Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes.

AIM: To compare plaque removal efficacy of Oral-B CrossAction (CA) used for 1 min with an American Dental Association (ADA) manual toothbrush used for 2 or 5 min in an examiner-blind, three-treatment, six-period crossover study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After refraining from all oral hygiene procedures for 23-25 h, subjects were randomly assigned to one of nine possible six-period (visit) treatment sequences. Plaque was assessed at baseline (Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index). Post-brushing scores were recorded after brushing with a marketed dentifrice and the assigned toothbrush for the specified duration. The same procedure was followed at each of six subsequent visits. Clinical measurements were carried out by the same examiner. RESULTS: Forty subjects completed the study. All three treatments effectively removed plaque from the whole mouth, along the gingival margin and from approximal surfaces. Whole mouth and gingival margin plaque removal scores with CA for 1 min did not differ significantly from scores with the ADA toothbrush used for 2 min. The ADA brush used for 5 min showed significantly greater whole mouth (P < 0.001) and gingival margin (P < 0.001) plaque reduction than the two other treatments. Approximal plaque removal scores did not differ between the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Efficient plaque removal can be achieved after 1 min of brushing with CA. The amount of plaque removed did not differ significantly from that achieved with the ADA brush after 2 min of brushing. Greater whole mouth and gingival margin plaque removal scores were seen with the ADA brush after 5 min.

The relative anticaries effectiveness of three fluoride-containing dentifrices in Puerto Rico.

The objective of this research was to evaluate the anticaries effectiveness of a low-dose (500 ppm F, low-NaF) sodium fluoride dentifrice, a high-dose (2,800 ppm F, high-NaF) sodium fluoride dentifrice and an experimental 0.454% stabilized stannous fluoride (1,100 ppm F) with sodium hexametaphosphate (SnF2-HMP) dentifrice, each relative to a standard 1,100 ppm F sodium fluoride positive control dentifrice. Subjects (n = 955, with approximately 239 per group) with a mean age of 10.6 (approximately 9-12 years) were randomly assigned to one of four dentifrice treatments. Two calibrated examiners independently measured visual-tactile caries as DMFS that was supplemented with a radiographic examination at baseline, 12 months and 24 months for each subject. Generally similar results were independently observed by both examiners at the conclusion of the 2-year study period. Considering all subjects that attended at least 60% of the supervised brushing sessions, statistically significantly less caries was observed in the high-NaF group compared to the control group. Similarly, statistically significantly less caries was observed in the SnF2-HMP group as compared to the control group. Differences in caries increments between the low-NaF and control groups were not statistically significant. One of the examiners observed these same statistically significant differences after 1 year. In conclusion, the results of this clinical trial indicated that while no difference in caries increments was observed between the low-NaF and control groups, both the high-NaF and the SnF2-HMP groups experienced significantly fewer lesions than the control group.

Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush.

PURPOSE: Recently, a new power toothbrush has been marketed with a design that fundamentally differs from other marketed power toothbrushes, in that it incorporates a round oscillating head, in conjunction with fixed bristles. The objective of this study was to compare the plaque removal efficacy of a control manual toothbrush (Colgate Navigator) to this experimental power toothbrush (Crest SpinBrush) following a single use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, 4-period crossover design which examined plaque removal with the two toothbrushes following a single use in 40 completed subjects. Plaque was scored before and after brushing using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Index. RESULTS: Baseline plaque scores were 1.77 for both the experimental toothbrush and control toothbrush treatment groups. With respect to all surfaces examined, the experimental toothbrush delivered an adjusted (via analysis of covariance) mean difference between baseline and post-brushing plaque scores of 0.48 while the control toothbrush delivered an adjusted mean difference of 0.35. The experimental toothbrush removed, on average, 37.6% more plaque than the control toothbrush. These results were statistically significant (P< 0.001). With respect to buccal surfaces, the experimental toothbrush delivered an adjusted mean difference between baseline and post-brushing plaque scores of 0.54 while the control toothbrush delivered an adjusted mean difference of 0.42. This represents 27.8% more plaque removal with the experimental toothbrush compared to the control toothbrush. These results were also statistically significant (P= 0.001). Results on lingual surfaces also demonstrated statistically significantly (P< 0.001) greater plaque removal for the experimental toothbrush with an average of 53.4% more plaque removal.

