Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a frequently diagnosed neoplasm, which is typically managed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) eventually followed by intravesical therapies. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is used as first-line adjuvant treatment in high- (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC, although, in the latter, mitomycin C (MMC) may also be used. Multiple limitations to the use of BCG encouraged the search for therapeutic alternatives. In this context, hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with MMC (HIVEC-MMC) emerged as a promising therapy in the adjuvant setting for NMIBC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the tolerability, compliance, and survival outcomes of HIVEC-MMC in patients with IR- and HR-NMIBC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of IR- and HR- NMIBC patients who received HIVEC-MMC after TURBT between August 2018 and August 2022. Levels of risk stratification were defined using the European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. The protocol consisted of four weekly HIVEC-MMC instillations (induction) followed by six monthly instillations (maintenance). The primary outcomes were to evaluate the tolerability and compliance with the HIVEC-MMC protocol and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For the purpose of statistical analysis, methods of descriptive statistics, survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimation), and multivariate analysis (Cox regression, and binary logistic regression) were used. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled with a median age of 67.9 (34.4-83.5) years old. In this cohort, 40 patients (70.2%) had primary tumors. At the time of referral for HIVEC-MMC, the majority of the patients had IR-NMIBC (n= 33, 57.9%). A total of 41 patients (71.9%) completed the HIVEC-MMC protocol. Disease recurrence and adverse events (AEs) were the most common reasons to stop the protocol. After a median follow-up of 31 months (95% CI, 5.0-54.0), 32 patients (61.4%) were disease-free, 22 (38.6%) experienced recurrent disease and six patients (10.5%) died, although only one death was directly attributable to bladder cancer. The median DFS was 42 months (95% CI, 28.0-56.0). Completion of the HIVEC-MMC maintenance phase protocol stood as a predictive factor for DFS (44 months, 95% CI 29.1-58.9 vs. 14 months, 95% CI 0.0-29.6, p < 0.001; HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.65-12.15). The median OS was not reached; the 24- and 48-month OS were 92.6% and 82.7%, respectively. EAU risk group, ECOG-PS, and completion of HIVEC protocol were found to be significant predictive factors of OS but lost their significance on multivariate analysis. However, if we exclude those who experienced recurrence during the maintenance phase protocol, treatment completion had a significant positive impact on OS (HR: 42.8, 95% CI 1.75-1045.072, p= 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that HIVEC is a secure and well-tolerated treatment with promising efficacy data, making this therapeutic approach a feasible option in IR- and HR-NMIBC patients, mainly in those who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to BCG therapy, but also as an alternative during BCG shortages.

HER2 Status in RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Portuguese Study.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-most deadly cancer worldwide. However, there remains a scarcity of precision treatments available for this type of cancer. Amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) is a well-established therapeutic target in gastric and breast cancer. HER2 is positive in approximately 5% of CRC cases and has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. The aim of this study was to evaluate HER2 status in RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC (mCRC) and its correlation with survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients undergoing systemic treatment was conducted from July 2014 to September 2020. Tissue HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). HER2+ was defined as IHC3 (+) or IHC2 (+) through FISH or CISH (+). RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included. The median age of all the included patients was 64 years (33-82). Four patients had HER2+ tumors (7%). Four patients had HER2+ tumors (7%). The majority of HER2+ mCRC cases were males (n=3) and left-sided CRC (n=3). All patients received FOLFIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment. At the median follow-up of 24.0 months, patients with HER2-negative mCRC presented with a median overall survival (mOS) of 39.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.7-46.0) and the four patients with HER2+ mCRC had a mOS of 20.4 months (95% CI; 9.5-31.3; p=0.07). In HER2-negative patients, the median PFS (mPFS) was 11.3 months (95% CI; 9.2-13.4) vsHER2-positive patients with a mPFS of 10.9 months (95% CI; 1.3-20.4; p=0.47). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting HER2+ in mCRC patients in a Portuguese population and the HER2+ rate was consistent with previous studies. Our study suggests that HER2+ may potentially be a marker that is able to predict poor prognosis in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC.

