Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10years.

PURPOSE: To report on the oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) patients using the French SurACaP protocol, with a focus on long-term outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter study recruited patients with low-grade PCa between 2007 and 2013 in four referral centers in France. The cohort included patients meeting the SurACaP inclusion criteria, i.e., aged ≤75years, with low-grade PCa (i.e., ISUP 1), clinical stage T1c/T2a, PSA ≤10ng/mL and ≤3 positive cores and tumor length ≤3mm per core. The SurACaP protocol included a digital rectal examination every six months, PSA level measurement every three months for the first two years after inclusion and twice a year thereafter, a confirmatory biopsy in the first year after inclusion, and then follow-up biopsy every two years or if disease progression was suspected. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was progressively included over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 86 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 10.6 years. Only one patient developed metastases and died of PCa. The estimated rates of grade reclassification and treatment-free survival at 15 years were 53.4% and 21.2%, respectively. A negative mpMRI at baseline and a negative confirmatory biopsy were significantly associated with a lower risk of disease progression (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AS using the French SurACaP protocol is a safe and valuable strategy for patients with low-risk PCa, with excellent oncological outcomes after more than 10 years' follow-up. Future studies are crucial to broaden the inclusion criteria and develop a personalized, risk based AS protocol with the aim of de-escalating follow-up examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A retrospective database review of two academic centers was conducted to identify favorable IR PCa patients initially managed by AS between 2014 and 2022. Favorable IR PCa was defined by the presence of one single element of IR disease (i.e., PSA 10-20ng/mL, Gleason Grade Group [GG] 2, or cT2b). All patients were diagnosed and followed up according to a contemporary scheme, including MRI and image-guided biopsies. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients met our inclusion criteria and the median follow-up was 56months. During follow-up, there were no cases of metastasis or death due to PCa, but 6 deaths due to competing causes. A total of 25 (44%) and 6 patients (11%) had definitive treatment and GG 3 reclassification during follow-up, respectively. In multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis, the risk of undergoing definitive treatment was significantly associated with PSA density>0.15 (HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.47 to 15; P=0.01) and PI-RADS 4-5 lesions on mpMRI (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.19; P=0.006). Interestingly, tumor burden (P=0.3) and GG (P=0.7) on biopsy were not associated with definitive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AS is a safe and valuable strategy for well-selected patients with favorable IR prostate cancer, with excellent oncological outcomes after five years' follow-up.

Mid-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in lymph node metastatic prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Lymph node invasion (LNI) has been reported in 10-15% of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy (RP). The objective of this study was to describe the mid-term oncological outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with metastatic lymph node. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at two French referral centers including consecutive cN0 PCa patients who underwent RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection and had lymph node metastases on final pathological analysis (pN1) between January 2000 and May 2020. Follow-up was per institution, which generally included a PSA level measurement every 3 to 12 months for 5 years and annually thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included: two (1.6%) low-risk, 64 (52%) intermediate-risk and 57 (46.4%) high-risk PCa according to the D'Amico risk classification. The median number of nodes removed and metastatic nodes per patient was 15 (IQR 11-22) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Adverse pathological features, i.e., ≥pT3a stage, ISUP grade ≥3, and positive surgical margins were reported in 113 (91.9%), 103 (83.7%), and 73 (59%) of cases, respectively. Postoperative treatment was administered in 104 patients, including radiotherapy alone (n=6), androgen deprivation therapy alone (n=27) or combination with androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy (n=71). The mean follow-up was 42.7 months. The estimated 3-year biochemical-free survival, clinical recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival was 66% and 85% and 98.8%, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, the number of metastatic nodes was associated with clinical recurrence (P=0.04) and a persistently elevated PSA with biochemical recurrence (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The management of lymph node metastatic PCa patients is challenging. Risk stratification of node-positive patients, based on postoperative PSA levels and pathologic features being identified, should help physicians determine which patient would best benefit from multimodal treatment.

Saline bladder infusion vs standard catheter removal in patients with acute urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: The BLAPERF Study.

