Can acetabular dysplasia be measured on axial CT? A measurement for trauma surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular dysplasia has been theorized as a risk factor instability amongst common acetabular fractures, such as posterior wall (PW) fractures. However, common radiographic measurements often cannot be acquired in trauma patients. We evaluated axial computed tomography (CT) scans to identify novel, easily-obtained measurements that correlate with acetabular dysplasia for use in surgical indications and planning. METHODS: Patients with known acetabular dysplasia undergoing elective periacetabular osteotomy were selected. A different group of patients without pelvic ring or acetabular fractures from an institutional trauma registry were selected as a comparison group. Standard indices of dysplasia were collected, such as center-edge angle (CEA). Acetabular geometric measurements were taken at three axial levels: 0 - cranial CT slice at the dome; 1 - cranial CT where the dome is an incomplete circle; 2 - cranial CT with femoral head visible. Distances between levels were also calculated: Levels 0-1 (Dome Height; DH), Levels 1-2 (Head Height; HH), and Dome-Head Difference (DH - HH = DHD). RESULTS: DH, HH, and DHD were all significantly correlated with CEA, Tonnis angle, and Sharp's angle in dysplastic hips. All dysplastic hips had DH ≤ 2.5 mm and HH ≥ 1.25 mm. DHD ≤ 0 mm was most specific (93.6 % sensitive, 77.3 % specific) for predicting dysplasia. CONCLUSION: DH ≤ 2.5 mm, HH ≥ 1.25 mm, and DHD ≤ 0 mm were independently associated with dysplasia on axial CT scans. These measurements may be quickly and easily used by trauma surgeons to assess a trauma-based axial CT scan for acetabular dysplasia.

Acetabular dysplasia and posterior wall fractures: The missing link?

BACKGROUND: Traumatologists are unable to predict hip instability based on CT scans and standard radiographs in posterior wall (PW) fractures comprising <50-60 % of the wall, necessitating an examination under anesthesia (EUA). Risk factors for instability have not been clarified, but acetabular dysplasia has been theorized as a potential etiology. Unfortunately, dysplasia is difficult to evaluate in the traumatic setting. The purpose of this study was to compare acetabular morphology between unstable and stable fractures with a novel method to detect dysplasia. METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years old with a PW fracture that underwent an EUA from 2013 to 2023 were retrospectively identified. For our experimental measurements, the axial distances on CT between the acetabular dome, lateral acetabular opening, and femoral head vertex were recorded. Acetabular geometry was quantified at these levels. Conventional dysplasia metrics (e.g., Tonnis angle) were obtained. Variables were compared between stable and unstable fractures. RESULTS: 58 patients met inclusion criteria with 42 stable versus 16 unstable fractures. Unstable fractures had higher distances between the acetabular dome and femoral head vertex (p > 0.05). They had more cranial fracture exit points (p = 0.0015), lower femoral head coverage (p = 0.0102), and lower posterior acetabular sector angles (p = 0.0281). No other differences in acetabular geometry, demographics, injury characteristics, or other markers of dysplasia were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Unstable hips demonstrated a more recessed acetabular dome when compared to stable hips. Posterior acetabular femoral head coverage and cranial fracture exit point may be related to hip instability. A larger sample size is needed to validate these findings.

Growth Modulation by Stimulating the Growth Plate: A Pilot Study.

This study investigates the ability of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) or direct injection of recombinant growth hormone (rGH) to stimulate local growth of long bones. In a randomized controlled animal trial, healthy immature rabbits were allocated to 1 of the following 4 conditions: epiphyseal rGH periosteal injection, transdermal LIPUS, saline periosteal injection, or no treatment. New bone deposition was labeled with calcein at days 1 and 18, and microscopic measurements of growth were conducted by blinded observers. Statistically significant differences in growth were observed between the LIPUS and rGH stimulated legs compared with contralateral control legs (35% p = 0.04 and 41% p = 0.04, respectively); whereas no difference was observed between the 4 control groups (p = 0.37). There was no evidence of physeal bar formation, suggesting that direct injection of rGH and application of LIPUS around the distal femoral physis in rabbits may have a positive effect on microscopic growth without short-term adverse sequelae.