Investigation of optimal cues to instruction for pelvic floor muscle contraction: a pilot study using 2D ultrasound imaging in pre-menopausal, nulliparous, continent women.

AIMS: Optimal urethrovesical positioning (UVP) may be important for continence. Pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC) influences UVP. PFMC instruction cues vary and often encourage anterior PFM recruitment that may result in sub-maximal posterior facilitation. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: posterior or combined cues are more influential in optimizing UVP during PFMC following a brief practice period than anterior cue. METHODS: Seventeen pre-menopausal, nulliparous, continent women were taught selective PFMC using different cues: anterior; posterior; anterior and posterior combined. Perineal ultrasound images of three PFMC for each cue were captured in supine and standing twice, 5 min apart. For reliability two raters measured data using angle of urethral inclination (AUI). Data analysis was undertaken using a customized General Linear Model ANOVA testing for interactions between all variables; subject, cue, posture, and test. Post hoc Bonferroni correction was used with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The ANOVA showed significant differences between variables (P = 0.000). Post hoc analysis indicated significant differences between posterior and anterior cues 4.240° (P = 0.003); combined and anterior 3.756° (P = 0.009) but not between posterior and combined cues -0.484° (P = 1.00). Mean difference in AUI between supine and standing was 9.496° (P = 0.000); however, the interaction of cues and postures was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: AUI was significantly more acute/optimal when PFMC instruction included a posterior cue. This may be due to optimal recruitment of puborectalis and other posterior regional muscles which may be sub-maximally recruited with anterior cue. Investigation of the potential impact of these findings and possible usefulness of standardized instructions in PFM training is required.

Functional imaging of the pelvic floor.

The clinical treatment of patients with anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction is often difficult. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography (DCP) has evolved from a method of evaluating the anorectum for functional disorders to its current status as a functional method of evaluating the global pelvic floor for defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse. It has both high observer accuracy and a high yield of positive diagnoses. Clinicians find it a useful diagnostic tool that can alter management decisions from surgical to medical and vice versa in many cases. Functional radiography provides the maximum stress to the pelvic floor, resulting in levator ani relaxation accompanied by rectal emptying-which is needed to diagnose defecatory disorders. It also provides organ-specific quantificative information about female pelvic organ prolapse-information that usually can only be inferred by means of physical examination. The application of functional radiography to the assessment of defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse has highlighted the limitations of physical examination. It has become clear that pelvic floor disorders rarely occur in isolation and that global pelvic floor assessment is necessary. Despite the advances in other imaging methods, DCP has remained a practical, cost-effective procedure for the evaluation of anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction. In this article, the authors describe the technique they use when performing DCP, define the radiographic criteria used for diagnosis, and discuss the limitations and clinical utility of DCP.

Can perfusion CT assessment of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma blood flow at staging predict for subsequent metastatic disease? A pilot study.

We aimed to determine whether perfusion CT measurements at colorectal cancer staging may predict for subsequent metastatic relapse. Fifty two prospective patients underwent perfusion CT at staging to estimate tumour blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, and permeability surface area product. Patients considered metastasis free and suitable for surgery underwent curative resection subsequently. At final analysis, a median of 48.6 months post-surgery, patients were divided into those who remained disease free, and those with subsequent metastases. Vascular parameters for these two groups were compared using t-testing, and receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these vascular parameters for predicting metastases. Thirty seven (71%) patients underwent curative surgery; data were available for 35: 26 (74%) remained disease free; 9 (26%) recurred (8 metastatic, 1 local). Tumour blood flow differed significantly between disease-free and metastatic patients (76.0 versus 45.7 ml/min/100 g tissue; p = 0.008). With blood flow <64 ml/min/100 g tissue, sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for development of metastases were 100% (60-100%) and 73% (53-87%), respectively. Our preliminary findings suggest that primary tumour blood flow might potentially be a useful predictor warranting further study.

