Hypothermia in patients with cardiac arrest prior to ECMO-VA: Insight from the HYPO-ECMO trial.

AIM: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has become a common intervention for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), often complicated by cardiac arrest (CA). Moderate hypothermia (MH) has shown promise in mitigating ischemia-reperfusion injury following CA. The HYPO-ECMO trial aimed to compare the effect of MH versus normothermia in refractory CS rescued by VA-ECMO. The primary aim of this non-predefined post hoc study was to assess the treatment effect of MH in the subgroup of patients with cardiac arrest (CA) within the HYPO-ECMO trial. Additionally, we will evaluate the prognostic significance of CA in these patients. METHODS: This post hoc analysis utilized data from the randomized HYPO-ECMO trial conducted across 20 French cardiac shock care centers between October 2016 and July 2019. Participants included intubated patients receiving VA-ECMO for CS for less than 6 hours, with 334 patients completing the trial. Patients were randomized to early MH (33-34°C) or normothermia (36-37°C) for 24 hours. RESULTS: Of the 334 patients, 159 (48%) experienced preceding CA. Mortality in the CA group was 50.9% at 30 days and 59.1% at 180 days, compared to 42.3% and 51.4% in the no-CA group, respectively (adjusted risk difference [RD] at 30 days, 8.1% [-0.8 to 17.1%], p=0.074 and RD at 180 days 7.0% [-3.0 to 16.9%], p=0.17). MH was associated with a significant reduction in primary (RD -13.3% [-16.3 to -0.3%], p=0.031) and secondary outcomes in the CA group only (p<0.025 for all), with a significant interaction between MH and CA status for 180-day mortality [p=0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis suggests that MH shows potential for reducing mortality and composite endpoints in patients with cardiac arrest and refractory CS treated with VA-ECMO without an increased risk of severe bleeding or infection. Further research is needed to validate these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Serial daily lactate levels association with 30-day outcome in cardiogenic shock patients treated with VA-ECMO: a post-hoc analysis of the HYPO-ECMO study.

BACKGROUND: Reliable predictors of outcomes in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy are limited. While elevated lactate levels over time have been linked to outcomes in cardiogenic shock (CS), their significance in VA-ECMO-treated patients remains inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from the HYPO-ECMO trial, which compared normothermia to moderate hypothermia in CS patients supported by VA-ECMO. We examined daily lactate levels collected over a week to assess their correlation with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among the 318 out of 334 patients (95%) with baseline lactate measurements, 66 had normal levels (< 2.2 mmol/l, 21%). No difference was found in lactate course between moderate hypothermia and normothermia groups. Lactate levels were consistently higher in non-survivors at each time point (p = 0.0002). Baseline hyperlactatemia was associated with an increased risk of death (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.85 (1.12-3.05), p = 0.016). When considering all time points, lactate levels during the ICU stay were significantly and gradually associated with a higher risk of death (p < 0.0001). In the overall population, a decrease in lactate levels was not linked to 30-day mortality. However, patients with baseline hyperlactatemia exhibited a more significant decrease in lactate levels from day one to seven (p < 0.0001). In this group, survivors had a significantly greater decrease in lactate levels at day 1 compared to non-survivors (63% (48-77) versus 57% (21-75), p = 0.026). Patients experiencing a secondary increase in lactate (24%) had a worse prognosis (Hazard Ratio: 1.78 (1.21-2.61), p = 0.004), regardless of both baseline lactate levels and the occurrence of severe ischemic adverse events (intestinal and/or limb ischemia). CONCLUSIONS: The consistent and significant association between lactate levels, whether assessed at baseline or during ICU treatment, and the risk of mortality underscores the pivotal prognostic relevance of lactate levels in patients with CS undergoing VA-ECMO therapy. The study findings provide some novel insights, regarding the trend profile and the relevance of a second peak during the 7 day period after ECMO start. Trial Registration identifier NCT02754193 registered on 2016-04-12.

Use of the Win Ratio Analysis in Critical Care Trials.

