Oculomotor analysis to assess brain health: preliminary findings from a longitudinal study of multiple sclerosis using novel tablet-based eye-tracking software.

A growing body of evidence supports the link between eye movement anomalies and brain health. Indeed, the oculomotor system is composed of a diverse network of cortical and subcortical structures and circuits that are susceptible to a variety of degenerative processes. Here we show preliminary findings from the baseline measurements of an ongoing longitudinal cohort study in MS participants, designed to determine if disease and cognitive status can be estimated and tracked with high accuracy based on eye movement parameters alone. Using a novel gaze-tracking technology that can reliably and accurately track eye movements with good precision without the need for infrared cameras, using only an iPad Pro embedded camera, we show in this cross-sectional study that several eye movement parameters significantly correlated with clinical outcome measures of interest. Eye movement parameters were extracted from fixation, pro-saccade, anti-saccade, and smooth pursuit visual tasks, whereas the clinical outcome measures were the scores of several disease assessment tools and standard cognitive tests such as the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Furthermore, partial least squares regression analyses show that a small set of oculomotor parameters can explain up to 84% of the variance of the clinical outcome measures. Taken together, these findings not only replicate previously known associations between eye movement parameters and clinical scores, this time using a novel mobile-based technology, but also the notion that interrogating the oculomotor system with a novel eye-tracking technology can inform us of disease severity, as well as the cognitive status of MS participants.

A real-world, observational study of erenumab for migraine prevention in Canadian patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess real-world effectiveness, safety, and usage of erenumab in Canadian patients with episodic and chronic migraine with prior ineffective prophylactic treatments. BACKGROUND: In randomized controlled trials, erenumab demonstrated efficacy for migraine prevention in patients with ≤4 prior ineffective prophylactic migraine therapies. The "Migraine prevention with AimoviG: Informative Canadian real-world study" (MAGIC) assessed real-world effectiveness of erenumab in Canadian patients with migraine. METHODS: MAGIC was a prospective open-label, observational study conducted in Canadian patients with chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) with two to six categories of prior ineffective prophylactic therapies. Participants were administered 70 mg or 140 mg erenumab monthly based on physician's assessment. Migraine attacks were self-assessed using an electronic diary and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) after the 3-month treatment period. RESULTS: Among the 95 participants who mostly experienced two (54.7%) or three (32.6%) prior categories of ineffective prophylactic therapies and who initiated erenumab, treatment was generally safe and well tolerated; 89/95 (93.7%) participants initiated treatment with 140 mg erenumab. At week 12, 32/95 (33.7%) participants including 17/64 (26.6%) CM and 15/32 (48.4%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD while 30/86 (34.9%) participants including 19/55 (34.5%) CM and 11/31 (35.5%) EM achieved ≥50% reduction in MMD at week 24. Through patient-reported outcome questionnaires, 62/95 (65.3%) and 45/86 (52.3%) participants reported improvement of their condition at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Physicians observed improvement in the condition of 78/95 (82.1%) and 67/86 (77.9%) participants at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients with EM and CM achieved ≥50% MMD reduction after 3 months of erenumab treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of erenumab effectiveness, safety, and usage for migraine prevention in adult Canadian patients with multiple prior ineffective prophylactic treatments.

Real-world persistence of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic and episodic migraine: Retrospective real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the real-world treatment persistence (defined as the continuation of medication for the prescribed treatment duration), demographics and clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns for patients prescribed erenumab for migraine prevention in Canada. BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of prophylactic migraine treatments is often undermined by poor treatment persistence. In clinical trials, erenumab has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability as a preventive treatment, but less is known about the longer term treatment persistence with erenumab. METHODS: This is a real-world retrospective cohort study where a descriptive analysis of secondary patient data was conducted. Enrollment and prescription data were extracted from a patient support program for a cohort of patients prescribed erenumab in Canada between September 2018 and December 2019 and analyzed for persistence, baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns. Descriptive analyses and unadjusted Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to summarize the persistence and dose escalation/de-escalation at different timepoints. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 14,282 patients. Median patient age was 47 years, 11,852 (83.0%) of patients were female, and 9443 (66.1%) had chronic migraine at treatment initiation. Based on KM methods, 71.0% of patients overall were persistent to erenumab 360 days after treatment initiation. Within 360 days of treatment initiation, it is estimated that 59.3% (KM-derived) of patients who initiated erenumab at 70 mg escalated to 140 mg, and 4.4% (KM-derived) of patients who initiated at 140 mg de-escalated to 70 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients prescribed erenumab remained persistent for at least a year after treatment initiation, and most patients initiated or escalated to a 140 mg dose. These results suggest that erenumab is well tolerated, and its uptake as a new class of prophylactic treatment for migraine in real-world clinical practice is not likely to be undermined by poor persistence when coverage for erenumab is easily available.