Effect of temporal interval between scan acquisitions on quantitative vascular parameters in colorectal cancer: implications for helical volumetric perfusion CT techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how the temporal interval between scan acquisitions influences quantitative perfusion CT vascular parameters in colorectal cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma prospectively underwent a 65-second single-anatomic-level perfusion CT study. Blood flow, blood volume, transit time, and permeability-surface area product for a 2-cm tumor coverage were determined with commercial software based on distributed parameter analysis for four temporal intervals (1, 2, 3, and 4 seconds) between acquisitions. Mean vascular values obtained for these intervals were compared by use of analysis of variance with posttesting by the Bonferroni method. Statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD blood flow, volume, transit, and permeability-surface area product were 71.5 +/- 34.8 mL/min/100 g tissue, 6.33 +/- 1.96 mL/100 g tissue, 10.8 +/- 5.54 seconds, and 14.9 +/- 3.51 mL/min/100 g tissue, respectively, at 1 second; 86.6 +/- 40.6 mL/min/100 g tissue, 6.30 +/- 2.53 mL/100 g tissue, 10.7 +/- 7.12 seconds, and 14.5 +/- 3.55 mL/min/100 g tissue at 2 seconds; 97.8 +/- 42.7 mL/min/100 g tissue, 5.98 +/- 1.72 mL/100 g tissue, 8.11 +/- 4.37 seconds, and 14.5 +/- 3.58 mL/min/100 g tissue at 3 seconds; and 108.8 +/- 46.0 mL/min/100 g tissue, 6.69 +/- 3.46 mL/100 g tissue, 7.12 +/- 3.54 seconds, and 13.9 +/- 3.49 mL/min/100 g tissue at 4 seconds. Blood flow was overestimated (p = 0.0002) and transit underestimated (p = 0.03) with lengthening acquisition interval. Posttesting revealed that in a comparison with 1-second data, this difference was significant for 3- and 4-second data for blood flow and 4-second data for transit. CONCLUSION: Increasing the temporal interval from 1 to 4 seconds leads to overestimation of tumor blood flow and underestimation of blood transit in distributed parameter analysis. Use of the helical perfusion CT techniques being developed may lead to inaccurate assessment unless the acquisition interval is shorter than 3 seconds.

Colorectal tumor vascularity: quantitative assessment with multidetector CT--do tumor perfusion measurements reflect angiogenesis?

PURPOSE: To establish the relationships between quantitative perfusion computed tomography (CT) parameters-specifically, primary tumor blood flow, blood volume, transit time, and permeability surface-area product-and immunohistologic markers of angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained for this prospective study, 23 patients (11 men, 12 women; mean age, 68.4 years; age range, 34.8-87.1 years) with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent a 65-second perfusion CT examination, and tumor blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, and permeability surface-area product were determined. After surgery, resected specimens were sectioned and stained immunohistochemically to identify CD34 for quantification of microvessel density (MVD), to identify smooth muscle actin for assessment of pericyte coverage index, to identify vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and to identify glucose transporter protein (GLUT-1). Perfusion CT measurements were correlated with MVD, pericyte coverage index, VEGF expression, and GLUT-1 expression by using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation analysis, with significance assigned at the 5% level. RESULTS: Mean blood flow, blood volume, transit time, and permeability surface-area product values were 72.1 mL/min/100 g of tissue +/- 28.4 (standard deviation), 6.2 mL/100 g of tissue +/- 1.4, 9.3 seconds +/- 3.9, and 13.9 mL/min/100 g of tissue +/- 3.2, respectively. Blood volume (r = 0.59, P = .002) and permeability surface-area product (r = 0.46, P = .03) correlated positively with MVD, but blood flow (r = 0.27, P = .22) and transit time (r = -0.18, P = .44) did not. There were no significant associations between any perfusion CT parameter and pericyte coverage index (r .05), VEGF score (rho or= .15), or GLUT-1 score (rho < 0.21, P >or= .33). CONCLUSION: Tumor permeability surface-area product and blood volume correlate positively with MVD and may reflect the microvascularity of colorectal tumors.

Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer tumor vascular parameters by using perfusion CT: influence of tumor region of interest.

