91, p=0.04) and difficulty solving family problems together (OR 45.12, 95% CI 2.70-752.87), p = 0.008). Caring for children with ADHD and/or ASD may affect caregiver QoL.

2.
World J Pediatr ; 17(2): 210-214, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33604731

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Preschool-age children with developmental disabilities (DD) have higher prevalence of obesity than children without DD. This study aimed to explore the relationship between parent perception of their children's anthropometric phenotype and child body mass index (BMI) z score change over one school year among preschoolers with DD. METHODS: The analysis consisted of a subsample (N  =  64) of children with DD from a larger randomized controlled trial to test an obesity prevention program in the childcare center setting. Parents ranks their child's anthropometric phenotype on a visual silhouette chart on a scale from 1 (underweight) to 7 (obese) and that rank score is compared to their BMI z score change over one school year. RESULTS: The majority (75%) of parents with an obese child underestimated their child's anthropometric phenotype while 7% parents with a non-obese child overestimated. Parent overestimation of child anthropometric phenotype status is associated with increased BMI z score change over 1 school year among preschool-age children with disabilities. CONCLUSION: Parental overestimation of child anthropometric phenotype status was associated with weight gain in preschool children with DD after one school year.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Pais/psicologia , Antropometria , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fenótipo
3.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 57: 38-42, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33212345

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a unique developmental profile with an increased risk for co-morbid neurodevelopmental diagnoses, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), anxiety, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), among others. A delay in a diagnosis of these conditions can impact the health and psychosocial wellbeing of the child and family. The purpose of this study was to assess identification of secondary co-morbid neurodevelopmental diagnoses within an academic DS specialty Clinic. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of secondary co-morbid neurodevelopmental diagnoses including children with DS ages 2 to 17 years old, with a visit encounter in a pediatric DS specialty clinic between January 2018 to August 2019 was conducted. Comparisons included diagnoses identified before (T1) and after (T2) inclusion of developmental behavioral specialists as pediatric DS providers. Two sample t-tests, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact t-test were utilized to compare categorical and non-categorical variables. RESULTS: 145 children were identified in T1 of which 51.7% were male. 225 children were seen in T2, 56.0% were male. Increased detection of several co-morbid conditions occurred between T1 and T2 including language disorder (p < 0.0001), intellectual disability (p < 0.0001), and non-specific developmental/behavioral diagnoses (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Developmental/behavioral assessment is integral for detection of co-morbid conditions among a pediatric DS population and prevention of diagnostic overshadowing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Interprofessional teams, including pediatric nurse practitioners, play a key role in providing health supervision and assessment for a pediatric DS population.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Síndrome de Down , Pediatria , Adolescente , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/diagnóstico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Down/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 18(4): 302-306, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29746272

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is common practice for healthcare practitioners to swaddle infants in newborn nursery and neonatal intensive care unit settings. Despite the widespread use of this practice, the American Academy of Pediatrics neither bans nor recommends swaddling. To date, there has been no standard protocol developed for either healthcare professionals or parents to establish optimal swaddling techniques in terms of infant arm positioning, infant leg positioning, and tightness of wrap. PURPOSE: To evaluate the variability in swaddling techniques used for infants in the newborn nursery and neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Across 2 pediatric hospitals, the swaddling positioning of each open-crib infant in the newborn nursery and neonatal intensive care unit was examined. For each infant, the following data were collected: gender, left and right arm position, left and right leg position, and tightness of wrap. RESULTS: In total, 132 swaddle observations were recorded. There was significant variability in swaddling positioning of arms and legs. The most common combination of arm/leg positioning was "mixed arm positioning" and "both legs flexed" (25.0% of all observations). In 9.1% of cases, tightness of wrap around chest was "tight," and in 30.3% of cases, tightness of wrap around legs was "tight." IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There was a large variability in swaddling positioning of both arms and legs. For such a widespread practice, the lack of medical guidelines results in inconsistent, and potentially harmful, positioning. Parents and healthcare professionals would benefit from specific, research-driven guidelines regarding proper swaddling techniques. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Different variations on swaddling should be evaluated for consideration of best practice swaddling.


Assuntos
Cuidado do Lactente/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Berçários Hospitalares , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Enfermeiros Neonatologistas , Pais , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem
5.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 28(4): 559-66, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27386975

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of an infant#$#apos;s life, with continuation of breastfeeding for at least a year or as mutually desired by mother and child. A robust body of research literature documenting the short-term medical, developmental, and emotional benefits of breastfeeding for infants and toddlers supports this position. This article reviews the neurodevelopmental benefits of breastfeeding as it relates to preschool and school-age children, with particular emphasis on cognitive development, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of research studies examining breastfeeding and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes suggest that children who breastfeed for longer than 6 months have better cognitive outcomes, lower risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and lower risk of being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. SUMMARY: Pediatricians play a critical role in educating and counseling families about infant nutrition and feeding. Along with the many positive short-term medical effects that breastfeeding confers, physicians should be aware of the growing body of research suggesting that there are also significant long-term neurodevelopmental benefits of breastfeeding.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Desenvolvimento Infantil/fisiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mães/psicologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...