Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The antimicrobial de-escalation strategy (ADE) plays a crucial role in antimicrobial stewardship, reducing the likelihood of bacterial resistance. This study aims to evaluate how often the intensive care unit (ICU) used ADE for empirical treatment during COVID-19. MATERIALS: Adult ICU patients receiving empirical antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections were retrospectively studied from September 2020 to December 2021. ADE was defined as (1) discontinuation of an antimicrobial in case of empirical combination therapy or (2) replacement of the antimicrobial to narrow the antimicrobial spectrum within the first 3 days of therapy, according to the test results and clinical picture. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included in the study. The number of patients who received empirical combined therapy (38.4%) was lower than those who received monotherapy (61.6%). The most preferred monotherapy (45.9%) was piperacillin-tazobactam, while the most preferred in combination treatment (22.7%) was meropenem. Within the first 3 days of admittance to the ICU, 3% of patients underwent ADE for their empirical antimicrobial therapy, 61.6% underwent no change, and 35.4% underwent change other than ADE. Procalcitonin levels were below 2 µg/L on the third day of treatment in 69.7% of the patients. Culture or culture-antibiogram results of 50.5% of the patients were obtained within the first 3 days of empirical therapy. There was no growth in the culture results of 21 patients (21.2%) during their ICU stay. CONCLUSION: In this study, ADE practice was much lower than expected. In order to reduce the significant differences between theory and reality, clinical, laboratory, and organisational conditions must be objectively assessed along with patient characteristics.

2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 109(3): 116263, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615599

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Various bacteria produce complicated infections that are difficult to treat worldwide. Ceftobiprole is effective against resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: This review assessed effectiveness and safety of ceftobiprole monotherapy for severe infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing clinical cure, microbiological cure, and safety of ceftobiprole alone to a combination or non-combination antibiotic regimen was conducted. Until December 20, 2022, we searched a major databases. RESULTS: This study includes 4168 patients from six trials. Ceftobiprole and comparator-received patients had similar clinical responses for all patient population. Also, the eradication rate of all organisms and specific pathogenic bacteria in microbiologically examined patients was comparable between the groups. Ceftobiprole induced more gastrointestinal side events than comparable drugs, mostly nausea [OR 1.91 (1.26-2.90), p=<0.01]. While skin-related adverse events were significantly associated with comparator antibiotics [6 trials, 4062 patients; OR 0.77 (0.60-0.99), p=0.03]. CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole monotherapy is effective and safe for severe infections caused by Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Cefalosporinas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ; 25(1): 28, 2024 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38637817

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dialysis patients are at high risk for drug-related problems (DRPs), which have significant consequences for their morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Improved clinical outcomes can be achieved by preventing, identifying, and resolving these problems. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. In this study, the PAIR instrument (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) was validated for use in Turkish. Validation consisted of three stages: translation back-translation with expert panel evaluation, reliability analysis using the test-retest method, and conceptual validity with both Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) and PAIR used to determine DRPs prevalence. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients (mean ± SD age, 54.1 ± 15.8 years; 53.8% male) were included in the study. An expert panel evaluated the items in the criterion based on their intelligibility, service of purpose, differentiation, and cultural suitability during the translation stage. Content validity index (CVI) score was found to be 0.95. The reliability analysis was performed by applying the test-retest method and calculating correlation coefficient on 30 randomly selected patients one month later. Correlation coefficient (p) was found to be 0.8. To evaluate conceptual validity, 104 patients' pharmacotherapy plans were assessed using both the PAIR and PCNE criteria. The prevalence of DRPs according to PAIR criteria (100.0%) and PCNE (73.1%) were statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, PAIR criteria can identify clinically relevant DRPs in patients with CKD and is a new, validated tool to be used in Turkey, but may not be adequate for patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, it needs to be reviewed and updated for dialysis patients.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia
4.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(3)2024 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534700