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine whether position and size of tumor region of interest (ROI) influence estimates of colorectal cancer vascular parameters at computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, 25 men and 22 women (mean age, 65.8 years) with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent 65-second CT perfusion study. Blood volume, blood flow, and permeability-surface area product were determined for 40- or 120-mm(2) circular ROIs placed at the tumor edge and center and around (outlining) visible tumor. ROI analysis was repeated by two observers in different subsets of patients to assess intra- and interobserver variation. Measurements were compared by using analysis of variance; a difference with P = .002 was significant. RESULTS: Blood volume, blood flow, and permeability-surface area product measurements were substantially higher at the edge than at the center for both 40- and 120-mm(2) ROIs. For 40-mm(2) ROI, means of the three measurements were 6.9 mL/100 g (standard deviation [SD], 1.4), 108.7 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 39.2), and 16.9 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 4.2), respectively, at the edge versus 5.1 mL/100 g (SD, 1.5), 56.3 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 33.1), and 13.9 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 4.6), respectively, at the center. For 120-mm(2) ROI, means of the three measurements were 6.6 mL/100 g (SD, 1.3), 96.7 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 42.5), and 16.3 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 5.6), respectively, at the edge versus 5.1 mL/100 g (SD, 1.4), 58.3 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 32.5), and 13.4 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 4.3) at the center (P < .0001). Measurements varied substantially depending on the ROI size; values for the ROI for outlined tumor were intermediate between those at the tumor edge and center. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was poor for both 40- and 120-mm(2) ROIs. CONCLUSION: Position and size of tumor ROI and observer variation substantially influence ultimate perfusion values. ROI for outlined entire tumor is more reliable for perfusion measurements and more appropriate clinically than use of arbitrarily determined smaller ROIs.

Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable?

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the level of agreement between tumor blood volume and permeability measurements obtained with two commercially available perfusion computed tomographic (CT) software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed with institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained from all participants. A total of 44 patients (24 men, 20 women; mean age, 68 years; range, 28-87 years) with proved colorectal cancer were examined prospectively with multi-detector row CT. A 65-second tumor perfusion study was performed after intravenous bolus injection of contrast material. Tumor blood volume and permeability were determined with two methods: adiabatic approximation of distributed parameter analysis and Patlak analysis. Agreement between the results was determined by using Bland-Altman statistics. Within-patient variation was determined by using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean values for permeability and blood volume, respectively, were 13.9 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1) +/- 3.7 (standard deviation) and 6.1 mL/100 mL +/- 1.5, as calculated with distributed parameter analysis, and 17.4 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1) +/- 7.3 and 10.1 mL/100 mL +/- 4.2, as calculated with Patlak analysis. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement, respectively, were -3.6 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1) and -18.4 to 11.2 mL x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1) for permeability and -3.9 mL/100 mL and -10.9 to 3.0 mL/100 mL for blood volume. The coefficient of variation was 37.4% for permeability and 46.5% for blood volume. CONCLUSION: There was disagreement between the methods used to estimate tumor vascularity, which indicated the measurement techniques were not directly interchangeable.

Differentiation between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer: quantitative CT perfusion measurements versus morphologic criteria--initial experience.

PURPOSE: To determine whether computed tomographic (CT) perfusion measurements in prospectively recruited patients can be used to differentiate between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer and to compare this discrimination with that of standard morphologic criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained, 60 patients (24 men, 36 women; mean age, 69 years; range, 33.5-90.4 years; 20 patients with cancer, 20 with diverticulitis, and 20 with inactive diverticular disease) underwent CT perfusion imaging at the level of the colonic abnormality, and perfusion parameters were calculated. Analysis of variance was used to investigate any differences in perfusion between the patient groups. Two independent observers also analyzed an abdominopelvic CT study obtained immediately after the CT perfusion study and noted standard morphologic criteria for differential diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of CT perfusion measurements for determining the diagnostic category were compared with morphologic criteria by means of multivariate analysis to identify the most discriminatory criteria. RESULTS: Mean blood volume, blood flow, transit time, and permeability were significantly different between patients with cancer and those with diverticulitis (P < .0001); patients with cancer had the highest blood volume, blood flow, and permeability and the shortest transit time. The most discriminatory criteria for determining diagnostic category were blood volume, transit time, permeability, and presence of pericolonic nodes (P = .05, .02, .04, and .02, respectively). Blood volume and blood flow each had a sensitivity of 80% and had specificity of 70% and 75%, respectively, for cancer in comparison with standard morphologic criteria: less than 5 cm of bowel involvement (45% sensitivity, 95% specificity), presence of a mass (85% sensitivity, 90% specificity), pericolonic inflammation (75% sensitivity, 5% specificity), and pericolonic nodes (90% sensitivity, 45% specificity). CONCLUSION: CT perfusion measurements enable differentiation and better discrimination, in comparison with morphologic criteria, between cancer and diverticulitis.