Relative anti-caries efficacy of 1100, 1700, 2200, and 2800 ppm fluoride ion in a sodium fluoride dentifrice over 1 year.

There is limited evidence from clinical trials on the dose response of sodium fluoride dentifrices at concentrations above 1100 ppm fluoride ion, with respect to caries efficacy. This randomized, double-blind study examined the anti-caries effectiveness of sodium fluoride dentifrices containing 1700 ppm, 2200 ppm and 2800 ppm fluoride ion relative to an 1100 ppm fluoride ion control. A population of 5439 elementary schoolchildren, aged 6-15 years, was recruited from an urban central Ohio area with a low fluoride content water supply (<0.3 ppm). Subjects were examined by visual-tactile and radiographic examination at baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 years of using the sodium fluoride dentifrices. Subjects were stratified according to gender, age and baseline DMFS scores derived from the visual-tactile baseline examination and randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: 0.243% sodium fluoride (1100 ppm fluoride ion), 0.376% sodium fluoride (1700 ppm fluoride ion), 0.486% sodium fluoride (2200 ppm fluoride ion), and 0.619% sodium fluoride (2800 ppm fluoride ion). All products were formulated with the same fluoride compatible silica abrasive. Results after 1 year provided evidence of a positive sodium fluoride dose response. Compared to the 1100 ppm fluoride treatment group, the 1700 ppm fluoride treatment group had an 11.0% reduction in DMFS that was not statistically significant, while the 2200 ppm and 2800 ppm fluoride treatment groups showed statistically significant (P<0.05) reductions of 18.6% and 20.4%, respectively. The reductions in caries delivered by the higher fluoride dentifrices were present across all tooth surface types, but were most pronounced for occlusal surfaces. Results at years 2 and 3 were confounded by a concurrent fluoride rinse program, which involved portions of the study population. While the trends for the higher fluoride dentifrices observed at year 1 remained at years 2 and 3, the difference observed between treatments were substantially less and failed to reach statistical significance (P<0.05). Collectively, the data demonstrate that the 2200 ppm and the 2800 ppm fluoride treatments delivered statistically significantly greater caries efficacy than the 1100 ppm fluoride treatment. This large-scale clinical trial provides evidence of a positive statistically significant dose relationship between dental caries and sodium fluoride in a dentifrice at levels above 1100 ppm fluoride at year 1.

Reduction in dental caries with four concentrations of sodium fluoride in a dentifrice: a meta-analysis evaluation.

Information on the effects of fluoride concentrations above 1,100 ppm in dentifrices is not extensive in the literature. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine and compare the anticaries effectiveness (in terms of DMFS scores) of 1,700 ppm, 2,200 ppm and 2,800 ppm F- ion (as sodium fluoride) dentifrices vs. an 1,100 ppm F- ion (as sodium fluoride) control dentifrice based on results from six double-blind, randomized clinical studies, each conducted over a two- to three-year period. The studies each enrolled approximately 1,200-2,000 male and female school children per treatment group in grades I through 8, and were conducted in areas with low fluoride content water supplies in the states of Indiana, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Oregon. Separate meta-analyses were performed on the study results (DMFS increment scores determined by visual-tactile examinations supplemented with radiographs) for the one-year, two-year and three-year examinations. Comparisons of the 1,700 ppm F-, 2,200 ppm F-, and 2,800 ppm F- groups vs. the 1,100 ppm F- group were based on pooling the effect sizes for these comparisons from the individual studies. The effect sizes were calculated in two different ways, reflecting the analyses that were performed in the original studies: 1) effects based on the sample means and variances; and 2) effects based on the adjusted sample means and mean squared error from an analysis of covariance. The results obtained from this meta-analysis provide evidence that the use of a 2,800 ppm F- ion, as sodium fluoride, dentifrice results in statistically significantly lower caries increment than the use of an 1,100 ppm F- ion, as sodium fluoride, dentifrice. This result was noted after one, two, and three years of dentifrice use. The 1,700 ppm F- and 2,200 ppm F- dentifrice groups showed some directional advantages over the 1,100 ppm F- dentifrice group, however the analysis did not establish these groups as statistically significantly better than 1,100 ppm F-. The meta-analysis based on analysis of covariance results was somewhat more sensitive to treatment group differences than the analysis based on sample means and variances, as was expected.

Maintenance of tooth color after prophylaxis: comparison of three dentifrices.

