Evaluating patient outcomes in postoperative pain management according to the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R).

BACKGROUND: In the first 24 h after surgery, it is necessary to evaluate the patient responses to pain, analgesia and patient satisfaction to prevent complications related to the pain management process. AIM: To evaluate patients' outcomes (pain qualities, side effects of the pain management, pain treatment satisfaction, non-pharmacological pain treatment methods, predictors of pain management satisfaction and percentage of pain relief) according to the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) in the first 24 h. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study sample was comprised of 700 patients, who were surgically treated at the surgical clinics of a university hospital and completed the first postoperative 24 h. The data was collected through the "Patient Information Form" and the "Turkish version of the revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R)". RESULTS: The medians of the lowest and the worst postoperative pain severity level were 3.0 and 7.0, respectively. Patients experienced severe pain in 60 % of the first postoperative 24 h and reported that 70 % of their pain eventually decreased. A positive and significant correlation was found between pain interference, pain-affected mood/emotions, the severity of pain-related side effects, the least and worst pain severity levels and severe pain, and the percentage of time experienced with severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients experienced severe pain, which restricted their daily life activities and led to negative emotions. Acute postoperative pain may negatively affect patient outcomes and delay postoperative recovery during the early period. Therefore, pain should be managed in the early period to prevent physical and psychological side effects.

Vesicourethral anastomosis including rhabdosphincter in retropubic radical prostatectomy: Technique and results.

OBJECTIVE: Retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is still widely used in clinical practice in localized prostate cancer because of its high oncological success. The aim of this study was to define the continence status in patients where rhabdosphincter was included in the vesicourethral anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2004 and September 2010, 90 cases who underwent RRP by the same surgeon in our clinic were taken into the study. In all cases vesicourethral anastomosis was performed include the rhabdosphincter. The anastomosis was performed with mean 2.9 (0-7) interrupted no 2-0 vicryl sutures, depending on the angulation of symphysis pubis and pelvic cavity. Pad test was performed to all patients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. We defined patients as 'continent' when they no need pad, as 'mild incontinence' when they use only one pad daily, as 'moderate incontinence' when they use two or three pads daily and as 'severe incontinence' when they use more than three pads daily. RESULTS: Preoperative total PSA value was 12.2 ng/ml (range: 2.7-84 ng/ml). Preoperative prostate biopsy results were found that Gleason scores were 5, 6, 7 and 8 in 7, 53, 21, 9 patients, respectively. Mean operation and urethral catheter removal time was 103 minutes (60-200) and 14,6 days (9-28), respectively. Mean hospital stay was 4.6 days (2-20). According to results of postoperative pad tests, 38 (42.2%), 48 (53.3%), 55 (61.1%) and 75 (83.3%) patients were defined as continent in first, third, sixth and twelfth months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We think that, our novel technique of vesicourethral anastomosis in standard RRP provides more optimal urethral position during fixation of pelvic floor and urethra, protect caudal retraction, preserve functional urethral length. Also strong full thickness stitch on urethra provides better urinary continence by hanging urethra in our patients. Although our early continence rate is better, our long term continence rate is similar to literature.

Supracostal access for miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of supracostal and subcostal approaches during miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL). In two tertiary academic centers, we retrospectively analyzed the charts of patients who had undergone mPNL between January 2011 and June 2015 for the treatment of renal stones. Enrolled in the study were 49 patients who had access through the supracostal area (Group 1) and, to serve as controls, 49 patients who were accessed through the subcostal area (Group 2). To avoid potential bias between the groups, the patients were retrospectively matched one-on-one with respect to age, gender, body mass index, ASA score, and size and number of stones. The presence of upper calyx stones and distorted lower calyx anatomy were the most common reasons for performing supracostal access (57.1 and 28.6%, respectively). Access through 11-12 intercostal space was performed in 46 patients (93.9%), and the other three supracostal accesses (6.1%) were performed through the 10-11 intercostal area. The complication rates were 14.3% in Group 1 and 16.3% in Group 2 (p = 0.952). Final stone-free status had increased to 89.8 and 87.8% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.942). Our study demonstrated that mPNL resulted in acceptable stone-free rates whether accessed through either the supracostal or subcostal areas. Moreover, the supracostal approach with mPNL had no negative effect on any intraoperative and postoperative parameters, nor did it increase complication rates.

