Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) Services Within a Large Tertiary Referral Centre-First Year in Review.

BACKGROUND: Rapid Access Cardiology (RAC) services are hospital co-located cardiologist-led outpatient clinics providing prompt assessment and management of chest pain. This service model is part of chest pain management in the United Kingdom. However, little data exists on RAC services in Australia. Our aim was to describe the introduction of RAC services to an Australian tertiary centre (utility, safety, and acceptability). METHODS: Referrals were accepted for low-intermediate risk chest pain. Referrer and patient clinical data was collected prospectively in the first year of RAC - 4 February 2015 to 4 February 2016. Data was linked to hospital presentations/admissions to identify readmissions/mortality data. RESULTS: Among 520 patients (55.0% male, mean age 55.2 years), 87.6% were referred from emergency and 68.4% assessed within 5 days. The final diagnosis was new coronary artery disease (CAD) in 7.9%, and 81.3% had ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, overweight/obesity, smoker, pre-existing CAD, and chronic renal failure). On average, 0.8 cardiac tests were ordered per person. In total, 35 (6.7%) had invasive coronary angiograms, with 51.4% having obstructive CAD. Patients reported in surveys (82.8% response rate) that 93.0% "strongly agreed" RAC services were useful to the community. Referrers were also "very satisfied" with RAC (7/17) or "satisfied" (9/17). Furthermore, of 336 referrals, referrers reported without RAC they would admit the patient in 11.3% of cases. There were 4.8% (25/520) unplanned cardiovascular readmissions and 0.6% (3/520) of these were for acute coronary syndromes and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient RAC services are an accepted, effective and safe pathway for management of low-intermediate risk chest pain.

The Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator: an Early Single Centre Australian Experience. Some Pitfalls and Caveats for Use.

BACKGROUND: Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillators (WCD) have been effectively used for more than a decade in North America and Europe for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular arrhythmias. This device has only recently been available in Australia. METHOD: At Westmead hospital, WCD has been used since 2013 as a bridging therapy to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for those at high risk, but are temporarily not suitable for an implantable device. Indications for use were explanted infected ICD, dilated cardiomyopathy, post partum cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and myocarditis. The default device settings were: ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) threshold of 150 bpm and 200 bpm respectively and response times were 60 secs for VT and 25 secs for VF. OUTCOME: WCD was used in eight patients. Duration of use ranged from five to 180 days with median of 77 days. Daily usage averaged 23.4±0.6hours. All except one were compliant with the device and none of our patients received shock or died during device usage. Four of the eight patients received ICD, two declined ICD, one was judged to no longer require ICD and one remains under assessment. CONCLUSION: WCD is easy to use, well tolerated and is effective for SCD prevention in patients who are temporarily not suitable for ICD. However patients need to be actively followed-up to reduce the duration of WCD usage and thereby be cost effective.