Innovation and Precision Medicine Applied to a Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Clinical Case.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor, accounting for 3%-4% of all thyroid cancers. Seventy-five percent are sporadic, of which 60% have pathogenic REarranged during Transfection (RET) somatic mutations. The sporadic RET-mutated MTC poses novel challenges for targeted treatment. The authors present a case of a 60-year-old male diagnosed in 2018 with MTC who underwent total thyroidectomy with sternotomy and bilateral cervical lymph node dissection - pT3N1b R1 L1 V1 Pn0 cM1 (hepatic and lung metastasis). According to the decisions made by the multidisciplinary tumor board, the patient received multiple palliative systemic treatments. Despite an initial response, vandetanib was accompanied by grade 3 high blood pressure and progression after 14 months of treatment. The patient also received cabozantinib, which led to an initial response, but with grade 3 hypertension and skin toxicity. The patient progressed, including symptomatic bone metastasis, after 15 months of treatment. Following the next sequencing genome result, which showed a somatic mutation in the RET M918T gene, the patient was treated with selpercatinib, a highly selective and potent RET inhibitor. The treatment led to clinical and radiological responses without significant toxicities. The objective of this case report is to highlight the impact of innovative treatment and precision medicine on the management of cancer patients, which not only has a direct effect on their survival but also on their quality of life.

Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among cancer patients in Portugal: attitudes and associated factors.

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 vaccines have shown efficacy and safety in healthy people. However, cancer patients under active immunosuppressive treatment were not included in the clinical trials conducted to test vaccines' efficacy and safety. This study aimed to evaluate the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in cancer patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: A total of 200 adult cancer patients received a questionnaire between March 8 and April 2, 2021, before the beginning of cancer patients' vaccination in Portugal. The questionnaire adapted from previously conducted studies included 11 close-ended items, evaluating variables such as patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the acceptance and underlying reasons to be or not to be vaccinated. The primary outcome was the intended acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in cancer patients. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with intended acceptance. RESULTS: Among the 200 delivered questionnaires, only 169 were included in this study. From those, 142 (84%) patients intended to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Only 27 participants (16%) had not yet decided or were reluctant to COVID-19 vaccination. High school degree (odds ratio (OR) 0.133, 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 0.031-0.579, p = 0.007], rural residence (OR 0.282, 95% C.I. 0.081-0.984, p = 0.047), and reluctance in believing in the vaccine efficacy (OR 0.058, 95% C.I. 0.016-0.204, p < 0.001] were identified predictors factor for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION: Most patients intended to be vaccinated against COVID-19, and specific factors such as education level, rural residence and the belief in vaccine efficacy were related to vaccine acceptance.

The effect of prognostic factors at baseline on the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A Portuguese exploratory analysis.

BACKGROUND: The RECOURSE trial supported trifluridine/tipiracil as a treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subsequent analysis demonstrated that low tumour burden and indolent disease are good prognosis factors improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of prognosis group in the OS, PFS and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with mCRC. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective, and observational study of patients with mCRC who started trifluridine/tipiracil between February 2018 and July 2019. Patients were divided into good prognosis characteristics (GPC) [low tumour burden (less than 3 metastasis site) and indolent disease (≥18 months from first metastasis diagnosis)] and poor prognostic characteristics (PPC) group [high tumour burden (3 or more metastasis sites) and/or aggressive disease (<18 months since the first metastasis diagnosis)]. RESULTS: Median age was 67 years (48-82), 67.3% of the patients were male, and 65.3% had stage IV disease at baseline. Overall, median OS was 7.5 months (95%CI:5.7-9.3). Twenty-two patients (44.9%) presented GPC and 29 (59.1%) had PPC. GPC patients had longer median OS [11.4 (95%CI:6.2-16.7)] versus 3.9 months [(95%CI: 3.3-4.6),p < 0.0001] and PFS [4.9 (95%CI:3.0-6.9) versus 2.6 months (95%CI:2.2-2.8),p < 0.0001]. These differences were more pronounced in GPC patients with no liver metastasis. Grade ≥3 adverse events incidence didn't vary between GPC and PPC subgroups. CONCLUSION: Our study validates the improved trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy in patients with GPC in comparison with PPC while maintaining a well-tolerated safety profile. Indolent disease, low tumour burden and the absence of liver metastasis were shown to be good prognosis factors influencing sustained response to trifluridine/tipiracil.