Canadian Real-World Experience of Using Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insight From the PARASAIL Study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) on tolerability, safety, and quality of life (QoL) in Canadian patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in a real-life setting. METHODS: In Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label, Post-Approval Study Aimed at Characterizing the Use of LCZ696 at 97 mg Sacubitril/103 mg Valsartan bid in Patients With HFrEF (PARASAIL), an open-label, prospective, phase IV, multicentre study, outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association functional class II-III were followed up for 12 months. The suggested starting dose of sacubitril/valsartan was 24/26 mg b.i.d. replacing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, with an uptitration to 97/103 mg b.i.d. or as per clinical judgement. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: For the 302 patients included, the mean age was 64.47 years, and a majority of patients (82.8%) belonged to New York Heart Association class II. Overall, 195 (64.6%) patients were on maximum dose of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. after 6 months and 62.3% remained on this dose at month 12. Using patient global assessment, patients experienced an improvement in QoL. For Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores, a significant decrease from the baseline was observed at weeks 4, 12, and 24 (P < 0.0001 for all), which indicated an improvement in QoL. The patient global assessment and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire results correlate with moderate but significant changes in Euro quality of life-5D visual analogue scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the PARASAIL study in a real-life setting have shown that most patients were on sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. and the treatment was well tolerated. The patient-reported outcomes showed an overall improvement in patients' QoL.

CONTEXTE: L'objectif était de déterminer, en contexte réel, l'efficacité de l'association sacubitril à 97 mg/valsartan à 103 mg, deux fois par jour, sous l'angle de la tolérabilité, de l'innocuité et de la qualité de vie (QV) chez des patients canadiens atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection réduite. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Au cours de l'étude multicentrique et prospective sans insu de phase IV PARASAIL ( P rospective, Multicenter, Open L a bel, Post-App r ov a l S tudy Ai med at Characterizing the Use of L CZ696 at 97 mg Sacubitril/103 mg Valsartan bid in Patients With HFrEF), des patients externes atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque de classe fonctionnelle II ou III selon la NYHA (New York Heart Association) avec fraction d'éjection réduite ont été suivis durant 12 mois. La dose initiale recommandée était de 24 mg de sacubitril/26 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, à la place d'un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine ou d'un antagoniste des récepteurs de l'angiotensine; la dose devait être augmentée à 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, ou selon le jugement du clinicien. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la proportion de patients chez qui la dose cible de 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, se trouvait atteinte après six mois de traitement. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen des 302 patients admis était de 64,47 ans. La majorité de ces patients (82,8 %) présentaient une insuffisance cardiaque de classe II selon la NYHA. Globalement, 195 (64,6 %) patients prenaient la dose maximale de 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, après six mois de traitement; 62,3 % continuaient de prendre cette dose à 12 mois de traitement. L'évaluation globale des patients indique une amélioration de leur QV. Les scores au Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire avaient significativement diminué par rapport aux scores de départ aux semaines 4, 12 et 24 (p < 0,0001 à tous les temps d'évaluation), ce qui indique une amélioration de la QV. L'évaluation globale des patients et les scores au Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire sont corrélés avec des variations modérées, mais significatives des scores de QV à l'échelle visuelle analogique du questionnaire EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: Les résultats obtenus en contexte réel au cours de l'étude PARASAIL montrent que la plupart des patients prenaient la dose de 97 mg de sacubitril/103 mg de valsartan, deux fois par jour, et que le traitement était bien toléré. Les résultats rapportés par les patients témoignent d'une amélioration globale de la QV de ces derniers.

Prevalence of dyslipidemia in statin-treated patients in Canada: results of the DYSlipidemia International Study (DYSIS).

BACKGROUND: Despite clear guideline recommendations, there is a growing body of evidence that there is suboptimal use of lipid-lowering treatment in Canadians. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and types of persistent lipid abnormalities in Canadian patients receiving statin therapy. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study recruited 2436 outpatients 45 years of age or older who were treated with statins by 232 physicians from 10 provinces; all underwent clinical examination and had their latest fasting lipid values while on statin therapy recorded. RESULTS: The median patient age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58 to 74 years), 60% were men and 80% were in the high 10-year risk category. The median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 2.0 mmol/L (IQR 1.6 mmol/L to 2.5 mmol/L) and the median total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio was 3.4 mmol/L (IQR 2.8 mmol/L to 4.1 mmol/L). However, based on the 2006 Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommendations, 37% of all patients did not have a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level at goal or intervention target level, including 45% of high-risk category patients. The majority of patients received atorvastatin (50%) or rosuvastatin (37%) but primarily at low-to-medium doses, and a minority (14%) received additional lipid-modifying therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The present observational study highlights the need for more intensive treatment of lipid abnormalities, particularly among high-risk patients. Recognizing several important limitations related to the observational nature of the study, the findings suggest the possibility that, in addition to optimizing adherence, there remains an important need to titrate current statin therapy to higher doses and potentially use a combination of lipid-modifying treatments (once the statin dose has been truly maximized) to further bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and current Canadian practice.