Quantitative assessment of tissue perfusion using MDCT: comparison of colorectal cancer and skeletal muscle measurement reproducibility.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to determine the reproducibility of quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurements using dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT, and to compare this with measurements from skeletal muscle. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten patients (mean age, 67 years; six men, four women) with histologically proven colorectal cancer were examined prospectively using 4-MDCT. Perfusion studies (cine mode; 4 x 5 mm collimation; 1 acquisition/s; 65 seconds total) were performed through the tumor epicenter after IV bolus contrast administration (iopamidol 340, 100 mL; 5 mL/s) and repeated within 48 hours. Quantitative values for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability were determined using commercial software. Two regions of interest were studied on the axial image: one within the tumor and another within the left gluteal muscle. Measurement reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman statistics. RESULTS: For the tumor, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) was -0.04 mL/100 g tissue (-2.50, 2.42); 8.80 (-50.5, 68.0) mL/100 g tissue/min; -0.99 (-8.19, 6.20) seconds; and 1.20 (-5.42, 7.83) mL/100 g tissue/min for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability, respectively. For muscle, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) was 0.02 (-1.40, 1.43), 6.60 (-11.2, 24.3), -3.76 (-16.87, 9.35), and 1.30 (-4.68, 7.28), respectively. CONCLUSION: Quantitative perfusion measurements are reproducible. Measurements from tumor are less variable than from skeletal muscle.

Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

OBJECTIVE: This article presents inter- and intraobserver agreement for estimates of polyp diameter using CT colonography, including the effects of different visualization displays and prior experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four observers, three of whom had prior experience with CT colonography, estimated the maximum diameter of 48 polyps using three different visualization displays: 2D colonography window, 2D abdominal window, and 3D surface rendering. Each re-measured a subset of 10 polyps. Polyps measured 2 to 12 mm according to a colonoscopic reference. Inter- and intraobserver agreement and agreement with the reference measurement were determined using the Bland-Altman method, paired Student's t testing, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and by calculating the components of variance. RESULTS: CT measurements overestimated polyp diameter, a phenomenon found least using the 2D abdominal display. Generally, 95% limits of agreement encompassed different size categories for individual polyps: the widest spanned 14.6 mm (-4.6 mm to 10.0 mm) for an experienced observer using the 3D display. When using the 2D abdominal display, no significant difference was found between estimates and the reference value for the other two experienced observers (p = 0.83 and 0.23). All the observers' measurements were significantly different from the reference when using the 3D display (p < 0.001). The novice was significantly different from the experienced observers in some analyses. Inter- and intraobserver agreement were poorest for the 3D display. CONCLUSION: Measurement of polyp diameter from CT colonography is subject to variation contingent on the observer's experience and the viewing display used. Although 3D visualization display is commonly used for polyp detection, it should not be used for measurement.

CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting.

PURPOSE: To assess the methodologic quality of available data in published reports of computed tomographic (CT) colonography by performing systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched for colonography reports published between 1994 and 2003, without language restriction. The terms colonography, colography, CT colonoscopy, CT pneumocolon, virtual colonoscopy, and virtual endoscopy were used. Studies were selected if the focus was detection of colorectal polyps verified with within-subject reference colonoscopy by using key methodologic criteria based on information presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy (Boston, Mass). Two reviewers independently abstracted methodologic characteristics. Per-patient and per-polyp detection rates were extracted, and authors were contacted, when necessary. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity were calculated for different lesion size categories, and Forest plots were produced. Meta-analysis of paired sensitivity and specificity was conducted by using a hierarchical model that enabled estimation of summary receiver operating characteristic curves allowing for variation in diagnostic threshold, and the average operating point was calculated. Per-polyp sensitivity was also calculated. RESULTS: Of 1398 studies considered for inclusion, 24 met our criteria. There were 4181 patients with a study prevalence of abnormality of 15%-72%. Meta-analysis of 2610 patients, 206 of whom had large polyps, showed high per-patient average sensitivity (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%, 98%) and specificity (97%; 95% CI: 95%, 99%) for colonography; sensitivity and specificity decreased to 86% (95% CI: 75%, 93%) and 86% (95% CI: 76%, 93%), respectively, when the threshold was lowered to include medium polyps. When polyps of all sizes were included, studies were too heterogeneous in sensitivity (range, 45%-97%) and specificity (range, 26%-97%) to allow meaningful meta-analysis. Of 150 cancers, 144 were detected (sensitivity, 95.9%; 95% CI: 91.4%, 98.5%). Data reporting was frequently incomplete, with no generally accepted format. CONCLUSION: CT colonography seems sufficiently sensitive and specific in the detection of large and medium polyps; it is especially sensitive in the detection of symptomatic cancer. Studies are poorly reported, however, and the authors propose a minimum data set for study reporting.

