Impact of dialysis modality on posttransplantation results in kidney transplantation.

Studies looking at the type of pretransplantation renal replacement therapy on graft and patient survivals after kidney transplantation have produced conflicting results. Therefore, we studied the effect of pretransplantation dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis [PD] or hemodialysis [HD]) on transplant outcomes. We performed a retrospective study of 78 patients (39 PD and 39 HD) who had their first renal transplantation between January 1986 and December 2004. Comparisons between groups were made using chi-square tests for qualitative parameters and nonpaired Student t tests for continuous variables. Comparisons between actuarial curves of patient and technique survivals used log-rank tests. The percentages of recipient males, cadaveric donors, transplant-induced diabetes, mean period of dialysis, mean transplantation follow-up, mean duration of first hospital stay, first infection, acute tubular necrosis, and acute rejection episodes were not significantly different among PD versus HD patients, whereas recipient and donor mean ages were significantly higher in HD and PD patients, respectively. There were no differences in graft and recipient survivals among PD versus HD patients. After kidney transplantation, there was no difference between PD and HD patients concerning percentages of infection, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection episodes or graft and recipient survivals.

[Indications, complications and cost of internal jugular catheters in hemodialysed patients: study of 533 cases]. / Indications, complications et cout des catheters jugulaires internes chez les hemodialyses: etude de 533 cas.

INTRODUCTION: Central venous catheters for hemodialysis are very useful as blood accesses when arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are not available. The aim of this study is to analyse the clinical impact of internal jugular catheters (IJC) in hemodialysed patients and to assess their economic consequences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It is a prospective study realised from July 1998 to March 2002 including 533 hemodialysed patients without functional AVF: 280 males and 253 females aged between 17 and 87 years (mean age: 54.1 +/- 15 years). Single lumen polyurethane Vygon were used. All catheters were placed using Seldinger procedure and the posterior route of Jernigan which is more comfortable for patient. RESULTS: Indications of IJC placement were new hemodialysed patients without AVF in 73.5% cases and no functional AVF in 26.5% cases. During the period of the study. IJC was placed in 533 patients. We failed to place the IJC at the first attempt in 42 patients but we succeed in placing it on the controlateral side. During IJC placement, we observed 50 (9.4%) cases of accidental puncture of carotid artery. The median duration use of IJC was 41 days (extreme: 1 to 413 days). IJC were removed mainly because of the use of AVF in 469 (88%) cases and the catheter infection in 41 (77%) cases. Bacteriological analysis were made only for 25 patients: staphylococci were identified in 16 cases and catheter cultures were negative in the 9 other cases. All patients were treated with antibiotics. Outcome was favourable for 39 of them and we had 2 deaths by septicemia. The IJC cost was 44,287 Tunisian Dinars (DT) coresponding to 31.633 Euro including 10125 DT (7,232 Euro) for infectious treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of IJC is frequent in our center with a high rate of infectious complications which increased the hemodialysis cost. The realisation of AVF, in patients with chronic renal failure before the beginning of hemodialysis, is the best way to limit the use of catheters.