Composite outcomes are commonly used in critical care trials to estimate the treatment effect of an intervention. A significant limitation of classical analytic approaches is that they assign equal statistical importance to each component in a composite, even if these do not have the same clinical importance (i.e., in a composite of death and organ failure, death is clearly more important). The win ratio (WR) method has been proposed as an alternative for trial outcomes evaluation, as it effectively assesses events based on their clinical relevance (i.e., hierarchical order) by comparing each patient in the intervention group with their counterparts in the control group. This statistical approach is increasingly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. However, WR may be useful to unveil treatment effects also in the critical care setting, because these trials are typically moderately sized, thus limiting the statistical power to detect small differences between groups, and often rely on composite outcomes that include several components of different clinical importance. Notably, the advantages of this approach may be offset by several drawbacks (such as ignoring ties and difficulties in selecting and ranking endpoints) and challenges in appropriate clinical interpretation (i.e., establishing clinical meaningfulness of the observed effect size). In this perspective article, we present some key elements to implementing WR statistics in critical care trials, providing an overview of strengths, drawbacks, and potential applications of this method. To illustrate, we conduct a reevaluation of the HYPO-ECMO (Hypothermia during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) trial using the WR framework as a case example.

Risk of readmission and death after hospitalization for worsening heart failure: Role of post-discharge follow-up visits in a real-world study from the Grand Est Region of France.

AIMS: Patients who experience hospitalizations due to heart failure (HF) face a significant risk of readmission and mortality. Our objective was to evaluate whether the risk of hospitalization and mortality following discharge from HF hospitalization differed based on adherence to the outpatient follow-up (FU) protocol comprising an appointment with a general practitioner (GP) within 15 days, a cardiologist within 2 months or both (termed combined FU). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied all adults admitted for a first HF hospitalization from 2016 to 2020 in France's Grand Est region. Association between adherence to outpatient FU and outcomes were assessed with time-dependent survival analysis model. Among 67 476 admitted patients (mean age 80.3 ± 11.3 years, 53% women), 62 156 patients (92.2%) were discharged alive and followed for 723 (317-1276) days. Combined FU within 2 months was used in 21.1% of patients, with lower rates among >85 years, women, and those with higher comorbidity levels (p < 0.0001 for all). Combined FU was associated with a lower 1-year death or rehospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.94, p < 0.0001) mostly related to lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68, p < 0.0001) whereas HF readmission was higher (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.24, p < 0.0001). When analysing components of combined FU separately, 1-year mortality was more related to cardiologist FU (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.67, p < 0.0001), than GP FU (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Combined FU is carried out in a minority of patients following HF hospitalization, yet it is linked to a substantial reduction in 1-year mortality, albeit at the expense of an increase in HF hospitalizations.

Role of aldosterone in mid- and long-term left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: The REMI study.

AIMS: Whether aldosterone levels after myocardial infarction (MI) are associated with mid- and long-term left ventricular (LV) remodelling in the era of systematic use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is uncertain. We prospectively investigated the relationship between aldosterone levels and mid- and long-term LV remodelling in patients with acute MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma aldosterone was measured in 119 patients successfully treated by primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty for a first acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI) 2-4 days after the acute event. LV volumes were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the same timeframe and 6 months later. LV assessment was repeated by TTE 3-9 years after MI (n = 80). The median aldosterone level at baseline was 23.1 [16.8; 33.1] pg/ml. In the multivariable model, higher post-MI aldosterone concentration was significantly associated with more pronounced increase in LV end-diastolic volume index (TTE: ß ± standard error [SE]: 0.113 ± 0.046, p = 0.015; CMR: ß ± SE: 0.098 ± 0.040, p = 0.015) and LV end-systolic volume index (TTE: ß ± SE: 0.083 ± 0.030, p = 0.008; CMR: ß ± SE: 0.064 ± 0.032, p = 0.048) at 6-month follow-up, regardless of the method of assessment. This result was consistent also in patients with a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%. The association between baseline plasma aldosterone and adverse LV remodelling did not persist at the 3-9-year follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: Aldosterone concentration in the acute phase was associated with adverse LV remodelling in the medium term, even in the subgroup of patients with LVEF >40%, suggesting a potential role of the mineralocorticoid system in post-MI adverse remodelling. Plasma aldosterone was no longer associated with LV remodelling in the long term (NCT01109225).

Diuretic dose is a strong prognostic factor in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation.

