Genome-Wide Association Shows that Pigmentation Genes Play a Role in Skin Aging.

Loss of fine skin patterning is a sign of both aging and photoaging. Studies investigating the genetic contribution to skin patterning offer an opportunity to better understand a trait that influences both physical appearance and risk of keratinocyte skin cancer. We undertook a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of a measure of skin pattern (microtopography score) damage in 1,671 twin pairs and 1,745 singletons (N = 5,087) drawn from three independent cohorts. We identified that rs185146 near SLC45A2 is associated with a skin aging trait at genome-wide significance (P = 4.1 × 10-9); to our knowledge this is previously unreported. We also confirm previously identified loci, rs12203592 near IRF4 (P = 8.8 × 10-13) and rs4268748 near MC1R (P = 1.2 × 10-15). At all three loci we highlight putative functionally relevant SNPs. There are a number of red hair/low pigmentation alleles of MC1R; we found that together these MC1R alleles explained 4.1% of variance in skin pattern damage. We also show that skin aging and reported experience of sunburns was proportional to the degree of penetrance for red hair of alleles of MC1R. Our work has uncovered genetic contributions to skin aging and confirmed previous findings, showing that pigmentation is a critical determinant of skin aging.

Heritability of strabismus: genetic influence is specific to eso-deviation and independent of refractive error.

Strabismus represents a complex oculomotor disorder characterized by the deviation of one or both eyes and poor vision. A more sophisticated understanding of the genetic liability of strabismus is required to guide searches for associated molecular variants. In this classical twin study of 1,462 twin pairs, we examined the relative influence of genes and environment in comitant strabismus, and the degree to which these influences can be explained by factors in common with refractive error. Participants were examined for the presence of latent ('phoria') and manifest ('tropia') strabismus using cover-uncover and alternate cover tests. Two phenotypes were distinguished: eso-deviation (esophoria and esotropia) and exo-deviation (exophoria and exotropia). Structural equation modeling was subsequently employed to partition the observed phenotypic variation in the twin data into specific variance components. The prevalence of eso-deviation and exo-deviation was 8.6% and 20.7%, respectively. For eso-deviation, the polychoric correlation was significantly greater in monozygotic (MZ) (r = 0.65) compared to dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs (r = 0.33), suggesting a genetic role (p = .003). There was no significant difference in polychoric correlation between MZ (r = 0.55) and DZ twin pairs (r = 0.53) for exo-deviation (p = .86), implying that genetic factors do not play a significant role in the etiology of exo-deviation. The heritability of an eso-deviation was 0.64 (95% CI 0.50-0.75). The additive genetic correlation for eso-deviation and refractive error was 0.13 and the bivariate heritability (i.e., shared variance) was less than 1%, suggesting negligible shared genetic effect. This study documents a substantial heritability of 64% for eso-deviation, yet no corresponding heritability for exo-deviation, suggesting that the genetic contribution to strabismus may be specific to eso-deviation. Future studies are now needed to identify the genes associated with eso-deviation and unravel their mechanisms of action.

Telemedicine model to prevent blindness from familial glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: To develop, implement and evaluate a telemedicine model to reduce glaucoma blindness through the early detection of undiagnosed glaucoma in high-risk individuals. DESIGN: Prospective study, private ophthalmology practice and public outpatient clinics in Tasmania. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and thirty-three individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma were invited to enrol their first-degree relatives (FDRs) to undergo an eye examination. Within the study period, 211 FDRs were available for examination. METHODS: A registered nurse was trained to perform the required assessments. Clinical data were entered into a purpose-built database, converted to a portable document format and graded offsite by an ophthalmologist to determine the presence, absence or risk of developing glaucoma. Participants were notified of the grading result and recommendations for review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of undiagnosed glaucoma in a high-risk population. RESULTS: Previously undiagnosed glaucoma was identified in 5% of those examined. For every 19 participants screened, one new case of previously undiagnosed case of glaucoma was identified. Additionally 15% of participants showed suspicious signs of glaucoma, and 6% had ocular hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: A telemedicine model is an efficient method for screening, grading and notifying participants of examination results. Nurses can be adequately trained to undertake the initial screening examinations, with grading of the results performed offsite by a suitably qualified ophthalmologist. Targeted screening for glaucoma increases the yield of identifying individuals with undiagnosed glaucoma or those at greatest risk. Cost efficiencies for this model of glaucoma screening should be further explored and implemented to prevent blindness from familial glaucoma.

