Impact of the HEART Pathway on Admission Rates for Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain: An External Clinical Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a common emergency department (ED) chief complaint. Safe discharge mechanisms for low-risk chest pain patients would be useful. OBJECTIVE: To compare admission rates prior to and after implementation of an accelerated disposition pathway for ED patients with low-risk chest pain based upon the HEART (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, Troponin) score (HEART pathway). METHODS: We conducted an impact analysis of the HEART pathway. Patients with a HEART score ≥ 4 underwent hospital admission for cardiac risk stratification and monitoring. Patients with a HEART score ≤ 3 could opt for discharge with 72-h follow-up in lieu of admission. We collected data on cohorts prior to and after implementation of the new disposition pathway. For each cohort, we screened the charts of 625 consecutive chest pain patients. We measured patient demographics, past medical history, vital signs, HEART score, disposition, and 6-week major adverse cardiac events (MACE) using chart review methodology. We compared our primary outcome of hospital admission between the two cohorts. RESULTS: The admission rate for the preintervention cohort was 63.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.7-68.2%), vs. 48.3% (95% CI 43.7-53.0%) for the postintervention cohort. The absolute difference in admission rates was 15.3% (95% CI 8.7-21.8%). The odds ratio of admission for the postintervention cohort in a logistic regression model controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and vital signs was 0.48 (95% CI 0.33-0.66). One postintervention cohort patient leaving the ED against medical advice (HEART Score 4) experienced 6-week MACE. CONCLUSIONS: The HEART pathway may provide a safe mechanism to optimize resource allocation for risk-stratifying ED chest pain patients.

A 12-month descriptive analysis of emergency intubations at Brooke Army Medical Center: a National Emergency Airway Registry study.

Emergency airway management is a critical skill for military healthcare providers. Our goal was to describe the Emergency Department (ED) intubations at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) over a 12-month period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Physicians performing endotracheal intubations in the BAMC ED complete data collection forms for each intubation event as part of the National Emergency Airway Registry, including patient demographics, intubation techniques, success and failure rates, adverse events, and patient disposition. We cross-referenced these forms against the numbers of intubation events reported in the ED nursing daily reports to ensure capture of all intubations. Providers completed forms for every intubation within 6 weeks of the procedure. We analyzed data from March 28, 2016, to March 27, 2017. RESULTS: During the study period, providers performed 259 intubations in the BAMC ED. Reasons for intubation were related to trauma for 184 patients (71.0%) and medical conditions for 75 patients (29.0%). Overall, first-attempt success was 83.0%. Emergency medicine residents performed a majority of first attempts (95.0%). Most common devices chosen on first attempt were a video laryngoscope for 143 patients (55.2%) and a direct laryngoscope for 115 patients (44.4%). One patient underwent cricothyrotomy. The 2 most common induction agents were ketamine (59.8%; 95% CI, 55.2%-67.4%) and etomidate (19.3%; 95% CI, 14.7%-24.7%). The most common neuromuscular blocking agents were rocuronium (62.9%; 95% CI, 56.7%-68.8%) and succinylcholine (18.9%; 95% CI, 14.3%-24.2%). CONCLUSION: In the BAMC ED, emergency intubation most commonly occurred for trauma indications using video laryngoscopy with a high first-pass success.

Soft tissue oxygen saturation to predict admission from the emergency department: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a soft tissue oxygen saturation (Sto2) measurement at triage for predicting admission to the hospital in adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) in addition to data routinely gathered at triage. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, single center study of adults presenting to the ED for evaluation. Research assistants obtained thenar eminence Sto2 measurements on subjects in ED triage. ED providers not involved in the study then made all management and disposition decisions. We prospectively collected data on each subject's final ED disposition (admission versus discharge). We identified the optimal Sto2 cutoff value for predicting admission. We then used logistic regression modeling to describe the added predictive value of Sto2 beyond routinely collected triage data including Emergency Severity Index level, age, and vital signs. RESULTS: We analyzed 2588 adult (>17years) subjects with 743 subjects (28.7%) admitted to the hospital. Sto2<76% was the optimal diagnostic cutoff for predicting admission. Of subjects with Sto2<76%, 158 of 384 (41.1%) underwent admission versus 585 of 2204 (26.5%) subjects with Sto2≥76. After controlling for age, vital signs, and ESI level in the logistic regression analysis, Sto2<76% had an odds ratio of 1.54 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 to 1.98) for predicting admission. CONCLUSIONS: Sto2 may provide additional prognostic data to routine triage assessment regarding the disposition for undifferentiated adult patients presenting to the ED.