RESUMO

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is FDA-approved for managing infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacilli, particularly infections via carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pathogens. The clinical data are still limited, particularly those in Saudi Arabia. The present study is a retrospective cohort study that was carried out at the Armed Forces Hospital in the southern region of Saudi Arabia to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes for CAZ-AVI-treated patients as monotherapy and as an add-on to standard therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) OXA-48 infections to those treated with standard drugs. The study included CRKP OXA-48-like infected patients who were administered antibiotics for more than seven days from 1 August 2018 to May 2023. Patients' baseline characteristics and demography were extracted from the clinical records, and their clinical/microbiology efficiencies were assessed as per the corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to identify the potential independent variable for CAZ-AVI efficiency. A total of 114 patient files were included for the evaluation. Among these patients, 64 used CAZ-AVI combined with standard therapy and were included in the intervention group, and 50 of them used standard therapy and were included in the comparative group. Following analysis, CAZ-AVI's clinical success was 42.2% (p = 0.028), while the intervention versus comparative groups showed decreased 30-day all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 70.0%; p = 0.036) and infection recurrence (7.8% versus 24.0%; p = 0.019), as well as substantially increased rates of microbial eradication (68.8% versus 42.0%; p = 0.007). CAZ-AVI add-on therapy rather than monotherapy showed statistically significant favored clinical and microbial outcomes over the standard therapy. Furthermore, sex (female %), ICU admission, and fever were negatively associated with patients' 30-day all-cause mortality, serving as independent negative factors. Only fever, CRP bio levels, inotropes, and ICU admissions were significant predictors influencing the CAZ-AVI's clinical efficiency. The duration of CAZ-AVI therapy positively influenced CAZ-AVI's microbial eradication, while both WBC counts and fever experiences were negative predictors. This study shows the effective usage of CAZ-AVI against CRKP OXA-48-like infections. The influencing independent variables depicted here should recommend that clinicians individualize the CAZ-AVI dose based on co-existing risk factors to achieve optimal survival and efficacy. Prospective multicenter and randomized control studies are recommended, with individualized CAZ-AVI precision administration implemented based on patients' characteristics.

5.
J Chemother ; : 1-9, 2024 Feb 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38409748

RESUMO

Meticulous antimicrobial management is essential among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, particularly if renal replacement therapy is needed. Many factors affect drug removal in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy CRRT. In this study, we aimed to compare current databases that are frequently used to adjust CRRT dosages of antimicrobial drugs with the gold standard. The dosage recommendations from various databases for antimicrobial drugs eliminated by CRRT were investigated. The book 'Renal Pharmacotherapy: Dosage Adjustment of Medications Eliminated by the Kidneys' was chosen as the gold standard. There were variations in the databases. Micromedex, UpToDate, and Sanford had similar rates to the gold standard of 45%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. The Micromedex database shows the most similar results to the gold standard source. In addition, a consensus was reached as a result of the expert panel meetings established to discuss the different antimicrobial dose recommendations of the databases.

6.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 1364, 2023 07 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37461105

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pharmaceutical care services (PCs) have evolved significantly over the last few decades, with a greater focus on patient's safety and proven effectiveness in a wide range of contexts. Many of the evidence supporting this technique comes from the United States, the evaluation and adoption of (PCs) which differ greatly across the globe. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to identify and assess the efficacy of pharmaceutical care services in various pharmaceutical aspects throughout seventeen Middle Eastern nations. METHOD: The Arkesy and O'Malley technique was used to conduct a scoping review. It was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Springer Link, Clinical Trials, and Web of Science etc. The Van Tulder Scale was utilized in randomized trials research, whereas the dawn and black checklists were used in non-randomized trials research. A descriptive and numerical analysis of selected research was done. The scope of eligible PCs, pharmaceutical implementers, study outcomes, and quality were all identified by a thematic review of research. RESULTS: There were about 431,753 citations found in this study, and 129 publications were found to be eligible for inclusion after analysing more than 271 full-text papers. The study design was varied, with 43 (33.3%) RCTs and 86 (66.7%) n-RCTs. Thirty-three (25.6%) of the studies were published in 2020. Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey were home to the majority of the studies (25.6%, 16.3%, and 11.6%) respectively. Thirty-seven studies (19.7%) were concerned with resolving drug related problems (DRPs), whereas 27 (14.4%) were concerned with increasing quality of life (QOL) and 23 (12.2%) with improving drug adherence. Additionally, the research revealed that the average ratings of the activities provided to patients improved every year. CONCLUSION: Studies in the Middle East continue to provide evidence supporting the positive impact of pharmaceutical care services on both hard and soft outcomes measured in most studies. Yet there was rare focus on the value of the implemented services. Thus, rigorous evaluation of the economic impact of implemented pharmaceutical care services in the Middle East and assessment of their sustainability is must.


