Role of pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion in the regulation of lipolysis in fasting humans.

BACKGROUND: The increase in growth hormone (GH) secretion during a prolonged fast stimulates lipolytic rate, thereby augmenting the mobilization of endogenous energy at a time when fuel availability is very low. STUDY AIM: To identify the specific component of GH secretory pattern responsible for the stimulation of lipolytic rate during fasting in humans. STUDY PROTOCOL: We measured lipolytic rate (using stable isotope dilution technique) after an overnight fast in 15 young, healthy, non-obese subjects (11 men and 4 women), and again on four separate occasions after a 59 h fast. These four prolonged fasting trials differed only by the contents of an infusion solution provided throughout the 59 h fasting period. Subjects were infused either with normal saline ("Control"; n = 15) or with graded doses of a GH Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist (GHRHa):10 µg/kg/h ("High"; n = 15), 1 µg /kg/h ("Medium"; n = 8), or 0.5 µg /kg/h ("Low"; n = 6). RESULTS: As expected, the 59 h fast completely suppressed plasma insulin levels and markedly increased endogenous GH concentrations (12 h vs 59 h Fast; p = 0.0044). Administration of GHRHa induced dose-dependent reduction in GH concentrations in response to the 59 h fast (p < 0.05). We found a strong correlation between the rate of lipolysis and GH mean peak amplitude (R = 0.471; p = 0.0019), and total GH pulse area under the curve (AUC) (R = 0.49; p = 0.0015), but not the GH peak frequency (R = 0.044; p = 0.8) or interpulse GH concentrations (R = 0.25; p = 0.115). CONCLUSION: During prolonged fasting (i.e., 2-3 days), when insulin secretion is abolished, the pulsatile component of GH secretion becomes a key metabolic regulator of the increase in lipolytic rate.

Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Pegvisomant is a new growth hormone receptor antagonist that improves symptoms and normalises insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in a high proportion of patients with acromegaly treated for up to 12 weeks. We assessed the effects of pegvisomant in 160 patients with acromegaly treated for an average of 425 days. METHODS: Treatment efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in tumour volume by magnetic resonance imaging, and serum growth hormone and IGF-1 concentrations in 152 patients who received pegvisomant by daily subcutaneous injection for up to 18 months. The safety analysis included 160 patients some of whom received weekly injections and are excluded from the efficacy analysis. FINDINGS: Mean serum IGF-1 concentrations fell by at least 50%: 467 mg/L (SE 24), 526 mg/L (29), and 523 mg/L (40) in patients treated for 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively (p<0.001), whereas growth hormone increased by 12.5 mg/L (2.1), 12.5 mg/L (3.0), and 14.2 mg/L (5.7) (p<0.001). Of the patients treated for 12 months or more, 87 of 90 (97%) achieved a normal serum IGF-1 concentration. In patients withdrawn from pegvisomant (n=45), serum growth hormone concentrations were 8.0 mg/L (2.5) at baseline, rose to 15.2 mg/L (2.4) on drug, and fell back within 30 days of withdrawal to 8.3 mg/L (2.7). Antibodies to growth hormone were detected in 27 (16.9%) of patients, but no tachyphylaxis was seen. Serum insulin and glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (p<0.05). Two patients experienced progressive growth of their pituitary tumours, and two other patients had increased alanine and asparate aminotransferase concentrations requiring withdrawal from treatment. Mean pituitary tumour volume in 131 patients followed for a mean of 11.46 months (0.70) decreased by 0.033 cm(3) (0.057; p=0.353). INTERPRETATION: Pegvisomant is an effective medical treatment for acromegaly.

Semiquantification of hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone output in women: evidence for sexual dimorphism in the mechanism of the somatopause.

The neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying the decline of GH with aging (somatopause) are uncertain. We recently found that the age-dependent diminution of the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) output contributes to the somatopause in men. As the regulatory mechanisms of GH secretion are sexually dimorphic, we assessed the suppressibility of spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion by graded doses of a specific competitive GHRH receptor antagonist in nine young (20-27 yr old) and eight elderly (65-77 yr old) healthy nonobese women to semiquantify hypothalamic GHRH output. Nocturnal mean GH was lower in elderly women (2.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.2 microg/liter; P = 0.01). Graded boluses of GHRH-44 resulted in similar GH responses in both populations (P = 0.28). Graded infusions of GHRH antagonist inhibited in a dose-dependent manner the GH responses to GHRH in both groups (P = 0.0001-0.04). The dose-inhibition curve for the lowest GHRH bolus dose was shifted to the left compared with the highest one (P = 0.04). However, the dose-inhibition curves for spontaneous GH secretion were not different in young and elderly women (P = 0.50). Thus, the female somatopause is not associated with a measurable decrease in hypothalamic GHRH output. When the dose-inhibition curves for young men and young women were compared, the latter was shifted to the left (P = 0.009), suggesting that the somatotropic system in women operates with less GHRH. We conclude that the contribution of endogenous GHRH to the maintenance of GH secretion and the neuroendocrine mechanisms of somatopause in humans are sexually dimorphic.

Regulation of GH secretion in acromegaly: reproducibility of daily GH profiles and attenuated negative feedback by IGF-I.

GH hypersecretion is a hallmark of acromegaly. It is unknown whether the secretory activity of somatotroph adenoma is autonomous or is still governed by central or peripheral mechanisms. In this study we investigated whether GH secretion in acromegaly 1) has a reproducible circadian pattern and 2) is inhibited by exogenous IGF-I. Eleven patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly were studied in 2 protocols. In protocol 1, peripheral blood was sampled every 10 min for 48 h in 6 patients for the determination of concordance between 24-h GH profiles. There was no significant day to day variability in mean 24-h output. There was, however, a significant time effect, and the 24-h GH secretion pattern was maintained between days. In protocol 2, 5 patients were sampled for GH every 10 min twice, once during infusion of normal saline and once during iv infusion of recombinant human IGF-I (10 microg/kg x h). The recombinant human IGF-I infusion increased plasma IGF-I to approximately 230% of the baseline concentration. This resulted in GH suppression (4220 +/- 1950 vs. 3223 +/- 1472 microg/liter.min; P = 0.001), but did not alter GH secretion pattern. There were highly significant cross-correlations for 10 of the 11 of the subjects in the two protocols when the lag was 0 min. By harmonic analysis, nocturnal augmentation of GH was maintained, and maximum daily GH occurred at approximately 2300 h. These data demonstrate that the pattern of GH secretion in acromegaly is not random, but is highly preserved with 24-h periodicity. In addition, negative feedback regulation by IGF-I is preserved, although the degree of negative feedback is grossly attenuated. Thus, secretory activity of somatotroph adenomas is not autonomous or haphazard, but is still subject to both feedback and feedforward regulatory mechanisms.

The "quality of life-assessment of growth hormone deficiency in adults" questionnaire: can it be used to assess quality of life in hypopituitarism?

Patients with hypopituitarism often have a multitude of physical and psychological complaints, collectively referred to as low quality of life (QoL). It has been asserted that GH deficiency (GHD) is the causative factor, and improved QoL scores have been reported during GH replacement. Qol-assessment of GHD (QoL-AGHDA) is the newest psychometric instrument with the purportedly high specificity for the issues encountered by patients with GHD. QoL-AGHDA was administered to 30 normal control subjects, 20 patients with severe GHD, and 22 patients with active acromegaly. QoL-AGHDA scores in controls (3.3 +/- 0.7) were significantly (P < 0.001) different from those in patients with hypopituitarism with unsubstituted GHD (10.6 +/- 1.5) and active acromegaly (11.6 +/- 1.6). However, QoL-AGHDA was unable to discriminate between the latter two groups, one with GHD and the other with GH excess. We conclude that as QoL-AGHDA cannot distinguish between the extremes of GH output, its ability to detect an improvement in QoL during GH replacement has to be viewed with skepticism. This can be dispelled only by double blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Generation of growth hormone pulsatility in women: evidence against somatostatin withdrawal as pulse initiator.

