Recommendations for assessing appearance concerns related to plexiform and cutaneous neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 may experience changes in their appearance due to physical manifestations of the disorders and/or treatment sequelae. Appearance concerns related to these physical changes can lead to psychological distress and poorer quality of life. While many neurofibromatosis 1 clinical trials focus on assessing changes in tumor volume, evaluating patients' perspectives on corresponding changes in symptoms such as physical appearance can be key secondary outcomes. We aimed to determine whether any existing patient-reported outcome measures are appropriate for evaluating changes in appearance concerns within neurofibromatosis 1 clinical trials. METHODS: After updating our previously published systematic review process, we used it to identify and rate existing patient-reported outcome measures related to disfigurement and appearance. Using a systematic literature search and initial triage process, we focused on identifying patient-reported outcome measures that could be used to evaluate changes in appearance concerns in plexiform or cutaneous neurofibroma clinical trials in neurofibromatosis 1. Our revised Patient-Reported Outcome Rating and Acceptance Tool for Endpoints then was used to evaluate each published patient-reported outcome measures in five domains, including (1) respondent characteristics, (2) content validity, (3) scoring format and interpretability, (4) psychometric data, and (5) feasibility. The highest-rated patient-reported outcome measures were then re-reviewed in a side-by-side comparison to generate a final consensus recommendation. RESULTS: Eleven measures assessing appearance concerns were reviewed and rated; no measures were explicitly designed to assess appearance concerns related to neurofibromatosis 1. The FACE-Q Craniofacial Module-Appearance Distress scale was the top-rated measure for potential use in neurofibromatosis 1 clinical trials. Strengths of the measure included that it was rigorously developed, included individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 in the validation sample, was applicable to children and adults, covered item topics deemed important by neurofibromatosis 1 patient representatives, exhibited good psychometric properties, and was feasible for use in neurofibromatosis 1 trials. Limitations included a lack of validation in older adults, no published information regarding sensitivity to change in clinical trials, and limited availability in languages other than English. CONCLUSION: The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis patient-reported outcome working group currently recommends the FACE-Q Craniofacial Module Appearance Distress scale to evaluate patient-reported changes in appearance concerns in clinical trials for neurofibromatosis 1-related plexiform or cutaneous neurofibromas. Additional research is needed to validate this measure in people with neurofibromatosis 1, including older adults and those with tumors in various body locations, and explore the effects of nontumor manifestations on appearance concerns in people with neurofibromatosis 1 and schwannomatosis.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSNMG) is defined as myasthenia gravis (MG) without detectable or low affinity antibodies to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). There are limited data on detailed clinical features and outcomes after treatment in dSNMG patients. The aim was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in dSNMG patients based on MG scales. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with MG who had negative AChR or MuSK antibodies and they were compared with an AChR-positive MG cohort. Correlations were made with data from the first and last clinic visits, between demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and disease severity, based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America category, Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII), Patient Acceptable Symptom State and simple single question (SSQ). RESULTS: Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria for dSNMG. The baseline MGII and SSQ scores in the dSNMG cohort showed no significant differences from the AChR group (p = 0.94 and p = 0.46). The dSNMG cohort MGII and SSQ scores improved significantly at the last clinical evaluation (p = 0.001 and p = 0.047). The MGII improvement in the AChR cohort was significantly better (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The initial severity of dSNMG based on clinical scores is similar to antibody-positive MG patients. There is significant clinical improvement in dSNMG patients after therapy, measured in the last clinical evaluation. This supports an immune pathophysiology of many dSNMG patients.