PURPOSE: Bladder infusion, which involves filling the bladder with saline prior to catheter removal, has been associated with reduced time-to-discharge and increased success rates in trials without catheter (TWOCs) in perioperative setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of this protocol in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study comparing bladder infusion with at least 150mL of warm saline vs. standard catheter removal during TWOC in patients with BPH-related AUR between January and December 2021. The primary outcome was time to discharge. Secondary outcomes included: TWOC success, and early recurrence of urinary retention defined as recurrence within three months of successful TWOC. RESULTS: A total of 75 men were included: 35 in the bladder infusion protocol and 40 in the standard protocol. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. Overall, 35 patients (46.7%) had a successful TWOC without statistically significant difference between groups (P=0.10). Bladder infusion protocol was associated with a shorter median time to discharge (200 vs. 240min, P=0.003). However, patients in the bladder infusion group were associated with a higher risk of early recurrence of urinary retention (30% vs. 0%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with BPH-related AUR, the saline bladder infusion method reduced time-to-discharge with similar TWOC success rates. Larger studies are needed to properly analyze the risk of early recurrence of urinary retention before any clinical application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Continuous saline bladder irrigation after blue light transurethral resection of bladder tumor increases recurrence-free survival in low- to intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of Continuous Saline Bladder Irrigation (CSBI) after blue light transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) to prevent recurrence of low- to intermediate-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including patients with low- to intermediate-risk NMIBC who underwent TURBT in two urological centers between January 2017 and December 2018. Each TURBT was performed using blue light after intravesical instillation of hexaminolaevulinic acid. The experimental group included patients who received CSBI while the control group included patients without CSBI. When practice, CSBI was started immediately after the surgery and was interrupted 24 hours thereafter. Low-risk NMIBC had a surveillance while intermediate NMIBC had 8 adjuvant endovesical instillations of Mitomycin. The primary endpoint was bladder tumor recurrence free-survival which was defined as the time between the initial TURBT and the date of TURBT for bladder recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients (median age: 71 years) were included: 20% female, 15% low-risk, 85% intermediate-risk NMIBC. CSBI was performed in 95 cases (57%). No complication related to irrigation was reported. Bladder recurrence was observed in 55 cases (32.9%): 22 (23.1%) in the CSBI group vs. 33 (45.8%) in the control group (P=0.002). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis with backward selection revealed that CSBI (HR 0.47 [0.27-0.81]; P=0.006) and MMC (HR 0.55 [0.31-0.95]; P=0.034) were significantly associated with reduced risk of bladder recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous saline bladder irrigation reduced the risk of bladder recurrence after blue light TURBT in patients with low- to intermediate-risk NMIBC while being safe. Prospective randomized study is needed to confirm these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Evolution of followed renal oncocytomas]. / Évolution des oncocytomes rénaux surveillés.

INTRODUCTION: Oncocytomas are primitive kidney tumours, considered benign but their evolution is not fully established. The local progression is generally admitted but few data explain what makes a oncocytoma to grow more or less quickly. The objective of our study is to analyse the evolution of followed renal oncocytomas after histologic confirmation and to identify factors that can influence their growth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study in two centers (North Hospital and Hospital of the Conception of Marseille). All patients with renal oncocytoma diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy from September 2010 to April 2016 and followed for more than one year were included. Epidemiological, histological, and morphological data were collected at diagnosis, during follow-up and in case of strategy change (intervention). Statistical analysis of factors influencing oncocytomes growth was based on the Pearson correlation test. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. The median age for diagnosis was 65 years [39-85]. The sex ratio H/F was 6/5. The median follow-up was 34 months [12-180]. The average diagnosis size was 29 mm [12-90]. Thirteen patients (25%) were treated secondarily, including 70% by conservative treatment. The average growth was 0.25 (±0.23) cm/yr. The patients treated were younger and had a higher growth rate than the untreated (0.48±0.23cm/yr versus 0.18±0.18cm/yr, P<0,001). According to Pearson's analysis, there was a positive linear relationship (R=0.27, P=0.047) between velocity and initial size and a negative linear relationship (ρ=-0.44, P<0.001) between velocity and age at diagnosis. So tumor growth was faster if the patients were young and the tumor voluminous at diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Rapid growth often leads to a cessation of surveillance in favour of an intervention strategy. For young patients, conservative treatment (partiel nephrectomy or ablative treatment) in the medium term is likely to be preferred, but for elderly patients or with important comorbidities follow-up is an alternative to an invasive attitude. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

An exceptional migration of ureteral stent after antegrade placement: A case report.

We report an exceptional migration of ureteral stent in patient who underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic right pyelotomy. After stone removal, an antegrade ureteral stenting (7-french; Double J) was performed without fluoroscopic control. A radiographic control was performed the next day and highlighted a migration into the cardiovascular system. The Double J was removed percutaneously through the right femoral vein under fluoroscopic guidance.

