Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 6(3): 231-238, 2017 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27147712

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diarrheal diseases are a major cause of ambulatory care visits and hospitalizations among children. Because of overlapping signs and symptoms and expensive and inefficient testing methods, the etiology of pediatric diarrhea is rarely established. METHODS: We identified children <18 years of age who were evaluated for diarrhea at Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah, between October 2010 and September 2012. Stool specimens submitted for testing were evaluated by using the FilmArray gastrointestinal diagnostic system, which is a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction platform that can simultaneously detect 23 bacterial, viral, and protozoal agents. RESULTS: A pathogen was detected in 561 (52%) of 1089 diarrheal episodes. The most commonly detected pathogens included toxigenic Clostridium difficile (16%), diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (15%), norovirus GI/GII (11%), and adenovirus F 40/41 (7%). Shiga toxin-producing E coli were detected in 43 (4%) specimens. Multiple pathogens were identified in 160 (15%) specimens. Viral pathogens (norovirus, adenovirus, rotavirus, and sapovirus) were more common among children <5 years old than among those 5 to 17 years old (38% vs 16%, respectively; P < .001). Bacterial pathogens were identified most commonly in children 2 to 4 years of age. Children with 1 or more underlying chronic medical conditions were less likely to have a pathogen identified than those without a chronic medical condition (45% vs 60%, respectively; P < .01). Viral pathogens were detected more commonly in the winter, whereas bacterial pathogens were detected more commonly in the summer. CONCLUSIONS: Toxigenic C difficile, diarrheagenic E coli, and norovirus were the leading organisms detected among these children with diarrhea. Viral pathogens are identified frequently among young children with acute gastroenteritis.


Assuntos
Diarreia/microbiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diarreia/parasitologia , Diarreia/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Estações do Ano , Utah/epidemiologia
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(3): 687-98, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26739158

RESUMO

Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increased medical expense. Rapid diagnosis improves outcomes and reduces costs. The FilmArray blood culture identification panel (BioFire Diagnostics LLC, Salt Lake City, UT), a highly multiplexed PCR assay, can identify 24 etiologic agents of sepsis (8 Gram-positive, 11 Gram-negative, and 5 yeast species) and three antimicrobial resistance genes (mecA, vanA/B, and blaKPC) from positive blood culture bottles. It provides results in about 1 h with 2 min for assay setup. We present the results of an eight-center trial comparing the sensitivity and specificity of the panel with those of the laboratories' standard phenotypic identification techniques, as well as with molecular methods used to distinguish Acinetobacter baumannii from other members of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex and to detect antimicrobial resistance genes. Testing included 2,207 positive aerobic blood culture samples, 1,568 clinical and 639 seeded. Samples were tested fresh or were frozen for later testing within 8 h after the bottles were flagged as positive by an automated blood culture system. At least one organism was detected by the panel in 1,382 (88.1%) of the positive clinical specimens. The others contained primarily off-panel organisms. The panel reported multiple organisms in 81 (5.86%) positive clinical specimens. The unresolved blood culture identification sensitivity for all target detections exceeded 96%, except for Klebsiella oxytoca (92.2%), which achieved 98.3% sensitivity after resolution of an unavoidable phenotypic error. The sensitivity and specificity for vanA/B and blaKPC were 100%; those for mecA were 98.4 and 98.3%, respectively.


Assuntos
Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/microbiologia , Leveduras/classificação , Leveduras/genética , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Genes Bacterianos , Genes Fúngicos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Leveduras/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 27(2): 148-54, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23424157