Pregnancy planning may impact maternal and neonatal outcomes in people with myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an acquired autoimmune condition commonly diagnosed in young people of reproductive age resulting in neuromuscular junction dysfunction. The course of MG during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes is vary in the literature. Pregnancy planning is a known strategy and modifiable risk factor in obstetric practice to decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity. We aim to assess if planning a pregnancy impacts maternal and neonatal outcomes, MG exacerbation, and pregnancy-related complications. METHODS: This study utilized data from an online, North American survey entitled "A Patient Centered study on Pregnancy in People with Myasthenia Gravis", distributed with the assistance of MG advocacy groups in the United States and Canada. It included individuals with MG who had at least one pregnancy in the last 10-years. Key maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between planned and unplanned pregnancies. RESULTS: Out of 156 survey participants, 58 had a pregnancy following MG diagnosis, totaling 90 reported pregnancies. Of these, 56 (62.2%) were planned and 34 (37.8%) were unplanned pregnancies. The unplanned pregnancies were associated with more MG exacerbations, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admission (37.7% vs. 13.7%, 26.5% vs. 11%, and 17.6% vs. 8.9%, respectively, p ≤ .05). The neonatal outcomes did not significantly differ between the groups. DISCUSSION: Planned pregnancies in people with MG may be associated with a reduced gestational and post-partum risk of MG exacerbation, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions. Larger studies are required to confirm this association and account for potential contributing variables.

Time to achieve a patient acceptable symptom state in myasthenia gravis.

Introduction: The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a reliable way to characterize a patient's satisfaction with their disease state in a "Yes"/"No" dichotomous manner. There is limited data on the time required to reach an acceptable state in Myasthenia Gravis (MG). We aimed to determine the time to reach a first PASS "Yes" response in patients at MG diagnosis and a PASS "No" status, and also to determine the influence of various factors on this time. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with myasthenia gravis who had an initial PASS "No" response and defined the time to reach a first PASS "Yes" by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Correlations were made between demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and disease severity, using the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) and Simple Single Question (SSQ). Results: In 86 patients meeting inclusion criteria, the median time to PASS "Yes" was 15 months (95% CI 11-18). Of 67 MG patients who achieved PASS "Yes," 61 (91%), achieved it by 25 months after diagnosis. Patients who required only prednisone therapy achieved PASS "Yes" in a shorter time with a median of 5.5 months (p = 0.01). Very-late-onset MG patients reached PASS "Yes" status in a shorter time (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 0.26-2.63; p = 0.001). Discussion: Most patients reached PASS "Yes" by 25 months after diagnosis. MG patients who only required prednisone and those with very-late-onset MG reach PASS "Yes" in shorter intervals.

Demographic and clinical determinants of the quality of life in adults with inherited and acquired myopathies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Measuring health-related quality of life (QOL) is vital for understanding the disease impact, but the complex relationship between clinical parameters and QOL remains unclear. The objective was to determine the demographic and clinical factors that influence the QOL in adults with inherited and acquired myopathies. METHODS: The study was of cross-sectional design. Detailed demographic and clinical details were collected. Patients answered Neuro-QOL and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short-form questionnaires. RESULTS: Data was collected from 100 consecutive in-person patient visits. Mean age of the cohort was 49.5 ± 20.1 (18-85) years, and the majority were male (53, 53%). Bivariate analysis between the various demographic and clinical features with the QOL scales revealed single simple question (SSQ), handgrip strength, Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score, female gender, and age to be nonuniformly associated with the QOL scales. There was no difference between inherited and acquired myopathies for any of the QOL scores, except for the poorer lower limb function domain in inherited myopathies (36.7 ± 7.3 vs. 40.9 ± 11.2, p = 0.049). Linear regression models revealed lower SSQ, lower handgrip strength, and lower MRC sum score to independently predict poor QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Handgrip strength and SSQ serve as novel predictors of QOL in myopathies. Handgrip strength has a significant impact on physical, mental, and social domains and deserves special attention with respect to rehabilitation. SSQ correlates well with QOL and can be employed as a quick and global assessment of a patient's well-being. Differences in QOL scores between patients with inherited and acquired myopathies were minimal.

Outcomes of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination Among Individuals With Myasthenia Gravis.

