Overview of Inhaled Nanopharmaceuticals.

Nanopharmaceuticals represent a group of nanoparticles engineered for medical purposes. Nowadays, nanotechnology offers several possibilities to improve the safety and efficacy of medicines by designing advanced carrier systems which have been found to offer particular advantages when formulated in the nanoscale. Some of the initially marketed nano-formulations already demonstrate advantages over conventional formulations. Innovative delivery systems offer the possibility to not only control drug release but also to overcome biological barriers. For the translation of new drug products from bench to bedside, however, it is pivotal to test and prove their safety. This is of course also true for nanopharmaceuticals, where in particular the biocompatibility and also the clearance/biodegradation of the carrier material after drug delivery has to be demonstrated. The pulmonary route offers some great opportunities for noninvasive drug delivery but also implicates peculiar challenges. Advanced aerosol formulations with innovative drug carriers have already contributed to the significant progress of inhalation therapy. However, in spite of the large alveolar epithelial surface area, the respiratory tract still features diverse efficient biological barriers, primarily designed by nature to protect the human body against inhaled pollutants and pathogens. Only a thorough understanding of particle-lung interactions will allow the rational design of novel nanopharmaceuticals capable of overcoming these barriers, while of course always keeping in mind the strict demands for their safety. While the recent resurrection of inhaled insulin has already confirmed the potential of the pulmonary route for systemic delivery of biopharmaceuticals, inhaled nanopharmaceuticals, currently under investigation, promise to improve also local therapies like anti-infectives.

Preparation of maltodextrin nanoparticles and encapsulation of bovine serum albumin - Influence of formulation parameters.

Maltodextrin, which is obtained by partial hydrolysis of starch, is water soluble and could serve as hydrophilic carrier for the encapsulation of protein-based active pharmaceutical ingredients. We investigated three different commercial maltodextrins (Dextrose Equivalents (DE) 4.0-7.0, DE 13.0-17.0 and DE 16.5-19.5) with focus on their ability to form nanoparticles by inverse precipitation. Successful particle formation was observed for DE 13.0-17.0 and DE 16.5-19.5 but not for DE 4.0-7.0. The process was investigated using acetone as anti-solvent and poloxamer 407 as stabilizer. A tunable size between 170 nm and 450 nm was achieved by varying the type of maltodextrin and the stabilizer concentration. Particles were spherical in shape and were stable over a time period of 14 days. Maltodextrin nanoparticles (MD NPs) were tested on A549 cells and did not show any cytotoxic effects. This underlines the potential of maltodextrin as material for drug delivery systems. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein was successfully encapsulated into MD NPs with encapsulation efficiencies of approx. 70% and loading rates of up to 20%.

Co-culture of human alveolar epithelial (hAELVi) and macrophage (THP-1) cell lines.

The air-blood barrier is mainly composed of alveolar epithelial cells and macrophages. Whereas the epithelium acts as a diffusional barrier, macrophages represent an immunological barrier, in particular for larger molecules and nanoparticles. This paper describes a new co-culture of human cell lines representing both cell types. Acquiring, culturing and maintaining primary alveolar epithelial cells presents significant logistical and technical difficulties. The recently established human alveolar epithelial lentivirus immortalized cell line, hAELVi, when grown on permeable filters, form monolayers with high functional and morphological resemblance to alveolar type I cells. To model alveolar macrophages, the human cell line THP-1 was seeded on pre-formed hAELVi monolayers. The co-culture was characterized regarding cellular morphology, viability and barrier function. Macrophages were homogenously distributed on the epithelium and could be kept in co-culture for up to 7 days. Transmission electron microscopy showed loose contact between THP-1 and hAELVi cells. When grown at air liquid interface, both cells were covered with extracellular matrix-like structure, which was absent in THP-1 mono culture. In co-culture with macrophages, hAELVi cells displayed similar, sometimes even higher, trans-epithelial electrical resistance than in mono-cultures. When exposed to silver and starch NPs, hAELVi mono-cultures were more tolerant to the particles than THP-1 mono-cultures. The viability in the co-culture was similar to that of hAELVi monocultures. Transport studies with sodium fluorescein in presence/absence of EDTA proved that the co culture acts as functional diffusion barrier. These data demonstrate that hAELVi-/THP-1 co-cultures represent a promising model for safety and permeability studies of inhaled chemicals, drugs and nanoparticles.

Inhibition of surface crystallisation of amorphous indomethacin particles in physical drug-polymer mixtures.

Surface coverage may affect the crystallisation behaviour of amorphous materials. This study investigates crystallisation inhibition in powder mixtures of amorphous drug and pharmaceutical excipients. Pure amorphous indomethacin (IMC) powder and physical mixtures thereof with Eudragit(®) E or Soluplus(®) in 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3 (w/w) ratios were stored at 30 °C and 23 or 42% RH. Samples were analysed during storage by X-ray powder diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). IMC Eudragit(®) mixtures showed higher physical stability than pure IMC whereas IMC Soluplus(®) mixtures did not. Water uptake was higher for mixtures containing Soluplus(®) than for amorphous IMC or IMC Eudragit(®) mixtures. However, the Tg of amorphous IMC was unaffected by the presence (and nature) of polymer. SEM revealed that Eudragit(®) particles aggregated on the surface of IMC particles, whereas Soluplus(®) particles did not. The drug particles developed multiple crystallites at their surface with subsequent crystal growth. The intimate contact between the surface agglomerated Eudragit(®) particles and drug is believed to inhibit crystallisation through reduced IMC surface molecular mobility. Polymer particles may also mechanically hinder crystal growth outwards from the surface. This work highlights the importance of microparticulate surface coverage of amorphous drug particles on their stability.