Comparison of intravesical (Cohen) and extravesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children.

INTRODUCTION: Various intravesical and extravesical techniques have been described for the surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Among those techniques Cohen (intra-vesical) and Lich-Gregoir (extra-vesical) are the most commonly used ones. However, there are limited studies that compare those two surgical techniques in the literature. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to compare the outcomes of the open intravesical and extravesical procedures for unilateral primary VUR in children. METHODS: We analyzed the records of 118 consecutive children with primary VUR who underwent open ureteral reimplantation surgery by single surgeon from January 2011 to October 2015 at our institution. Among them, intravesical reimplantation was group A, and extravesical reimplantation procedure was group B. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of both groups, including age, sex, preoperative reflux grade, presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), operative time, postoperative complications and hospitalization period. Success of surgery was defined as the resolution of the VUR as determined by voiding cystourethrography 6 -12 months after surgery. All the parameters were statistically compared. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were found eligible for the study. In 23 cases intravesical (group A) and in 35 cases extravesical (group B) procedure were performed. The operative time in group A was significantly higher than group B (110.3±16.9 and 87±29.8 min, respectively, p = 0.002). The mean hospital stay was also longer in group A (2.8±0.8 and 1.2±0.6 days, respectively, p = 0.007). The ureteral catheterization periods were 14.1±6.1 days for group A and there was no ureteral catheter placement in group B. The success rate of the two groups were comparable (100% vs 94.9%, p = 0.513). No intraoperative complications were detected in either group. The number of febrile urinary tract infections were similar between the groups after a mean follow up of 18.2 months (p = 0.746). DISCUSSION: Our results confirmed that both Cohen and Lich-Gregoir procedures had equivalent success and complication rates. Lich-Gregoir technique was found superior to Cohen technique in terms of hospital stay and operative time. Moreover, it avoids the necessity of urethral and ureteral stenting which probably might increase the comfort of the patients postoperatively. The main limitations of our study are unrecorded pain scores and amount of analgesics taken the after surgery and retrospective analysis of the data. CONCLUSION: Both the open intravesical and extravesical ureteroneocystostomy procedures are equally effective in the treatment of primary unilateral VUR. Any of the techniques can be opted by the surgeons depending on their surgical experience.

Bladder carcinosarcoma: A case report with review of the literature.

Carcinosarcoma of the urinary bladder is a rare neoplasm that is histologically composed of malignant epithelial and mesenchymal components. The etiology of sarcomatoid tumors is unclear, but smoking and history of previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy may lead to bladder disorders and to the formation of sarcomatoid carcinoma. These neoplasms behave as highly aggressive tumors and optimal treatment is uncertain. Herein, we report a case of sarcomatoid carcinoma of urinary bladder presenting as a giant intravesical mass in a 61-year-old man complaining of macroscopic hematuria.

Removal of a retroperitoneal foreign body through single port laparoscopy using nephroscope.

Foreign bodies are rare and challenging issues leading to symptoms according to the location. Laparoscopy is a popular and minimally invasive method used for removal of foreign bodies in the abdominal cavity or retroperitoneum. We herein report a case with retroperitoneal foreign body that was removed through retroperitoneal single- port laparoscopy using nephroscope. To our knowledge this is the first case of removal of a retroperitoneal foreign body through single- port laparoscopy using nephroscope.

Turkish validation of the urethral stricture surgery specific patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM) with supplemental assessment of erectile function and morbidity due to oral graft harvesting.