Importance: There are limited data regarding COVID-19 outcomes and vaccine uptake and safety among people with myasthenia gravis (MG). Objective: To investigate COVID-19-related outcomes and vaccine uptake among a population-based sample of adults with MG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, matched cohort study in Ontario, Canada, used administrative health data from January 15, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Adults with MG were identified using a validated algorithm. Each patient was matched by age, sex, and geographic area of residence to 5 controls from the general population and from a cohort of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Exposure: Patients with MG and matched controls. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were COVID-19 infection and related hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and 30-day mortality among patients with MG vs controls. Secondary outcomes were uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among patients with MG vs controls. Results: Among 11 365 233 eligible Ontario residents, 4411 patients with MG (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [15.6] years; 2274 women [51.6%]) were matched to 22 055 general population controls (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [15.6] years; 11 370 women [51.6%]) and 22 055 controls with RA (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [15.6] years; 11 370 women [51.6%]). In the matched cohort, 38 861 of 44 110 individuals (88.1%) were urban residents; in the MG cohort, 3901 (88.4%) were urban residents. Between January 15, 2020, and May 17, 2021, 164 patients with MG (3.7%), 669 general population controls (3.0%), and 668 controls with RA (3.0%) contracted COVID-19. Compared with general population controls and controls with RA, patients with MG had higher rates of COVID-19-associated emergency department visits (36.6% [60 of 164] vs 24.4% [163 of 669] vs 29.9% [200 of 668]), hospital admissions (30.5% [50 of 164] vs 15.1% [101 of 669] vs 20.7% [138 of 668]), and 30-day mortality (14.6% [24 of 164] vs 8.5% [57 of 669] vs 9.9% [66 of 668]). By August 2021, 3540 patients with MG (80.3%) vs 17 913 general population controls (81.2%) had received 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses, and 137 (3.1%) vs 628 (2.8%), respectively had received 1 dose. Of 3461 first vaccine doses for patients with MG, fewer than 6 individuals were hospitalized for MG worsening within 30 days of vaccination. Vaccinated patients with MG had a lower risk than unvaccinated patients with MG of contracting COVID-19 (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.60). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that adults with MG who contracted COVID-19 had a higher risk of hospitalization and death compared with matched controls. Vaccine uptake was high, with negligible risk of severe MG exacerbations after vaccination, as well as evidence of effectiveness. The findings support public health policies prioritizing people with MG for vaccination and new COVID-19 therapeutics.

Efgartigimod improved health-related quality of life in generalized myasthenia gravis: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (ADAPT).

There are substantial disease and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) burdens for many patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), especially for those whose disease symptoms are not well controlled. HRQoL measures such as the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item revised (MG-QOL15r) and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) are vital for evaluating the clinical benefit of therapeutic interventions in patients with MG, as they assess the burden of disease and the effectiveness of treatment, as perceived by patients. The phase 3 ADAPT study (NCT03669588) demonstrated that efgartigimod-a novel neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor-was well tolerated and that acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) participants who received efgartigimod had statistically significant improvements in MG-specific clinical scale scores. The ancillary data reported here, which cover an additional treatment cycle, show that these participants had similar significant improvements in HRQoL measures, the MG-QOL15r and EQ-5D-5L utility and visual analog scales, and that these improvements were maintained in the second treatment cycle. Positive effects on HRQoL were rapid, seen as early as the first week of treatment in both treatment cycles, and maintained for up to 4 weeks in the follow-up-only portion of treatment cycles. The pattern of improvements in HRQoL paralleled changes in immunoglobulin G level, and correlational analyses show that improvements were consistent across HRQoL measures and with clinical efficacy measures in the ADAPT study. The substantial and durable improvements in HRQoL end points in this study demonstrate the broader benefit of treatment with efgartigimod beyond relief of immediate signs and symptoms of gMG.