Epithelioid Trophoblastic Tumour Presenting with Scalp Lesions.

Epithelioid trophoblastic tumour (ETT) is a very rare variant of gestational trophoblastic disease, which arises in reproductive-age women with a prior gestational history. Because of its rarity, its biological behaviour, imaging characteristics and therapeutic schedule have not yet been fully established. Here we describe a rare case of metastatic ETT in a premenopausal woman. A 40-year-old, gravida 3, para 2, Portuguese woman was referred to the dermatology department for multiple skin nodules on the scalp measuring between 1 and 6 cm. A skin biopsy was suggestive of metastatic lesions of low differentiated carcinoma in favour of squamous cell carcinoma. Staging cervical-thoracic-abdominal and pelvic CT showed multiple lesions compatible with metastasis (ganglia, lung and kidneys). Since a CT scan was unable to identify the primary tumour, it was decided to perform a PET-CT scan and to take a biopsy of a vulvar nodule which had been clinically identified as ETT. The patient began the EMA-CO protocol and completed two cycles but with clinical worsening and radiological progression. Although several different chemotherapy regimens are used to treat gestational trophoblastic disease, the optimal treatment is not known given the rarity of this disease and the lack of controlled trials. LEARNING POINTS: Trophoblastic disease is a rare entity with several presentations at diagnosis.Presentation with dermatological changes may need differential diagnosis to distinguish it from other types of dermatological disease.Quick diagnosis and referral to an appropriate centre are needed.

Giant Metastatic Breast Phyllodes Tumour with an Elusive Diagnosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: The term phyllodes tumours, which account for less than 1% of breast neoplasms, describes a spectrum of heterogenous tumours with different clinical behaviours. Less than 30% present as metastatic disease. Complete surgical resection is the standard of care so that recurrence rates are reduced. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy is controversial. Patients with metastatic disease have a median overall survival of around 30 months. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors present the case of a 57-year-old woman with an exuberant left malignant phyllodes tumour with bilateral involvement, as well as lung and axillar metastasis. The patient underwent haemostatic radiation therapy and started palliative chemotherapy with doxorubicin, achieving partial response with significant improvement in quality of life. A posterior simple mastectomy revealed a small residual tumour. DISCUSSION: Metastatic malignant phyllodes tumours are rare, so therapeutic strategies rely on small retrospective studies and guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma. Palliative chemotherapy protocols include anthracycline-based regimens, either as monotherapy with doxorubicin or doxorubicin together with ifosfamide. With few treatment options, management of these patients must rely on a continuum of care. LEARNING POINTS: Phyllodes tumours are a rare type of breast neoplasm.The differential diagnosis of breast cancer should include phyllodes tumours.Accurate and rapid diagnosis is required.

Targeted agents in older patients with gastrointestinal cancers - An overview.

Targeted agents have been increasingly used in different malignancies and are associated with improved survival outcomes, including gastrointestinal cancers. Their use in the treatment of older patients is appealing given their favorable toxicity profile. In the last years, this subgroup of patients has been attracting increased interest given their representativeness and specific clinical needs. Nonetheless, the lack of data on efficacy and safety of standard treatments in older patients hinders proper evidence-based decision-making, leaving most therapeutic recommendations to be extrapolated from registration trials with low representation of older and frail patients. However, even if most decisions regarding the use of targeted agents in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer remain guided by subanalyses of large trials, data from recent older adult-specific trials are beginning to emerge, particularly in colorectal cancer. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence on treatment of older patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (colon and rectum, stomach, esophagus, liver, and pancreas) with targeted agents (cetuximab, panitumumab, bevacizumab, ramucirumab, aflibercept, regorafenib, encorafenib, trastuzumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, erlotinib, olaparib), and place the evidence in a geriatric oncology perspective.