Short-term predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for untreated single non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a restrospective cohort study.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for brain metastases (BM) not eligible for surgical resection, however, predictors of SRS outcomes are poorly known. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of SRS outcome in patients with BM secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective is to analyze the value of volumetric criteria in identifying BM progression. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years of age with a single untreated BM secondary to NSCLC. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were assessed. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a BM volumetric increase 12 months after SRS. The unidimensional measurement of the BM at follow-up was also assessed. One hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a median BM volume at baseline of 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.4-2.3). Fifty-two (38.5%) patients had SRS failure at follow-up. Only right BM laterality was associated with SRS failure (p=0.039). Using the volumetric definition of SRS failure, the unidimensional criteria demonstrated a sensibility of 60.78% (46.11%-74.16%), specificity of 89.02% (80.18%-94.86%), positive LR of 5.54 (2.88-10.66) and negative LR of 0.44 (0.31-0.63). SRS demonstrated a 61.5% local control rate 12 months after treatment. Among the potential predictors of treatment outcome analyzed, only the right BM laterality had a significant association with SRS failure. The volumetric criteria were able to identify more subtle signs of BM increase than the unidimensional criteria, which may allow earlier diagnosis of disease progression and use of appropriate therapies.

Predictors of Survival After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Untreated Single Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: 5- and 10-year Results.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) presents as a good treatment option for smaller, deep-seated brain metastases (BMs). This study aims to determine predictors of SRS failure for patients with non-small cell lung cancer BMs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of single non-small cell lung cancer BMs treated using SRS. We included patients >18 years with a single, previously untreated lesion. Primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as BMs dimension increase above the initial values. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected to study potential predictors of treatment failure. RESULTS: Worse rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were associated with heterogeneous contrast enhancement (18.1 ± 4.1 vs. 41.9 ± 4 months; P < 0.001). Better rates of PFS were associated with volumes <1.06 cm3 (log-rank; P = 0.001). Graded prognostic assessment was significantly associated with survival at 120 months (log-rank; P < 0.001). Karnofsky Performance Scale was evaluated in 3 strata: 90-100, 80, and ≤70. Mean survival rates for these strata were 31.8 ± 3.9, 10.6 ± 2.2, and 9.8 ± 2.3 months, respectively (log-rank; P < 0.001). There were no differences regarding presence of extracranial metastases, age, or lesion location. A multivariable logistic regression found that volume <1.06 cm3 was associated with higher survival rates at 10 years (odds ratio: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-8.0). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-homogeneous metastases and lesions <1.06 cm3 are associated with better rates of PFS. Karnofsky Performance Scale and graded prognostic assessment were associated with more favorable survival rates after 10 years. Volume <1.06 cm3 was the only significant predictor of survival in the multivariable analysis.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Injury Severity Score System: A Literature Review of Its Safety.

Study Design Systematic literature review. Objective The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score System (TLICS) is widely used to help guide the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of the TLICS in clinical practice. Methods Using the Medline database without time restriction, we performed a systematic review using the keyword "Thoracolumbar Injury Classification," searching for articles utilizing the TLICS. We classified the results according to their level of evidence and main conclusions. Results Nine articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. One article evaluated the safety of the TLICS based on its clinical application (level II). The eight remaining articles were based on retrospective application of the score, comparing the proposed treatment suggested by the TLICS with the treatment patients actually received (level III). The TLICS was safe in surgical and nonsurgical treatment with regards to neurologic status. Some studies reported that the retrospective application of the TLICS had inconsistencies with the treatment of burst fractures without neurologic deficits. Conclusions This literature review suggested that the TLICS use was safe especially with regards to preservation or improvement of neurologic function. Further well-designed multicenter prospective studies of the TLICS application in the decision making process would improve the evidence of its safety. Special attention to the TLICS application in the treatment of stable burst fractures is necessary.

Intramedullary non-dysraphic cervical spine lipoma - case report / Lipoma intramedular da coluna cervical não disráfica - relato de caso

Intramedullary lipomas correspond to about 1% of the intramedullary tumors. These lesions are commonly associated with spinal dysraphisms and midline defects. Non-dysraphic lipomas are quite rare lesions, potentially located at any site of the spinal cord. Here we present the case history of an intramedullary non-dysraphic cervical spine lipoma.

Lipomas intramedulares correspondem a aproximadamente 1% dos tumores intramedulares. Essas lesões são comumente associadas com disrafismos e defeitos da linha média. Lipomas não disráficos são lesões muito raras, potencialmente localizadas em qualquer local da medula espinhal. Neste trabalho apresentamos o caso de um lipoma intramedular da coluna cervical não disráfica.

Traumatic injuries of peripheral nerves: a review with emphasis on surgical indication.

Traumatic peripheral nerve injury is a dramatic condition present in many of the injuries to the upper and lower extremities. An understanding of its physiopathology and selection of a suitable time for surgery are necessary for proper treatment of this challenging disorder. This article reviews the physiopathology of traumatic peripheral nerve injury, considers the most used classification, and discusses the main aspects of surgical timing and treatment of such a condition.

Traumatic injuries of peripheral nerves: a review with emphasis on surgical indication / Lesoes traumaticas de nervos perifericos: uma revisao com enfase na indicacao cirurgica

Traumatic peripheral nerve injury is a dramatic condition present in many of the injuries to the upper and lower extremities. An understanding of its physiopathology and selection of a suitable time for surgery are necessary for proper treatment of this challenging disorder. This article reviews the physiopathology of traumatic peripheral nerve injury, considers the most used classification, and discusses the main aspects of surgical timing and treatment of such a condition.

Traumatismos dos nervos periféricos resultam em lesões incapacitantes e estão presentes em muitas das lesões dos membros. A compreensão da fisiopatologia dessas lesões e a seleção do momento operatório mais adequado são imprescindíveis para que o tratamento seja adequado. Neste artigo revisamos a fisiopatologia das lesões traumáticas dos nervos periféricos, apresentamos a classificação mais utilizada dessas lesões e discutimos os principais aspectos relacionados ao momento da cirurgia e às formas de reparo cirúrgico.