[Oncological results of active surveillance in prostate cancer: A retrospective multicentric cohort]. / Résultats oncologiques de la surveillance active dans le cancer de la prostate : série rétrospective multicentrique.

PURPOSE: To report oncological outcomes of patients with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance according to SURACAP criteria. METHODS: This multicentric study included patients who were initially treated with active surveillance for localized prostate cancer according to the SURACAP criteria. The duration of active surveillance as well as the causes of discontinuing the protocol and the definitive pathological results of patients who further underwent radical prostatectomy were retrospectively evaluated. The predictors of discontinuing active surveillance were assessed using a univariable Cox Model. In addition, the predictive value of initial MRI was assessed for patients who performed such imagery. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, 80 patients were included, with a median age of 64 years [47-74]. Median follow-up was 52.9 months [24-108]. At 5 years follow-up, 43.4% patients were still under surveillance. Among patients that underwent surgery, 17.8% had an extra-capsular extension. The risk of discontinuing was not significantly greater for patients with tumor size of 2 or 3mm versus 1mm (HR=0.9 [0.46-1.75], P=0.763), 2 positives cores versus 1 (HR=0.98 [0.48-2.02], P=0.967), T2a vs. T1c stage (HR=2.18 [0.77-6.18], P=0.133), increased PSA level (HR=1 [0.96-1.15], P=0.975) or the patient's age (HR=1 [0.93-1.16], P=0.966). Among the 50 patients who performed initial MRI, the results of such imagery was not significantly associated to the risk of discontinuing active surveillance MRI (HR=1.49 [0.63-3.52], P=0.36). CONCLUSION: Although this study reveals a high rate of release from active surveillance at 5 years, the rate of extra-capsular tumors reported in the group of patients that underwent surgery is among the lowest in literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Impact of the extent of extraprostatic extension defined by Epstein's method in patients with negative surgical margins and negative lymph node invasion.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of the degree of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and utility of the original Epstein's criteria to define EPE in a cohort of pT3aN0 without positive surgical margin (PSM). METHODS: A two-center retrospective analysis was performed on data from 490 pT3aN0 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2012. Patients with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy, detectable PSA and PSM were excluded. Our pathologists used Epstein's criteria to report the degree of EPE. When pathology reports did not reflect the terms 'focal' or 'established' (non-focal), slides were analyzed by a single genitourinary pathologist for final evaluation. The end point was defined by BCR. RESULTS: Selection criteria yielded 247 patients. Mean follow-up was 56.3±4.6 months; mean age at surgery was 62.5 years. Sixty-one (24.7%) patients experienced BCR during follow-up. Patients with focal extension had a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 89% versus 80% for those with non-focal extension (P=0.0018). In multivariate analysis, both pathologic Gleason score (hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.4-4.5; P=0.002) and the extent of EPE (hazard ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.1-3.5; P=0.029) were significant predictors of BCR. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of EPE is an independent predictor of BCR in pT3aN0 prostate cancer without PSM. This study reinforces the utility of the subjective Epstein approach already adopted by most pathologists for quantification of the extent of EPE.

[Imagery of treated prostate cancer]. / Imagerie post-thérapeutique du cancer de la prostate.

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis, localization of recurrence in the management of prostate cancer patients with increasing concentrations of tumor serum markers is crucial for treatment planning of the patients. The present review describes the role of prostate MRI and (18) Fcholine PET/computed tomography (CT) in tumor detection and extent, when there is a suspicion of residual or recurrent disease after treatment of prostate cancer. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching in the PUB MED/MEDLINE database searching for articles in French or English published between the last 12years. RESULTS: In patient with a clinical suspicion of recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer, imaging can be used to distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease. (11)C-choline PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MR imaging (mp MRI) are complementary in this indication. In this paper, the current status of imaging techniques used for the staging of patients with suspected locally recurrent or metastatic disease in patients treated for prostate cancer were reviewed. CONCLUSION: Mp MRI of the prostate may be valuable imaging modality for the detection and localization of local recurrence. C-choline PET/CT offers an advantage in detecting metastatic disease to lymph node and bone.

[Management of low-risk prostate cancer]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs de la prostate à faible risque évolutif.

INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of prostate cancer screening has led to a stage migration resulting in an increase in the diagnosis of low-risk disease, which currently accounts for 40-50% of diagnosed forms. New therapeutic strategies have been developed in order to minimize the risk of overtreatment. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature over the past 20 years was performed using the Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations. RESULTS: Low-risk tumors are conventionally defined by the d'Amico classification. The use of multiparametric MRI helps to better characterize these tumors. The contribution of molecular biology remains to be determined in clinical practice. Novel therapeutic options for low-risk disease are currently being evaluated. CONCLUSION: The new therapeutic strategies are evolving. They seek to reduce overtreatment without compromising oncological success.