Understanding the Symptom Burden and Impact of Myasthenia Gravis from the Patient's Perspective: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) experience functional impairment due to MG symptoms. This study aimed to assess, from the patient perspective, the symptoms, impacts, and treatment goals of individuals diagnosed with gMG. METHODS: Semi-structured, in-depth concept-elicitation interviews were conducted with 28 individuals diagnosed with gMG in the United States. RESULTS: Participants reported gMG symptoms that affected many body regions and functions, with an average of 16 symptoms per participant. The most frequently reported symptoms were eyelid drooping (93%), physical fatigue (89%), symptoms affecting the legs (82%), difficulty breathing (82%), and difficulty holding head up (82%). Nearly all participants (96%) reported fluctuations in symptoms and severity. Participants' most bothersome symptoms were blurry/double vision (43%), breathing difficulties (36%), all-over fatigue (36%), and swallowing problems (29%). Impacts on physical functioning included an inability to participate in hobbies/sports, need for increased planning, and difficulties performing activities of daily living. All participants reported emotional impacts and impacts on their work and finances. Their treatment goals included reduced fatigue and weakness, improved symptom stability, and minimization of the impact of symptoms, in particular the emotional impact. CONCLUSIONS: The fluctuating and unpredictable nature of gMG symptoms was found to have a substantial impact on patients' emotional, social, and economic well-being. Participants' goals for symptom management suggest that greater focus is needed to help them quickly resume a normal lifestyle by achieving symptom stability. Impacts of fluctuating and unpredictable symptoms are difficult to measure, but it is important to consider symptom fluctuation as well as ongoing symptomatology when making treatment decisions, and to recognize the impact of uncontrolled symptoms on patients, their partners/caregivers, and family/friends. These factors are often not reflected in burden/cost-of-illness studies.

The aim of this study was to understand­from the patient's point of view­the range of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) symptoms that they experience, which symptoms bother them most, and which symptoms have the greatest impact on everyday life, as well as patients' treatment goals. Researchers asked these questions in one-on-one interviews with 28 people in the US who have gMG. Study participants reported living with symptoms that come and go, and are sometimes severe, making it difficult to lead a normal life. The most frequently reported symptoms were eyelid drooping (reported by 93% of study participants), physical fatigue (89%), symptoms affecting the legs (82%), difficulty breathing (82%), and difficulty holding head up (82%). The symptoms that bothered patients most were difficulties with vision (43%), problems breathing (36%), all-over fatigue (36%), and trouble swallowing (29%). Participants reported that gMG symptoms affected physical functioning, making it hard to participate in hobbies/sports, increasing the amount of planning needed to conduct their daily lives, and hindering their ability to do day-to-day activities (like driving, eating, and bathing). All participants reported that they were affected emotionally, and that the symptoms of gMG impacted their ability to work and their financial well-being. Participants' treatment goals included reducing fatigue and weakness, making symptoms more stable, and reducing the impact of symptoms, particularly emotional impacts. These responses reveal the extensive effects of gMG symptoms on patients' daily lives and highlight that symptom stability is especially important to people with gMG.

Reliability of Automatic Computer Vision-Based Assessment of Orofacial Kinematics for Telehealth Applications.

Introduction: Telehealth/remote assessment using readily available 2D mobile cameras and deep learning-based analyses is rapidly becoming a viable option for detecting orofacial and speech impairments associated with neurological and neurodegenerative disease during telehealth practice. However, the psychometric properties (e.g., internal consistency and reliability) of kinematics obtained from these systems have not been established, which is a crucial next step before their clinical usability is established. Methods: Participants were assessed in lab using a 3 dimensional (3D)-capable camera and at home using a readily-available 2D camera in a tablet. Orofacial kinematics was estimated from videos using a deep facial landmark tracking model. Kinematic features quantified the clinically relevant constructs of velocity, range of motion, and lateralization. In lab, all participants performed the same oromotor task. At home, participants were split into two groups that each performed a variant of the in-lab task. We quantified within-assessment consistency (Cronbach's α), reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), and fitted linear mixed-effects models to at-home data to capture individual-/task-dependent longitudinal trajectories. Results: Both in lab and at home, Cronbach's α was typically high (>0.80) and ICCs were often good (>0.70). The linear mixed-effect models that best fit the longitudinal data were those that accounted for individual- or task-dependent effects. Discussion: Remotely gathered orofacial kinematics were as internally consistent and reliable as those gathered in a controlled laboratory setting using a high-performance 3D-capable camera and could additionally capture individual- or task-dependent changes over time. These results highlight the potential of remote assessment tools as digital biomarkers of disease status and progression and demonstrate their suitability for novel telehealth applications.

