DEMOGRAPHICS TO DEFINE PEDIATRIC BURN PATIENTS AT RISK OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES.

ABSTRACT: Background: There is currently no standard definition of a severe burn in the pediatric patient population to identify those at higher risk of infectious complications. Our aim was to correlate total burn surface area (TBSA), burn depth, and type of burn injury to nosocomial infection rates and systemic immune system responses to better define risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: A prospective observational study at a single-center, quaternary-care, American Burn Association-verified pediatric burn center was conducted from 2016 to 2021. Blood was collected within 72 h of injury from 103 pediatric patients. Whole blood was incubated with lipopolysaccharide or phytohemagglutinin stimulation reagent to measure innate and adaptive immune response, respectively. Flow cytometry was performed on whole blood samples to measure both innate and adaptive immune cells. Unstimulated plasma was also extracted, and IL-6 and IL-10 as well as soluble proteins B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator, CD27, and T-cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 were quantified. Results: There was a significant increased risk for nosocomial infection in pediatric patients with TBSA burns of ≥20%, full-thickness burn injuries ≥5%, or flame burn injuries. There was an overall decrease in both innate and adaptive immune function in patients with TBSA burns ≥20% or full-thickness burn injuries ≥5%. Both burn injury characteristics were also associated with a significant increase in unstimulated IL-6 and IL-10 and soluble immunoregulatory checkpoint proteins. We observed a significant decrease in soluble B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator for those with a flame injury, but there were no other differences between flame injury and scald/contact burns in terms of innate and adaptive immune function. Conclusion: Burns with ≥20% TBSA or ≥5% full thickness in pediatric patients are associated with systemic immune dysfunction and increased risk of nosocomial infections.

Dermal substrate application in the treatment of pediatric hand burns: clinical and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Hand burn injuries are common among pediatric patients. Management of deep partial thickness and full thickness hand burns varies by center, with some favoring upfront autografting and others using dermal substrates (DS) as biologic dressings to accelerate burn wound healing. Achieving best outcomes is critical in children given the propensity of burn wound scars to affect hand function as a child grows and develops. Given potential complications associated with autografting in children, our center often prefers to treat pediatric hand burns initially with DS, with subsequent autografting if there is failure to heal. In this case series, we examined the outcomes of this practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric burn patients with <10% total body surface area (TBSA) burns who underwent application of DS to hand burn injuries between 2013 and 2021. Burn mechanism, patient demographics, wound treatment details, healing and functional outcomes, and complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were computed. RESULTS: Fifty patients with hand burns and overall <10% TBSA burns underwent application of DS to hands. Median age at the time of injury was 4.1 years (IQR: 1.8, 10.7) and 29 patients (58%) were male. Eighteen (36%) patients had bilateral hand burns, 10 (20%) had burns to their dominant hand, 6 (12%) their non-dominant hand, and 16 (32%) had unestablished or unknown hand dominance. Subsequent autografting was required in 5 (10%) patients treated initially with DS; four of these patients had full thickness injuries. Five (10%) patients developed contracture at the site of DS application for which two underwent scar release with tissue rearrangement, one underwent laser treatment, and two were managed conservatively. Most patients had splints (94%), or compression garments (54%) prescribed to aid in functional recovery. CONCLUSION: Children with hand burns who underwent DS application healed well with few requiring autografting or developing contractures. Most patients who needed autografting had deeper injuries. Most patients who developed a contracture required additional procedural intervention. Recognizing factors that contribute to the need for autografting after initial treatment with DS can help direct intervention decisions in pediatric patients with hand burn injuries.