To test whether endogenous hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIH) fluctuations are playing a role in the generation of growth hormone (GH) pulses, continuous subcutaneous octreotide infusion (16 microg/h) was used to create constant supraphysiological somatostatinergic tone. Six healthy postmenopausal women (age 67 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 24.7 +/- 1.2 kg/m(2)) were studied during normal saline and octreotide infusion providing stable plasma octreotide levels of 2,567 +/- 37 pg/ml. Blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 24 h, and plasma GH was measured with a sensitive chemiluminometric assay. Octreotide infusion suppressed 24-h mean GH by 84 +/- 3% (P = 0.00026), GH pulse amplitude by 90 +/- 3% (P = 0.00031), and trough GH by 54 +/- 5% (P = 0.0012), whereas GH pulse frequency remained unchanged. The response of GH to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was not suppressed, and the GH response to GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) was unaffected. We conclude that, in women, periodic declines in hypothalamic SRIH secretion are not the driving force of endogenous GH pulses, which are most likely due to episodic release of GHRH and/or the endogenous GHRP-like ligand.

Aging-related growth hormone (GH) decrease is a selective hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone pulse amplitude mediated phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: Aging is accompanied by declining growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. The neuroendocrine mechanisms of this decline have been studied previously, but the interpretation of the data was confounded by the imprecision in GH measurements and by the intervening variables of altered body composition and decreased gonadal steroid milieu in the elderly subjects of both sexes. METHODS: To study the contribution of aging per se, we evaluated discrete parameters of GH pulsatility in young (n = 8 women, n = 8 men) and elderly (n = 11 women, in 10 men) subjects closely matched for body mass index. Blood samples for GH were obtained every 10 minutes for 24 hours. Plasma GH was measured by a sensitive chemiluminescent assay. GH pulsatility was assessed using cluster analysis. RESULTS: The elderly subjects had plasma IGF-I levels and integrated GH concentrations that were 32% to -56% of their sex-matched younger counterparts. The age-associated attenuation in GH was due to a decrease in GH pulse amplitude, whereas pulse frequency and nadir levels were unchanged. The majority of the young subjects (81%) reached their peak GH during the "lights off" period, whereas the majority of the elderly subjects (62%) peaked during the "lights on" period (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that aging in both sexes is accompanied by profound decreases in GH output and in plasma IGF-I concentrations. This effect is separate from the alterations in body mass index that accompany the normal aging process. Attenuation of GH output associated with aging is related solely to the lower GH and, by inference, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) pulse amplitude.

Growth hormone therapy for hypopituitary adults: time for re-appraisal.

The advent of the production of large quantities of recombinant growth hormone (GH) has made it possible to have sufficient material to assess its efficacy in adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Although some studies have shown that patients who are severely deficient benefit from GH therapy, the spectrum of GHD is broad, and the degree of deficiency at times is very difficult to define. In some cases, benefit is not easily quantified, and some studies have claimed benefits that, although statistically significant, are either not clinically important or are so marginal as to be questionable in terms of cost, difficulty of administration and potential risks. The purpose here is to identify the current problems in the diagnosis of GHD, to discuss the rationale for GH therapy and to assess the potential effects of GHD as well as the benefits of GH therapy in GHD adults. We will include a commentary as to which effects appear more robust than others and which are likely to result in the greatest patient benefit. Finally, some attention will be paid to long-term safety issues that should be monitored to ensure that this medication is safe even for the patients with the greatest need.

Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormone-receptor antagonist pegvisomant.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acromegaly are currently treated with surgery, radiation therapy, and drugs to reduce hypersecretion of growth hormone, but the treatments may be ineffective and have adverse effects. Pegvisomant is a genetically engineered growth hormone-receptor antagonist that blocks the action of growth hormone. METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study of three daily doses of pegvisomant (10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg) and placebo, given subcutaneously, in 112 patients with acromegaly. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) decreased from base line by 4.0+/-16.8 percent in the placebo group, 26.7+/-27.9 percent in the group that received 10 mg of pegvisomant per day, 50.1+/-26.7 percent in the group that received 15 mg of pegvisomant per day, and 62.5+/-21.3 percent in the group that received 20 mg of pegvisomant per day (P<0.001 for the comparison of each pegvisomant group with placebo), and the concentrations became normal in 10 percent, 54 percent, 81 percent, and 89 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for each comparison with placebo). Among patients treated with 15 mg or 20 mg of pegvisomant per day, there were significant decreases in ring size, soft-tissue swelling, the degree of excessive perspiration, and fatigue. The score fortotal symptoms and signs of acromegaly decreased significantly in all groups receiving pegvisomant (P< or =0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these preliminary results, treatment of patients who have acromegaly with a growth hormone-receptor antagonist results in a reduction in serum IGF-I concentrations and in clinical improvement.