Effectiveness of dorzolamide­timolol (COSOPT) in patients who were treatment naive for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the COSOPT first-line study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of dorzolamide-timolol (DT) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension. METHODS: An open-label, 12-week, multicenter, Canadian study was conducted. Patients with untreated OAG or ocular hypertension received DT for 12 weeks to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). If target IOP was not reached after the first 6-week treatment period, a prostaglandin (PG) (latanoprost) was added for the remaining 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures were changes in IOP from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks of treatment, and secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving target IOP and the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic response defined as a reduction of 5.0 mmHg or 20% in IOP from baseline. IOP values were the mean of 2 measures taken before and at least 2 h after patients administered the study medication. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were enrolled. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] population age was 63.0 (12.3) years and 53.0% of the patients were men. At week 6, the mean (SD) absolute and percent change in IOP for the total population was (-11.1) (4.9) and (-36.4)% (13.9%), respectively, and 92.1% of the patients achieved a reduction in IOP of at least 5 mmHg. Therapeutic target was achieved by 136 (82.9%) patients (DT subgroup) at 6 weeks, whereas 28 (17.1%) patients were changed to a combination therapy of DT and latanoprost [DT plus PG (DT & PG) subgroup]. Between weeks 6 and 12, DT was effective in sustaining the IOP within therapeutic target, whereas addition of latanoprost reduced the IOP of the DT & PG subgroup by an additional 6.3 mmHg or 22.1% (20.1%). At week 12, patients in the DT subgroup experienced a clinically and statistically significant mean (SD) decrease in IOP from a baseline of 12.2 mmHg or 40.4% (11.9%) (P < 0.001), whereas these values corresponded to 13.4 mmHg and 39.7% (15.7%) (P < 0.001), respectively, in the DT & PG subgroup. The proportion of patients who achieved therapeutic response during the entire 12-week study period was over 82%. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 19 (14.0%) patients in the DT subgroup and by 6 (21.4%) patients in the combination subgroup. Eye disorders and nervous system disorders were among the most common treatment-related AEs in both subgroups. No serious AEs were reported during the study period. CONCLUSION: DT alone and DT in combination with a PG are effective in significantly reducing IOP in patients with untreated OAG or ocular hypertension. The treatment was safe and well tolerated with a low incidence of AEs.

Tolerability and effectiveness of preservative-free dorzolamide-timolol (preservative-free COSOPT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of preservative-free dorzolamide-timolol on nonvisual symptoms and intraocular pressure (IOP) in newly diagnosed and untreated patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a prospective, 8-week, open-label, Canadian multicenter study. All patients were treated with preservative-free dorzolamide-timolol formulation. The primary outcome was the change in the nonvisual symptom score of the Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS-SYMP-6) from baseline to 8 weeks. Secondary effectiveness outcome measures were absolute and percent changes in IOP from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were enrolled. Mean (SD) age was 65.6 (12.1) years and 90 (50.6%) were females. There were 92 patients diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma, 62 with ocular hypertension, and 23 with both diseases (diagnosis was missing for one patient). The mean (SD) GSS-SYMP-6 score increased from 73.6 (21.8) at baseline to 76.1 (20.7) at 8 weeks (P = 0.097). Mean (SD) IOP significantly decreased by 11.7 (5.1) mmHg at 4 weeks (P < 0.001) and by 11.5 (5.3) mmHg at 8 weeks (P < 0.001), representing reductions of -38.5% (P < 0.001) and -38.0% (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Preservative-free dorzolamide-timolol does not increase eye discomfort while significantly reducing IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular-hypertension.

Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of glaucoma is aimed at reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) to prevent further damage to the optic nerve. For patients who do not respond to monotherapy, combination treatment may be effective in achieving therapeutic reduction or target IOP. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide 2% with timolol 0.5% alone or combined with latanoprost in reducing IOP in a real-world setting. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized interventional study was designed. Three hundred fifty patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and uncontrolled IOP after latanoprost monotherapy for 4 or more weeks were treated with combination dorzolamide-timolol twice daily added to their existing latanoprost therapy (D/T-Add-On; n = 280) or dorzolamide-timolol twice daily monotherapy (D/T-Switch; n = 70). The primary effectiveness outcome measure was the change in IOP after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Of the total population, 313 patients completed this trial (248 D/T-Add-On; 65 D/T-Switch). After 12 weeks, the mean +/- SD IOP decrease was -6.3 +/- 3.6 mm Hg (-28.1%) and -5.8 +/- 4.9 mm Hg (-23.5%) in the D/T-Add-On and D/T-Switch groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). Therapeutic response rates (defined as IOP reduction >20%) after 12 weeks of treatment for the D/T-Add-On and the D/T-Switch groups were 66.4% (186/280) and 52.9% (37/70), respectively. There were 116 predominantly mild, nonserious adverse events attributed to the study drugs, reported by 86 (24.6%) patients. The most frequent adverse events were eye irritation (n = 42; 12.0%) and taste perversion (n = 15; 4.3%). No serious adverse events related to the study medications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and elevated IOP while on monotherapy with latanoprost, switching to dorzolamide-timolol or combining dorzolamide-timolol with latanoprost are effective and safe treatment options for reducing IOP and achieving therapeutic response.