How to Improve Compliance With Dermatologic Screening in Liver Transplant Recipients: Experience in a (Spoke) Peripheral Center for Follow-up.

Annual dermatologic examination is required in all transplant recipients because of the high risk of skin cancers. Nevertheless, if the transplant recipient is merely advised to have a dermatologic consultation, the adherence usually appears to be poor. We analyzed our population of liver transplant recipients in 2 periods: in 2014 (group 1) and in 2016 (group 2), when we had organized the presence of a dermatologist at scheduled intervals to annually examine the entire liver transplant population we actively follow-up. The adherence to dermatologic screening during period 1 was significantly lower (50/179; 28% of patients) than during period 2 (198/200; 99% of patients) (P < .0001). In group 1 and 2, respectively, we found cutaneous lesions in 3 of 50 (6%) and in 13 of 198 (7%) examined patients and in 3 of 179 (1.7%) and in 13 of 200 (6.5%) of the whole groups of patients in follow-up (P = .02). The type of neoplastic lesions found at dermatologic visits were similar in group 1 (1 squamous cell carcinoma, 1 basal cell carcinoma) and group 2 (2 squamous cell carcinoma, 3 basal cell carcinoma) (P = .45), but with this intensive protocol of surveillance we discovered more preneoplastic lesions (1 leukoplakia in group 1 vs 7 actinic keratosis and 1 dysplastic nevus in group 2; P = .03). These results suggest that the planned presence of a dermatologist is mandatory among the many aspects of a well-organized transplant follow-up team.

Melanoma detection in Italian pigmented lesion clinics.

AIM: Accuracy in melanoma detection is important to recognize early curable melanomas and to minimize the unnecessary excision of benign lesions. The aim of this paper was to evaluate melanoma screening accuracy of Italian pigmented lesion clinics in terms of number needed to excise (NNE), melanoma thickness, and number of melanomas diagnosed during patient follow-up. METHODS: Information on all skin tumors excised in 2011 were extracted from the databases of the participating centers. Information whether the lesion was excised at the baseline examination or during patient follow-up was recorded, as well as the overall number of patients examined in each center in 2011. RESULTS: After e-mail solicitation, 22 of 40 centers agreed to participate. A total of 8229 excised lesions were collected. The overall number of examined patients was 86.564, thus 9.5% of screened patients had a lesion removed. Of the excised lesions, 866 were diagnosed as melanoma (1% of examined patients) and 5311 (88.9%) were melanocytic nevi. Three NNE were calculated giving values of 7.9 excised lesions to find 1 melanoma, 7.1 melanocytic lesions to find 1 melanoma, and 3.7 lesions to find 1 skin malignancy. The median melanoma thickness was 0.6 mm, with only 15.1% of melanomas ≥ 1 mm of thickness. Melanomas detected over time were 96 (11.1%; mean thickness, 0.3 mm), with 15.6% of lesions excised after short-term follow-up and 84.4% after long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: The NNE values comparable to those achieved in specialized clinical settings and the high number of early melanomas diagnosed at the baseline examination or during patient follow-up indicate a high level of accuracy in melanoma screening achieved by Italian pigmented lesion clinics.