Roles of binding elements, FOXL2 domains, and interactions with cJUN and SMADs in regulation of FSHß.

We previously identified FOXL2 as a critical component in FSHß gene transcription. Here, we show that mice deficient in FOXL2 have lower levels of gonadotropin gene expression and fewer LH- and FSH-containing cells, but the same level of other pituitary hormones compared to wild-type littermates, highlighting a role of FOXL2 in the pituitary gonadotrope. Further, we investigate the function of FOXL2 in the gonadotrope cell and determine which domains of the FOXL2 protein are necessary for induction of FSHß transcription. There is a stronger induction of FSHß reporter transcription by truncated FOXL2 proteins, but no induction with the mutant lacking the forkhead domain. Specifically, FOXL2 plays a role in activin induction of FSHß, functioning in concert with activin-induced SMAD proteins. Activin acts through multiple promoter elements to induce FSHß expression, some of which bind FOXL2. Each of these FOXL2-binding sites is either juxtaposed or overlapping with a SMAD-binding element. We determined that FOXL2 and SMAD4 proteins form a higher order complex on the most proximal FOXL2 site. Surprisingly, two other sites important for activin induction bind neither SMADs nor FOXL2, suggesting additional factors at work. Furthermore, we show that FOXL2 plays a role in synergistic induction of FSHß by GnRH and activin through interactions with the cJUN component of the AP1 complex that is necessary for GnRH responsiveness. Collectively, our results demonstrate the necessity of FOXL2 for proper FSH production in mice and implicate FOXL2 in integration of transcription factors at the level of the FSHß promoter.

Differential utilization of TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-related factor 1 (TRF1) at different classes of RNA polymerase III promoters.

In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, RNA polymerase III transcription was found to be dependent not upon the canonical TATA box-binding protein (TBP) but instead upon the TBP-related factor 1 (TRF1) (Takada, S., Lis, J. T., Zhou, S., and Tjian, R. (2000) Cell 101, 459-469). Here we confirm that transcription of fly tRNA genes requires TRF1. However, we unexpectedly find that U6 snRNA gene promoters are occupied primarily by TBP in cells and that knockdown of TBP, but not TRF1, inhibits U6 transcription in cells. Moreover, U6 transcription in vitro effectively utilizes TBP, whereas TBP cannot substitute for TRF1 to promote tRNA transcription in vitro. Thus, in fruit flies, different classes of RNA polymerase III promoters differentially utilize TBP and TRF1 for the initiation of transcription.

Identification of SNAPc subunit domains that interact with specific nucleotide positions in the U1 and U6 gene promoters.

The small nuclear RNA (snRNA)-activating protein complex (SNAPc) is essential for transcription of genes coding for the snRNAs (U1, U2, etc.). In Drosophila melanogaster, the heterotrimeric DmSNAPc recognizes a 21-bp DNA sequence, the proximal sequence element A (PSEA), located approximately 40 to 60 bp upstream of the transcription start site. Upon binding the PSEA, DmSNAPc establishes RNA polymerase II preinitiation complexes on U1 to U5 promoters but RNA polymerase III preinitiation complexes on U6 promoters. Minor differences in nucleotide sequence of the U1 and U6 PSEAs determine RNA polymerase specificity; moreover, DmSNAPc adopts different conformations on these different PSEAs. We have proposed that such conformational differences in DmSNAPc play a key role in determining the different polymerase specificities of the U1 and U6 promoters. To better understand the structure of DmSNAPc-PSEA complexes, we have developed a novel protocol that combines site-specific protein-DNA photo-cross-linking with site-specific chemical cleavage of the protein. This protocol has allowed us to map regions within each of the three DmSNAPc subunits that contact specific nucleotide positions within the U1 and U6 PSEAs. These data help to establish the orientation of each DmSNAPc subunit on the DNA and have revealed cases in which different domains of the subunits differentially contact the U1 versus U6 PSEAs.

TBP recruitment to the U1 snRNA gene promoter is disrupted by substituting a U6 proximal sequence element A (PSEA) for the U1 PSEA.

Transcription of Drosophila U1 or U6 snRNAs by RNA polymerases II and III respectively requires a unique approximately 21 base-pair promoter element termed the proximal sequence element A (PSEA) recognized by the snRNA activating protein complex (DmSNAPc). A five-nucleotide substitution that changed the U1 PSEA to a U6 PSEA inactivated the U1 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated this substitution did not affect DmSNAPc DNA binding but instead interfered with SNAPc recruitment of TBP to the TATA-less U1 promoter. These findings support a model wherein sequence differences between the U1 and U6 PSEAs induce distinct DmSNAPc conformational states involved in RNA polymerase selectivity.