The Norfolk Island Eye Study (NIES): rationale, methodology and distribution of ocular biometry (biometry of the bounty).

AIM: To describe the recruitment, ophthalmic examination methods and distribution of ocular biometry of participants in the Norfolk Island Eye Study, who were individuals descended from the English Bounty mutineers and their Polynesian wives. METHODS: All 1,275 permanent residents of Norfolk Island aged over 15 years were invited to participate, including 602 individuals involved in a 2001 cardiovascular disease study. Participants completed a detailed questionnaire and underwent a comprehensive eye assessment including stereo disc and retinal photography, ocular coherence topography and conjunctival autofluorescence assessment. Additionally, blood or saliva was taken for DNA testing. RESULTS: 781 participants aged over 15 years were seen (54% female), comprising 61% of the permanent Island population. 343 people (43.9%) could trace their family history to the Pitcairn Islanders (Norfolk Island Pitcairn Pedigree). Mean anterior chamber depth was 3.32mm, mean axial length (AL) was 23.5mm, and mean central corneal thickness was 546 microns. There were no statistically significant differences in these characteristics between persons with and without Pitcairn Island ancestry. Mean intra-ocular pressure was lower in people with Pitcairn Island ancestry: 15.89mmHg compared to those without Pitcairn Island ancestry 16.49mmHg (P = .007). The mean keratometry value was lower in people with Pitcairn Island ancestry (43.22 vs. 43.52, P = .007). The corneas were flatter in people of Pitcairn ancestry but there was no corresponding difference in AL or refraction. CONCLUSION: Our study population is highly representative of the permanent population of Norfolk Island. Ocular biometry was similar to that of other white populations. Heritability estimates, linkage analysis and genome-wide studies will further elucidate the genetic determinants of chronic ocular diseases in this genetic isolate.

Associations of birth weight with ocular biometry, refraction, and glaucomatous endophenotypes: the Australian Twins Eye Study.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship of birth weight with ocular measures in a Caucasian twin population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 1498 twins (308 monozygotic and 441 dizygotic pairs) aged between 5 to 80 years participating in the Australian Twins Eye Study. METHODS: All participants underwent ophthalmic examination including bilateral cycloplegic autorefraction, keratometry, interpupillary distance (IPD), central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure (IOP), and retinal photography. Birth weight and gestation were obtained from a self-administered questionnaire. A subset of the twins also participated in the Tasmanian Infant Health Study (288) and the Childhood Blood Pressure Study (184), which collected data on birth parameters allowing for verification of data. Linear mixed models were used for the main analysis. RESULTS: Both the within-pair (ß(w) 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15, 0.38 mm per kg increase in birth weight, P < .001) and between-pair associations (ß(B) 0.22, 95% CI 0.08, 0.35, P = .002) of birth weight with axial length were significant and of similar magnitude (difference in effect, P = .56), after adjusting for relevant confounders. In contrast, birth weight was negatively associated with corneal curvature (ß(w) -0.82, 95% CI -1.09, -0.55 diopters per kg increase; ß(B) -0.69, 95% CI -0.98, -0.41, both P < .001). These associations remained significant within dizygotic and monozygotic pairs. Refraction, anterior chamber depth, IPD, IOP, and optic disc parameters are unrelated to birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous studies in singleton children, lower birth weight is associated with shorter axial length and more curved corneas in this twin study. This also adds new insights into the emmetropization process.

How significant is a family history of glaucoma? Experience from the Glaucoma Inheritance Study in Tasmania.