AIMS: We validated a Turkish language version of the urethral stricture surgery specific patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM) in men undergoing anterior urethroplasty. We also investigated changes in erectile function (EF) and quality of life (QoL) due to oral mucosa graft (OMG) harvesting. METHODS: The USS-PROM captures lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), health related QoL (HRQoL) with EQ-5D visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). To evaluate EF and OMG morbidity, we used International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and a self-completed questionnaire, respectively. Psychometric assessment of USS-PROM included test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion validity, and responsiveness. Objective evidence for urethroplasty success was demonstrated with fluoroscopic imaging and urethral calibration at post-operative six months. RESULTS: Among the 101 men included during study period, 42 had complete pre- and postoperative 6th month data for analysis. The test-retest intraclass correlation was 0.79. Cronbach's α for internal consistency of the LUTS construct was 0.79. There was a significant negative correlation between total LUTS scores and peak flow rates, both preoperatively (r = -0.478) and postoperatively (r = -0.508). Mean baseline EQ-VAS increased from 70 to 84 postoperatively (P < 0.001), indicating improved HRQoL. IIEF scores did not change significantly after urethroplasty. Early and late-term QoL impairment rates due to OMG harvesting were 28.9 and 13.1%, respectively. Three (7.1%) men required endoscopic intervention for recurrence within 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Turkish version of USS-PROM showed comparable psychometric properties with the original version. Complementation of this instrument with additional measures that address sexual function and OMG morbidity provides better QoL assessment for urethral reconstruction.

The role of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones.

OBJECTIVE: In our study we aimed to evaluate outcomes of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) performed for the treatment of kidney stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2014 and September 2015, a single surgeon performed UMP on a total of 49 consecutive patients with symptomatic kidney stones at our center. Pregnants, anticogulant users, patients with bleeding diathesis pyonephrosis, and partial/complete staghorn stones were excluded from the study. Patient characteristics, operative data and postoperative outcomes were assessed in detail. RESULTS: The UMP was performed on 50 (34 right/16 left) renal units of the 48 (28 male/20 female) patients included in this study. The mean age and body mass index was 36.5 (2-83) years and 26.2 (17.6-32.8) kg/m2, respectively. Mean stone size was calculated as 22.2 (10-55) mm. The mean durations of the operations and fluoroscopic examination were calculated as 65.4 (20-120) minutes and 89.4 (9-322) seconds, respectively. The mean duration of hospitalization was 1.4 (1-5) days. In 52% of the patients the procedure was terminated tubeless. Mean hemoglobin drop was 0.6 (0-3) g/dL. Our series experienced a 10% complication rate. The UMP procedure was successful in 96% of the renal units at the 1st month control visit assessment. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of our study have demonstrated that UMP is an effective and safe treatment modality, especially in the treatment of medium-sized renal calculi.

Flexible ureterorenoscopy results: Analysis of 279 cases.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the outcomes of 279 cases in whom we performed retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) were evaluated retrospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RIRS was performed on 279 cases with the aid of access sheath of guidewire between March 2011 and February 2015. All patients were operated in the standard lithotomy position. A hydrophilic guidewire was inserted with the aid of rigid ureterorenoscopy and we checked whether there were any residual ureteral stones and other pathologies. Fluoroscopy was used routinely in all cases. Stone fragments smaller than 3 mm were left off but those bigger than 3 mm were removed by grasper after stone fragmentation. Controls of the patients were assessed by plain films (KUB), urinary tract ultrasonography (US) and/or computed tomography (CT) 1 month after the operation. Success rate of the procedure was defined as the stone-free status or presence of residual fragments less than 3 mm. RESULTS: 152 of the patients were male and 127 were female. The median ages of the male and female patients were 47.7 (1-86) ve 45.9 (3-79) years respectively. The median stone size was 13.5 mm (8-25). Preoperatively 34 (12.1%) patients had double-J ureteral stent. 19 (6.8%) patients were operated while they were still receiving antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy Solitary kidney was present in 24 patients while the remaining patients had kyphoscoliosis (n=3), rotation anomaly (n=6), pelvic kidney (n=2), double collecting system (n=3), and horseshoe kidney (n=6). In 264 patients access sheath was used, in 15 patients operation was performed with the help of the guidewire. Double-J stents were inserted to 14 patients because of ureteral stricture and they underwent operation after 2 weeks later. Renal stones of 219 patients among all cases were fragmented completely and the patients were discharged as stone free (SF). Our success rate (SF or presence of clinically insignificant residual [CIRF]) was 78.4%. Stone size (p=0.029), stone number (p=0.01), stone location (p=0.023) had significant influence on the stone-free rate after RIRS The mean operation and floroscopy time was 62.5 min. (40-180) and 29.8 sec (4-96), respectively. The mean hospitalization time was 26.4 hours (12-72). Double J stents were placed to 253 patients for more stone burden and ureteral edema. Any complication was not observed for all cases except perioperative developed infection for two patients. CONCLUSION: With advances in laser technology and flexible ureterorenoscopy, kidney stones can be treated with lower morbidity and high success rates.

