Penile revascularization--contemporary update.

Contemporary therapies for erectile dysfunction are generally targeted towards older men and universally engage pharmacological and/or device related treatment options. Penile revascularization, using microvascular arterial bypass surgical techniques, is a non-pharmacological, non-device-related, and reconstructive surgical strategy for men with erectile dysfunction that was first described by Dr Vaclav Michal in 1973. Contemporary penile revascularization attempts to 'cure' pure arteriogenic erectile dysfunction in young men with arterial occlusive pathology in the distal internal pudendal, common penile or proximal cavernosal artery secondary to focal endothelial injury from blunt pelvic, perineal or penile trauma. A microvascular anastomosis is fashioned between the donor inferior epigastric and recipient dorsal penile artery. Increased perfusion pressure is theoretically communicated to the cavernosal artery via perforating branches from the dorsal artery. This article will review the history, indications and pathophysiology of blunt trauma-induced focal arterial occlusive disease in young men with erectile dysfunction, current surgical techniques utilized and results of surgery. Contemporary use of penile revascularization is a logical and wanted therapeutic option to attempt to reverse erectile dysfunction in young men who have sustained blunt pelvic, perineal or penile trauma.

Vardenafil provides reliable efficacy over time in men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of vardenafil efficacy and tolerability within 12 weeks in a broad population of men with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of two pivotal, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted in 107 centers, 1650 men aged 18 years or older with ED received vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg on demand for 12 to 26 weeks. Outcome measures included the first-time and subsequent overall success rate until week 12 for diary entries regarding vaginal penetration (Sexual Encounter Profile [SEP]-2), erection maintenance (SEP-3), satisfaction with erection hardness, and overall satisfaction with the sexual experience. Mean efficacy was calculated for each patient during 12 weeks and then averaged for all patients within each treatment group. RESULTS: At baseline, the intention-to-treat population had moderate ED (International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score of 13). For SEP-2 (penetration), the first-attempt and subsequent success rate was 44% and 74% for placebo, 71% and 81% for vardenafil 5 mg, 76% and 86% for vardenafil 10 mg, and 76% and 91% for vardenafil 20 mg, respectively. For SEP-3 (maintenance), first-attempt and subsequent success rate was 25% and 56% for placebo, 51% and 76% for vardenafil 5 mg, 65% and 76% for vardenafil 10 mg, and 59% and 84% for vardenafil 20 mg, respectively. For overall satisfaction with the sexual experience, the first-attempt and subsequent success rate was 19% and 48% for placebo, 48% and 68% for vardenafil 5 mg, 57% and 72% for vardenafil 10 mg, and 56% and 79% for vardenafil 20 mg, respectively. The reliability of vardenafil was similar or slightly greater in sildenafil-naive subjects compared with prior sildenafil responders. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate headache, flushing, and rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Vardenafil provides reliable efficacy for key erectile function parameters important to patients when continuing oral treatment for ED.