Assuntos
Assistência Farmacêutica , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Jordânia , Turquia , Preparações Farmacêuticas
7.
BMC Nephrol ; 24(1): 149, 2023 05 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37237342

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health concern due to its high mortality risk, high hospitalization rates and cost, and low life expectancy. Thus, CKD patients are among patient group that may benefit from clinical pharmacy services the most. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study conducted between October 1, 2019, and March 18, 2020, in the nephrology ward of Ankara University School of the Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital. DRPs were classified according to PCNE v8.03. The main outcomes were interventions proposed and the rate of acceptance by the physicians. RESULTS: 269 pre-dialysis patients were included to determine DRPs during the treatment process of the patients. 205 DRPs were found in 131 (48.7%) patients. Treatment efficacy was found to be the main type of DRPs (56.2%) followed by treatment safety (39.6%). When patients with and without DRPs were compared, it was found that the number of female patients (55.0%) was higher in the group with DRPs (p < 0.05). The length of hospital stays (11.3 ± 7.7) and the mean number of drugs used (9.6 ± 3.6) in the group with DRPs were significantly higher than those without DRPs (9.3 ± 5.9; 8.1 ± 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.05). 91.7% of the interventions were accepted by the physicians, and patients and found clinically beneficial. 71.7% of DRPs were fully resolved, 1.9% partially resolved and 23.4% could not be resolved. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of DRPs in patients with chronic kidney disease was determined during therapy. Clinical pharmacist interventions were highly accepted by the physicians and patients. This may indicate implementation of clinical pharmacy services in the nephrology ward has a great impact on optimized therapy and prevention DRPs.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Feminino , Farmacêuticos , Estudos Prospectivos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Rim
8.
J Chemother ; 35(8): 712-720, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37021512

RESUMO

This study aims to evaluate the clinical pharmacist's contribution impact on the appropriate use of colistin. Our study was conducted prospectively in patients in the Internal Diseases Intensive Care Unit of Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital for eight months. The first four months of the study were with the observation group, while the next four months were with the intervention group. The study determined how the active participation of clinical pharmacists had affected the appropriateness of colistin use. The results showed that the appropriate use of colistin was higher in the intervention group than in the observational group; furthermore, incidence of nephrotoxicity was lower. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.05), respectively. This study showed that the clinical pharmacist's active intervention by following the patients increased the frequency and percentage of the appropriate use of colistin. This decreased the incidence of nephrotoxicity, colistin's most important side effect.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Humanos , Farmacêuticos , Erros de Medicação , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(4): 846-853, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234102

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The role of a community pharmacist is well recognized in the literature as the most accessible health care provider that promotes health wellness and disease prevention. Evidence supports their role in cancer health promotion though this is not seen yet in practice. The aim of the study was to assess community pharmacists' preparedness in terms of knowledge, role perception and barriers for providing cancer health promotion in North Cyprus. METHODS: A cross-sectional face-to-face questionnaire-based study was carried among a randomly selected representative sample of community pharmacists in North Cyprus between June 2020 and August 2020. A pre-validated 31-item questionnaire tool was revised by an expert panel and adopted for purpose of this study. RESULTS: 200 (64.5%) out of 310 approached community pharmacists' have accepted and responded to the questionnaire of which 183 were fully answered. The community pharmacists' awareness of cancer was moderate, as 70% answered correctly. Most respondents (93.4%) agree that pharmacists should be involved in cancer health promotion. Most respondents (> 90%) agree that pharmacist's lack of interest in oncology, lack of educational material and pharmacist's hesitancy about their knowledge of cancer are respectively the most important barriers for cancer health promotion. CONCLUSION: The study shows that community pharmacist well perceives their role in cancer health promotion despite moderate awareness of cancer related facts and hesitancy of their knowledge necessary for assuming their role. Lack of interest, motivation and cancer educational materials availability are also major barrier to address.


Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Neoplasias , Humanos , Farmacêuticos , Estudos Transversais , Chipre , Papel Profissional , Promoção da Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde
10.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(12): 1932-1944, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36401121

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Adherence has proved to have a positive influence on achieving plausible treatment outcomes. Self-report questionnaires are widely used in evaluating adherence, creating thus a high-powered research field. This review aims to provide an update of scales used in hypertension, which are compared and analysed against reliability and validity. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched in May 2022 to identify studies. We extracted the study characteristics and evaluated their quality. A random-effects model with subgroup analysis was used to calculate estimates and heterogeneity parameters as well as regressions, funnel and forest plots. A bivariate model was selected to conduct validity analyses and draw receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fifty-five articles were identified and classified into 22 different reliable and validated tools. Pooled analyses predicted an overall good Cronbach's alpha of 0.76 (95%CI:0.67-0.83), a good ICC of 0.8 (95%CI:0.72-0.86) and an excellent correlation coefficient of 0.91 (95%CI:0.86-0.95), which all showed high heterogeneity and slight detection of asymmetry. Regression analyses showed that only time and the number of items/scale type influenced significantly retest and alpha, respectively. Overall validity showed acceptable sensitivity of 0.65 (95%CI:0.53-0.75) and specificity of 0.57 (95%CI:0.47-0.67) with a good Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.637. Upon comparison, four tools showed superiority over Morisky's scale. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Adherence is a multi-dimensional phenomenon, which deems scales to be highly variable or complex; thus, complicating the selection process. Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) is the most promising free non-inferior alternative to Morisky, the most used scale.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Humanos , Autorrelato , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 44(3): 651-662, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35235113

RESUMO

Background Drug-drug interactions are frequently observed in kidney transplant recipients due to polypharmacy and use of immunosuppressants. However, there is only one study evaluating clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants specially in kidney transplant recipients by means of online databases and Stockleys Drug Interactions, as a gold standard. Aim This study aimed to compare four online databases used frequently to determined clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients according to the Renal Drug Handbook. Method This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted between October 1, 2019, and March 18, 2020, in the nephrology ward of Ankara University School of the Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital. In total, 52 adult patients' discharge prescriptions were retrieved from their medical records and analyzed retrospectively. Micromedex®, Lexicomp®, Medscape, and Drugs.com databases were used to evaluate drug interactions. The Renal Drug Handbook was used as a gold standard to do specificity and sensitivity analysis. Results A total of 127 potential drug-drug interactions between the immunosuppressants and co-medications were detected by at least one online database. 32 (25.2%) of these were approved as clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions by the Renal Drug Handbook. Lexicomp® and Drugs.com have exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.72 and 0.75) while Micromedex® has shown the highest specifity (0.83). Furthermore, the highest positive predictive value has been observed in Micromedex® (0.53). Micromedex® and Medscape had the highest negative predictive value (0.83 and 0.82). However, the kappa value of all was low. The values of inter-rater agreement (Kappa index) between online databases and the Renal Drug Handbook were weak (range 0.05-0.36). In addition, only 11 (8.7%) of potential drug-drug interactions were identified by all online databases. Conclusion This study showed that there was a weak compatibility between each database examined and the Renal Drug Handbook to detect clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions for immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, we suggest that although databases might be practical to take a quick glance in detection of potential drug-drug interactions between immunosuppressants and co-medications, the data should be evaluated in detail and interpreted with caution in combination with a reference book like Renal Drug Handbook.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Interações Medicamentosas , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 79, 2022 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35033079