[Head to head comparison of two currently used nomograms predicting the risk of side specific extra capsular extension to indicate nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy for treatment of prostate cancer]. / Validation externe des nomogrammes de prédiction de l'extension extra-prostatique spécifiquement au côté pour des patients atteints de cancer de prostate traités par prostatectomie totale.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a head to head comparison of these two nomograms by an external validation combined with an identification of probability cut-offs when to indicate NS. METHODS: The full models of the nomograms of Ohori et al. and Steuber et al. were used to calculate the risk of ECE based on PSA and side specific information on clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, % positive cores, and % cancer in cores. A dataset of 968 prostate half lobes was used retrospectively for analysis. All patients underwent laparoscopic robot-assisted or open radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: The predictive accuracy of the Ohori nomogram was at 0.80 and for the Steuber Nomogram at 0.78 (comparison P > 0.05). In the calibration plot, the Ohori nomogram showed less departures from ideal predictions than the Steuber nomogram. The best probability cut-off to allow NS for the Ohori nomogram seemed to be ≤ 10%, permitting NS in 59.7% of all cases and being associated with a false negative rate of 10%. The best cut-off for the Steuber nomogram seemed to be ≤ 8%, permitting NS in 44% and associated with a false negative rate 12.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The Ohori et al. and the Steuber et al. nomograms allow highly accurate and comparable predictions of the risk of side specific ECE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Prostate cancer surgical margin: review by the CCAFU (Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology)]. / Les marges chirurgicales dans le cancer de la prostate. CCAFU revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVE: Literature showed the impact of surgical margin status on prognosis after radical prostatectomy (mostly on biochemical survival). Margin status is an easy self-evaluation of surgical practice to assess. The aim of this paper was to define what a positive surgical margin (PSM) is and how to prevent the occurrence, to precise the impact on survival and how to treat. METHOD: A literature analysis with Pubmed has been performed to 2012, furthermore conclusions of the main congresses with selection committee and review publication have also been studied. RESULTS: PSM is defined as "tumor cells touching the ink on the specimen edge". The most frequent reported incidence is between 15 to 20%. Margin status remains one of the major criteria to determine the need of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Quality of life is not or only lightly modified by radiotherapy with the current techniques. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves biological survival but is synonymous with overtreatment in many times. Salvage radiotherapy has to be quickly performed after Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse (PSA<1 ng/mL even<0.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: This literature review did not allow to suggest superiority of one surgical technique over another. In the same way, the kind of dissection i.e. bladder neck or neurovascular bundle preservation does no clearly modify PSM rate. However, it seems logical to "customize" dissection according to prostate cancer characteristics (D'Amico criteria for instance) guided with multiparametric MRI. Intrafascial dissection has to be applied only to low risk. Lastly, the debate between adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy is always ongoing.

[Value of MRI in detection of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: a prospective study comparing imaging and histology]. / Performances de l'IRM pour la détection de l'extension extracapsulaire dans le cancer de la prostate: étude prospective de confrontation radiopathologique.

OBJECTIVE: To establish MRI's performances for the detection of extracapsular progression of prostate carcinoma, in a single center, analyzing the correlation between MRI imaging and histological analysis of prostate specimen. METHODS: From February 2008 to June 2012, all the patients selected for prostatectomy had a pre-operative MRI. Diffusion, T2 and dynamic T1 with gadolinium injection sequences were realized on a 1.5T-MRI with external antenna. All imaging data was analyzed by a specialized radiologist. Prostate specimens were histologically analyzed throughout large blades for utmost topographic comparison. The histological TNM was compared to the MRI data. MRI's capacity in determining the existence and the size of extracapsular progression was studied. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients (median age 62 years old, mean PSA 8.6 ng/mL) were included, among which 45% of d'Amico low risk and 55% of intermediate and high risk. Histological results were 63% of pT2 and 37% of pT3. MRI's sensibility and specificity for detecting extracapsular progression were 0.30 and 0.85 respectively (PPV 0.54; NPV 0.67), with a 65% accuracy. In the low risk group, sensibility equaled to 0.16. CONCLUSION: In our experience, MRI results were not reliable to influence the choice of treatment. It should be executed by expert radiologists, who are still very few.