AIMS: The prognostic value of 'high dose' loop diuretics in advanced heart failure outpatients is unclear. We aimed to assess the prognosis associated with loop diuretic dose in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). METHODS AND RESULTS: All ambulatory patients (n = 700, median age 55 years and 70% men) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were divided into 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' loop diuretics corresponding to furosemide equivalent doses of ≤40, 40-250, and >250 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was a combined criterion of waitlist death and urgent HT. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, creatinine levels, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary pressures gradually increased with higher diuretic dose. At 12 months, the risk of waitlist death/urgent HT was 7.4%, 19.2%, and 25.6% (P = 0.001) for 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' patients, respectively. When adjusting for confounders, including natriuretic peptides, hepatic, and renal function, the 'high dose' group was associated with increased waitlist mortality or urgent HT [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 1.33 to 3.73; P = 0.002] and a six-fold higher risk of waitlist death (adjusted HR 6.18, 2.16 to 17.72; P < 0.001) when compared with the 'low dose' group. 'Intermediate doses' were not significantly associated with these two outcomes in adjusted models (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 'high dose' of loop diuretics is strongly associated with residual congestion and is a predictor of outcome in patients awaiting HT despite adjustment for classical cardiorenal risk factors. This routine variable may be helpful for risk stratification of pre-HT patients.

Validation of the clinical utility of microRNA as noninvasive biomarkers of cardiac allograft rejection: A prospective longitudinal multicenter study.

While studies have shown an association between microRNAs and cardiac rejection, the clinical relevance of a preidentified miRNA signature as a noninvasive biomarker has never been assessed in prospective multicentric unselected cohorts. To address this unmet need, we designed a prospective study (NCT02672683) including recipients from 11 centers between August 2016 to March 2018. The objective was to validate the association between 3 previously identified circulating microRNA (10a, 92a, 155) and the histopathological diagnosis of rejection. Both relative and absolute (sensitivity analysis) quantifications of microRNAs were performed. Overall, 461 patients were included (831 biopsies, 79 rejections). A per-protocol interim analysis (258 biopsies, 49 rejections) did not find any association between microRNA and rejection (microRNA 10a: odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.87-1.27, p = 0.61; 92a: OR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.87-1.10, p = 0.68; 155: OR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.76-1.10, p = 0.33). These results were confirmed in the sensitivity analysis. The analysis of the remaining sera was stopped for futility. This study shows no clinical utility of circulating microRNAs 10a, 92a, and 155 monitoring in heart allograft recipients.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Graft Dysfunction Early After Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a prevailing option for the management of severe early graft dysfunction. This systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis aims to evaluate (1) mortality, (2) rates of major complications, (3) prognostic factors, and (4) the effect of different VA-ECMO strategies on outcomes in adult heart transplant (HT) recipients supported with VA-ECMO. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic search and included studies of adults (≥18 years) who received VA-ECMO during their index hospitalization after HT and reported on mortality at any timepoint. We pooled data using random effects models. To identify prognostic factors, we analysed IPD using mixed effects logistic regression. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the GRADE framework. We included 49 observational studies of 1477 patients who received VA-ECMO after HT, of which 15 studies provided IPD for 448 patients. There were no differences in mortality estimates between IPD and non-IPD studies. The short-term (30-day/in-hospital) mortality estimate was 33% (moderate certainty, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28%-39%) and 1-year mortality estimate 50% (moderate certainty, 95% CI 43%-57%). Recipient age (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04) and prior sternotomy (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.99-2.49) are associated with increased short-term mortality. There is low certainty evidence that early intraoperative cannulation and peripheral cannulation reduce the risk of short-term death. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients who receive VA-ECMO for early graft dysfunction do not survive 30 days or to hospital discharge, and one-half do not survive to 1 year after HT. Improving outcomes will require ongoing research focused on optimizing VA-ECMO strategies and care in the first year after HT.