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients treated in the intensive care units (ICUs) often suffer from side effects and drug-related problems (DRPs) that can be life-threatening. A way to prevent DRPs and improve drug safety and efficacy is to include clinical pharmacists in the clinical team. This study aims to evaluate the classification of drug-related problems and the implementation of clinical pharmacy services by a clinical pharmacist in the ICU of a university hospital in Turkey. METHODS: This study was carried out prospectively between December 2020 and July 2021 in Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital Internal Diseases ICU. All patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for more than 24 h were included in the study. During the study, the clinical pharmacist's interventions and other clinical services for patients were recorded. DRPs were classed according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V.8.02. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included during the study period corresponding to 2264 patient-days. Patients with DRPs had a longer hospital stay and a higher mortality rate (p < 0.05). 108 patients had at least one DRP and the total number of DRPs was 206. There was an average of 1.36 DRPs per patient, 71.5% of patients experienced DRP and 89.22 DRPs per 1000 patient-days. A total of 35 ADEs were observed in 32 patients. ADE incidence was per 1000 patient-days 15.45. ADEs were caused by nephrotoxicity (48.57%), electrolyte disorders (17.14%), drug-induced thrombocytopenia (17.14%), liver enzyme increase (8.57%) and other causes (8.57%). Drug selection (40.29%) and dose selection (54.36%) constituted most of the causes of DRPs. Dose change was the highest percentage of planned interventions with a rate of 56.79%. Intervention was accepted at a rate of 90.8% and it was fully implemented. CONCLUSION: In this study, the importance of the clinical pharmacist in the determination and analysis of DRPs was emphasized. Clinical pharmacy services like the one described should be implemented widely to increase patient safety.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Farmacêuticos , Turquia/epidemiologia
13.
Afr Health Sci ; 22(4): 104-118, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37092108

RESUMO

Background: The role of clinical pharmacist in hospital settings of Ethiopia is still new and infant. Objective: To evaluate the impact of pharmaceutical care on clinical outcome and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods: A single cantered, pre-post interventional study design was carried out by enrolling 100 uncontrolled T2DM patients from March 1-August 30, 2020. The intervention package included assessment of pharmacological and non-pharmacological needs, counselling patients in person at the clinic, and providing educational materials. Results: Of the 100 patients initially enrolled, 87(87%) completed the follow-up and included in the final data analysis. The intervention showed a decrease in average FBG, systolic blood pressure (SBP), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 47.3 mg/dL, 22.6mmHg and 31.4mg/dL, while high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) exhibited significant increase by 13.4 mg/dL and 11.5 ml/min/1.73m2 respectively (p<0.0001). In addition, diastolic blood pressure, lipid values, kidney function parameters, and liver function parameters showed significant decrease in post intervention compared to pre-intervention (p<0.05). Medication adherence of the patients increased significantly at 6-month follow-up (p<0.001). Conclusion: These results also suggest the benefits of integrating clinical pharmacist services in multidisciplinary healthcare teams and diabetes management in Ethiopia.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Assistência Farmacêutica , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Etiópia , Farmacêuticos
14.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260539, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843561

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare between current evidence of novel glycopeptides against vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review and meta-analysis was done. Major databases were searched for eligible randomized control trials that assessed clinical success, microbiological success and safety profile of novel glycopeptides versus vancomycin for infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included eleven trials (7289 participants) comparing telavancin, dalbavancin and oritavancin with vancomycin. No differences were detected between novel glycopeptides and vancomycin for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) among modified intent-to-treat patients (OR: 1.04, CI: 0.92-1.17) as well as within the clinically evaluable patients (OR: 1.09, CI: 0.91-1.30). Data analysed from SSTIs, HAP and bacteremia studies on telavancin showed insignificant high clinical response in microbiologically evaluable patients infected with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (OR: 1.57, CI: 0.94-2.62, p: 0.08) and in the eradication of MRSA (OR: 1.39, CI: 0.99-1.96, P:0.06). Dalbavancin was non-inferior to vancomycin for the treatment of osteomyelitis in a phase II trial, while it was superior to vancomycin for the treatment of bacteremia in a phase II trial. Data analysed from all trials showed similar rates of all-cause mortality between compared antibiotics groups (OR: 0.67, CI: 0.11-4.03). Telavancin was significantly related with higher adverse events (OR: 1.24, CI: 1.07-1.44, P: <0.01) while dalbavancin and oritavancin were associated with significant fewer adverse events (OR: 0.73, CI: 0.57-0.94, p: 0.01; OR: 0.72, CI: 0.59-0.89, p: <0.01 respectively). CONCLUSION: Efficacy and safety profiles of both dalbavancin and oritavancin were the same as vancomycin in the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections in different clinical settings, while telavancin might be an effective alternative to vancomycin in MRSA infections, but caution is required during its clinical use due to the high risk of adverse events, especially nephrotoxicity.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Glicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Glicopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos
15.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(1): 502, 2020 Dec 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302925