The role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening.

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a relatively noninvasive technique for large bowel imaging that has the ability to detect colorectal neoplasia. Already well established as a reliable diagnostic tool in symptomatic patients who are unable to undergo complete colonoscopy, it is now being considered as a viable method for population screening. Advances in technique over the past 10 yr make this an attractive alternative, including reduced bowel preparation and stool tagging, three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction, computer-aided detection software, and low-radiation dose protocols. CTC may be favored by patients compared to other available screening tests due to the ease of performance and comfort. Although published studies vary in relation to the sensitivity of this test for the detection of polyps, in the best hands a sensitivity of greater than 90% for detection of polyps at least 10 mm in diameter may be obtained. Although not yet endorsed for widespread use by major gastroenterological societies, CTC shows promise as a screening tool.

Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer perfusion using MDCT: inter- and intraobserver agreement.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine inter- and intraobserver agreement of MDCT colorectal cancer perfusion measurements. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (17 men, 14 women; median age, 69 years) with proven colorectal cancer were examined prospectively using MDCT. A 65-sec dynamic study (cine mode, 4 x 5 mm collimation) was acquired through the tumor after i.v. contrast administration (100 mL of iopamidol 350, 5 mL/sec). Tumor blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability measurements were determined by two independent observers using commercial software. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman test. RESULTS: The mean difference for interobserver agreement (95% limits of agreement) was -0.81 mL/100 g tissue (-3.14 to 1.52); -9.94 mL/100 g tissue/min (-51.43 to 32.65); -1.09 sec (-7.05 to 4.86); and -2.90 mL/100 g tissue/min (-11.48 to 5.68) for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83, 0.89, 0.89, and 0.80, respectively. The mean difference for intraobserver agreement (95% limits of agreement) was 0.12 mL/100 g tissue (-1.90 to 2.14); 0.02 mL/100 g tissue/min (-13.13 to 13.17); -0.19 sec (-3.19 to 2.81); and 0.00 mL/100 g tissue/min (-2.45 to 2.45) for observer 1 and 0.26 mL/100 g tissue (-1.46 to 1.98); 4.47 mL/100 g tissue/min (-26.65 to 35.59); -0.21 sec (-2.48 to 2.06); 1.08 mL/100 g tissue/min (-4.92 to 7.08) for observer 2. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86, 0.98, 0.97, 0.98 for observer 1 and 0.93, 0.96, 0.99, and 0.94, respectively, for observer 2. CONCLUSION: There is greater inter- than intraobserver agreement for CT vascular perfusion measurements of primary colorectal cancer, which must be addressed for reliable clinical application in therapeutic monitoring.