Development of algorithms to identify individuals with Neurofibromatosis type 1 within administrative data and electronic medical records in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: There is limited population-based data on Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) in North America. We aimed to develop and validate algorithms using administrative health data and electronic medical records (EMRs) to identify individuals with NF1 in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We conducted an electronic free-text search of 15 commonly-used terms related to NF1 in the Electronic Medical Records Primary Care Database. Records were reviewed by two trained abstractors who classified them as confirmed, possible, and not NF1. An investigator with clinical expertise performed final NF1 classification. Patients were classified as confirmed if there was a documented diagnosis, meeting NIH criteria. Patients were classified as possible if (1) NF1 was recorded in the cumulative patient profile, but no clinical information to support the diagnosis; (2) only one criterion for diagnosis (e.g. child of confirmed case) but no further data to confirm or rule out. We tested different combinations of outpatient and inpatient billing codes, and applied a free-text search algorithm to identify NF1 cases in administrative data and EMRs, respectively. RESULTS: Of 273,440 eligible patients, 2,058 had one or more NF1 terms in their medical records. The terms "NF", "café-au-lait", or "sheath tumour" were constrained to appear in combination with another NF1 term. This resulted in 837 patients: 37 with possible and 71 with confirmed NF1. The population prevalence ranged from 1 in 3851 (confirmed NF1) to 1 in 2532 (possible and confirmed NF1). Billing code algorithms had poor performance, with overall low PPV (highest being 71%). The accuracy of the free-text EMR algorithm in identifying patients with NF1 was: sensitivity 85% (95% CI 74-92%), specificity 100% (95% CI 100-100%), positive predictive value 80% (95% CI 69-88%), negative predictive value 100% (95% CI 100-100%), and false positive rate 20% (95% CI 11-33%). Of false positives, 53% were possible NF1. CONCLUSIONS: A free-text search algorithm within the EMR had high sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Algorithms using billing codes had poor performance, likely due to the lack of NF-specific codes for outpatient visits. While NF1 ICD-9 and 10 codes are used for hospital admissions, only ~ 30% of confirmed NF1 cases had a hospitalization associated with an NF1 code.

Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments.

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehensive and widespread guideline to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, but key information is often missing in published reviews. This hinders the appraisal of the quality of outcome measurement instruments, impacts the decisions of knowledge users regarding their appropriateness, and compromises reproducibility and interpretability of the reviews' findings. To facilitate sufficient, transparent, and consistent reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments, an extension of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guideline will be developed: the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline. METHODS: The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be developed in accordance with recommendations for reporting guideline development from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. First, a candidate reporting item list will be created through an environmental literature scan and expert consultations. Second, an international Delphi study will be conducted with systematic review authors, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, psychometricians/clinimetricians, reporting guideline developers, journal editors as well as patients, caregivers, and members of the public. Delphi panelists will rate candidate items for inclusion on a 5-point scale, suggest additional candidate items, and give feedback on item wording and comprehensibility. Third, the draft PRISMA-COSMIN guideline and user manual will be iteratively piloted by applying it to systematic reviews in several disease areas to assess its relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, along with usability and user satisfaction. Fourth, a consensus meeting will be held to finalize the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline through roundtable discussions and voting. Last, a user manual will be developed and the final PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will be disseminated through publications, conferences, newsletters, and relevant websites. Additionally, relevant journals and organizations will be invited to endorse and implement PRISMA-COSMIN. Throughout the project, evaluations will take place to identify barriers and facilitators of involving patient/public partners and employing a virtual process. DISCUSSION: The PRISMA-COSMIN guideline will ensure that the reports of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are complete and informative, enhancing their reproducibility, ease of use, and uptake.