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Continuing professional development (CPD) continues to gain acceptance as a model for health care professionals to engage in lifelong learning (LLL). Many pharmacy schools have not adopted yet specific programs targeting the development of LLL skills, though LLL is widely accepted as an essential competence. This paper examines the effectiveness and utility of a longitudinal CPD training program. METHODS: A CPD simulation course was introduced to a cohort of fifth year students in Northern Cyprus in the 2018-2019 academic year. The program was delivered as an interactive orientation course in one semester; meanwhile, in the second semester, the students applied the CPD cycle and completed their portfolios during their final experiential practice. A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the outcomes of the intervention using students' preparedness for lifelong learning (SPLLL) self-administered questionnaire delivered pre-post program, focus group sessions for students to reflect on the course experience, and instructors' evaluations of portfolios. RESULTS: Following the implementation of the course, students' assessment scores were significantly higher overall and for all scale domains, including "knowledge, skills, attitude and practice", compared to the baseline assessment. Additionally, compared to fifth year students who responded to the second SPLLL questionnaire, the intervention group students' assessment was significantly higher in knowledge, skills, and practice. The qualitative analysis reported high student satisfaction and achievement of the course objectives. Nineteen of the students scored high on their portfolios. CONCLUSION: The CPD simulation course provided students with opportunities to practice and develop self-assessment and self-management skills that are all desirable for lifelong learning and prepared them for CPD.


Assuntos
Educação em Farmácia , Assistência Farmacêutica , Estudantes de Farmácia , Currículo , Chipre , Humanos , Aprendizagem
16.
Oncol Res Treat ; 43(12): 694-702, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32950984

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is frequently used alone or combined with other chemotherapy agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in relapsed patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of capecitabine monotherapy versus combination in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and safety of capecitabine alone compared to capecitabine combination were systematically searched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and grades 3-4 drug-related adverse events were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS: A total of 6,714 patients of 9 trials were involved in the pooled analysis. Our findings demonstrated that capecitabine combination is significantly superior to capecitabine monotherapy in improving PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.54, p < 0.0001) and ORR (risk ratio [RR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.83, p < 0.001), but it was insignificant in OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98-1.22, p = 0.12). On the other hand, the incidence of non-hematological adverse events such as hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea was lower in capecitabine combination compared to capecitabine monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy showed superiority over capecitabine monotherapy in terms of PFS and ORR, with no significant difference in OS. Non-hematological adverse effects such as hand-foot syndrome were fewer with a combination regimen. However, hematological adverse events were fewer with capecitabine monotherapy regimen.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Antraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Síndrome Mão-Pé/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0235495, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32667938

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the presence of effective strategies and standard guidelines for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a considerable proportion of patients at risk of developing thromboembolism did not receive prophylaxis during hospitalization, while others received it irrationally, thus led to unwanted side effects. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the current thromboprophylaxis practice and management of hospitalized patients at risk of developing DVT, along with the assessment of health care providers (HCPs) knowledge, and attitudes regarding DVT prevention. METHODS: An observational study was conducted in the general wards of two leading tertiary university hospitals in Northern Cyprus in which patients from multiple clinics were enrolled to investigate the rational use of DVT prophylaxis using the Caprini risk assessment tool. Patients were also followed for possible complications two weeks post-hospitalization. A cross-sectional study followed to assess the knowledge and attitude of HCPs regarding DVT risks and prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 180 patients enrolled, 47.7% were identified as irrationally managed, 52.3% were identified as rationally managed, 77.8% of patients were identified as having a high level of risk. Notably, Four of thirteen patients who received more thromboprophylaxis developed minor complications. Additionally, 73.3% of nurses had not received DVT education. Furthermore, more than 50% of physicians and nurses achieved a low knowledge score for DVT risks and prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: A high degree of irrationality in the administration of thromboprophylaxis therapy to hospitalized patients was observed. The overall scores for HCPs indicated insufficient knowledge of DVT risk assessments and prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Chipre , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco Ajustado , Trombose Venosa/terapia
18.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 442, 2019 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31783841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the implementation and evaluation of a clinical pharmacy practice (CPP) course in Northern Cyprus. The course covered a range of subjects, including internal medicine, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and drug information services. METHODS: An 8-week structured CPP course was designed for fifth-year students. Students' competencies were assessed using an objective structural clinical examination (OSCE) before and after the intervention. The course addressed all CPP competence domains and learning outcomes, and it utilized a wide variety of learning activities. Student perceptions, experience and preceptor evaluations were assessed using surveys. RESULTS: Students reported that the learning objectives of the course were met. Substantial knowledge and skills in different areas of CPP were gained. A significant overall enhancement in the average grades on the OSCE was identified (23.09 ± 0.75 and 27.51 ± 0.71 out of 40). Students received the highest scores in drug information data retrieval and interpretation (4.4 ± 0.13), communication skills (4.2 ± 0.09) and public health promotion (3.92 ± 0.12). The lowest scores were recorded in clinical prescription management problems (2.5 ± 0.23) and pharmacotherapy application (2.54 ± 0.18). CONCLUSION: Students' scores significantly improved from the baseline in the core competence domains. Most students found the structure, process and outcomes of the course to be beneficial and satisfactory.