Induction of growth hormone (GH) mRNA by pulsatile GH-releasing hormone in rats is pattern specific.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a main inducer of growth hormone (GH) pulses in most species studied to date. There is no information regarding the pattern of GHRH secretion as a regulator of GH gene expression. We investigated the roles of the parameters of exogenous GHRH administration (frequency, amplitude, and total amount) upon induction of pituitary GH mRNA, GH content, and somatic growth in the female rat. Continuous GHRH infusions were ineffective in altering GH mRNA levels, GH stores, or weight gain. Changing GHRH pulse amplitude between 4, 8, and 16 microg/kg at a constant frequency (Q3.0 h) was only moderately effective in augmenting GH mRNA levels, whereas the 8 microg/kg and 16 microg/kg dosages stimulated weight gain by as much as 60%. When given at a 1.5-h frequency, GHRH doubled the amount of GH mRNA, elevated pituitary GH stores, and stimulated body weight gain. In the rat model, pulsatile but not continuous GHRH administration is effective in inducing pituitary GH mRNA and GH content as well as somatic growth. These studies suggest that the greater growth rate, pituitary mRNA levels, and GH stores seen in male compared with female rats are likely mediated, in part, by the endogenous episodic GHRH secretory pattern present in males.

Pituitary disorders. Drug treatment options.

Pituitary diseases are relatively common entities in the general population. They include pituitary adenomas and hypopituitarism. Pituitary tumours can cause symptoms of mass effect and hormonal hypersecretion that can be reversed with surgical resection or debulking of the adenoma, radiotherapy, or medical treatment. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is the treatment of choice for acromegaly, Cushing's disease, gonadotropin-secreting tumours; and thyrotropin (TSH)-secreting adenomas. Pituitary irradiation and medical therapy are secondary options. Conversely, medical treatment is the primary choice for prolactinomas. Dopamine agonists are very effective in the treatment of prolactin (PRL)-secreting tumours, with rates of control as high as 80 to 90% for microprolactinomas (< 10 mm) and 60 to 75% for macroprolactinomas (> or = 10 mm). Somatostatin analogues have also shown efficacy in patients with acromegaly who have not responded to surgery or in patients with TSH-secreting adenomas who have not improved with surgery and radiotherapy. In patients with Cushing's disease, who are not cured surgically or who relapse after pituitary adenomectomy and irradiation, steroidogenic inhibitors can be an efficient method of controlling the hypercortisolism. Pituitary insufficiency is the partial or complete loss of the anterior hypophyseal function, which is due to hypothalamic or pituitary disease. Although the classic sequence of loss of pituitary secretion is growth hormone (GH), gonadotropins, TSH, and corticotropin (ACTH), the order to begin the replacement therapy of the deficient hormone(s) is cortisol, thyroxine, androgens/estrogens and, if necessary, GH. There are multiple preparations that can be used to achieve clinical and biochemical improvement. In general, the hormone replacement therapy is lifelong.

Growth hormone secretory dynamics over the menstrual cycle.

Whether GH secretion in women varies over the menstrual cycle is uncertain. Previous investigations have led to conflicting conclusions; some studies suggested that there is an estrogen mediated rise in GH during the periovulatory (PO) and luteal (L) phases whereas others indicated no change in GH axis over the cycle. Differences in conclusions could relate to heterogeneity of the study populations, GH sampling paradigms or sensitivity of the GH assays used. In order to investigate whether GH secretion varied over the cycle, 24-h GH profiles using every 10-min sampling were obtained in 6 ovulatory women during the early follicular (EF), PO and L phases of the cycle. The TSH response to TRH, GH response to GRH and fasting plasma IGF-I were measured on each occasion. There was a trend toward higher integrated GH concentration (IGHC) during the PO phase, although this difference was not statistically significant (3284+/-721 vs 4542+/-872 vs 4071+/-699 microg/min/L; EF vs PO vs L; p=0.09). Similarly, deconvolution estimated GH secretion did not vary over the cycle (p=0.56). There were no differences in GH pulse amplitude or frequency. There were no correlations between IGHC and sex steroids. Serum IGF-I was constant over the cycle (272+/-38 vs 277+/-31 vs 265+/-38 microg/L; p=0.89). The TSH response to TRH and GH response to GRH did not vary over the cycle. We concluded that the effect of changes in the ovarian steroid milieu on the GH axis during spontaneous menstrual cycles is minimal.