Pellicle rapidly accumulates on tooth surfaces after prophylaxis and may acquire cosmetically unacceptable levels of stain. A three-month clinical trial was conducted to evaluate stain prevention by a new silica-based tartar control whitening dentifrice (Crest Extra Whitening) compared to marketed tartar control baking soda peroxide whitening and regular dentifrice controls. Prior to the trial, a one-month screening exercise was conducted to identify adult subjects who accumulated extrinsic tooth stain after dental prophylaxis. A total of 672 subjects were stratified based on tooth whiteness, gender and tobacco usage, then given a dental prophylaxis and randomized into one of three dentifrice treatment groups. All product use was unsupervised. Change in tooth whiteness (delta L*) was determined by comparing colorimeter measurements collected on the facial surfaces of the four central incisors at months 1 and 3 to baseline. Ninety-six percent of subjects completed the three-month study. At both one and three months, the two whitening dentifrices did not differ from baseline in terms of delta L*. In contrast, the regular control had delta L* values of -0.26 and -0.39 at one and three months, respectively, differing significantly from baseline at both time points. Each of the whitening dentifrices differed statistically from the regular control in stain accumulation (p < or = 0.001) at one and three months, but were not different from each other. In general, all three test dentifrices were well tolerated. These data demonstrate the effectiveness of the new tartar control whitening dentifrice in preventing stain accumulation after dental prophylaxis compared to the marketed regular dentifrice control.

Identification and consequences of distinct Löe-Silness gingival index examiner styles for the clinical assessment of gingivitis.

BACKGROUND: In clinical studies, gingivitis is most frequently assessed by the Löe-Silness gingival index (GI). The objective of this work was to develop an understanding of how clinicians experienced with GI differ with respect to how they apply GI and to assess the impact of different examination styles on statistical outcomes and magnitude of treatment differences. METHODS: A method was developed to mathematically relate the average GI score and degree of bleeding observed for a subject. Graphical analyses were used to profile examiner styles with respect to using the GI index. A prospective single-center, examiner-blind study comparing the effects of a staggered prophylaxis on gingivitis was then conducted, where a difference in gingivitis was created between two balanced groups by providing subjects a prophylaxis at two staggered time points. Subjects were assigned to one of two cohorts; within each cohort, group 1 subjects received a dental prophylaxis following the baseline examination and group 2 subjects received a dental prophylaxis 8 weeks later. Five to 7 days after the group 2 prophylaxis, all subjects were examined for GI. Twelve experienced clinicians participated. RESULTS: Retrospective analyses indicated the presence of distinct examiner styles which are based on the frequency that a given GI score (0, 1, 2, or 3) is measured by a clinician. In the prospective study, all 12 examiners observed statistically significant differences between the prophylaxis treatment groups at the final visit for both mean number of bleeding sites and mean GI; the magnitude ranged from 21.5% to 84.6% for mean number of bleeding sites and 9.4% to 39.2% for mean GI. There were 4 distinct styles employed by these experienced clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Varying examiner styles impact the structure of resulting data. Importantly, the implementation of arbitrary thresholds (e.g., 20%) regarding percent treatment differences between groups as a guideline for judging the clinical significance is scientifically unsupported. A more scientific criterion in the field of gingivitis clinical testing would be the independent demonstration of statistical superiority compared to a negative control and/or a demonstration of similar or superior efficacy to clinically proven positive controls. In addition, interexaminer calibration is a mechanism that can be utilized to minimize the impact of different examiner styles in clinical settings involving more than one examiner.

Helicobacter pylori infection in indigenous families of Central America: serostatus and oral and fingernail carriage.

Helicobacter pylori infection remains one of the most common in humans, but the route of transmission of the bacterium is still uncertain. This study was designed to elucidate possible sources of infection in an isolated, rural population in Guatemala. A total of 242 subjects in family units participated in the study. A medical history, including a history of dyspepsia, was taken by a physician and immunoglobulin G antibodies to H. pylori were detected with the QuickVue (Quidel, San Diego, Calif.) onsite serology test. Overall, 58% of subjects were seropositive, with a positive relationship between mother and child (P = 0.02) and a positive correlation between the serostatuses of siblings (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.63). There was no association between serostatus and gastric symptoms. Oral H. pylori was detected from periodontal pockets of various depths and the dorsum of the tongue by nested PCR. Eighty-seven percent of subjects had at least one oral site positive for H. pylori, with the majority of subjects having multiple positive sites. There was no association between periodontal pocket depth and the detection of H. pylori. Nested PCR was also used to detect H. pylori from beneath the nail of the index finger of each subject's dominant hand. Overall, 58% of subjects had a positive fingernail result, with a significant positive relationship between fingernail and tongue positivity (P = 0.002). In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that oral carriage of H. pylori may play a role in the transmission of infection and that the hand may be instrumental in transmission.

