Prevalence of Social Needs & Social Risks Among EMS Providers.

Background: A national shortage of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers is a critical issue for the profession that has only worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers have identified possible causes, including difficult workplace conditions, low wages, and burnout. However, the impact of EMS providers' social needs and social risks has yet to be thoroughly explored. Methods: Demographic data for 1,112 EMS providers who responded to the 2021 national Social Needs in the Pre-hospital Setting (SNIPS) Study were analyzed to produce descriptive statistics and test for differences in social needs using chi square tests. Results: EMS providers reported experiencing housing insecurity (23.0%), food insecurity (27.4%), struggles with substance use (20.9%), mental health concerns (41.5%), domestic violence (18.5%), and healthcare affordability concerns (30.8%) during their EMS career. Almost 90% of study participants screened positive for burnout. Both women and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were more likely than men and paramedics respectively to suffer from food and housing insecurity, mental health issues, and domestic violence at some point in their careers. Discussion: EMS providers reported high levels of burnout as well as a variety of social needs. Social needs may necessitate overtime work, increasing risk of burnout and negatively impacting providers' well-being and contributing to the provider shortage. Barriers to entry for paramedic training and gender differences in promotion rates may exacerbate the disparities experienced by EMTs and female providers, respectively. Conclusion: With high levels of burnout, staffing shortages, and EMS professionals leaving the profession, more must be done to support EMS providers. This includes programs to facilitate entry to and advancement within the EMS profession, ability to make ends meet without reliance on overtime pay, and mental health support.

High Prescribing and State-Level Variation in Z-Drug Use Among Medicare Patients.

BACKGROUND: Z-drugs are nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics used for sleep initiation and maintenance; these drugs increase the risk of fall-related injuries in older adults. The American Geriatrics Society's Beers criteria classifies Z-drugs as high-risk and strongly recommends avoiding prescribing Z-drugs to older adults due to adverse effects. The study objectives were to determine the prevalence of Z-drug prescribing among Medicare Part D patients and identify state or specialty-dependent prescribing differences. This study also aimed to determine prescribing patterns of Z-drugs to Medicare patients. METHODS: Z-drug prescription data was extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services State Drug Utilization Data for 2018. For all 50 states, the number of prescriptions per 100 Medicare enrollees and days-supply per prescription was determined. The percentage of total prescriptions prescribed by each specialty and the average number of prescriptions per provider within each specialty was also determined. RESULTS: Zolpidem was the most prescribed Z-drug (95.0%). Prescriptions per 100 enrollees were significantly high in Utah (28.2) and Arkansas (26.7) and significantly low in Hawaii (9.3) relative to the national average (17.5). Family medicine (32.1%), internal medicine (31.4%), and psychiatry (11.7%) made up the largest percentages of total prescriptions. The number of prescriptions per provider was significantly high among psychiatrists. DISCUSSION: Contrary to the Beers criteria, Z-drugs are prescribed to older adults at high rates.

Review of the Effect of Continuous Use and Limited Reuse of N95 Respirators on Respirator Fit.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to severe shortages of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). As a result, extended use, limited reuse, and FFR decontamination have been utilized to extend the life of single-use FFRs. Although some studies have raised concerns that reuse could affect the FFR's ability to form a seal, no comprehensive literature review of the effect of extended use or limited reuse on FFR seal exists. Objective: The goal of this review was to assess the effect of extended use and reuse on respirator fit, with and without decontamination. Methods: Searches of PubMed and Medrxiv yielded 24 papers that included assessment of fit after extended use or limited reuse on a human. One additional handpicked paper was added. Results: Studies report a wide variation in the number of donnings and doffings before fit failure between different models of respirators. Additionally, while seal checks lack sufficient sensitivity to reliably detect fit failures, individuals who failed fit testing were often able to pass subsequent tests by re-positioning the respirator. Even with failure, respirators often maintained a substantially higher level of fit than a surgical mask, so they may still provide a level of protection in crisis settings. Conclusion: Based on currently available data, this literature review was unable to establish a consensus regarding the amount of time a respirator can be worn or the number of uses before fit failure will occur. Furthermore, variations in reuses before fit failure between different models of N95 respirators limit the ability to offer a comprehensive recommendation of greater than one reuse or a specific amount of wear time.