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in primary adrenal insufficiency: effects of cortisol withdrawal and patterned replacement on GH pulsatility and circadian rhythmicity.

We studied the effects of cortisol withdrawal and patterned replacement upon spontaneous GH secretion and circadian rhythmicity in 7 patients with Addison's disease. Hydrocortisone was administered in physiological daily total dosages, and all resulting plasma cortisol values were 2-15 micrograms/dl. It was given in 3 pulsatile modes: simulating "physiological" rhythm, "reverse" diurnal rhythmicity and "continuous" pulsatility. All modes of cortisol administration increased mean 24 h, GH pulse amplitude and interpulse GH levels. During saline infusions circadian GH rhythmicity was preserved, with GH being at its highest between 2400-0400 h. Administration of hydrocortisone in any mode did not modify circadian GH rhythmicity. We conclude: Cortisol replacement in physiological daily doses increases GH output in patients with Addison's disease by augmenting GH pulse amplitude and interpulse levels. This is likely due to the attenuation of hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIF) secretion by physiologic levels of cortisol. By inference, it implies that cortisol deficiency leads to diminution of GH output with low GH pulse amplitude, likely as a result of an augmented hypothalamic somatostatin secretion. However, circadian rhythmicity of GH secretion is glucocorticoid-independent.

Rapid re-expansion of a macroprolactinoma after early discontinuation of bromocriptine.

Prolactin (PRL)-secreting pituitary adenomas are the most common functioning pituitary tumors. Medical treatment with dopamine agonists is the therapy of choice for macroprolactinomas (> or = 10 mm). Withdrawal of bromocriptine after weeks or months of uninterrupted therapy has been associated with rapid tumor re-expansion as evidenced by x-ray and CT scanning of the pituitary region. We report a patient with a giant macroprolactinoma who had a dramatic response to bromocriptine (tumor volume shrinkage of 53% within a month) but rapid re-expansion to its original dimensions one week after discontinuation of bromocriptine. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the rapid shrinkage/re-expansion of a macroprolactinoma has been documented with serial MRI scans.

Pergolide as primary therapy for macroprolactinomas.

The objective of this study is to determine whether pergolide therapy is an effective modality for the de novo treatment of patients with macroprolactinomas. Twenty-two consecutive patients with macroprolactinomas were included in the study and followed prospectively. These included 16 men and 6 women in whom pregnancy was not of concern. Pergolide was administered once or twice a day depending on the patient's preference. Ten patients received 0.1 mg daily as a maintenance regimen and in the others the daily dose ranged from 0.05 to 0.5 mg. Eight patients reported minor but tolerable side effects. One patient had to be switched to cabergoline because of intolerable nausea. After a mean of 12 months (range, 3-36), mean PRL levels declined from 3,135 ng/ml (range, 126-31,513) to 50 ng/ml (3-573), representing a mean PRL suppression of 88% (range, 0-99). PRL levels became normal in 15 patients and decreased to 25-40 ng/ml in 3 others. The mean tumor volume shrinkage was 25% or greater in 19 patients (86%), 50% or greater in 17 patients (77%), and 75% or greater in 10 patients (45%). Visual abnormalities were reversible after pergolide therapy in all but 1 of 12 patients with initially abnormal formal visual testing. Two out of 4 premenopausal women did not normalize PRL levels and had persistent oligomenorrhea. Testosterone was low in 14 men at presentation and normalized in 3 with pergolide therapy. We conclude that pergolide is a safe, inexpensive, and generally well-tolerated dopamine agonist for the treatment of macroprolactinomas in men and women in whom pregnancy is not of concern. In these specific populations, pergolide may become the first-line therapy for treatment of macroprolactinomas.