Outcome of primary graft dysfunction rescued by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction remains the leading cause of 30-day mortality after heart transplantation. Few data have been published about the clinical outcome of severe primary graft dysfunction treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and outcome of severe primary graft dysfunction requiring VA-ECMO, and to identify factors associated with hospital mortality. METHODS: We performed an observational analysis of our institutional database of VA-ECMO for primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation. Patients with severe primary graft dysfunction, according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation classification, were included. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were searched with multiple logistic regression analysis using backward stepwise variable elimination. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients who had heart transplantation between January 2007 and December 2018, 60 (15.1%) developed severe primary graft dysfunction requiring VA-ECMO. The median age was 52 (interquartile range 39-59) years, and 73.3% were male. Thirty-nine (65.0%) patients were weaned after a mean duration of VA-ECMO support of 7.2±6.0 days. Thirty-two (53.3%) patients were alive at hospital discharge. Inotropic support in the recipient before heart transplantation (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-14.44; P=0.04), total ischaemic time (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00; P=0.01) and 48-hour total blood transfusion (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26; P=0.01) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Severe primary graft dysfunction requiring VA-ECMO is frequent after heart transplantation. Survival to hospital discharge after VA-ECMO for severe primary graft dysfunction is satisfactory in such a critically ill population.

Prognosis value of Forrester's classification in advanced heart failure patients awaiting heart transplantation.

AIMS: The value of Forrester's perfusion/congestion profiles assessed by invasive catheter evaluation in non-inotrope advanced heart failure patients listed for heart transplant (HT) is unclear. We aimed to assess the value of haemodynamic evaluation according to Forrester's profiles to predict events on the HT waitlist. METHODS AND RESULTS: All non-inotrope patients (n = 837, 79% ambulatory at listing) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 with right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. The primary outcome was a combined criteria of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent HT or left ventricular assist device implantation. Secondary outcome was waitlist death. The 'warm-dry', 'cold-dry', 'warm-wet', and 'cold-wet' profiles represented 27%, 18%, 27%, and 28% of patients, respectively. At 12 months, the respective rates of primary outcome were 15%, 17%, 25%, and 29% (P = 0.008). Taking the 'warm-dry' category as reference, a significant increase in the risk of primary outcome was observed only in the 'wet' categories, irrespectively of 'warm/cold' status: hazard ratios, 1.50; 1.06-2.13; P = 0.024 in 'warm-wet' and 1.77; 1. 25-2.49; P = 0.001 in 'cold-wet'. CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic assessment of advanced HF patients using perfusion/congestion profiles predicts the risk of the combine endpoint of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. 'Wet' patients had the worst prognosis, independently of perfusion status, thus placing special emphasis on the cardinal prominence of persistent congestion in advanced HF.

Prognosis of Advanced Heart Failure Patients according to Their Hemodynamic Profile Based on the Modified Forrester Classification.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation (HT) remains the gold-standard treatment but is conditioned by organ shortage. This study aimed to evaluate the value of Forrester classification and determine which congestion criteria had the best prognostic value to predict cardiorenal events on heart transplant waiting list. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients (54 years old, 72% men) with available right heart catheterization (RHC) listed in our center for HT between 2014 and 2019 were included. Cardiac catheterization measurements were obtained at the time of HT listing evaluation. Patients were classified according to perfusion and congestion status in four groups: "warm and dry", "warm and wet", "cold and dry", and "cold and wet". pWet was used to classify patients with pulmonary congestion and sWet for systemic congestion. The primary endpoint was the rate of a composite criteria of cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, and acute heart failure. Secondary endpoint was the incidence of waitlist death, emergency HT, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation at 12 months evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Only Forrester classification according to systemic congestion was associated with the primary composite endpoint (p = 0.011), while patients' profile according to pulmonary congestion was not (p = 0.331). Similarly, only the Forrester classification according to systemic congestion predicted waitlist death, emergency HT, or LVAD implantation at 12 months, with p = 0.010 and p = 0.189 for systemic and pulmonary congestion, respectively. Moreover, systemic congestion was the main driver of cardiorenal events on waitlist. CONCLUSIONS: Forrester classification according to systemic congestion is associated with cardiorenal outcomes in patients listed for heart transplant and the risk of waitlist death, emergency HT, or LVAD implantation at 12 months.

De Novo Complement-Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplanted Patients Is Associated with Severe Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Poor Long-Term Survival.