PURPOSE: To determine what proportion of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in Tasmania, Australia is familial. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996 an audit of Tasmanian patients diagnosed with glaucoma was performed. Identified probands along with their family members were invited to participate. Family history of POAG was noted and pedigrees constructed. Each participant underwent a detailed examination, including visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, gonioscopy, optic disc assessment and visual field testing. Participants were classified as normal, suspect or POAG. Data from 467 participants in the Twins Eye Study in Tasmania (TEST) were used as a reference for the general population. RESULTS: Of 2062 participants examined, 1700 were classified as POAG. A total of 1014 participants (59.6%) belonged to families in which other members were affected (familial glaucoma). Six hundred and fifty-six of these 1014 familial cases (64.8%) had a first-degree relative affected. The number of affected members in the family groups varied from two to 29. Six hundred and eighty-eight participants had no known family history of POAG (sporadic glaucoma). There were significantly more POAG patients with a family history of POAG compared to the TEST population (chi2 = 161.81, P < 0.0001), and for a person with POAG the odds ratio of having a positive family history was 4.1 (95% confidence interval: 3.2-5.2). CONCLUSION: Approximately 60% of POAG in Tasmania is familial. This percentage is higher than most previous reports of familial glaucoma and emphasizes the importance of genetics in POAG, with major implications for screening and future research.

Are Duane syndrome and infantile esotropia allelic?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical overlap of families with Duane syndrome and infantile esotropia to determine whether the identification of genes for Duane syndrome may explain some cases of infantile esotropia. METHODS: Three separate groups of patients were evaluated. 1) Families with features of infantile esotropia were identified through the Strabismus Inheritance Study Tasmania (SIST). Clinical details of participants and their families were reviewed for any cases of Duane syndrome. 2) Cases of Duane syndrome were identified through the clinical diagnostic database at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, and private ophthalmology clinics in Melbourne and Tasmania. Previous medical notes were reviewed and family history of strabismus noted. All affected individuals were invited for re-examination in cases where a positive family history of strabismus was reported; siblings, parents, and other family members, where appropriate, were invited to be examined for signs of Duane syndrome or infantile esotropia. 3) Cases of mosaic trisomy 8, which has been associated with Duane syndrome and infantile esotropia, were reviewed for signs of strabismus. RESULTS: A total of 133 families from the SIST were reviewed, but no 'pure' families of Duane syndrome were identified. Two families with infantile esotropia had several members affected with Duane syndrome. Of the 40 index cases with Duane syndrome whose families agreed to be involved in the study, 21 had a family history of ocular motility disorders, but only two of these families had multiple cases of Duane syndrome. From 24 cases with mosaic trisomy 8, one individual case had Duane syndrome and another had mild congenital cataracts and infantile esotropia. CONCLUSIONS: There is clinical overlap in families with Duane syndrome and infantile esotropia. We confirmed the previous association of mosaic trisomy 8 with both Duane syndrome and infantile esotropia. These data suggest that the two conditions may be allelic and may be due to a gene on chromosome 8.

Investigation of albinism genes in congenital esotropia.

PURPOSE: Esotropia is a feature of albinism. Amongst esotropic patients there may be mild unrecognised albinos. Oculocutaneous albinism shares several clinical features with congenital esotropia. It is well known that mammals with oculocutaneous albinism have misrouted retinal ganglion cell axons, most likely caused by the absence of melanin or DOPA during development. We investigated the hypothesis that mutations in the albinism genes Tyrosinase, the P Gene, and TYRP1 may also be responsible for congenital esotropia via a similar mechanism. METHODS: We screened these three genes in 21 families with congenital esotropia using single stranded conformational polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: No rare sequence variants segregating with esoptopia were detected. A novel silent mutation of the TYRP1 gene was identified in one pedigree but is not likely to be causative. Several previously reported common polymorphisms were detected but do not segregate with disease in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Rare mutations of these genes do not appear to be responsible for congenital esotropia. Although we found no evidence for segregation of common variants with disease, these require further investigation for a possible contribution to a complex threshold model. Several lines of evidence indicate a genetic componenet of congenital esotropia, however, this is the first investigation of candidate genes for this disorder.