Assuntos
Educação em Farmácia , Competência Clínica/normas , Currículo , Chipre , Avaliação Educacional , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/normas
19.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 41(5): 1272-1281, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31313004

RESUMO

Background In order to achieve patient adherence, individuals require different levels of information. Basic and adequate information must be provided by different health care providers to patients. Objective To assess the information level of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to determine the source of their information regarding the medicine they use in addition to their satisfaction, inhalation usage techniques and perception of the information providing role of health care professionals. Setting Respiratory disease clinics in Nicosia and Famagusta state hospitals and community pharmacies in North Cyprus. Method A cross-sectional multicentered observational study was carried out in respiratory disease clinics and community pharmacies. Patients' knowledge and healthcare providers' perceptions of their roles were evaluated using "The satisfaction with information about medicines scale". Evaluation of patient's inhalation techniques was performed using a validated checklist. Main outcome measure (a) Patients' knowledge of their medication and satisfaction with the information provided by health care professionals, (b) the prevalence of critical inhalation mistakes, (c) health care professionals' perceptions of their patient counseling practice. Results A total of 110 patients were evaluated, and 6 physicians and 76 pharmacists were recruited for the interview. The health care professionals reported that they talk about the action and the use of medicines with the patients. The standardized average patients' satisfaction score for action and use was 0.35 (± 0.21), whereas for potential side effects, it was 0.26 (± 0.15). Even though 92% of patients believed that they use their inhaler properly, 75% of the patients made at least one critical mistake while using the inhalation demo, which would likely affect the delivery of the medicine to the lungs. Conclusion In spite of health care professionals feeling comfortable with their counseling practices, the majority of patients reported dissatisfaction with the information they provided about medicine, and three out of four patients were making critical mistakes in the use of inhalers. More effort is warranted by health care professionals on patient education to limit critical mistakes.


Assuntos
Administração por Inalação , Aconselhamento , Pessoal de Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Chipre , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Satisfação do Paciente , Farmácias , Farmacêuticos , Médicos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
20.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 41(5): 1299-1306, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267362

RESUMO

Background Pharmacogenomics is a branch of biotechnological science integrating medicine, pharmacology, and genomics techniques. Moreover, it focuses on creating drug therapies in order to analyze genetic differences in patients causing various responses to a single therapeutic regimen. Objective This cross sectional study aimed to examine the attitude, knowledge and adoption among pharmacists in North Cyprus and the most appropriate method to improve education among them. Setting Community pharmacy setting. Method A total of 103 out of 140 pharmacists responded to a pre-tested and validated questionnaire consisting of 25 items during July through September 2016. Main outcome measure Pharmacists attitude, knowledge and adoption towards pharmacogenomic tests. Result Data showed that most of the pharmacists in North Cyprus had positive attitude and knowledge scores with mean value of 28.3 ± 5.3 (out of 40) and 6.9 ± 0.8 (out of 10) respectively, further findings showed that there is a significant difference among age groups in their total attitude score (p < 0.05). Conclusion Even though pharmacogenomics is a field promising a variety of benefits, it is vital to implement it in clinical settings in order to improve outcomes. Our findings highlight the necessity for more education on the availability and interpretation of pharmacogenomics tests.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Farmacêuticos , Farmacogenética , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos Transversais , Chipre , Educação em Farmácia , Feminino , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmácias , Prática Profissional , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...