A comparison of increment and incidence density analyses in evaluating the anticaries effects of two dentifrices.

This study aimed to determine whether incidence density (ID) calculations of caries incidence rates would provide a more sensitive means of detecting caries-preventive effects than would traditional techniques. A secondary analysis was conducted using data from a 1981 study in which three dentifrices were compared in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Subjects were examined at baseline and 1, 2 and 3 years after baseline. Three-year DMFS increments were calculated for 1,754 subjects attending the baseline and 3-year examinations. Caries ID rates then were calculated for 2, 661 subjects who had at least two examinations, using each surface's net increment (-1, 0 or +1) as the numerator and the surface's time at risk as the denominator. Despite theoretical advantages, the ID method did not alter the conclusions drawn using DMFS increments, apparently because (a) subjects lost to follow-up were similar to those completing the study, and (b) loss to follow-up was similar among treatment groups.

Reversal of incipient and radiographic caries through the use of sodium and stannous fluoride dentifrices in a clinical trial.

Experimental evidence has clearly demonstrated that the early stages of lesion formation (enamel demineralization) are reversible following exposure to saliva and/or fluoride. Clinical evidence for remineralization has also been reported extensively in the literature. However, the literature is lacking with respect to data from well-controlled clinical studies regarding the quantitative contribution of remineralization to arrestment and reversal of caries. Retrospective analysis of an existing clinical trial database provided an opportunity to examine the incidence of clinical lesion reversals in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded caries clinical study. The clinical study examined three treatment groups: 1) 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica dentifrice, 2) 0.4% stannous fluoride/calcium pyrophosphate (positive control) dentifrice and 3) non-fluoridated placebo/calcium pyrophosphate (negative control) dentifrice. Clinical measures in this study included both radiographic and visual-tactile assessments of caries. Examination of all subjects revealed a statistically greater frequency for caries reversals in the sodium fluoride group as compared to the placebo group at Year 3, for both total and radiographic caries. In contrast, while caries reversals in the stannous fluoride group occurred with greater frequency than in the placebo group at Year 3, for both total and radiographic caries, the differences were not statistically significant. When only subjects who were "at risk" for potential reversals (i.e., those with a minimum of one carious lesion at baseline) were examined, a statistically greater frequency in caries reversals was observed in both the sodium fluoride (total, incipient, and radiographic caries) and stannous fluoride (total and radiographic caries) groups as compared to the placebo group at Year 3. Collectively, these data confirm the ability of both 0.243% sodium fluoride/silica and 0.4% stannous fluoride/calcium pyrophosphate dentifrices to clinically reverse caries. The results suggest that sodium fluoride may deliver a greater frequency of caries reversals than stannous fluoride, although these treatments were not found to be significantly different.

A comparison of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice and triclosan/copolymer dentifrice for efficacy in the reduction of gingivitis and gingival bleeding: six-month clinical results.

This parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial directly compared the efficacy of two antimicrobial dentifrice formulations for the control of plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding during six months of use following a pre-test randomization period. Test antimicrobial dentifrices for the study included: a stabilized stannous fluoride formulation (Crest Plus Gum Care-currently marketed in U.S.) comprised of 0.454% SnF2 in a stabilized silica abrasive base; and a formulation containing triclosan (Colgate Total, currently marketed outside the U.S. in numerous countries) comprised of 0.30% triclosan. 2.0% Gantrez co-polymer and 0.243% NaF in a silica abrasive base. The control dentifrice was a conventional fluoride dentifrice comprised of 0.243% NaF in a silica abrasive base. Clinical evaluations included Turesky et al. plaque, Löe-Silness gingivitis and gingival bleeding, and Meckel stain. The stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice exhibited significant efficacy in the reduction of both gingivitis (20.5%) and gingival bleeding (33.4%) after six months relative to the placebo control (p < 0.05). In direct comparison, the stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice reduced gingivitis and gingival bleeding significantly relative to the triclosan/copolymer dentifrice (p < 0.05). These results establish: 1) the superior clinical efficacy of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice relative to a triclosan/copolymer dentifrice in the chemotherapeutic control of gingivitis and gingival bleeding; 2) the important contribution of clinical test design/sensitivity in assessing the therapeutic efficacy of antimicrobial agents; and 3) the value of head-to-head comparative studies in establishing the therapeutic relevance of clinical effects of formulations for the reduction of gingivitis.