Pilot study: fibrin sealant in anal fistula model.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the failure of fibrin sealant treatment for fistula-in-ano in an experimental porcine model and to determine histologic changes associated with the sealant and setons. METHODS: Three surgically created fistulas were treated by seton drainage in each of eight male pigs. After 26 days, magnetic resonance imaging was performed and setons were removed. Two pigs were killed as controls for stereologic histologic fistula track assessment. In six, fistulas were curetted, and in four the fistulas were treated with fibrin sealant. In these four sealant and two seton pigs, magnetic resonance imaging was repeated a median of 47.5 days after fistula formation. The pigs were killed and stereologic histologic fistula track examination was performed to determine granulation tissue and fistula lumen volumes. These values were compared among control, seton, and sealant groups over time, and related to fistula volumes derived from magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Sealant was not visible microscopically within tracks, although some sections revealed a foreign body-type reaction. On stereologic assessment, granulation tissue volumes were smaller in sealant and seton groups than in controls (median, 88 vs. 187 vs. 453 mm3, respectively; P = 0.002) and decreased over time (median, 408 and 152 mm3 (Day 42) vs. 88 and 75 (Day 53), respectively; P = 0.002). Fistula lumen (P < 0.001), and granulation tissue combined with fistula lumen volumes (P = 0.002) were similarly smaller. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula intensity was less in the sealant group than in the seton group and controls (mean, 777 vs. 978 vs. 1214 units/mm2, P = 0.003). Magnetic resonance imaging fistula volumes were least in sealant and seton groups vs. controls (P = 0.024), decreasing significantly in the sealant group over time (P = 0.018). No direct relationship was found between imaging and histologic volumes. CONCLUSIONS: In an experimental porcine model of anal fistula, granulation tissue was still present, albeit diminished, following track curettage combined with seton or sealant therapy, and was minimal in the sealant group, confirming some benefit from this procedure. Eradication of all longstanding granulation tissue may ensure complete success of fibrin sealant therapy.

Experimental model of fistula-in-ano.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to create and evaluate an experimental porcine model of fistula-in-ano. METHODS: Initial cadaveric dissection enabled refinement of the technique for fistula formation and histoanatomical study of the porcine anal canal. Subsequently, three surgically created fistulas were treated by seton drainage in each of eight male pigs (weight, 38-41 kg). After 26 days, magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla was performed and setons removed under general anesthesia, enabling clinical and microbiologic track assessment. Two pigs were killed for histologic fistula track assessment. RESULTS: Histoanatomical assessment noted a rudimentary internal anal sphincter, together with structures resembling anal glands. Artificial fistulas persisted during seton drainage and were more often associated with fecal than skin-derived organisms compared with both perineal and anal canal swabs (P = 0.002). All six fistulas assessed histologically had a lumen, and abundant surrounding granulation tissue similar to that seen in human fistula-in-ano. Epithelialization was not evident in any track. Fistulas were visualized as high signal tracks using magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Porcine anal anatomy resembles that of humans, and an experimental model proved suitable when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, microbiology, and histologically, which demonstrated abundant granulation tissue. This model could be further used to investigate fistula treatments.

Value of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in fistula-in-ano.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound with that of hydrogen peroxide enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in diagnosing recurrent or complex fistula-in-ano. METHODS: Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound reconstructions were performed before and after hydrogen peroxide enhancement in 19 patients with suspected recurrent or complex fistula-in-ano. Two experienced observers derived a consensus fistula classification after a blinded random review of the data sets. The accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and that of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound were compared with a reference standard derived from surgical findings and magnetic resonance imaging and modified by outcome over a median follow-up of 13 months. RESULTS: Patients had previously undergone a median of three fistula operations. Four had Crohn's disease. There were 21 internal openings and primary tracks in 19 patients: 1 superficial, 1 intersphincteric, 18 transsphincteric, and 1 extrasphincteric. Fourteen patients had 19 secondary tracks. Both techniques detected fistula tracks in 19 of 21 (90 percent) patients. There was no significant difference between three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in classifying internal openings (19/21 (90 percent) vs. 18/21 (86 percent)), primary tracks (17/21 (81 percent) vs. 15/21 (71 percent)), or secondary tracks (13/19 (68 percent) vs. 12/19 (63 percent)). Where three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound correctly detected an internal opening, gas from hydrogen peroxide enhancement was present in 8 of 18 (44 percent) studies. Similarly, gas made primary tracks more conspicuous in 6 of 19 (32 percent) and secondary tracks in 6 of 13 (46 percent) of those detected. CONCLUSIONS: In recurrent or complex fistula-in-ano, endoanal ultrasound proved more accurate for detecting primary tracks and internal openings than for detecting extensions. Hydrogen peroxide improved conspicuity of some tracks and internal openings and so may be helpful in difficult cases, although no overall diagnostic benefit was demonstrated.

Quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurement using dynamic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of acquisition time and implications for protocols.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of acquisition time on quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurement. METHODS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed prospectively in 10 patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer using 4-detector row CT (Lightspeed Plus; GE Healthcare Technologies, Waukesha, WI). Tumor blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, and permeability were assessed for 3 acquisition times (45, 65, and 130 seconds). Mean values for all 4 perfusion parameters for each acquisition time were compared using the paired t test. RESULTS: Significant differences in permeability values were noted between acquisitions of 45 seconds and 65 and 130 seconds, respectively (P=0.02, P=0.007). There was no significant difference for values of blood volume, blood flow, and mean transit time between any of the acquisition times. CONCLUSIONS: Scan acquisitions of 45 seconds are too short for reliable permeability measurement in the abdomen. Longer acquisition times are required.

A novel technique to measure splanchnic transit time using microbubble ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to measure splanchnic transit time by intravenous injection of a microbubble. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten volunteers were examined before and after eating. After Doppler indices of splanchnic circulation were obtained, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and vein (SMV) were simultaneously interrogated using power Doppler ultrasound after intravenous injection of a microbubble. Contrast arrival in the SMA and subsequently the SMV was recorded and splanchnic transit time calculated from differences in the time-intensity curves. RESULTS: Splanchnic transit time decreased significantly after eating (mean 11 vs. 6.9 seconds; P = 0.007), reflecting splanchnic hemodynamics. Between-subject variability attributable to repeated measurements was least for the SMA resistive index (17%) but 56% for the new index, suggesting poor reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Splanchnic transit time may be measured by microbubble injection but is subject to considerable measurement error. Newer microbubbles and imaging methods may allow more reproducible measurements.

Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the relative accuracy of digital examination, anal endosonography, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for preoperative assessment of fistula in ano by comparison to an outcome-derived reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical committee approval and informed consent were obtained. A total of 104 patients who were suspected of having fistula in ano underwent preoperative digital examination, 10-MHz anal endosonography, and body-coil MR imaging. Fistula classification was determined with each modality, with reviewers blinded to findings of other assessments. For fistula classification, an outcome-derived reference standard was based on a combination of subsequent surgical and MR imaging findings and clinical outcome after surgery. The proportion of patients correctly classified and agreement between the preoperative assessment and reference standard were determined with trend tests and kappa statistics, respectively. RESULTS: There was a significant linear trend (P < .001) in the proportion of fistula tracks (n = 108) correctly classified with each modality, as follows: clinical examination, 66 (61%) patients; endosonography, 87 (81%) patients; MR imaging, 97 (90%) patients. Similar trends were found for the correct anatomic classification of abscesses (P < .001), horseshoe extensions (P = .003), and internal openings (n = 99, P < .001); endosonography was used to correctly identify the internal opening in 90 (91%) patients versus 96 (97%) patients with MR imaging. Agreement between the outcome-derived reference standard and digital examination, endosonography, and MR imaging for classification of the primary track was fair (kappa = 0.38), good (kappa = 0.68), and very good (kappa = 0.84), respectively, and fair (kappa = 0.29), good (kappa = 0.64), and very good (kappa = 0.88), respectively, for classification of abscesses and horseshoe extensions combined. CONCLUSION: Endosonography with a high-frequency transducer is superior to digital examination for the preoperative classification of fistula in ano. While MR imaging remains superior in all respects, endosonography is a viable alternative for identification of the internal opening.

CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance.

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the effect of radiologist experience and increasing exposure to CT colonography on reader performance. Three radiologists of differing general experience (consultant, research fellow, trainee) independently analysed 100 CT colonographic datasets. Readers had no prior experience of CT colonography and received feedback and training after the first 50 cases from an independent experienced radiologist. Diagnostic performance and reporting times were compared for the first and second 50 datasets and compared with the results of a radiologist experienced in CT colonography. Before training only the consultant reader achieved statistical equivalence with the reference standard for detection of larger polyps. After training, detection rates ranged between 25 and 58% for larger polyps. Only the trainee significantly improved after training ( P=0.007), with performance of other readers unchanged or even worse. Reporting times following training were reduced significantly for the consultant and fellow ( P<0.001 and P=0.03, respectively), but increased for the trainee ( P<0.001). In comparison to the consultant reader, the odds of detection of larger polyps was 0.36 (CI 0.16, 0.82) for the fellow and 0.36 (CI 0.14, 0.91) for the trainee. There is considerable variation in the ability to report CT colonography. Prior experience in gastrointestinal radiology is a distinct advantage. Competence cannot be assumed even after directed training via a database of 50 cases.