RESUMO
There is increasing interest by researchers and clinicians in behavior change interventions for promoting physical activity in persons newly diagnosed with MS. Ideally, such interventions require the delivery of behavior change techniques (BCTs) based on theory and the selection of BCTs might further require tailoring for this MS subpopulation. The current study examined BCTs preferred by persons newly diagnosed with MS for informing the design and delivery of physical activity behavior change interventions in early-stages of MS. We recruited and interviewed 20 persons newly diagnosed with MS (i.e., disease duration ≤ 2 years). The interviews were conducted online via video conferencing platform and followed a semi-structured script. During the interviews, participants provided opinions regarding an ideal physical activity behavior change program, and the opinions of participants were mapped with the Intervention Functions of the Behavior Change Wheel, BCTs, and BCT groups. Ten frequently mentioned BCTs were identified as preferred strategies for a physical activity behavior change intervention among persons newly diagnosed with MS. These BCTs focused on providing social support, skills and strategies for physical activity performance and regulation, and knowledge on benefits of physical activity in MS. This research provides a refined list of BCTs that can be included when designing tailored physical activity behavior change interventions for persons newly diagnosed with MS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is a promising intervention for disease modification and symptom management in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, there is a lack of research focusing on PA behavior change interventions for persons newly diagnosed with MS. Such PA behavior change interventions should be developed based on a strong empirical foundation of understanding the behavior and its determinants (ie, what to target for changes to occur). To that end, this qualitative study examined factors explaining PA in persons newly diagnosed with MS and identified potential targets for future behavior change intervention development based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. METHODS: Twenty individuals diagnosed with MS within the past 2 years underwent one-on-one semistructured interviews using questions developed based on the COM-B model. Data were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis, and the identified themes were then mapped with the COM-B model. RESULTS: Factors explaining PA in the study sample were identified across the COM-B components. The typical factors include knowledge and skills to sufficiently engage in PA with appropriate approaches, ability to adapt and navigate through new environmental and social difficulties after diagnosis, and motivation resulting from a combination of factors, such as outcome expectation, belief of capabilities, role/identity, reinforcement, and emotions. CONCLUSIONS: The COM-B model was applied successfully in this study to understand PA behavior and identify potential targets for behavior change in individuals newly diagnosed with MS. Future behavior change interventions should consider addressing these factors to generate effective PA behavior change in this population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is beneficial for rehabilitation and symptom management in multiple sclerosis (MS), yet persons newly diagnosed with MS are insufficiently active and have not been the focus of PA research. This is important as early initiation of lifestyle PA, alongside other disease modifying therapies, might maximize the lasting benefits of this behavior on health outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in MS. PURPOSE: This single group, pre-post study examined the feasibility and initial efficacy of a 12-week remotely delivered COM-B-based behavior change intervention targeting lifestyle PA in persons newly diagnosed with MS. METHODS: Persons newly diagnosed with MS (diagnosis of 2 years or less) were recruited for the study. The intervention was designed based on COM-B and formative research, and included a program manual, newsletters, video coaching calls, pedometer, logbook, and calendar. Feasibility was assessed in four domains: process (e.g., recruitment, retention), resource (e.g., time and costs), management (e.g., data management), and scientific evidence (e.g., safety, treatment effects). RESULTS: Thirty-two persons newly diagnosed with MS underwent screening, 17 were eligible, and 14 started the intervention. Twelve participants completed the study (86 % retention rate). All participants in the intervention engaged in 100 % of video coaching calls and participants provided 73 % of online step count entries. Eighty-three percent of participants fully complied with reviewing the newsletters. No relapses were reported during the intervention. There were moderate-to-large increases in PA outcomes, as measured by the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and accelerometry (light PA) (d ≥ 0.5). There were no significant changes in other accelerometry outcomes, including step counts and moderate-to-vigorous PA (d = 0.2). There were large, positive effects of the intervention on physical and mental health-related quality of life with (d ≥ 1), but the change in fatigue severity was small and not statistically significant among the study participants (d = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for feasibility and initial efficacy of a COM-B-based PA intervention for persons newly diagnosed with MS. The results indicate that this intervention was feasible, safe, acceptable, and promising for promoting lifestyle PA in persons newly diagnosed with MS.