The comparative efficacy of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice, peroxide/baking soda dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse for the prevention of gingivitis.

This double-blind parallel-design clinical study compared the efficacy of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice (Crest Plus Gum Care), baking soda and peroxide (NaF) dentifrice (Mentadent), and essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine) to a conventional NaF dentifrice (Crest) for the control of plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding over six months. Following an initial baseline examination and stratification, subjects received a complete oral prophylaxis and were distributed assigned test products. Following three and six months, subjects re-visited the clinic for examinations. Evaluations at baseline and at 3 and 6 months included soft tissue status. Löe-Silness gingivitis/gingival bleeding, Silness-Löe plaque and dental stain. Results subsequent to six months of product use were as follows: At six months, the stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice was observed to produce statistically significant 17.5% reductions in gingivitis and 27.5% reductions in gingival bleeding relative to the NaF dentifrice. The combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse produced statistically significant reductions of 7.4% in gingivitis and 10.8% in plaque as compared with the NaF dentifrice. The stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice produced statistically significant reductions in both gingivitis (10.8%) and gingival bleeding (23.0%) relative to the combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse. The baking soda and peroxide (NaF) dentifrice did not provide reductions in gingivitis, plaque or gingival bleeding as compared with the conventional NaF dentifrice. The stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice provided statistically significant reductions in gingivitis as compared with the baking soda and peroxide dentifrice following six months of use, and both the essential oil mouthrinse and stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice provided statistically significant reductions in gingivitis as compared with the baking soda and peroxide dentifrice following three months of use. These results support: 1) the efficacy of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice and the combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse for the prevention of gingivitis; 2) the superior activity of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice as compared with a combination of sodium fluoride dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse for the control of gingivitis and gingival bleeding; and 3) the lack of efficacy for baking soda and peroxide dentifrice for the control of plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding as compared with conventional fluoridated dentifrice.

The comparative clinical efficacy of pyrophosphate/triclosan, copolymer/triclosan and zinc citrate/triclosan dentifrices for the reduction of supragingival calculus formation.

Three triclosan-containing "multi-benefit" dentifrices were compared for clinical efficacy in reducing supragingival calculus formation following a dental prophylaxis. A total of 544 subjects completed a double-blind parallel-group clinical study using the Volpe-Manhold Index (VMI) to record severity and occurrence of supragingival calculus. The study design included a pre-test period where the calculus formation rate was measured in subjects brushing with a placebo dentifrice. Following a prophylaxis, subjects were stratified for age, gender and VMI scores and assigned to one of four treatments: 1) a dentifrice containing 5.0% soluble pyrophosphate/0.145% fluoride as NaF/silica abrasive/0.28% triclosan (hereafter PPi/TCS-comparable to Crest Complete dentifrice, Procter & Gamble, UK); 2) a commercial dentifrice containing 2.0% Gantrez acid copolymer/ 0.145% fluoride as NaF/silica abrasive/0.30% triclosan (hereafter Gan/TCS-Colgate Total dentifrice, Colgate-Palmolive Company, UK); 3) a commercial dentifrice containing 0.5% zinc citrate trihydrate/0.15% fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate/silica abrasive/0.20% triclosan (hereafter Zn/TCS-Mentadent P dentifrice, Unilever, UK); and 4) a control dentifrice comprised of 0.145% fluoride as NaF/silica abrasive (hereafter Control). Subjects were instructed to use their assigned dentifrice at least twice per day and to brush as they do normally. Supragingival calculus formation was assesed at two and four months using site-specific and whole-mouth VMI indices for both calculus severity and occurrence. Following four months of use, the PPi/TCS dentifrice provided statistically significant reductions in calculus severity (22-23%) and occurrence (15%) as compared with the Control dentifrice. The Zn/TCS dentifrice also provided significant reductions in calculus severity (17-19%) and occurrence (12-13%) as compared with the Control. The Gan/TCS produced no statistically significant reductions in calculus formation (occurrence or severity) compared with the Control. The PPi/TCS dentifrice provided statistically significant reductions in calculus severity (15-21%) and occurrence (12-16%) as compared with the Gan/TCS dentifrice. These results support the clinical effectiveness of PPi/TCS and Zn/TCS dentifrices for the reduction of supragingival dental calculus formation following a dental prophylaxis.