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Respiratory pathogens are a leading cause of hospital admission and traditional detection methods are time consuming and insensitive. Multiplex molecular detection methods have recently been investigated in hope of replacing these traditional techniques with rapid panel-based testing. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the FilmArray(®) Respiratory Panel ([FARP], Idaho Technology Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) as a replacement for direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing in a pediatric hospital. METHODS: Eleven of the 21 FARP analytes (Adenovirus, Bordetella pertussis, human Metapneumovirus, Influenza A, Influenza A H1N1 2009, Influenza B, Parainfluenza [1, 2, & 3], Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and rhinovirus) were evaluated using nasopharyngeal specimens. Positive samples were pooled in groups of 5. Samples identified by reference methods as positive for respiratory pathogens were used for the majority of positive samples. DFA was the reference method for ten analytes; Luminex™ xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) was the reference method for rhinovirus. Discrepant results were resolved by positive culture and fluorescent antibody stain and/or laboratory-developed real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (LDT). RESULTS: The agreement for most analytes was in concordance with the established reference methods with the exception of Adenovirus. Additionally, the FARP detected several pathogens not previously detected by DFA, and most were confirmed by LDT. Several DFA-positive analytes were confirmed as true-negatives by the FARP and LDT. CONCLUSION: FARP overall performed better than DFA with the exception of Adenovirus, making the FARP an attractive alternative to laboratories looking to replace DFA with a rapid, user-friendly, multiplex molecular assay.


Assuntos
Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Virologia/métodos , Adolescente , Bordetella pertussis , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Limite de Detecção , Pneumopatias/microbiologia , Pneumopatias/virologia , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Nasofaringe/virologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Vírus/genética , Vírus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 74(4): 349-55, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22999332

RESUMO

Sepsis is a leading cause of death. Rapid and accurate identification of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance directly from blood culture could improve patient outcomes. The FilmArray® (FA; Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) Blood Culture (BC) panel can identify >25 pathogens and 4 antibiotic resistance genes from positive blood cultures in 1 h. We compared a development version of the panel to conventional culture and susceptibility testing on 102 archived blood cultures from adults and children with bacteremia. Of 109 pathogens identified by culture, 95% were identified by FA. Among 111 prospectively collected blood cultures, the FA identified 84 (91%) of 92 pathogens covered by the panel. Among 25 Staphylococcus aureus and 21 Enterococcus species detected, FA identified all culture-proven methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The FA BC panel is an accurate method for the rapid identification of pathogens and resistance genes from blood culture.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Sangue/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Adulto , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos
5.
J Clin Virol ; 52(3): 210-4, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21855405

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Identifying respiratory pathogens within populations is difficult because invasive sample collection, such as with nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA), is generally required. PCR technology could allow for non-invasive sampling methods. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the utility of non-invasive sample collection using anterior nare swabs and facial tissues for respiratory virus detection by multiplex PCR. STUDY DESIGN: Children aged 1 month-17 years evaluated in a pediatric emergency department for respiratory symptoms had a swab, facial tissue, and NPA sample collected. All samples were tested for respiratory viruses by multiplex PCR. Viral detection rates were calculated for each collection method. Sensitivity and specificity of swabs and facial tissues were calculated using NPA as the gold standard. RESULTS: 285 samples from 95 children were evaluated (92 swab-NPA pairs, 91 facial tissue-NPA pairs). 91% of NPA, 82% of swab, and 77% of tissue samples were positive for ≥1 virus. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human rhinovirus (HRV) were most common. Overall, swabs were positive for 74% of virus infections, and facial tissues were positive for 58%. Sensitivity ranged from 17 to 94% for swabs and 33 to 84% for tissues. Sensitivity was highest for RSV (94% swabs and 84% tissues). Specificity was ≥95% for all viruses except HRV for both collection methods. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of anterior nare swabs and facial tissues in the detection of respiratory viruses by multiplex PCR varied by virus type. Given its simplicity and specificity, non-invasive sampling for PCR testing may be useful for conducting epidemiologic or surveillance studies in settings where invasive testing is impractical or not feasible.


Assuntos
Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Líquido da Lavagem Nasal/virologia , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios/isolamento & purificação , Sistema Respiratório/virologia , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Rhinovirus/isolamento & purificação , Viroses/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Face/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Nasofaringe/virologia , Infecções por Picornaviridae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/diagnóstico , Vírus Sinciciais Respiratórios/genética , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Rhinovirus/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Manejo de Espécimes , Viroses/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...