Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 18(4): 745-751, jul. 2013. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-114501

RESUMO

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxic effects of ProRoot MTA and DiaRoot BA, a bioceramic nanoparticulate cement, on subcutaneous rat tissue. Study Design: Fifty Sprouge Dawley rats were used in this study. Polyethylene tubes filled with ProRoot MTA and DiaRoot BioAggregate, along with a control group of empty, were implanted into dorsal connective tissue of rats for 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90 days. After estimated time intervals the rats were sacrificed. The specimens were fixed, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and then evaluated under a light microscope for inflammatory reactions and mineralization. Results: All groups evoked a severe to moderate chronic inflammatory reaction at 7 and 15 days, which decreased with time. Both the MTA and BioAggregate groups showed similar inflammatory reactions, except at 90 days when MTA showed statistically significant greater inflammation (p>0.05). The MTA group showed foreign body reaction at all times. Compared to BioAggregate, MTA showed significantly more foreign body reaction at 60 and 90 days (p<0.0001). After 30 days foreign body reaction of BioAggregate decreased significantly. Both MTA and BioAggregate groups showed similar necrosis at 7 and 15 days (p=0.094 and p=0.186 respectively). No necrosis was observed after 15 days. Similarly there was no fibrosis after 30 days for both MTA and BioAggregate groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: Since DiaRoot BioAggregate showed significantly better results than MTA, we can conclude that it is more biocompatible. However, further studies are required to confirm this result (AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Ratos , Citotoxinas/análise , Cimentos Dentários/análise , Materiais Biocompatíveis/análise , Tecido Conjuntivo , Tela Subcutânea , Teste de Materiais
2.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal ; 18(4): e745-51, 2013 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23722144

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxic effects of ProRoot MTA and DiaRoot BA, a bioceramic nanoparticulate cement, on subcutaneous rat tissue. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty Sprouge Dawley rats were used in this study. Polyethylene tubes filled with ProRoot MTA and DiaRoot BioAggregate, along with a control group of empty, were implanted into dorsal connective tissue of rats for 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90 days. After estimated time intervals the rats were sacrificed. The specimens were fixed, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and then evaluated under a light microscope for inflammatory reactions and mineralization. RESULTS: All groups evoked a severe to moderate chronic inflammatory reaction at 7 and 15 days, which decreased with time. Both the MTA and BioAggregate groups showed similar inflammatory reactions, except at 90 days when MTA showed statistically significant greater inflammation (p>0.05). The MTA group showed foreign body reaction at all times. Compared to BioAggregate, MTA showed significantly more foreign body reaction at 60 and 90 days (p<0.0001). After 30 days foreign body reaction of BioAggregate decreased significantly. Both MTA and BioAggregate groups showed similar necrosis at 7 and 15 days (p=0.094 and p=0.186 respectively). No necrosis was observed after 15 days. Similarly there was no fibrosis after 30 days for both MTA and BioAggregate groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Since DiaRoot BioAggregate showed significantly better results than MTA, we can conclude that it is more biocompatible. However, further studies are required to confirm this result.


Assuntos
Compostos de Alumínio/toxicidade , Compostos de Cálcio/toxicidade , Hidróxido de Cálcio/toxicidade , Hidroxiapatitas/toxicidade , Óxidos/toxicidade , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/toxicidade , Silicatos/toxicidade , Tela Subcutânea/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Combinação de Medicamentos , Masculino , Teste de Materiais , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18718776

RESUMO

This report describes the 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of an accidental extrusion of a root canal filling material into the maxillary sinus and emphasizes the importance of monitoring of similar cases. The most favorable prognosis is achieved by surgically removing the extruded material from the sinus. Excess zinc oxide-eugenol-based materials in the sinus might cause aspergillosis sinusitis, and this entity often needs many years to develop. In this case, endomethasone was the filling material; however, the patient refused to undergo any surgical intervention. After a follow-up period of 5 years, the patient had no symptoms and radiographic examination disclosed no pathologic changes in the antrum.


Assuntos
Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Extravasamento de Materiais Terapêuticos e Diagnósticos/complicações , Corpos Estranhos/etiologia , Formaldeído/efeitos adversos , Hidrocortisona/efeitos adversos , Seio Maxilar , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/efeitos adversos , Timol/análogos & derivados , Dente Pré-Molar , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/efeitos adversos , Timol/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...