Introduction: De novo anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) have been inconsistently associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and long-term mortality. We tested whether C3d-binding de novo DSA were associated with CAV or long-term-survival. Methods: We included 282 consecutive patients without preformed DSA on coronary angiography between 2010 and 2012. Angiographies were classified according to CAV ISHLT grading. The primary outcome was a composite criterion of severe CAV or mortality. As the impact of de novo antibodies should be assessed only after appearance, we used a Cox regression with time-dependent covariables. Results: Of the 282 patients, 51(18%) developed de novo DSA during follow-up, 29 patients had DSA with C3d-binding ability (DSA+C3d+), and 22 were without C3d-binding ability (DSA+C3d-). Compared with patients without DSA, DSA+C3d+ patients had an increased risk for the primary outcome of severe CAV or mortality (adjusted HR = 4.31 (2.40−7.74) p < 0.001) and long-term mortality (adjusted HR = 3.48 (1.97−6.15) p < 0.001) whereas DSA+C3d- did not (adjusted HR = 1.04 (0.43−2.47) p = 0.937 for primary outcome and HR = 1.08 (0.45−2.61) p = 0.866 for mortality). Conclusion: According to this large monocentric study in heart transplant patients, donor specific antibodies were associated with worse clinical outcome when binding complement. DSA and their complement-binding ability should thus be screened for to optimize heart transplant patient follow-up.

Prescription, Compliance, and Burden Associated with Salt-Restricted Diets in Heart Failure Patients: Results from the French National OFICSel Observatory.

(1) Background: There is much debate about the use of salt-restricted diet for managing heart failure (HF). Dietary guidelines are inconsistent and lack evidence. (2) Method: The OFICSel observatory collected data about adults hospitalised for HF. The data, collected using study-specific surveys, were used to describe HF management, including diets, from the cardiologists' and patients' perspectives. Cardiologists provided the patients' clinical, biological, echocardiography, and treatment data, while the patients provided dietary, medical history, sociodemographic, morphometric, quality of life, and burden data (burden scale in restricted diets (BIRD) questionnaire). The differences between the diet recommended by the cardiologist, understood by the patient, and the estimated salt intake (by the patient) and diet burden were assessed. (3) Results: Between March and June 2017, 300 cardiologists enrolled 2822 patients. Most patients (90%) were recommended diets with <6 g of salt/day. Mean daily salt consumption was 4.7 g (standard deviation (SD): 2.4). Only 33% of patients complied with their recommended diet, 34% over-complied, and 19% under-complied (14% unknown). Dietary restrictions in HF patients were associated with increased burden (mean BIRD score of 8.1/48 [SD: 8.8]). (4) Conclusion: Healthcare professionals do not always follow dietary recommendations, and their patients do not always understand and comply with diets recommended. Restrictive diets in HF patients are associated with increased burden. An evidence-based approach to developing and recommending HF-specific diets is required.

Characteristics and outcome of ambulatory heart failure patients receiving a left ventricular assist device.

AIMS: Despite regularly updated guidelines, there is still a delay in referral of advanced heart failure patients to mechanical circulatory support and transplant centres. We aimed to analyse characteristics and outcome of non-inotrope-dependent patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: The ASSIST-ICD registry collected LVAD data in 19 centres in France between February 2006 and December 2016. We used data of patients in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Classes 4-7. The primary endpoint was survival analysis. Predictors of mortality were searched with multivariable analyses. A total of 303 patients (mean age 61.0 ± 9.9 years, male sex 86.8%) were included in the present analysis. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy was the leading heart failure aetiology (64%), and bridge to transplantation was the main implantation strategy (56.1%). The overall likelihood of being alive while on LVAD support or having a transplant at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years was 66%, 61.7%, 58.7%, and 55.1%, respectively. Age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.05; P = 0.02], a concomitant procedure (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.52-3.53; P < 0.0001), and temporary mechanical right ventricular support during LVAD implantation (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.49-5.77; P = 0.002) were the only independent variables associated with mortality. Heart failure medications before or after LVAD implantation were not associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory heart failure patients displayed unsatisfactory survival rates after LVAD implantation. A better selection of patients who can benefit from LVAD may help improving outcomes.

Haemodynamic parameters associated with renal function prior to and following heart transplantation.