In vivo semiquantification of hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) output in humans: evidence for relative GHRH deficiency in aging.

GH secretion declines with aging. The neuroendocrine mechanisms of somatopause are uncertain. To semiquantify endogenous hypothalamic GHRH output, we measured the suppressibility of spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion by graded doses of a specific competitive GHRH receptor antagonist (N-Ac-Tyr1,D-Arg2)GHRH-(1-29) in healthy young and elderly men. Nocturnal GH was about 30% lower in the elderly than in the young. Graded boluses of GHRH elicited dose-dependent GH responses, with no difference between the two age groups. Graded infusions of GHRH antagonist suppressed GH responses to GHRH in a dose-dependent manner, but with similar potency in both groups. The degree of inhibition depended on the magnitude of GHRH bolus: the dose-inhibition curves for the low GHRH boluses were shifted to the left compared to those with the high GHRH bolus (P = 0.01). Similarly, the dose-inhibition curve for spontaneous GH secretion was shifted to the left for the elderly compared to the young men (P = 0.01). Thus, the model of graded infusions of GHRH antagonist differentiates between different amounts of GHRH presented to the pituitary, permitting semiquantification of the endogenous hypothalamic GHRH output in vivo. Our data suggest that there is an age-dependent decrease in the endogenous hypothalamic GHRH output contributing to the age-associated GH decline.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy of a patient with a giant invasive prolactinoma.

A 41-year-old with a giant prolactinoma underwent in-111 pentetreotide (Octreotide) imaging showing very intense tracer uptake in the region of the anterior skull base. In contrast, there was no significant response to Octreotide therapy. Prediction of clinical responsiveness to Octreotide therapy in patients with pituitary adenomas may depend on the presence of somatostatin receptor subtype 5. Pentetreotide does not avidly bind to this receptor subtype and therefore, cannot be used clinically to predict therapeutic Octreotide responsiveness in patients with large prolactinomas.

Chromosome 13q deletion mapping in pituitary tumors: infrequent loss of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB1) locus despite loss of RB1 protein product in somatotrophinomas.

Two recent studies have described allelic loss of an RB1 intragenic marker on chromosome 13q in aggressive and metastatic pituitary tumors that did not correlate with loss of pRB. The second report also showed that losses were more frequently associated with a more centromeric marker. Because both of these studies suggest the presence of another or other tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) on 13q, we carried out an allelotype analysis encompassing known and recently described TSG loci on 13q, together with immunohistochemical analysis of pRB. We analyzed 82 nonfunctional tumors and 53 somatotrophinomas subdivided into invasive and noninvasive cohorts. A significantly higher frequency of loss, at one or more of 13 markers, was evident in the invasive nonfunctional tumors (54%, 26 of 48) than in their noninvasive counterparts (29%, 10 of 34). An approximately equal frequency of loss was apparent in invasive (28%, 5 of 18) and noninvasive (31%, 11 of 35) somatotrophinomas at one or more markers. In those tumors harboring deletion, loss at two or more markers was more frequent in invasive nonfunctional tumors 65% (17 of 26) compared with 36% (4 of 11) of their noninvasive counterparts. In somatotrophinomas, 40% (2 of 5) of invasive tumors as compared with 64% (7 of 11) of noninvasive tumors had evidence of two or more deletions. In tumors showing loss at two or more loci, the majority showed large deletions; however, loss of the RB1 intragenic marker D13S153 was infrequent. In most cases, loss at individual markers was more frequent in invasive tumors than their noninvasive counterparts. A marker 3 cM telomeric to RB1 (D13S1319) showed the highest frequency of deletion in both invasive cohorts (29% of somatotrophinomas and 24% of nonfunctional tumors). Immunohistochemical analysis of pRB showed frequent loss in somatotrophinomas (27%, 9 of 33) in comparison with 4% (2 of 53) of non-functional tumors. Although loss of pRB did not correlate with loss of an intragenic marker or tumor grade, it was significantly associated with the somatotrophinoma subtype (P = 0.002). These data suggest that chromosome 13q is a frequent target for allelic deletion in pituitary tumors and point to another or other TSG loci in these regions.