Retrospective study on the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Given the lack of information on safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients, we aimed to review our experience after surveying patients, as part of routine clinical practice, to ensure that advice on safety is accurate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of MG patients from the Prosserman Family Neuromuscular Clinic at the Toronto General Hospital who received two injections of any COVID-19 vaccine from February to August 2021. Demographic data were abstracted from the patient medical records. We assessed changes in the severity of MG using the virtual Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (vMGII), the simple single question (SSQ), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). We also assessed adverse effects after vaccination. RESULTS: We included 200 patients with a mean age of 64.3 ± 13.9 y, 51.5% were men, and 82% had generalized MG. The vMGII, SSQ, and PASS scores remained stable after each vaccine dose, and at last follow-up. Of the patients, 60% reported an adverse reaction after the first injection, and 56% after the second. The most common adverse reactions reported were local pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and fever. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 vaccinations were well tolerated in MG patients and were not associated with worsening severity of their MG. The prevalence of vaccine-related adverse reactions was the same as in the general population.

An update on the use of immunoglobulins as treatment for myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody mediated disease where pathogenic antibodies interact with the acetylcholine receptor or other proteins at the post-synaptic neuromuscular junction. There is growing evidence that immunoglobulin infusions are beneficial for clinical exacerbations and chronic refractory disease and may be an option for patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. AREAS COVERED: We performed an extensive literature review, looking for evidence on the use of immunoglobulins for the treatment of MG, by conducting a search in MEDLINE (1946 to present), EMBASE (1947 to present) and Clinicaltrials.gov. We have included studies on the use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIG) for acute deterioration and chronic disease. EXPERT OPINION: The use of IVIG in MG provides an option for rapid improvement in critical deterioration, being preferred over more invasive and less available therapies such as plasmapheresis. For refractory MG, the addition of IVIG can improve a patient's status and reduce the dosage of immunosuppressive medications. The alternative of SCIG is also effective and has advantages of infusion time flexibility, fewer side-effects, and patient independence. The safety and efficacy of both interventions, patient preferences and quality of life may direct therapeutic choices in the future.

Protocol for psychometric evaluation of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - Bulbar Dysfunction Index (ALS-BDI): a prospective longitudinal study.

INTRODUCTION: Early detection and tracking of bulbar dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are critical for directing management of the disease. Current clinical bulbar assessment tools are lacking, while existing physiological instrumental assessments are often inaccessible and cost-prohibitive for clinical application. The goal of our research is to develop and validate a brief and reliable, clinician-administered assessment tool-the ALS-Bulbar Dysfunction Index (ALS-BDI). This publication describes the study protocol that has been established to ascertain the tools' psychometric properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ALD-BDI's development closely follows guidelines outlined by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Through the proposed study protocol, we expect to establish psychometric properties of both individual test items of the ALS-BDI as well as the final version of the entire tool, including test-retest and inter-rater reliability, construct validity using gold-standard assessment methods and responsiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by research ethics boards at two data collection sites: Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, primary (Toronto, Canada; ID3080) and Mass General Brigham (#2013P001746, Boston, USA). Prior to participation in the study, the participants sign the informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Once validated, the ALS-BDI will be disseminated to key stakeholders. Following validation, the ALS-BDI and any required training material will be implemented for clinical use in a context of a multidisciplinary ALS clinic and used as an outcome measure for clinical trials in ALS research.