AIMS: Abnormal renal function is a common feature in patients on heart transplant waiting lists. This study aimed to identify the haemodynamic parameters associated with decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients listed for heart transplantation (HT) and renal function improvement following HT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 176 adults (52 years old, 81% men) with available right heart catheterization (RHC) listed in our centre for HT between 2014 and 2019 were studied. Cardiac catheterization measurements were obtained at time of HT listing evaluation. Changes in renal function were assessed between RHC and 6 months after HT. Median eGFR was 63 mL/min/1.73 m2 at time of RHC. Central venous pressure > 10 mmHg was associated with a two-fold increase in the likelihood of eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at time of RHC (adjusted odd ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.7; P = 0.04). In the 134 patients (76%) who underwent HT during follow-up, eGFR decreased by 7.9 ± 29.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 from RHC to 6 months after HT. In these patients, low cardiac index (<2.1 L/min/m2 ) at initial RHC was associated with a (adjusted) 6 month post-HT eGFR improvement of 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.018). Patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and low cardiac index at time of RHC exhibited the greatest eGFR improvement (delta eGFR = 18.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) while patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and normal cardiac index had a marked decrease in eGFR (delta eGFR = -27.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Central venous pressure is the main haemodynamic parameter associated with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients listed for HT. Low cardiac index prior to HT is associated with post-transplant renal function recovery.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19-associated acute myocardial injury complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock.

Cardiovascular system involvement and its negative prognostic impact have been increasingly identified in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Optimal medical treatment allows for safe management of most of these cardiovascular presentations while COVID-19-associated refractory cardiogenic shock could be rescued by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). We present a case of acute myocardial injury related to COVID-19 complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock and treated by VA-ECMO implantation.

Outcome Predictors and Safety of Home Dobutamine Intravenous Infusion in End Stage Heart Failure Patients.

Patients in end-stage heart failure can experiment cardiogenic shock and may not be weanable from dobutamine. The fate of these patients is a challenge for doctors, patients, family, and the institution. Dobutamine use at home can be a solution. The aim of the present study was to assess the outcome, biological predictors, and safety of dobutamine use at home in dobutamine-dependent patients. All consecutive dobutamine-dependent patients discharged with continuous home intravenous dobutamine, from a single tertiary center between February 2014 and November 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 19 patients (age 65 ± 10 years) were followed for one year. At one-year, the survival rate was 32%, (6/19). Five (26%) patients had an adverse event related to the intravenous catheter. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the combination of a glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min and a brain natriuretic peptide level <1000 ng/L, were highly predictive of one-year survival (HR = 10.87, IC95% (5.78-36.44), p < 0.001). Management of dobutamine-unweanable patients after cardiogenic shock may involve dobutamine at home to permit a home return. This strategy allows a significant survival and few readmissions, and, if eligible, access to surgical strategies, such as heart transplantation. Simple biological markers at discharge can identify severe patients to refer to palliative care and good responders.

First symptoms and health care pathways in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure: ICPS2 survey. A report from the Heart Failure Working Group (GICC) of the French Society of Cardiology.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common serious condition that contributes to about 5% of all emergency hospital admissions in Europe. HYPOTHESIS: To assess the type and chronology of the first AHF symptoms before hospitalization and to examine the French healthcare system pathways before, during and after hospitalization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study including patients hospitalized for AHF RESULTS: 793 patients were included, 59.0% were men, 45.6% identified heart failure (HF) as the main cause of hospitalization; 36.0% were unaware of their HF. Mean age was 72.9 ± 14.5 years. The symptoms occurring the most before hospitalization were dyspnea (64.7%) and lower limb edema (27.7%). Prior to hospitalization, 47% had already experienced symptoms for 15 days; 32% of them for 2 months. Referral to hospital was made by the emergency medical assistance service (SAMU, 41.6%), a general practitioner (GP, 22.3%), a cardiologist (19.5%), or the patient (16.6%). The modality of referral depended more on symptom acuteness than on type of symptoms. A sudden onset of AHF symptoms led to making an emergency call or to spontaneously attending an emergency room (ER), whereas cardiologists were consulted when symptoms had already been present for over 15 days. Cardiologists referred more patients to cardiology departments and fewer patients to the ER than general practitioners or the SAMU. CONCLUSION: This study described the French healthcare system pathways before, during and after hospitalization AHF. AHF clinic network should be developed to provide adequate care for all HF patients and create awareness regarding AHF symptoms.