Comparison of flexible ureterorenoscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for moderately size lower-pole stones.

PURPOSE: To present a retrospective comparative clinical study of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) versus flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) in treatment of moderate-size lower-pole stones (LPSs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on patients with isolated LPSs ≤2 cm in diameter treated with F-URS and/or microperc in two referral centers. Patients were divided into two groups by treatment modality: F-URS (Group 1) and microperc (Group 2). Demographics and perioperative parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients with isolated LPSs were treated via F-URS (Group 1, n = 59) and microperc (Group 2, n = 68). Mean patient age in microperc group was slightly lower than in F-URS group (p = 0.112). We found no statistically significant difference in terms of either the size or number of stones in two groups (p = 0.113 and p = 0.209, respectively). Operative time was shorter in microperc, whereas fluoroscopy time was shorter in F-URS (60.1 ± 26.2 vs. 46.2 ± 24.3 min, p < 0.001; and 28.3 ± 19.1 vs. 108.9 ± 65.2 s, p < 0.001). Mean fall in hemoglobin level was statistically significantly lower in F-URS and hospitalization time was also significantly shorter in F-URS (0.68 ± 0.51 vs. 1.29 ± 0.88 mg/dL, p < 0.001; and 23.0 ± 58.1 vs. 33.8 ± 17.2 h, p < 0.001, respectively). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were 74.5 % (44/59) in Group 1 and 88.2 % (60/68) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that microperc was safe and efficacious when used to treat moderate-size LPSs and may be considered as an alternative to F-URS, affording a higher SFR. Our study supports the notion that microperc should play an increasing role in treatment of LPSs.

Laparoscopic-assisted "microperc" of a stone in a pelvic kidney of a 3-year-old girl.

Treatment of kidney stones in pelvic ectopic kidneys of children is a challenging procedure for urologists. Herein we report a case of laparoscopy-assisted "microperc" in a 3-year-old girl with a stone in her pelvic ectopic kidney. This micro-optical system is helpful in confirming the percutaneous access and provides the possibility of fragmenting the stone without the necessity of dilating the tract.

Is fluoroscopic imaging mandatory for endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones?

OBJECTIVE: To present the feasibility and safety of fluoro-less endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones to diminish radiation exposure of the patient and operating team, and to determine circumstances where a fluoroscopic imaging is mandatory. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2011, 93 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent ureteroscopic treatment by experienced urologists were retrospectively evaluated. Manipulations, such as guidewire, ureteral stent insertion, and balloon dilatation were performed with visual and tactile cues. Patient demographics, need for fluoroscopic imaging, operation and fluoroscopy time, and complication and success rates were investigated. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 34.03 ± 12.09 years (range, 9-63 years). The mean stone size was 10.64 ± 3.16 mm (range, 6-17 mm). The stones were localized in the proximal, middle, and distal segments in 11, 30, and 52 patients, respectively. The mean duration of the operation was 34.51 ± 7.94 minutes (range, 24-55 minutes). Stone-free status was achieved for 90 patients (96.77%). Fluoroscopic imaging was required for 7 patients with a mean fluoroscopy time of 9 ± 4.72 seconds (range, 4-16 seconds) for the following reasons: stone migration to the kidney (3 patients), double collecting system with 2 ureters (1 patient), and ureteral orifice stricture extending to the upper segment (1 patient). No major complications were observed, but minor complications were observed in 11 patients (11.8%). CONCLUSION: The ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones can be safely and effectively performed in experienced hands, with limited or no usage of fluoroscopy except in special circumstances, such as anatomic abnormalities, upper ureteral strictures, and impacted ureteral stones leading to ureteral tortuosity, kinking, and obstruction.