Validating Automatic Diadochokinesis Analysis Methods Across Dysarthria Severity and Syllable Task in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

PURPOSE: Oral diadochokinesis (DDK) is a standard dysarthria assessment task. To extract automatic and semi-automatic DDK measurements, numerous DDK analysis algorithms based on acoustic signal processing are available, including amplitude based, spectral based, and hybrid. However, these algorithms have been predominantly validated in individuals with no perceptible to mild dysarthria. The behavior of these algorithms across dysarthria severity is largely unknown. Likewise, these algorithms have not been tested equally for various syllable types. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of five common DDK algorithms as a function of dysarthria severity, considering syllable types. METHOD: We analyzed 282 DDK recordings of /ba/, /pa/, and /ta/ from 145 participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Recordings were stratified into mild, moderate, or severe dysarthria groups based on individual performance on the Speech Intelligibility Test. Analysis included manual and automatic estimation of the number of syllables, DDK rate, and cycle-to-cycle temporal variability (cTV). Validation metrics included Bland-Altman mixed-effects limits of agreement between manual and automatic syllable counts, recall and precision between manual and automatic syllable boundary detection, and Kendall's tau-b correlations between manual and algorithm-detected DDK rate and cTV. RESULTS: The amplitude-based algorithm (absolute energy) yielded the strongest correlations with manual analysis across all severity groups for DDK rate (τ b = 0.7-0.84) and cTV (τ b = 0.7-0.84) and the narrowest limits of agreement (-5.92 to 7.12 syllable difference). Moreover, this algorithm also provided the highest mean recall and precision across severity groups for /ba/ and /pa/, but with significantly more variation for/ta/. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithms based on signal energy analysis appeared to be the most robust for DDK analysis across dysarthria severity and syllable types; however, it remains prone to error against severe dysarthria and alveolar syllable context. Further development is needed to address this important issue.

Validation of the Italian version of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII).

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Italian version of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII). INTRODUCTION: MGII is a recent promising measure developed for MG patient evaluation. It includes a clinical severity evaluation and a patient-reported questionnaire. It has been developed in English and has demonstrated feasibility, reliability, and construct validity. Recently, its Dutch translation has been validated. METHODS: MGII was translated to Italian with a multi-step forward process. We assessed correlations with the following scores: Istituto Nazionale Carlo Besta score for Myasthenia Gravis (INCB-MG), the MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), the Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC), the Quality of Life 15 for Myasthenia Gravis (QOL15-MG), and the Myasthenia Gravis Disability (MGDIS). We also assessed differences in MGII scores by disease severity with the ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients were enrolled. The mean MGII total score was 13.3 ± 11.9 (range 0-49), with a mean ocular subscore of 3.7 ± 4.7 and a mean MGII generalized subscore of 9.6 ± 9.0. As expected, the MGII had a good correlation with the other severity scores. The MGII had a lower floor effect (3.5%) than the other measures. Twenty-five patients were assessed in follow-up; as expected, the MGII change scores had moderate correlations with change in other MG severity measures and lower correlations with quality of life measures. CONCLUSIONS: The MGII score was cross-culturally validated in an Italian cohort of MG patients. We confirmed its lower floor effect and the correlations with other MG measures including INCB-MG that was not evaluated in previous studies.

Clinical profile and impact of comorbidities in patients with very-late-onset myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical profile of myasthenia gravis (MG) in older patients and determine the impact of medical comorbidities on their MG status and outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients with a symptom onset of MG at or after 65 years of age. Correlations were made between demographics, clinical characteristics, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) severity scale scores, and Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) scores with two outcome measures: MGFA Post-Intervention Status (MGFA-PIS) and Simple Single Question (SSQ). RESULTS: The study population included 109 patients, with 90 of them having more than one follow-up visit. Their mean age was 75.3 ± 6.9 years and sex distribution was even. Of these patients, 67.7% had generalized MG. Nine-one percent of patients had one comorbidity. None of the demographic factors or comorbidities showed an association with MGFA-PIS, SSQ, or MGII after correction for multiple comparisons. Seventy-one percent of the patients improved with treatment, 12.4% remained unchanged, and 16.6% showed worsening at their last follow-up visit. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that patients with very-late-onset MG had a good prognosis and treatment response. None of the comorbidities had an impact on the severity of myasthenic symptoms or on outcome in these patients.