RESUMO
Objectives: In recent years, commercial molecular tools for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis have emerged, requiring evaluation to ensure quality. Here we assessed the specificity of Aspergillus spp.-ELITe MGB Assay a commercial assay tergeting 18S gene of Aspergillus spp. Design and methods: As part of a method validation, we evaluate the specificity of the Aspergillus spp.-ELITe MGB Assay by testing fourteen culture based samples of sequenced non-Aspergillus fungal species. The benefits of a pre-lysis treatment was evaluated in parallel on serial dilutions of an Aspergillus fumigatus strain. Results: Our findings revealed cross-reactivity in five strains using the 50 copies/mL cut-off recommended by the manufacturer, suggesting potential diagnostic errors and inappropriate management of patients. Pre-lysis treatment does not affect the limit of detection at serial dilution. Conclusions: In conclusion, the Aspergillus spp. ELITe MGB Assay exhibits limited specificity in culture-based samples, underscoring the importance of careful utilization in laboratories. Further studies are warranted to better comprehend of the impact of this cross-reactivity on clinical samples.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created an unprecedented need for rapid large-scale diagnostic testing to prompt clinical and public health interventions. Currently, several quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays recommended by the World Health Organization are being used by clinical and public health laboratories and typically target regions of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), envelope (E) and nucleocapsid (N) coding region. However, it is currently unclear if results from different tests are comparable. This study aimed to clarify the clinical performances of the primer/probe sets designed by US CDC and Charité/Berlin to help clinical laboratories in assay selection for SARS-CoV-2 routine detection. METHODS: We compared the clinical performances of the recommended primer/probe sets using one hundred nasopharyngeal swab specimens from patients who were clinically diagnosed with COVID-19. An additional 30 "pre-intervention screening" samples from patients who were not suspected of COVID-19 were also included in this study. We also performed sequence alignment between 31064 European SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern genomes and the recommended primer/probe sets. RESULTS: The present study demonstrates substantial differences in SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection sensitivity among the primer/probe sets recommended by the World Health Organization especially for low-level viral loads. The alignment of thousands of SARS-CoV-2 sequences reveals that the genetic diversity remains relatively low at the primer/probe binding sites. However, multiple nucleotide mismatches might contribute to false negatives. CONCLUSION: An understanding of the limitations depending on the targeted genes and primer/probe sets may influence the selection of molecular detection assays by clinical laboratories.