A comparison of intraoral antimicrobial effects of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice, baking soda/peroxide dentifrice, conventional NaF dentifrice and essential oil mouthrinse.

The intraoral antimicrobial activity of four commercial oral products-conventional NaF dentifrice (Crest), baking soda/peroxide/NaF dentifrice (Mentadent), essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine) and SnF2 dentifrice (Crest Plus Gum Care)-have been compared in three test regimens. Formulations were compared for their ability to suppress the regrowth and apical extension of dental plaque following toothbrushing during thirty hours of non-brushing where products were used as oral rinses (30-hour plaque regrowth model). Formulations were also compared for their ability to suppress the colony-forming units (cfu) of facultative anaerobic bacteria sampled from buccal gingival surfaces following use (Gingival Surface Microbial Index-GSMI model). Lastly, formulations were compared for effects in suppressing the glycolytic metabolic activity and regrowth activity of in vivo-treated dental plaques sampled at various periods following topical use and incubated under controlled ex vivo conditions (Plaque Glycolysis and Regrowth-PGRM model). In thirty-hour plaque regrowth testing, the rank ordered antimicrobial efficacy of formulations followed SnF2 > essential oils > NaF = water = baking soda/peroxide. In GSMI testing, all formulations were shown to suppress the cfu of facultative anaerobic bacteria relative to baseline, although SnF2 treatment was observed to reduce bacterial levels to a significantly greater degree than NaF dentifrice or baking soda/peroxide dentifrice up to two hours following brushing. In PGRM testing, the SnF2 dentifrice provided significant inhibition of bacterial metabolism and regrowth following topical application when compared with the NaF dentifrice as control. The baking soda/peroxide dentifrice provided no reduction in either bacterial metabolism or regrowth in PGRM. Previous studies had demonstrated modest effects for essential oil rinse in reducing PGRM plaque regrowth, with no effects for this treatment on plaque metabolism. Overall, these results demonstrate that SnF2 dentifrice provides substantial intraoral antimicrobial effects. The essential oil mouthrinse also exhibits significant intraoral antimicrobial effects, albeit apparently less than SnF2 dentifrice. The baking soda/peroxide dentifrice did not produce any antimicrobial effects following in vivo use compared with conventional dentifrice. These results provide mechanistic rationale for the chemotherapeutic efficacy of SnF2 and essential oil formulations in reducing gingivitis, while providing no support for the expectation of clinical efficacy for formulations containing baking soda and peroxide.

Assessing the efficacy of three dentifrices in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

A multicenter clinical trial conducted by the authors compared the desensitizing efficacy of a new 5 percent potassium nitrate: 0.243 percent sodium fluoride dentifrice along with two clinically proven, commercially available desensitizing dentifrices to a placebo dentifrice. Sensitivity to cold air and tactile stimulation, along with patients' subjective assessments, were evaluated to assess the dentinal desensitizing efficacy of the test dentifrices. Results demonstrated that after four weeks, participants who used the new dentifrice formulation experienced significant decreases in dentinal sensitivity compared to the placebo group for all measured indexes.

Augmentation of acetaminophen analgesia by the antihistamine phenyltoloxamine.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was performed to compare the analgesic activity of the combination of 650 mg acetaminophen plus 60 mg phenyltoloxamine citrate with that of 650 mg acetaminophen alone. Two hundred female inpatients who had severe pain associated with a recent episiotomy procedure were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of one of the two active treatments or a placebo. Analgesia was assessed over a 6-hour period. Treatments were compared on the basis of standard subjective scales for pain intensity and relief, a number of derived variables based on these data and two global measures. For essentially all measures, the two active treatments were significantly superior to the placebo control. The combination was significantly superior to acetaminophen alone for all analgesic measures including SPID, TOTAL, and global ratings. The results of this study demonstrate that 60 mg phenyltoloxamine produces significant augmentation of the analgesic activity of 650 mg acetaminophen in postepisiotomy pain.